J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 327-334.

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

海拉尔盆地红旗凹陷早白垩世构造特征与变形期次的厘定

刘志宏1|黄超义1|王芃1|吴相梅2| 梅梅1|周飞1   

  1. 1.吉林大学地球科学学院|长春130061;
    2.大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院|黑龙江 大庆163712
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-14 出版日期:2011-03-26 发布日期:2011-03-26
  • 作者简介:刘志宏(1962-)|男|辽宁庄河人|教授|博士生导师|主要从事造山带与盆地构造研究|E-mail:liuzhih@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41072150)

Structural Features and Determination of Deformation Stages of Hongqi Sag in Hailar Basin During the Early Cretaceous

LIU Zhi-hong1, HUANG Chao-yi1, WANG Peng1, WU Xiang-mei2, MEI Mei1, ZHOU Fei1   

  1. 1.Collage of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun130061|China;
    2.Exploration and Development Institute, Daqing Oil Company, Daqing163712, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2010-04-14 Online:2011-03-26 Published:2011-03-26

摘要:

海拉尔盆地是叠置于内蒙-大兴安岭古生代碰撞造山带之上的中-新生代盆地,总体上呈北东向展布,由三坳、两隆5个一级构造单元组成,自西向东依次为扎贲诺尔坳陷、嵯岗隆起、贝尔湖坳陷、巴彦山隆起和呼和湖坳陷, 其中红旗凹陷是位于贝尔湖坳陷北部的一个二级构造单元。研究表明,红旗凹陷在早白垩世经历了4个变形阶段:在早白垩世兴安岭群-南屯组沉积时期为NW-SE向伸展作用阶段,形成以大型犁式正断层为控陷断层的NE向箕状半地堑;在大磨拐河组-伊敏组一段沉积时期为NW-SE向挤压作用阶段,使早期控陷正断层发生强烈的反转作用而转化为逆断层,靠近控陷断层的NW边界由于断层上盘的逆冲而隆升,凹陷的SE斜坡带由于控陷断层在反转作用过程中深部的逆冲滑移在浅部受阻而发生的旋转式隆升,使凹陷的规模发生明显萎缩,并在凹陷的中部形成大型NE向断层转折褶皱,构成了红旗凹陷的中部断隆带;在伊敏组二段下部沉积时期为近EW向伸展作用阶段,早期控陷断层表现出正断层的特征,新形成的NE向控陷断层具有左行离散型走滑的性质;在伊敏组二段上部沉积时期为近EW向挤压作用阶段,早期控陷断层再次表现为上盘逆冲的特征,在断层上盘、靠近断层的部位形成反转背斜,并在凹陷中形成断层转折褶皱。在每一变形阶段中,红旗凹陷的构造特征在空间上存在一定的差异。

关键词: 油气, 伸展构造, 挤压构造, 反转构造, 变形期次, 红旗凹陷, 海拉尔盆地

Abstract:

Hailar basin is a meso-cenozoic basin which superimposed on the Inner Mongolia-Greater Hinggan Mountain Paleozoic collision orogenic belt. The north-east trending basin consists of five first-order structural units (three depressions and two uplifts) including Zhalenuoer depression, Cuogang uplift, Beier Lake depression, Bayanshan uplift and Huhe Lake depression from west to east, respectively, The Hongqi sag is a secondorder structural unit in the north of Beier Lake depression. Research indicates that the Hongqi sag underwent four deformation stages during the Early Cretaceous: Stage of NW-SE extension during the deposition of Xing’anling Group and the Nantun Formation, NE trending half-garben controlled by large scale dustpan-like normal fault as depression-controlling fault developed; Stage of NW-SE compression during the deposition of Damoguaihe Formation and the first member of Yimin Formation, thrust fault formed due to the intensive inversion of early normal fault, the thrust of the hanging wall lead to the uplift of the NW boundary of the sag near the depression-controlling fault, and the block of thrust sliding of the deep part of the depression-controlling fault in the shallow area lead to the rotary uplift of the SE slope zone during the inversion, hence, the size of the sag dwindled obviously, and the large scale NE trending fault-bend fold formed in the center of the sag which consists of the central fault-uplift zone of Hongqi sag; Stage of EW trending extension during the deposition of lower part of the second member of Yimin Formation, the early depression-controlling fault showed features of normal fault, and the newly formed depression-controlling fault had features of sinistral discrete slip; Stage of EW compression during the deposition of upper part of the second member of Yimin Formation, the early depression-controlling fault showed features of thrust of hanging wall again, inverted anticline developed in the hanging wall near the fault, forming fault-bend fold in the sag. During each deformation stage, there were some differences of the structural features of Hongqi sag in space.

Key words: petroleum gas, extensional structure, compressional structure, inversion structure, deformation stage, Hongqi sag, Hailar basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618. 13
[1] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[2] 陈爱民. 澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 965-980.
[3] 宋明春, 李杰, 李世勇, 丁正江, 谭现锋, 张照录, 王世进. 鲁东晚中生代热隆-伸展构造及其动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 941-964.
[4] 李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[5] 舒晴, 朱晓颖, 高维, 李瑞, 尹航. 三塘湖盆地航磁异常特征及油气远景预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 451-460.
[6] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[7] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[8] 杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[9] 马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛, 王彦君, 魏彩茹. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1695-1704.
[10] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[11] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[12] 李博南, 刘财, 郭智奇. 基于等效介质模型和频变AVO反演的裂缝储层参数估算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 234-244.
[13] 贾珍臻, 林承焰, 任丽华, 董春梅, 宫宝. 苏德尔特油田低渗透凝灰质砂岩成岩作用及储层质量差异性演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1624-1636.
[14] 陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 杨克明, 祝渭平, 严青霞. 川西坳陷深层叠复连续型致密砂岩气藏成因及形成过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1611-1623.
[15] 刘峻桥, 吕延防, 付广, 孙同文, 李佳兴. 正断层输导油气运移模式及其对油气分布的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1672-1683.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!