吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1502-1510.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201705204

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

SIMHYD模型在松花江流域应用的适应性分析

李鸿雁1, 李悦1, 刘海琼1, 王小军2,3, 王世界1, 王傲4   

  1. 1. 吉林大学环境与资源学院, 长春 130021;
    2. 南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 南京 210029;
    3. 水利部应对气候变化研究中心, 南京 210029;
    4. 吉林省水文水资源局长春分局, 长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-30 出版日期:2017-09-26 发布日期:2017-09-26
  • 作者简介:李鸿雁(1968),女,教授,博士,主要从事流域水文过程模拟与水文预报方面的研究,E-mail:lihongyan@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（51379088）

Adaptability Analysis of the Application of SIMHYD Model in the Songhua River Basin

Li Hongyan1, Li Yue1, Liu Haiqiong1, Wang Xiaojun2,3, Wang Shijie1, Wang Ao4   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China;
    3. Research Center of Climate Change, MWR, Nanjing 210029, China;
    4. Changchun Branch of Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau of Jilin Province, Changchun 130022, China
  • Received:2016-12-30 Online:2017-09-26 Published:2017-09-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379088)

PDF (PC)

548

摘要： 近年来，概念性水文模型在水文预报中得到了广泛应用，为探讨SIMHYD模型在松花江流域应用的适应性，为其汛期的防洪控制、水库调度提供依据，本文选择嫩江流域上游石灰窑断面和第二松花江流域白山断面汛期（6—9月）的日径流过程进行模拟。计算结果表明，SIMHYD模型在松花江流域的应用中存在区域性差异：在嫩江流域上游石灰窑汇水区，率定期的纳什系数为0.501，验证期的纳什系数为0.158，模型应用的适应性较差；在第二松花江流域白山汇水区，率定期的纳什系数为0.777，验证期的纳什系数为0.729，模型应用的适应性优良。模型对于洪峰处的模拟存在较大误差，主要原因在于该模型没有考虑到产流时空分布不均及河道汇流计算过程。

关键词: SIMHYD模型, 松花江流域, 汛期, 适应性分析

Abstract: In recent years, the conceptual hydrological model has been widely used in hydrological forecasting. In order to explore the adaptability of SIMHYD model in the Songhua River basin, and provide the basis for flood control and reservoir control in flood season, we selected the Shihuiyao section located in the upper Nenjiang and the Baishan section located in the upstream of the second Songhua River to simulate the daily runoff of flood period. The results show that there are regional differences of the application of the model in the Songhua River basin:For the Shihuiyao collection area, the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient is 0.501 in calibration period, and 0.158 in verification period, poor adaptability of the model; For Baishan collection area, the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient is 0.777 in calibration period, and 0.729 in verification period, good adaptability of the model. There is a big error for the simulation of flood peaks, which is mainly caused by that the model does not take into account the uneven space-time distribution of runoff generation and the calculation process of river concentration.

Key words: SIMHYD model, Songhua River basin, flood period, adaptability analysis

中图分类号: 

  • P338.1
[1] 水利部水文局, 水利部松辽水利委员会. 1998年松花江暴雨洪水[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2002:5. Hydrology Bureau of the Ministry of Water Resources, Songliao Water Resources Commission, the Ministry of Water Resources. Storm Flood in Songhua River in 1998[M]. Beijing:China Water and Power Press, 2002:5.
[2] 武慧智,姜琦刚,李远华,等. 松嫩流域湿地景观动态变化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(1):327-334. Wu Huizhi, Jiang Qigang, Li Yuanhua, et al. Dynamic Change of Wetland Landscape Pattern in Songhuajiang-Nenjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015,45(1):327-334.
[3] 郭禹含,徐世杰,齐天松. 流域水文模型综述[J]. 科技视界,2015(25):321,326. Guo Yuhan, Xu Shijie, Qi Tiansong. Review on Hydrological Models[J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2015(25):321, 326.
[4] 崔泰昌,陆建华. 试论蓄满产流模型与超渗产流模型[J]. 山西水利科技,2000(3):13-15. Cui Taichang, Lu Jianhua. Discussing into Two Runoff Yielding Models[J]. Shanxi Hydrotechnics, 2000(3):13-15.
[5] 郭飞,马娟娟. SIMHYD模型在黄河流域的适用性分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2015(6):75-80. Guo Fei, Ma Juanjuan. An Analysis of Applying SIMHYD Model in the Yellow River Basin[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015(6):75-80.
[6] 张俊, 郭生练, 李超群, 等. 概念性流域水文模型的比较[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2007, 40(2):1-6. Zhang Jun, Guo Shenglian, Li Chaoqun, et al. Comparative Study on Conceptual Hydrological Models[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2007,40(2):1-6.
[7] Poter J W, McMahon T. A Model for the Simulation of Streamflow Data from Climatic Decords[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1971:297-324.
[8] Chiew F H S, McMahon T A. Application of the Daily Rainfall-Runoff Model MODHYDROLOG to 28 Australian Catchments[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1994, 153(1):383-416.
[9] Vijay P S, Donald F. Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications[M]. Fort Collins:Water Resources Pulications, LLC, 2002:335-367.
[10] Chiew, F H S,Siriwardena L. Estimation of SIMHYD Parameter Values for Application in Ungauged Catchments[C]//Zerger A, Argent R M. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation(MODSIM05). Melbourne:Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc, 2005:2883-2889.
[11] 陈晓丹, 张翔, 刘彩云. SIMHYD模型在中国南北方流域的应用[C]//高丹盈, 左其亭.中国水论坛第四届学术研讨会文集. 郑州:郑州大学, 2006:414-417. Chen Xiaodan, Zhang Xiang, Liu Caiyun.Application of SIMHYD Model in Northern and Southern Basin of China[C]//Gao Danying, Zuo Qiting.Collected Works of Fourth Symposium of China Water Forum. Zhengzhou:Zhengzhou University, 2006:414-417.
[12] 张俊, 郭生练, 李超群. SIMHYD模型及其应用比较研究[C]//周孝德.全国第三届水问题研究学术研讨会论文集. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2005:294-299. Zhang Jun, Guo Shenglian, Li Chaoqun. Comparative Study of SIMHYD Model and Its Application[C]//Zhou Xiaode. Collected Works of Third National Water Research Symposium. Beijing:China Water and Power Press, 2005:294-299.
[13] 章光新, 郭跃东. 嫩江中下游湿地生态水文功能及其退化机制与对策研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(1):122-128. Zhang Guangxin, Guo Yuedong. Study on the Wetland Ecological and Hydrological Functions and Their Degradation Mechanisms and Counter Measures in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Nenjiang River[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2008, 22(1):122-128.
[14] 梁忠民, 钟平安, 华家鹏. 水文水利计算[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2008:13-14. Liang Zhongmin, Zhong Ping'an, Hua Jiapeng. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Computation[M]. Beijing:China Water and Power Press, 2008:13-14.
[15] 李鸿雁, 田琪, 王小军, 等. 嫩江流域径流时空演化规律分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4):1282-1289. Li Hongyan, Tian Qi, Wang Xiaojun, et al. Analysis on the Laws of Spatio-Temporal Changes of Runoff in Nenjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(4):1282-1289.
[16] Wahl K L, Wahl T L. Determining theFlow of Comal Springs at New Braunfels, Texas[J]. Proceedings of Texas Water, 1995, 95:16-17.
[17] 李鸿雁, 张蕾, 郑龙群, 等. 递归数字滤波法在嫩江流域地下径流分割中的应用[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 49(6):631-635. Li Hongyan, Zhang Lei, Zheng Longqun, et al. Application of Recursive Digital Filtering Method in Groundwater Flow Separation in Nenjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2013, 49(6):631-635.
[18] 包为民. 水文预报[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2009:142-205. Bao Weimin. Hydrologic Forecasting[M]. Beijing:China Water and Power Press, 2009:142-205.
[19] 王中根, 夏军, 刘昌明, 等. 分布式水文模型的参数率定及敏感性分析探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4):649-655. Wang Zhonggen, Xia Jun, Liu Changming, et al. Comments on Sensitivity Analysis, Calibration of Distributed Hydrological Model[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(4):649-655.
[20] Nash J E, Sutcliffe J. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models:Part 1:A Discussion of Principles[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1970,10 (3):282-290.
[21] 宋霁云, 张利平, 李武阶, 等. 水文模型参数优选方法比较与参数敏感性分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2011, 29(4):24-27. Song Jiyun, Zhang Liping, Li Wujie, et al. Uncertainty Analysis of Monthly Water Balance Model Based on MOMM-CLUB Algorithm[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2011, 29(4):24-27.
[22] 王国庆,李永涛,金艳,等. 黄河中游无定河流域的水文模拟研究[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报,2006(3):8-10. Wang Guoqing, Li Yongtao, Jin Yan, et al. The Hydrological Simulation Study in the Middle Reaches of Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of North China Institute, 2006(3):8-10.
[23] 王国庆,王军平,荆新爱,等. SIMHYD模型在清涧河流域的应用[J]. 人民黄河,2006(3):29-30. Wang Guoqing, Wang Junping, Jing Xin'ai, et al. Application of SIMHYD Model to the Qingjian River Basin[J]. Yellow River, 2006(3):29-30.
[24] 赵人俊. 流域水文模拟:新安江模型与陕北模型[M].北京:水利电力出版社, 1984. Zhao Renjun. Watershed Hydrological Modeling:Xin'anjiang Model and Shaanbei Model[M]. Beijing:Water Resources and Electric Power Press, 1984.
[25] 胡宇丰,安波,陆玉忠,等. 新安江模型在嫩江流域洪水预报中应用[J]. 东北水利水电,2011,29(8):41-45, 72. Hu Yufeng, An Bo, Lu Yuzhong, et al. Application of Xin'anjiang Model in Flood Forest of Nenjiang River Basin[J]. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast,2011,29(8):41-45, 72.
[1] 丁志宏, 张金良, 冯平. 黄河中游汛期水沙联合分布模型及其应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1130-1135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发