吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 795-815.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210429

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东地区下侏罗统凉高山组地层-沉积充填特征与油气勘探方向

易娟子1,张少敏2,蔡来星3,陈守春1,罗鑫1,于吉星3,罗妮娜1,杨田3   

  1. 1.中国石油西南油气田分公司重庆气矿地质研究所,重庆401120   2.中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探开发研究院,成都610041   3.成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,成都610059
  • 出版日期:2022-05-26 发布日期:2024-01-03
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41906188);油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目(PLC20210111);自然资源部沉积盆地与油气资源重点实验室开放基金项目(cdcgs2020003)


Strata and Sedimentary Filling Characteristics of the Lower Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation and Its Hydrocarbon Exploration in Eastern Sichuan Basin#br#

Yi Juanzi1, Zhang Shaomin2, Cai Laixing3, Chen Shouchun1, Luo Xin1, Yu Jixing3, Luo Nina1, Yang Tian3   

  1. 1. Geology Institute of Chongqing Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chongqing 401120, China

    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China

    3. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

  • Online:2022-05-26 Published:2024-01-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41906188), the Open-End Fund of State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (PLC20210111) and the Open-End Fund of Key Laboratory of Sedimentary Basin and Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources (cdcgs2020003)

摘要: 为了明确川东地区凉高山组地层-沉积充填特征,以有效指导油气勘探决策,综合利用野外露头勘测、钻井岩心观察、沉积岩石学分析和油气地质学分析等手段,在系统梳理研究区层序地层结构与沉积相类型的基础上,探讨沉积序列约束下的页岩油气、致密油气协同成藏规律。结果表明:研究区发育典型的“二分”层序地层结构,早期湖侵阶段形成凉下段三角洲前缘—前三角洲—半深湖—深湖退积式准层序组,晚期湖退阶段形成凉上段进积式准层序组并可细分为3个准层序(亚段),整体由半深湖向三角洲前缘、滨浅湖演变。凉高山组半深湖—深湖、前三角洲泥页岩与三角洲前缘水下分流河道砂体纵向叠置,可形成“自生自储、下生上储、旁生侧储”多类型源储接触关系,为凉下段页岩油气、凉上段致密砂岩油气协同成藏提供了地质基础。

关键词: 地层格架, 三角洲, 凉高山组, 页岩油气, 致密油气, 川东地区

Abstract:

In order to clarify the strata and sedimentary filling characteristics of the Lower Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in eastern Sichuan basin, for effectively guiding the hydrocarbon exploration, this study comprehensively utilizes the research tools of outcrop survey, core observation and analysis of sedimentary petrology and petroleum geology. On the basis of systematically sorting out the stratigraphic structure and sedimentary facies in the study area, we further discuss the synergistic reservoir-forming rule between shale oil and gas and tight oil and gas under the constraints of sedimentary sequence. The results show that typical dichotomy sequence stratigraphic structure is developed in the study area. In the early lake transgression stage, the Lower Lianggaoshan Formation formed a landward stepping parasequence set, which was composed of delta front, prodelta, semi-deep lake and deep lake. In the late lake regression stage, a seaward stepping parasequence set is developed in the Upper Lianggaoshan Formation, which can be subdivided into three parasequences or subsections, showing the evolution from semi-deep lake to delta front, shore and shallow lake. The mudstones and shales of semi-deep lake, deep lake and prodelta facies are vertically superimposed with the sandstone bodies of underwater distributary channel in the delta front subfacies, forming various source-reservoir contact relationships, such as “self-generation and self-storage, lower generation and upper storage, side generation and side storage”. This provides a geological basis for the coordinated accumulation of shale oil and gas in the Lower Lianggaoshan Formation and tight oil and gas in the Upper Lianggaoshan Formation.

Key words: stratigraphic framework, delta, Lianggaoshan Formation, shale oil and gas, tight oil and gas, eastern Sichuan basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 罗卫锋, 胡志方, 王胜建, 杨云见, 张林, 张云枭. 基于可控源电磁技术的页岩压裂监测试验——以宜昌地区鄂阳页2HF井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1338-.
[2] 李燕, 金振奎, 高白水, 石良, 李桂仔. 汊口滩沉积特征及沉积模式——以鄱阳湖赣江三角洲汊口滩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1678-1688.
[3] 夏景生, 王志坤, 王海荣, 薛林, 王恺, 刘成权. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西斜坡中深层“混合型河口坝”成因及沉积学意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1642-1653.
[4] 赵汉卿, 张建民, 李栓豹, 周连德, 江远鹏. 渤海湾盆地A油田新近系明下段沉积特征及演化模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1021-1029,1046.
[5] 朱兆群, 林承焰, 张宪国, 李志鹏, 谢晶晶, 魏肃东, 程平. 断陷湖盆早期浅水三角洲沉积——以高邮凹陷永安地区戴一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 659-673.
[6] 陈欢庆, 穆剑东, 王珏, 邓西里. 扇三角洲沉积储层特征与定量评价——以辽河西部凹陷某试验区于楼油层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 14-24.
[7] 张宇焜, 胡晓庆, 牛涛, 张显文, 高玉飞, 王晖, 范廷恩, 卜范青. 古地貌对渤海石臼坨凸起古近系沉积体系的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1589-1596.
[8] 姜洪福,张世广. 复杂断块油田高分辨率层序地层学及砂体几何学特征--以海塔盆地贝尔凹陷呼和诺仁油田贝301区块南屯组二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1419-1431.
[9] 安乐生, 刘贯群, 叶思源, 赵全升, 丁喜桂, 张建伟. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地健康条件评价[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1157-1165.
[10] 李顺明, 宋新民, 刘曰强, 王友启, 李艳明, 唐后军. 温米退积型与进积型浅水辫状河三角洲沉积模式[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 665-672.
[11] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228-234.
[12] 黄芮, 张延军, 李洪岩, 倪金. 辽河三角洲相沉积软土动力特性试验[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1115-1120.
[13] 刘长利, 朱筱敏, 王兴明, 任红民, 李树静. 苏北盆地海安凹陷泰州组层序地层及沉积特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 519-526.
[14] 曹金舟, 任战利, 高兴军, 康立明, 张娜, 韩伟, 王敏. 鄂尔多斯盆地子北油田涧峪岔地区长6油层沉积微相识别与分布特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 30-37.
[15] 刘招君, 孙平昌, 杜江峰, 方石, 陈永成, 贾建亮, 孟庆涛. 汤原断陷古近系扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 1-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!