architecture differences,braided river bar,sandy braided river,Lower He8 Member,Sulige gasfield


,"/> <span>Architecture Differences Analysis in Sandy Braided River Facies: A Case Study of Lower He8 Member in Sulige Gasfield</span>

Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 30-43.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210425

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Architecture Differences Analysis in Sandy Braided River Facies: A Case Study of Lower He8 Member in Sulige Gasfield

Luo Chao1,2, Li Xiaoyan1, Liu Quyang3, Zhang Qiang4, Yu Zhou5, Dai Jie1, Yin Nanxin1, Lin Hun1   

  1. 1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Complex Oil and Gas Exploration and Development, Chongqing University of Science &

    Technology, Chongqing 401331, China

    2. Engineering Research Center of Development and Management for Low to Ultra-Low Permeability Oil & Gas Reservoirs in West

    China (Xi’an Shiyou University), Ministry of Education, Xi’an 710065, China

    3. CNPC Changqing Petroleum, No.7 Oil Production Company, Xi’an 717606, China

    4. PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield CDB Operation Company, Chengdu 610021, China

    5. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou 310023, China

  • Received:2021-12-22 Online:2023-01-26 Published:2023-04-04

Abstract:

 It is of great significance for the efficient development of sandy braided river reservoirs to clarify the different characteristics and genesis of the same level architecture elements. Based on modern deposit, field outcrop, and core, the quantitative architecture characterization was carried out in typical layers by taking the sandy braided river of lower He8 Member in Sulige gasfield as the study subject. Architecture differences were emphatically compared from the fifth to third level in typical layers of H8x2-2, H8x1-3, and H8x1-1. Influenced by source condition and base level change, the braided belt scale of lower He8 Member changes from 650.0 m to 1 750.0 m. The single braided belt has three different distribution patterns: Isolated type, lateral splicing type, and vertical superposition type. Architecture differences in individual sandbody are remarkably affected by flooding, channel erosion, and chute scour. The scale of braided river bar is greater with an average thickness of 7.2 m in the layer of advantage lithofacies probability higher than 80%. The average length and width are 1 402.0 m and 809.0 m in H8x2-2. The architecture differences of the third level are minor in braided bar. Falling-silt layers have the similar feature of thin, gentle and lenticular distribution. They are 0.1-0.4 m thick and with a dip angle of 1-3 degrees. Single lateral accretions are 360.0-565.0 m wide. The number of lateral accretions and the single size control the difference in the average bar scale in every layer. With the constraint of architecture differences in different levels, a three-dimensional geological model is built up to accurately reflect the distribution of sandy braided river architecture in Sulige gasfield, which can provide a reference for later development adjustment of the reservoir.


Key words: architecture differences')">

architecture differences, braided river bar, sandy braided river, Lower He8 Member,
')">Sulige gasfield


CLC Number: 

  • P618.13
[1] Qiao Yupeng, Qiu Longwei, Song Ziyi, Wang Jun, Song Fan, Liu Wei. Research and Modeling of Interlayers in Distal Sandy Braided River Reservoir: A Case Study of Upper Guantao Formation, Block 6 in Gudong Oilfield, Zhanhua Sag [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(1): 41-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHENG Li-ren, ZHANG Yu-jie, ZHANG Yi-chun. Ordovician Nautiloid Fossils of Xainza Region,Tibet[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] LI Bing-cheng. Preliminary Studies on Holocene Climatic In Fuping,Shaanxi Province[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] HE Zhong-hua,YANG De-ming,WANG Tian-wu,ZHENG Chang-qing. SHRIMP U[CD*2]Pb Dating of Zircons from Two-Mica Granite in Baga Area in Gangdise Belt[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] JI Hong-jin,SUN Feng-yue2,CHEN Man,HU Da-qian,SHI Yan-xiang,PAN Xiang-qing. Geochemical Evaluation for Uncovered GoldBearing Structures in Jiaodong Area[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[5] CHU Feng-you, SUN Guo-sheng,LI Xiao-min,MA Wei-lin, ZHAO Hong-qiao. The Growth Habit and Controlling Factors of the CobaltRich Crusts in Seamount of the Central Pacific[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[6] LI Bin, MENG Zi-fang, LI Xiang-bo, LU Hong-xuan, ZHENG Min. The Structural Features and Depositional Systems of the Early Tertiary in the Biyang Depression[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[7] LI Tao, WU Sheng-jun, CAI Shu-ming, XUE Huai-ping, YASUNORI Nakayama. Simulation Analysis of the Storage Capacity Based on DEM Before and After Connecting to Yangtze River in Zhangdu Lake[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[8] KUANG Li-xiong,GUO Jian-hua, MEI Lian-fu, TONG Xiao-lan, YANG Li. Study on the Upheaval of the Bogeda Mountain Block from Angle of Oil and Gas Exploration[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[9] ZHANG Guang-xin, DENG Wei, HE Yan, RAMSIS Salama. An Application of Hydrological Response Units in Assessment of Soil Salinization Risks[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[10] WANG Qian, WU Zhi-fang, ZHANG Han-quan, MO Xiu-wen. The Application of Statistical Fractals to Describing the Reservoir Heterogeneity[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .