Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 219-230.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220088

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Cluster Analysis of Influencing Factors of Surface Subsidence in Shield Interval of Sandy Gravel Stratum#br#

Wang Wei1, Wang Xing1, Zhou Xun2, Wei Shengda2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
    2. China Communication North Road and Bridge Co., Ltd., Beijing 100024, China
  • Received:2022-04-03 Online:2024-01-26 Published:2024-03-11
  • Supported by:
    the Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province(20220203058SF) and the Research and Development Project of China Communication Road and Bridge Construction Co., Ltd.(ZJLJ-2018-44)

Abstract: In order to grasp the comprehensive influence law of shield tunneling parameters and geological conditions on surface subsidence between shield intervals in sandy gravel stratum, a shield interval of Chengdu Metro is chosen as a case study, combined with the relationship between the surface subsidence and tunneling parameters of the our study team in the early stage, the total thrust,cutter head speed,screw machine speed,overlying soil thickness,groundwater level and gravel stratum thickness are determined as clustering indexes. The K-means algorithm is applied to cluster the actual monitoring data of each parameter index, and the influence of each index on the surface subsidence is analyzed comprehensively. The research results show that: 1) According to the results of K-means clustering, the monitoring points, corresponding to construction sections, are divided into three risk levels of surface subsidence, 1-3 is strong dangerous (Grade Ⅰ), 7-13, 16-19, 25-34 are weak dangerous (Grade Ⅱ), 4-6, 14-15, 20-24 are safe (Grade Ⅲ). 2) According to the clustering results, there is a positive and negative correlation between tunneling parameters, stratum structure and surface subsidence in a specific range. 3) Through an analysis of the relationship between geological structure, tunneling parameters and surface settlement, it is determined that when the overlying soil layer is thick, the groundwater level is low, and the gravel layer is thick, the control range of excavation parameters is a total thrust of 29 034.00-31 181.95 kN, cutterhead rotation speed of 1.25-1.32 r/min, and screw conveyor rotation speed of 6.13-6.98 r/min. When the overlying soil layer is thin, the groundwater level is low, and the gravel layer is thin, the control range of excavation parameters is a total thrust of 34 419.89-36 867.28 kN, cutterhead rotation speed of 1.44-1.45 r/min, and screw conveyor rotation speed of 5.74-6.99 r/min.

Key words: sandy gravel stratum, shield, surface subsidence, clustering analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU455.43
[1] Qin Shengwu, Zhang Yanqing, Zhang Lingshuai, Miao Qiang, Cheng Qiushi, Su Gang, Sun Jingbo. Prediction of Ground Settlement Around Deep Foundation Pit Based on Stacking Model Fusion [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1316-1323.
[2] Yang Jihua, Lu Xinjing, Yan Changbin, Qi Sanhong, Guo Weixin. Stability Classification of Tunnel Surrounding Rock During Shield TBM Construction Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1596-1602.
[3] Shi Youzhi, Lin Shuzhi, Che Ailan, Hui Xiangyu, Feng Shaokong, Huang Yulin. Boulder Detection in Metro Shield Zones Based on 3D Seismic Method,and Its Application [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1885-1893.
[4] Chen Huanqing, Mu Jiandong, Wang Jue, Deng Xili. Reservoir Characteristics of Fan Delta Deposits and Its Quantitative Evaluation: Taking Yulou Oil Bearing Sets in a Certain Experimental Area of West Depression in Liaohe Basin as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 14-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Bing-cheng. Preliminary Studies on Holocene Climatic In Fuping,Shaanxi Province[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[2] HE Zhong-hua,YANG De-ming,WANG Tian-wu,ZHENG Chang-qing. SHRIMP U[CD*2]Pb Dating of Zircons from Two-Mica Granite in Baga Area in Gangdise Belt[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[3] JI Hong-jin,SUN Feng-yue2,CHEN Man,HU Da-qian,SHI Yan-xiang,PAN Xiang-qing. Geochemical Evaluation for Uncovered GoldBearing Structures in Jiaodong Area[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[4] LI Tao, WU Sheng-jun, CAI Shu-ming, XUE Huai-ping, YASUNORI Nakayama. Simulation Analysis of the Storage Capacity Based on DEM Before and After Connecting to Yangtze River in Zhangdu Lake[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[5] KUANG Li-xiong,GUO Jian-hua, MEI Lian-fu, TONG Xiao-lan, YANG Li. Study on the Upheaval of the Bogeda Mountain Block from Angle of Oil and Gas Exploration[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[6] ZHANG Guang-xin, DENG Wei, HE Yan, RAMSIS Salama. An Application of Hydrological Response Units in Assessment of Soil Salinization Risks[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[7] LIU Jia-jun, LI Zhi-ming,LIU Jian-ming,WANG Jian-ping,FENG Cai-xia, LU Wen-quan. Mineralogy of the Stibnite-Antimonselite Series in the Nature[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 545 -553 .
[8] ZHAO Hong-guang,SUN Jing-gui, CHEN Jun-qiang,ZHAO Jun-kang, YAO Feng-liang,DUAN Zhan. The Genesis and Evolution of Orebearing Fluids of the Xiaoxinancha Goldbearing Porphyry Copper Deposit in Yanbian Area: H,O,C,S,Pb Isotope Tracing[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 601 -606 .
[9] JING Jian-en, WEI Wen-bo,MEI Zhong-wu. Discussion on Development Regularities of Karst Cave on Top of the Ordovician of Tahe Oilfield and Relation in OilGas[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 622 -625 .
[10] XUE Yong-chao,CHENG Lin-song,FU Guang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Gas Sealing Ability of the Lower DengloukuFormation (K1d2) Mudstone Caprock in the East of the Daqing Placanticline[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 626 -631 .