吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 965-980.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170082

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素

陈爱民   

  1. 中海油能源发展股份有限公司工程技术分公司, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-27 出版日期:2018-07-26 发布日期:2018-07-26
  • 作者简介:陈爱民(1967-),男,中级工程师,主要从事石油天然气勘探地质综合评价方面的研究工作,E-mail:chenam@cnooc.com.cm
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学重点基金项目(41530315)

Hydrocarbon Accumulation Condition and Controlling Factors of Block WA-406-P in Bonaparte Basin, Australia

Chen Aimin   

  1. CNOOC EnerTech-Drilling & Production Co, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2017-10-27 Online:2018-07-26 Published:2018-07-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Key Foundation of China (41530315)

摘要: Bonaparte盆地属于陆内裂谷与被动大陆边缘相叠加的叠合型盆地,WA-406-P区块就位于盆地早-中侏罗世发育的大型Plover三角洲沉积体系之上,该区块油气成藏条件及控制因素的研究是确定下步有利勘探目标的前提与基础。本文结合油气地质、分析化验、三维地震、测井曲线等资料进行综合分析,研究表明:WA-406-P区块发育两种烃源岩类型,西北部以Ⅱ1型为主,东南部以Ⅱ2型为主,成岩作用控制着储层的储集性能,整体上属于低孔高渗透型储层;中-下侏罗统的Plover组和Elang组及上侏罗统-下白垩统的Flamingo组三套三角洲砂体与大套的海相泥岩配置形成两套有利储盖组合,由于圈闭形成期早于大规模油气运聚期,因此,油气经历两期充注后,具备良好的成藏匹配关系。烃源岩分布特征控制着油气藏的流体类型,构造形态及断层展布控制着油气藏的类型,储层物性控制着油气地质储量的丰度,断层活化作用控制着油气藏能否完整保存。油气成藏控制作用的明确指明了有利勘探区域:北部垒堑间互带为Ⅰ类勘探区,西南斜坡带为Ⅱ类勘探区,东南洼槽区为Ⅲ类勘探区。

关键词: 成藏条件, 控制因素, 侏罗系-白垩系, WA-406-P区块, 油气, Bonaparte盆地, 澳大利亚

Abstract: The Bonaparte basin is a superimposed basin where the intra-continental rift and passive continental margin are superimposed, and the block WA-406-P is located in the large Plover delta sedimentary system formed in Early-Middle Jurassic in this basin. In this study, the comprehensive analyses were conducted on oil & gas geology, experimental data, 3D seismic, well logging curves and so on, to find out the hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and controlling factors, and then to specify the next exploration target area. The research results show that in the block WA-406-P, two types of source rocks are developed:one is type Ⅱ1 in the northwestern region and the other one is type Ⅱ2 in the southeastern region. The reservoir is controlled by diagenesis for its capacity, and belongs to low porosity and high permeability reservoirs. Three sets of delta sand bodies in the Plover and Elang Groups of Middle-Lower Jurassic and the Flamingo Group of Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous combined with large set of marine mudstones formed two sets of favorable reservoir and cover combinations. Because the traps formed earlier than the large-scale oil & gas migration and accumulation, the block WA-406-P had very good conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation when the reservoirs were filled within the two different periods. With the analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions, the controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation were also determined. The main results indicate that the distribution characteristics of source rock control the fluid type of oil & gas reservoir, the structural morphology and fault distribution control oil & gas reservoir type, the reservoir properties control the abundance of geological reserves, and the fault activation effect controls whether oil & gas reservoir can be preserved. On the above analysis, the favorable exploration areas are determined as below:the first class is in the inter zone of horst and graben in the northern block, the second class is in the slope zone in the southwestern block, and the third class is in the trough zone in the southeastern block.

Key words: hydrocarbon accumulation condition, controlling factors, Jurassic-Cretaceous system, block WA-406-P, oil gas, Bonaparte basin, Australia

中图分类号: 

  • TE112.31
[1] Bishop D J, O'Brien G W. A Multi-Disciplinary App-roach to Definition and Characterisation of Carbonate Shoals, Shallow Gas Accumulations and Related Complex Near-Surface Sedimentary Structures in the Timor Sea[J]. The APPEA Journal, 1998, 38(1):93-114.
[2] Pattillo J, Nicholls P J. A Tectonostratigraphic Fra-mework for the Vulcan Graben, Timor Sea Region[J]. The APPEA Journal, 1990, 30(1):27-51.
[3] Earl K L. Bonaparte Basin Petroleum Systems Charts[M]. Canberra:Geoscience Australia, 2004.
[4] Saiag J, Brigaud B, Portier E, et al.Sedimentological Control on the Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality of Tidal Sandstones of the Upper Cape Hay Formation (Permian, Bonaparte Basin, Australia)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 77:597-624.
[5] Messent B E J, Goody A K, Collins E, et al. Sequence Stratigraphy of the Flamingo Group, Southern Bonaparte Basin[C]//The Sedimentary Basins of Western Australia:Proceedings of the Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Symposium. Perth:University of Western Australia, 1994:243-257.
[6] Preston J C, Edwards D S. The Petroleum Geoche-mistry of Oils and Source Rocks from the Northern Bonaparte Basin, Offshore Northern Australia[J]. The APPEA Journal, 2000, 40(1):257-282.
[7] Abbassi S, George S C, Edwards D S, et al. Ge-neration Characteristics of Mesozoic Syn-and Post-Rift Source Rocks, Bonaparte Basin, Australia:New Insights from Compositional Kinetic Modelling[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014, 50:148-165.
[8] Cadman S J, Temple P R. Bonaparte Basin, NT, WA, AC & JPDA, Australian Petroleum Accumulations Report 5[M]. Canberra:Geoscience Australia, 2004.
[9] Edwards D S, Kennard G M, Preston J C, et al. Geochemical Evidence for Numerous Mesozoic Petroleum Systems in the Bonaparte and Browse Basins, Northwestern Australia[J]. Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts, AAPG, 2001, 85(1):55-56.
[10] Stalvies C, Talukder A, Ross A, et al. Establishing Hydrocarbon Charge to the Ashmore Platform, Bonaparte Basin, Australia:A Natural Seeps Study[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 82:56-68.
[11] Bourget J, Ainsworth R B, Backé G, et al. Tectonic Evolution of the Northern Bonaparte Basin:Impact on Continental Shelf Architecture and Sediment Distribution During the Pleistocene[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2012, 59(6):877-897.
[12] Saqab M M, Bourget J. Structural Style in a Young Flexure-Induced Oblique Extensional System, North-Western Bonaparte Basin, Australia[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2015, 77:239-259.
[13] 周恳恳,牟传龙,梁薇,等. 湘西北龙山、永顺地区龙马溪组潮控三角洲沉积发现[J]. 沉积学报,2014,32(3):468-477. Zhou Kenken, Mou Chuanlong, Liang Wei, et al. Tide-Dominated Deltaic Deposits in Formation, Longshan-Yongshun Regions, Northwestern Hunan[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3):468-477.
[14] 殷茵.潮控三角洲相油藏精细描述及剩余油分布特征研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2007. Yin Yin. Study on Fine Description and Remaining Oil Distribution of Tide Dominated Delta Reservoir[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2007.
[15] 曹瑞成,曲希玉,文全,等. 海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷储层物性特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(1):23-30. Cao Ruicheng, Qu Xiyu, Wen Quan, et al. Physical Properties and Control Factors of Reservoir in Beier Depression, Hailaer Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2009, 39(1):23-30.
[16] 高志勇,崔京钢,冯佳睿,等. 埋藏压实作用对前陆盆地深部储层的作用过程与改造机制[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(5):867-876. Gao Zhiyong, Cui Jinggang, Feng Jiarui, et al. An Effect of Burial Compaction on Deep Reservoirs of Foreland Basins and Its Reworking Mechanism[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5):867-876.
[17] 范卓颖,林承焰,鞠传学,等. 塔河油田二区奥陶系优势储集体特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(1):34-47. Fan Zhuoying, Lin Chengyan, Ju Chuanxue, et al.Characteristics of Main Ordovician Reservoir Rocks in Block Two of Tahe Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1):34-47.
[18] 查明. 油气成藏条件及主要控制因素[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2003. Zha Ming. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Condition and Main Controlling Factors[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.
[19] 陈维涛,杜家元,施和生,等. 珠江口盆地惠西南地区复式油气成藏特征及富集规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(2):194-199. Chen Weitao, Du Jiayuan, Shi Hesheng, et al. Compound Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Enrichment in Southwestern Huizhou Area, Pearl River Month Basin, Southern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2):194-199.
[20] 姚泾利,赵彦德,邓秀芹,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油成藏控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):983-992. Yao Jingli, Zhao Yande, Deng Xiuqin, et al. Controlling Factors of Tight Oil Reservior in Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4):983-992.
[21] Abbassi S, Primio R, Horsfield B, et al. On the Filling and Leakage of Petroleum from Traps in the Laminaria High Region of the Northern Bonaparte Basin, Australia[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 59:91-113.
[22] Tan Fengqi, Li Hongqi, Xu Changfu, et al. Quan-titative Evaluation Methods for Waterflooded Layers of Conglomerate Reservoir Based on Well Logging Data[J]. Petroleum Science, 2010, 7(4):485-493.
[23] 师本强,侯忠杰. 覆岩中断层活化突水的力学分析及其应用[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(10):3053-3057. Shi Benqiang, Hou Zhongjie. Mechanical Analysis of Fault Activation Water Inrush in Over Burden Rock and Its Application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(10):3053-3057.
[24] 蒋有录,刘培,宋国奇,等. 渤海湾盆地新生代晚期断层活动与新近系油气富集关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2015,36(4):525-533. Jiang Youlu, Liu Pei, Song Guoqi, et al.Late Cenozoic Faulting Activities and Their Influence Upon Hydrocarbon Accumulations in the Neogene in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(4):525-533.
[1] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[2] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[3] 李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[4] 孙海涛, 钟大康, 李勇, 毛亚昆, 杨宪彰. 超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素——以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 693-704.
[5] 舒晴, 朱晓颖, 高维, 李瑞, 尹航. 三塘湖盆地航磁异常特征及油气远景预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 451-460.
[6] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[7] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[8] 杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[9] 马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛, 王彦君, 魏彩茹. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1695-1704.
[10] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[11] 高崇龙, 纪友亮, 靳军, 王剑, 任影, 车世琦, 王茹, 桓芝俊. 准噶尔盆地莫索湾地区清水河组深层优质储层特征及其物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 990-1006.
[12] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[13] 李博南, 刘财, 郭智奇. 基于等效介质模型和频变AVO反演的裂缝储层参数估算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 234-244.
[14] 陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 杨克明, 祝渭平, 严青霞. 川西坳陷深层叠复连续型致密砂岩气藏成因及形成过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1611-1623.
[15] 姜贵璞. 陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1649-1659.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[2] 孟庆涛, 刘招君, 柳蓉, 孙平昌, 胡菲, 张京. 桦甸盆地桦甸组与美国犹他盆地绿河组油页岩生物标志化合物特征对比[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 391 -399 .
[3] 王朝阳, 孟恩, 李壮, 李艳广, 靳梦琪. 吉东南新太古代晚期片麻岩类的时代、成因及其对早期地壳形成演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 587 -625 .
[4] 宋明春, 李杰, 李世勇, 丁正江, 谭现锋, 张照录, 王世进. 鲁东晚中生代热隆-伸展构造及其动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 941 -964 .
[5] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 尚庆华, 黄生旺. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 981 -990 .
[6] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991 -1007 .
[7] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008 -1017 .
[8] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018 -1029 .
[9] 龚跃华, 杨胜雄, 王宏斌, 梁金强, 梁劲. 琼东南盆地天然气水合物成矿远景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1030 -1042 .
[10] 日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043 -1049 .