地下水,背景值,预筛选法,数理统计法,基于图谱的探索性数据分析,组合方法


," /> 地下水,背景值,预筛选法,数理统计法,基于图谱的探索性数据分析,组合方法


,"/> groundwater, natural background levels, pre-selection methods, statistics methods, exploratory data analysis based on graphs, combination of methods ,"/> <span>地下水背景值评估研究进展</span>

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 1655-1670.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240199

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

地下水背景值评估研究进展

闫纲丽1,冯屾1,刘睿男2,黄冠星2   

  1. 1.黄河水利职业技术学院土木与交通工程学院,河南 开封475004

    2.中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所,石家庄050061

     


     


  • 出版日期:2025-09-26 发布日期:2025-11-15
  • 基金资助:

    自然资源科技战略研究项目(2023-ZL-10);开封市科技发展计划项目(2303056)


Research Progress on  Assessment of Natural Background Levels in Groundwater

Yan Gangli1, Feng Shen1, Liu Ruinan2, Huang Guanxing2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil and Traffic Engineering, Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China

    2. Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China

  • Online:2025-09-26 Published:2025-11-15
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Science and Technology Strategy Research Project of Natural Resource (2023-ZL-10) and the Science and Technology Development Program of Kaifeng City (2303056)

摘要: 选取适宜的地下水背景值评估方法是客观认知地下水背景值的关键。本文在回顾地下水背景值研究发展历程的基础上,概述了现有评估方法及其优缺点,并指出其未来发展趋势。地下水背景值评估方法大致可分为基于未被污染地下水样本的方法、预筛选法、数理统计法、基于图谱的探索性数据分析方法及多方法组合等五类。其中:基于未被污染地下水样本的方法因其自身局限性较强已很少采用;预筛选法和数理统计法是当前常用单一类方法,前者主观性较强而后者客观性更优;基于图谱的探索性数据分析方法少见单独使用,多与其他方法组合联用;多方法组合通过互补单一方法的局限性已经成为地下水背景值评估研究的重要发展方向。多方法组合中:预筛选-数理统计组合方法最常见,应用较广;新兴的基于图谱的探索性数据分析方法与预筛选法、数理统计法或预筛选-数理统计法三种方法中的其中一种分别组合的方法更为优越,但该类组合方法的使用往往需要以研究区水文地球化学的深入认知为基础,便捷性和普适性不如预筛选-数理统计组合方法。多方法组合已成为地下水背景值评估研究的主要发展趋势。

关键词: 地下水')">

地下水, 背景值, 预筛选法, 数理统计法, 基于图谱的探索性数据分析,
')">组合方法


Abstract: Selecting an appropriate method for assessing natural background levels (NBL) in groundwater is crucial for objectively understanding the NBL in groundwater. On the basis of reviewing the development process of NBL in groundwater, this article focused on summarizing the current methods for the assessment of NBL in groundwater with their advantages and disadvantages, and pointed out the development trend of the assessment for NBL in groundwater in the future. The methods for assessing NBL in groundwater can be roughly divided into five categories: Methods based on uncontaminated groundwater samples, pre-selection methods, statistics methods, exploratory data analysis methods based on graphs, and the combination of multi-methods. The method based on uncontaminated groundwater samples has been rarely adopted due to its inherent limitations. Pre-selection and statistics method are two commonly used independent methods in the study of groundwater NBL. Generally, the former one is more subjective than the latter one. Nowadays, the combination of multiple methods becomes a development trend in the research of groundwater NBL assessment, because some limitations of one method for assessing groundwater NBL may be avoided by the combination with another method. Among them, the combination of pre-selection and statistics methods is the most common way of combination. In addition, the combination of emerging exploratory data analysis methods based on graphs with pre-selection methods and/or statistics methods is commonly better than the combination of pre-selection and statistics methods. However, the use of the former combination often requires a good understanding of the hydrogeochemical characteristics in study areas. Therefore, the former ones for assessing groundwater NBL are less convenience and universality in comparison with the latter ones.

Key words: groundwater')">

groundwater, natural background levels, pre-selection methods, statistics methods, exploratory data analysis based on graphs, combination of methods

中图分类号: 

  • P641.2
[1] 李琴, 贾卓, 黎建刚, 唐红梅, 詹聪, 赵勇胜, . 活性炭改性土-膨润土泥浆墙阻隔苯酚污染地下水[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 251-260.
[2] 闫佰忠, 徐文杰, 李玉涵, 孙剑, 毕攀, 李瑶, 张旭. 地下水源热泵抽灌井优化布置及参数灵敏度[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 218-229.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!