J4

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

大型凹陷斜坡带油气成藏模式--以三肇凹陷葡萄花油层为例

刘宗堡1,马世忠1,吕延防1,马仲尊2,谭伟雄2   

  1. 1.大庆石油学院 地球科学学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318;2.中海油基地集团 监督监理技术公司,天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-11-26 发布日期:2008-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘宗堡

Hydrocarbon Accumulation Model of Big Depression Ramp Area-As Putaohua Reservoir in the Sanzhao Depression

LIU Zong-bao1,MA Shi-zhong1,L Yan-fang1,MA Zhong-zun2,TAN Wei-xiong2   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences,Daqing Petroleum Institute,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163318,China;2.Base Site Supervisor and Management Technique Company,CNOOC, Tianjin 300452,China
  • Received:2008-04-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-11-26 Published:2008-11-26
  • Contact: LIU Zong-bao

摘要: 利用4 079口测井曲线、10口井岩心,结合开发井初期产能数据,对松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层烃源岩埋藏史、古构造演化史、油气运聚场、储层沉积特征和油水分布规律等油气成藏主控因素进行了综合分析。认识如下:葡萄花油层油气主要来自下伏青山口组二+三段源岩,油气初始运移时期为嫩江组末期,成藏关键时期为明水组末期;总结出葡萄花油层顶面古构造演化的4个阶段,油气运移时期向凹陷中心倾没的大型鼻状构造轴线为古油气主要运移方向,油气运移方向呈“旋转式”变化,即嫩江组末期的北西向转变为明水组末期的近东西向;葡萄花油层为单一北部物源,发育河控浅水三角洲沉积成因的大量密集且水下延伸较远的分流河道砂体,北西向展布的河道砂体与断层组合构成了油气侧向运移的优势通道。开发井初期产能数据和圈闭精细解剖表明,油水分布受局部构造控制,单一圈闭内具有统一的油水界面。在以上研究基础上,总结出三肇凹陷葡萄花油层2种成藏模式:继承性鼻状构造控油和凹陷平缓斜坡区反向正断层下降盘泥岩遮挡成藏模式;并在研究区刻画出101个有利钻井圈闭,预测新增石油储量2 800×104 t,为三肇凹陷葡萄花油层下一步的勘探与开发提供了依据。

关键词: 葡萄花油层, 古构造演化, 油气运聚场, 沉积特征, 成藏模式, 三肇凹陷

Abstract: Using 4 079 log curves, 10 well cores, as well as the initial deliverability data of production wells, the authors comprehensively analyze the chief factors that control hydrocarbon accumulation in Putaohua reservoirs of the Sanzhao depression in the Songliao Basin, including the buried history of the source rocks, the palaeotectonics evolution history, the migration and accumulation field of hydrocarbon, the reservoir sedimentary character and oil-water distribution rule. The scenario is thought as the follows:the hydrocarbon of the Putaohua reservoir was derived from the underlying source rocks of the Ⅱ+Ⅲ segment of the Qingshankou Group, the initial migration period of hydrocarbon began from the final stage of the Nenjiang Group, the key stage of hydrocarbon accumulation was at the end of the Mingshui Group; the Putaohua reservoir top has undergone four stages of paleotectonics evolution, and the major hydrocarbon migration direction was along the axis of some large nose structure that dumps to depression center, some hydrocarbon migration direction seems to be “rotating”, namely, they was in northwest direction at the end of the Nenjiang Group, became near eastwest at the end of Mingshui Group; The Putaohua reservoir is identified as the single northern source, with well development of distributary channel sand bodies that controlled by shallow water delta dominated river sediment and that are intensively located and have long extension. The combination of these channel sand bodies arranged in northwest direction and faults makes up the most favorable passageways for hydrocarbon lateral migration; initial deliverability data of production wells and detailed analysis of reservoir traps indicate that oilwater distribution is controlled by local structures, and a single trap has a unified oil-water interface. Based on above research, 2 types of accumulation mode are recognized in the Putaohua reservoir in the Sanzhao depression:inheritance nose structure accumulation mode and the overlying mudstone shielding of the reverse normal fault down-throwing block in depression gentle slope. Under the guidance of these accumulation models, 101 favorable drilling traps containing 2 800×104 t reserves are forecasted. This forecast could direct the next step of exploration and development of the Putaohua reservoir in the Sanzhao depression.

Key words: Putaohua reservoir, palaeotectonic evolution, migration and accumulation field of hydrocarbon, sedimentary character, accumulation model, Sanzhao depression

中图分类号: 

  • P618.130.2
[1] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[2] 牛子铖, 柳广第, 国殿斌, 王朋, 张家舲, 赵其磊. 查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1047-1059.
[3] 林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[4] 连晓亮, 郭波, 闫巧洁, 姜忠诚, 张昌盛. 大情字井地区葡萄花油层储层砂体地震描述技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1561-1570.
[5] 高帅, 马世忠, 庞雄奇, 巩磊, 陈昶旭, 高昂, 秦旗. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气成藏主控因素定量分析及有利区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 36-45.
[6] 刘为付, 刘双龙, 孙立新, 张绍臣. 升平油田葡萄花油层高分辨率层序地层格架及储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 46-56.
[7] 李秋芬, 苗顺德, 江青春, 王铜山, 徐安娜, 翟秀芬. 四川宣汉盘龙洞长兴组生物礁沉积特征及成礁模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1322-1331.
[8] 冯方, 王晓杰, 吕本勋, 吴小斌, 李海燕. 亚诺斯前陆盆地MM油田成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1269-1277.
[9] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 李昂, 石蕾, 刘爽. 松辽盆地肇州区块沙河子组层序格架特征及其对沉积和烃源岩的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 724-735.
[10] 孙忠军,杨志斌,秦爱华,张富贵,周亚龙. 中纬度带天然气水合物地球化学勘查技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1063-1070.
[11] 任宪军, 单玄龙, 王建波. 松辽盆地尚家油田葡萄花油层成藏过程的再认识[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 38-44.
[12] 刘华,蒋有录,徐浩清,宋国奇,蔡东梅. 东营凹陷民丰地区深层裂解气藏成因类型与成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1638-1646.
[13] 李军辉. 海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷下白垩统层序构成样式及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 961-969.
[14] 刘宗堡, 赵淼, 吕延防, 马世忠, 方庆, 郭新. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层地层减薄模式及控油意义[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 984-990.
[15] 万志峰, 夏斌, 林舸, 施秋华, 郭峰, 刘宝明. 莺歌海盆地与济阳拗陷成因机制与沉积特征的比较及其油气勘探意义[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 976-982.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!