J4

• 基础地质·矿床·盆地 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨节状石香肠构造应变计初探

许海萍1,曾佐勋1,2,程 明1,李 泉3   

  1. 1.中国地质大学 地球科学学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2.华中构造力学研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074;3.中国科学院 地质与地球物理研究所,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2004-11-14 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-09-26 发布日期:2005-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 许海萍

Primary Approach to the Strain Gauge in Bone-shape Boudins

XU Hai-ping1,ZENG Zuo-xun1,2,CHENG Ming1,LI Quan3   

  1. 1.Faculty of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;2.Huazhong Tectonomechanical Research Center, Wuhan 430074, China;3.Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029,China
  • Received:2004-11-14 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2005-09-26 Published:2005-09-26
  • Contact: XU Hai-ping

摘要: 考虑两期纯剪切变形成因的骨节状石香肠。假设骨节缝处香肠层的厚度近似等于香肠层的原始厚度,再根据等面积法原理恢复骨节状石香肠层的原始长度,求得石香肠层的拉伸有限应变,并采用物理模拟方法对骨节状石香肠等面积法进行了检验,误差范围分别为3.23%,2.84%,3.94%和6.82%。将该种方法应用于湖北铁山含骨节状石香肠岩石的有限应变测量,得到石香肠层的伸长有限应变值为33.80%~48.22%。再利用矩形断裂石香肠对骨节状石香肠应变测量结果进行检验,取得比较一致的结果。并将两期构造变形的岩石有限应变进行了分离。

关键词: 骨节状石香肠, 应变测量, 等面积法, 湖北铁山

Abstract: The authors have taken the boneshaped boudins of two different stages into account. With the assumption that thickness of joints of the ‘bone’ is approximately the same as the original thickness of the layers of the boudins,the original length of the boudins has been reconstructed with the equalarea method to measure their finite strain. Meanwhile, this equalarea method is demonstrated by physical modeling, showing that the errors are 3.23%, 2.84%, 3.94% and 6.82%, respectively. This new strain gauge is successfully applied in the finite strain determination of rocks embedded boneshaped boudins and developed in Tieshan, Hubei, indicating the extension finite strain of the layers ranges from 33.80% to 48.22%. This result is relatively consistent to the other method applied in the measurement of the boudins’ finite strain. Furthermore, the authors have also successfully segregated the finite strain in two structural deformation periods.

Key words: boneshape boudins, strain determination, equalarea method, Tieshan, Hubei

中图分类号: 

  • P542.2
[1] 李三忠, 杨朝, 赵淑娟, 李玺瑶, 郭玲莉, 余珊, 刘鑫, 索艳慧, 兰浩圆. 全球早古生代造山带(Ⅰ):碰撞型造山[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 945-967.
[2] 李振宏,董树文,渠洪杰. 华北克拉通北缘侏罗纪造山过程及关键时限的沉积证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1553-1574.
[3] 刘树文, 杨朋涛, 李秋根, 王宗起, 张万益, 王伟. 秦岭中段印支期花岗质岩浆作用与造山过程[J]. J4, 2011, 41(6): 1928-1943.
[4] 刘德民, 李德威, 范旭光, 廖群安. 喜马拉雅造山带中段麻粒岩构造侵位过程中变质变形演化[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 699-705.
[5] 温泉波, 刘永江, 李伟民, 韩国卿, 丁凌. 佳木斯地块花岗质片麻岩的独居石年龄及其地质意义[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 187-0193.
[6] 覃小锋,夏 斌,李 江,黎春泉,陆济璞,许 华,周府生,胡贵昂,李 乾. 阿尔金南缘构造带西段新元古代-早古生代变质岩系的变质作用[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 856-0867.
[7] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346-0350.
[8] 王孔伟, 张帆, 邱殿明. 三峡库区黄陵背斜形成机理及与滑坡群关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1142-1154.
[9] 王亚东, 郑建京, 孙国强, 郑有伟, 刘兴旺. 柴西北地区碎屑锆石裂变径迹年龄记录的阿尔金山早新生代隆升事件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1447-1459.
[10] 李三忠, 杨朝, 赵淑娟, 李玺瑶, 索艳慧, 郭玲莉, 余珊, 戴黎明, 李少俊, 牟墩玲. 全球早古生代造山带(Ⅱ):俯冲-增生型造山[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 968-1004.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!