基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案——以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201706105

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1654-1667.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201706105

基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案——以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例

蔡来星^1,2,3, 卢双舫³, 张训华², 肖国林^1,2, 吴志强^1,2, 黄文彪³

1. 中国地质调查局青岛海洋地质研究所, 山东青岛 266071;
2. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室/海洋矿产资源评价与探测技术功能实验室, 山东青岛 266237;
3. 中国石油大学(华东)非常规油气与新能源研究院, 山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2017-03-29 出版日期:2017-11-26 发布日期:2017-11-26
通讯作者: 卢双舫(1962),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气地质学及油气地球化学方面的研究,E-mail:lushuangfang@qq.com E-mail:lushuangfang@qq.com
作者简介:蔡来星(1985),男,在站博士后,主要从事油气地质学方向的研究,E-mail:qingxin717717@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（"973"计划）项目（2014CB239005）；国家自然科学基金项目（41330313）；国家油气重大专项（2011ZX05007-001）；教育部自主创新基金项目（15CX05046A）

Establishment of Evaluation Scheme of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs Based on Pore Throat:A Case Study on the 4th Member of Quantou Formation at Central Depression of Southern Songliao Basin

Cai Laixing^1,2,3, Lu Shuangfang³, Zhang Xunhua², Xiao Guolin^1,2, Wu Zhiqiang^1,2, Huang Wenbiao³

1. Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China;
2. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology/Evaluation and Detection Technology Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China;
3. Research Institute of Unconventional Petroleum and Renewable Energy, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

Received:2017-03-29 Online:2017-11-26 Published:2017-11-26
Supported by:
Supported by National Basic Research Program("973" Program)of China (2014CB239005), National Natural Science Foundation of China(41330313), National Oil and Gas Major Project of China (2011ZX05007-001) and Independent Innovation Project of Education Department (15CX05046A)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 致密砂岩储层评价方案是识别储层"甜点"的基础，也是致密油勘探的重点和难点，但目前国内对此尚无统一认识。为此，以松南中央坳陷区泉四段致密砂岩为例，综合常规压汞、恒速压汞、高压压汞等多种资料对致密储层微观孔喉结构进行了精细表征，并以此为基础建立了致密砂岩储层评价方案。结果表明：研究区致密砂岩孔喉小、物性差，储集空间以次生溶孔为主；储层渗透性主要由占小部分体积的最大孔喉半径所控制，喉道半径越大、大喉道所占比例越高，致密储层的渗透率（K）就越高、品质就越好。在此基础上，由孔喉结构的差异性出发，将松南中央坳陷区泉四段致密砂岩储层分类4类，其中，石油能够充注至Ⅰ-Ⅲ类致密储层，且Ⅰ类致密储层（K为（0.1~1.0）×10^-3μm²）品质最高，可视为储层"甜点"。

关键词: 孔喉结构, 评价方案, 致密砂岩储层, 泉四段, 松南中央坳陷

Abstract: The evaluation criterion of tight sandstone reservoirs is not only the foundation to distinguish reservoir "sweet spot",but also the key and difficult point to explore tight oil. However,no unified understanding has been achieved so far. Taking the tight sandstone reservoirs of Quantou 4 Formation at the central depression in the southern Songliao basin as an example,we established the evaluation scheme of tight sandstone reservoirs on the basis of micro pore throat through integrating the subtle characterization of conventional mercury injection,constant-rate mercury injection, high-pressure mercury injection experiment,and other data. The results show that tight sandstone reservoirs in this area are characterized by small pore throats and poor physical property,whose reservoir space is dominated by the secondary solution pores. The reservoir permeability is mainly controlled by the large-radius pore throats whose volume are small. The larger the throat radius and the larger throat ratio is, the higher the permeability (K) of the tight reservoir and the better the quality. According to the differences of pore throat structures,tight sandstone reservoirs of Quantou 4 Formation at the central depression in the southern Songliao basin can be divided into four categories. Oil can be filled into the first,the second,and the third levels of tight reservoirs;and the first level of reservoirs (K=(0.1-1.0)×10^-3 μm²) are the best that can be taken as reservoir "sweet spots".

Key words: pore throat structure, evaluation scheme, tight sandstone reservoirs, Quantou 4 Formation, Central depression in southern Songliao basin

中图分类号:

P618.13

蔡来星, 卢双舫, 张训华, 肖国林, 吴志强, 黄文彪. 基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案——以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1654-1667.

Cai Laixing, Lu Shuangfang, Zhang Xunhua, Xiao Guolin, Wu Zhiqiang, Huang Wenbiao. Establishment of Evaluation Scheme of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs Based on Pore Throat:A Case Study on the 4th Member of Quantou Formation at Central Depression of Southern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1654-1667.

参考文献

[1] Schmoker J W. US Geological Survey Assessment Concepts for Continuous Petroleum Accumulations[M]. Denver:US Geological Survey,2005:1-9.
[2] 邹才能.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2013. Zou Caineng. Unconventional Oil and Gas Geology[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013.
[3] IEA. Short-Term Energy Outlook Supplement:Const-raints in New England Likely to Affect Regional Energy Prices This Winter[R]. US:Energy Information Administration,2013.
[4] 邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187. Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al. Types,Characteristics,Genesis and Prospects of Conventional and Unconventional Hydrocarbon Accumulations:Taking Tight Oil and Tight Gas in China as an Instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
[5] 贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密岩油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-350. Jia Chengzao,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al. Assessment Criteria,Main types,Basic Features and Resource Prospects of the Tight Oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):343-350.
[6] Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Tao Shizhen,et al.Nano-Hy-drocarbon and the Accumulation in Coexisting Source and Reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):15-32.
[7] Zhang Hong,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al. A Theoretical Discussion and Case Study on the Oil-Charging Throat Threshold for Tight Reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):367-374.
[8] 朱超,夏志远,王传武,等.致密油储层甜点地震预测[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(2):602-610. Zhu Chao,Xia Zhiyuan,Wang Chuanwu,et al. Seismic Predication for Sweet Spot Reservoir of Tight Oil[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2015,45(2):602-610.
[9] 任战利,李文厚,梁宇,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组致密油成藏条件及主控因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):190-198. Ren Zhanli,Li Wenhou,Liang Yu,et al. Tight Oil Reservoir Formation Conditions and Main Controlling Factors of Yanchang Formation in Southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(2):190-198.
[10] 郭迎春,庞雄奇,陈冬霞,等.川西坳陷中段须二段致密砂岩储层致密化与相对优质储层发育机制[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(增刊2):21-31. Guo Yingchun,Pang Xiongqi,Chen Dongxia,et al. Densification of Tight Gas Sandstones and Formation Mechanism of Relatively High-Quality Reservoir in the Second Member of the Xujiahe Formation,Western Sichuan Depression[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2012,42(Sup.2):21-31.
[11] 杨升宇,张金川,黄卫东,等.吐哈盆地柯柯亚地区致密砂岩气储层"甜点"类型及成因[J].石油学报,2013,34(2):272-282. Yang Shengyu,Zhang Jinchuan,Huang Weidong,et al. "Sweet spot" Types of Reservoirs and Genesis of Tight Sandstone Gas in Kekeya Area,Turpan-Huami Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(2):272-282.
[12] 郑磊,金之钧,张哨楠.中东鲁卜哈利盆地古生界致密砂岩储层特征及评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):475-482. Zheng Lei,Jin Zhijun,Zhang Shaonan. Features and Evaluation of the Palaeozoic Tight Sandstone Reservoirs of the Rub Ai Khali Basin in the Middle East[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(4):475-482.
[13] 朱如凯,郭宏莉,高志勇,等.塔里木盆地北部地区白垩系-古近系储集性与储层评价[J].中国地质,2007,34(5):837-842. Zhu Rukai,Guo Hongli,Gao Zhiyong,et al. Characteristics and Evalution of Cretaceous-Paleogene Reservoirs in the Northern Tarin Basin[J]. Geology in China,2007,34(5):837-842.
[14] 胡明毅,李士祥,魏国齐,等.川西前陆盆地上三叠统须家河组致密砂岩储层评价[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(4):456-462. Hu Mingyi,Li Shixiang,Wei Guoqi,et al. Reservoir Apprecisal of Tight Sandstones of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Western Sichuan Forland Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(4):456-462.
[15] 徐兆辉,汪泽成,徐安娜,等.四川盆地须家河组致密砂岩储集层特征与分级评价[J].新疆石油地质,2011,32(1):26-28. Xu Zhaohui,Wang Zecheng,Xu Anna,et al. Characteristics and Grade Evalution of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2011,32(1):26-28.
[16] Nguyen V H,Sheppard A P,Knackstedt M A,et al.The Effect of Displacement Rate on Imbibition Relative Permeability and Residual Saturation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2006,52:54-67.
[17] 肖开华,冯动军,李秀鹏.川西新场须四段致密砂岩储层微观孔喉与可流动体变化特征[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(1):77-82. Xiao Kaihua,Feng Dongjun,Li Xiupeng. Micro Pore and Throat Characteristics and Moveable Fluid Variation of Tight Sandstone in 4^th Member of Xujiahe Formation,Xinchang Gas Field,Western Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(1):77-82.
[18] 高辉,任国富,穆谦益.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组特地渗透砂岩微观孔喉特征的定量评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增刊2):3116-3122. Gao Hui,Ren Guofu,Mu Qianyi. Quantitative Evaluation of Micro-Pore Throat Characteristics in Extra-Low Permeability Sandstone of Yanchang Group,Ordos Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2013,32(Sup.2):3116-3122.
[19] 高辉,王美强,尚水龙.应用恒速压汞定量评价特低渗透砂岩的微观孔喉非均质性:以鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田长8储层为例[J].地球物理学进展,2013,28(4):1900-1907. Gao Hui,Wang Meiqiang,Shang Shuilong. Quantitative Evalution of Micro-Pore Throat Heterogeneity in Extra-Low Permeability Sandstone Using Constant Rate Mercury Penetration:Taking the Chang8 Reservoir of Xifeng Oilfield in Ordos Basin[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2013,28(4):1900-1907.
[20] 赵继勇,刘振旺,谢启超,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长7致密油储层微观孔喉结构分类特征[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(5):73-79. Zhao Jiyong,Liu Zhenwang,Xie Qichao,et al. Micro-Pore Throat Structural Classification of Chang7 Tight Oil Reservoir of Jiyuan Oilfield in Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(5):73-79.
[21] 潘树新,卫平生,王天奇,等.大型坳陷湖盆"洪水-河漫湖"沉积:以干旱背景下的松南泉四段为例[J].地质论评,2012,58(1):41-52. Pan Shuxin,Wei Pingsheng,Wang Tianqi,et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of Flood-Overlake in Large Depression Basin:Taking the 4^th Member,Quantou Formation,Lower Cretaceous,in Southern Songliao Basin as an Example[J]. Geological Review,2012,58(1):41-52.
[22] 黄文彪,邓守伟,卢双舫,等.泥页岩有机非均执行评价及其在页岩油资源评价中的应用:以松辽盆地南部青山口组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(5):704-711. Huang Wenbiao,Deng Shouwei,Lu Shuangfang,et al. Shale Organic Heterogeneity Evalution Method and Its Application to Shale Oil Resource Evaluation:A Case Study from Qingshankou Formation,Southern Songliao Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(5):704-711.
[23] 孙雨,陈晨,马世忠,等.松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部扶余油层油气运移机制与成藏模式研究[J].地质论评,2013,59(3):501-509. Sun Yu,Chen Chen,Ma Shizhong,et al. Hydrocarbon Migration Mechanism and Accumulation Models of the Fuyu Oil Layer in Southern Fuxin Uplift,Songliao Basin[J]. Geological Review,2013,59(3):501-509.
[24] 陶士振,邹才能,袁选俊,等.流体包裹体在油气勘探中的应用:以吉林油田扶新隆起扶余油层为例[J].中国石油勘探,2006,(4):46-51. Tao Shizhen,Zou Caineng,Yuan Xuanjun,et al. Application of Fluid Inclusion in Oil-Gas Exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2006,(4):46-51.
[25] 闫丽萍.松辽盆地南部泉四段沉积体系分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2007. Yan Liping. Analysis of the Sedimentary System of the Fourth-Member of Quantou Group in the South of Songliao Basin[D]. Changchun:Jilin Univesity,2007.
[26] 张鑫.松辽盆地南部泉四段物源判别与沉积特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2011,35(5):16-20. Zhang Xin. Sedimentary Characteristics and Provenance Identification in Section 4 of Quantou Formation in South of Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2011,35(5):16-20.
[27] 吴胜和,熊琦华.油气储层地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998:113-122. Wu Shenghe,Xiong Qihua. Hydrocarbon Reservoir Geology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1998:113-122.
[28] 王瑞飞,沈平平,宋子齐,等.特低渗透砂岩油藏储层微观孔喉特征[J].石油学报,2009,30(4):560-569. Wang Ruifei,Shen Pingping,Song Ziqi,et al. Characteristics of Micro-Pore Throat in Ultra-Low Permeability Sandstone Reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(4):560-569.
[29] 杨峰,宁正福,孔德涛,等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):450-455. Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Kong Detao,et al. Pore Structure of Shale from High Pressure Mercury Injection and Nitrogen Adsorption Method[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):450-455.
[30] 白玉彬.鄂尔多斯盆地吴堡地区长7致密储层成岩演化与成藏过程耦合机理[D].西安:西北大学,2013. Bai Yubin. The Coupling Mechanism of the Diagenetic Evolution and Oil Accumulation Process of Chang7 Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Wubo Area,Ordos Basin[D]. Xi'an:Northwest University,2013.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案——以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例

Establishment of Evaluation Scheme of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs Based on Pore Throat:A Case Study on the 4th Member of Quantou Formation at Central Depression of Southern Songliao Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈爱民. 澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 965-980.
[2]	王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 尚庆华, 黄生旺. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 981-990.
[3]	林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[4]	牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[5]	赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[6]	龚跃华, 杨胜雄, 王宏斌, 梁金强, 梁劲. 琼东南盆地天然气水合物成矿远景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1030-1042.
[7]	李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[8]	贾艳聪, 操应长, 林畅松, 王健. 东营凹陷博兴洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝优质储层形成机理与分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 652-664.
[9]	刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[10]	冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[11]	孙海涛, 钟大康, 李勇, 毛亚昆, 杨宪彰. 超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素——以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 693-704.
[12]	胡欣蕾, 吕延防, 孙永河, 孙同文. 泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 705-718.
[13]	蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[14]	李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[15]	田亚, 杜治利, 刘宝宪, 杜小弟, 陈夷. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部宜川黄龙地区奥陶系风化壳储层发育特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1620-1630.