吉林大学学报(地球科学版)

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

琼东南盆地中央峡谷体系东段形态-充填特征及其地质意义

苏明1, 2, 3,姜涛3,张翠梅4,张成3,何云龙3,王振峰5   

  1. 1.中国科学院广州能源研究所天然气水合物成藏机制研究实验室,广州510640;
    2.中国科学院广州天然气水合物研究中心,广州510640;
    3.中国地质大学构造与油气资源教育部重点实验室,武汉430074;
    4.中国科学院南海海洋研究所边缘海地质重点实验室,广州510301;
    5.中海石油(中国)有限公司湛江分公司技术部,广东 湛江524057
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-02 出版日期:2014-11-26 发布日期:2014-11-26
  • 作者简介:苏明(1983-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事深水沉积体系与油气勘探、海域天然气水合物成藏地质条件分析的科研工作,E-mail:suming@ms.giec.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(91028009);油气资源与探测国家重点实验室开放基金项目(PRP/open-1205); 国土资源部海洋油气资源与环境地质重点实验室开放基金项目(MRE201305);中国科学院海洋地质与环境重点实验室开放基金项目(MGE2013KG02)

Characteristics of Morphology and Infillings and the Geological Significances of the Central Canyon System in Eastern Qiongdongnan Basin

Su Ming1, 2, 3, Jiang Tao3, Zhang Cuimei4, Zhang Cheng3, He Yunlong3, Wang Zhenfeng5   

  1. 1.Laboratory of Gas Hydrate Formation Mechanism, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou510640, China;
    2.Guangzhou Center for Gas Hydrate Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou510640, China;
    3.Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan430074, China;
    4.Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou510301, China;
    5.China National Offshore Oil Zhanjiang Ltd. Corporation, Zhanjiang524057, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2014-03-02 Online:2014-11-26 Published:2014-11-26

摘要:

通过对琼东南盆地东部水深数据和高精度地震资料的综合分析,对盆地东段中央峡谷体系的形态特征和内部充填结构进行了详细的描述和刻画。研究结果显示:琼东南盆地中央峡谷体系东段呈NEE向分布于长昌凹陷中央,峡谷具有相对笔直的通道,较为狭窄,剖面上表现为明显的“V型”形态,两侧发育陡峭的峡谷侧壁;东段峡谷的内部充填沉积物由滞留沉积体、块体流-席状砂复合体、浊流沉积体和垮塌沉积体构成,垂向上显示出多期的形成演化过程。形态特征和充填结构表明,盆地东段峡谷主要受到该区域古地貌特征的影响和控制,形成于晚中新世早期的长条状负地形为中央峡谷的形成提供了有利的空间,限制了盆地东段峡谷的形态特征,该地貌特征将持续影响峡谷内部的沉积物输送和堆积样式。更新世以来充分的沉积物供给在陆架坡折处形成了大量的陆坡峡谷,沉积物以垂向输送的方式沿着坡降向下运移,在下陆坡位置形成现代深水扇,并被现今中央峡谷的头部区域所捕获,在地貌特征的限制下,沉积物将发生转向输送,沿着盆地东段峡谷的走向,自西向东发生轴向运移。盆地东段构造控制型峡谷是造成琼东南盆地东西部中央峡谷体系在形态和充填上具有明显差异的原因。研究区内3种不同的现代沉积物输送方式,对于更好地理解盆地西部沉积物运移和西段峡谷的形成过程也具有一定的指示和对比意义。

关键词: 中央峡谷体系, 内部充填结构, 构造变革, 沉积物输送方式, 琼东南盆地东部

Abstract:

Based on the integrated analysis of the bathymetric data and high-resolution seismic data, the morphological features and internal structures of the Central Canyon System (CCS) in eastern Qiongdongnan basin (QDNB) have been described and dissected accurately. The result shows that the CCS in eastern QDNB was located in the central part of the Changchang depression with an NEE orientation, showing a narrow, straight course in the plan and symmetrical V-shaped morphology with steep flanks in seismic profiles. The infillings were considered as turbidite channel lag deposits, mass transport complex-sheet sands (MTC-sheet complex) with cake-layer geometry, turbidites, and collapse deposits. They showed a multiple evolutional processes. The distinct differences of the CCS between the western and eastern segments implied that the canyon in eastern QDNB was primarily controlled by the plaeo-morphological feature associated to the tectonic transformation around 11.6 Ma, which might form the axial sub-basin in the central part of Changchang depression seemed as the rudiment of the CCS, define the morphology, and influence the sediment transports and accumulation patterns. The canyon in eastern QDNB wasconsidered as a tectonic-dominated submarine canyon. During the Holocene period, the sufficient deposits could be discharged by the slope canyons at the lower slope, where the modern submarine fan developed. Then the deposits were captured by the head of modern central canyon, and further transported along the canyon from west to east. The three modern sediment transportation models in eastern QDNB, the vertical transportation along the slope from north to south, the veer motion transportation in the head area of modern central canyon dominated by the topography, and the axial transportation associated to the canyon orientation from west to east, would be helpful in understanding the deepwater sedimentary processes in QDNB and provide more evidence for the forming of the CCS.

Key words: central canyon system, internal architecture, tectonic transformation, sediment transportation model, eastern Qiongdongnan basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 陈爱民. 澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 965-980.
[2] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 尚庆华, 黄生旺. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 981-990.
[3] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[4] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[5] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[6] 龚跃华, 杨胜雄, 王宏斌, 梁金强, 梁劲. 琼东南盆地天然气水合物成矿远景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1030-1042.
[7] 李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[8] 贾艳聪, 操应长, 林畅松, 王健. 东营凹陷博兴洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝优质储层形成机理与分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 652-664.
[9] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[10] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[11] 孙海涛, 钟大康, 李勇, 毛亚昆, 杨宪彰. 超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素——以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 693-704.
[12] 胡欣蕾, 吕延防, 孙永河, 孙同文. 泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 705-718.
[13] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[14] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[15] 田亚, 杜治利, 刘宝宪, 杜小弟, 陈夷. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部宜川黄龙地区奥陶系风化壳储层发育特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1620-1630.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!