Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 198-207.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220118

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of In-Situ Stress Measurement Technology of  Ultra Deep Survey Borehole ASR Method#br#

Zhang Xiaolin, Ying Li, Zhao Dong’an   

  1. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2022-04-20 Online:2024-01-26 Published:2024-03-11
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972284)

Abstract: Baolingshan tunnel is a key and difficult control engineering in the first section of a certain railway. The depth of survey Borehole DZ-06 is 2 118.00 m, which is the deepest survey borehole in this railway. Appropriate cores were selected at the depths of 2 072.53 m and 2 084.27 m, and in-situ stress test was carried out by anelastic strain recovery method(ASR). The results show that in the depth range of 2 072.53-2 084.27 m, the average values of the maximum principal stress, intermediate principal stress and minimum principal stress obtained from the two measuring points of ASR method are 59.70, 54.03 and 30.74 MPa respectively. The maximum principal stress is nearly horizontal and the direction is close to SN direction, indicating that the area is dominated by horizontal tectonic stress. The average value of the maximum principal stress test result of ASR method is in good agreement with the regression value from the hydraulic fracturing method test, the consistency of the minimum principal stress test value and the regression value of the hydraulic fracturing method test result is in a reasonable range, and the horizontal principal stress direction test results from the two methods are basically consistent.

Key words: railway tunnel, survey boreholes, in situ stress, ASR method, hydraulic fracturing measurement

CLC Number: 

  • TU452
[1] Ou Xiaoqiang, Wang Shi, Li Yongliang, Liu Zhiqiang, Zheng Zongxi, Wu Jian. In-Situ Stress Analysis of Tunnel in Plate Suture Zone of Lhasa-Nyingchi Railway [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1689-1697.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHENG Li-ren, ZHANG Yu-jie, ZHANG Yi-chun. Ordovician Nautiloid Fossils of Xainza Region,Tibet[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] LI Bing-cheng. Preliminary Studies on Holocene Climatic In Fuping,Shaanxi Province[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] HE Zhong-hua,YANG De-ming,WANG Tian-wu,ZHENG Chang-qing. SHRIMP U[CD*2]Pb Dating of Zircons from Two-Mica Granite in Baga Area in Gangdise Belt[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] JI Hong-jin,SUN Feng-yue2,CHEN Man,HU Da-qian,SHI Yan-xiang,PAN Xiang-qing. Geochemical Evaluation for Uncovered GoldBearing Structures in Jiaodong Area[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[5] CHU Feng-you, SUN Guo-sheng,LI Xiao-min,MA Wei-lin, ZHAO Hong-qiao. The Growth Habit and Controlling Factors of the CobaltRich Crusts in Seamount of the Central Pacific[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[6] LI Bin, MENG Zi-fang, LI Xiang-bo, LU Hong-xuan, ZHENG Min. The Structural Features and Depositional Systems of the Early Tertiary in the Biyang Depression[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[7] KUANG Li-xiong,GUO Jian-hua, MEI Lian-fu, TONG Xiao-lan, YANG Li. Study on the Upheaval of the Bogeda Mountain Block from Angle of Oil and Gas Exploration[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[8] ZHANG Guang-xin, DENG Wei, HE Yan, RAMSIS Salama. An Application of Hydrological Response Units in Assessment of Soil Salinization Risks[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[9] WANG Qian, WU Zhi-fang, ZHANG Han-quan, MO Xiu-wen. The Application of Statistical Fractals to Describing the Reservoir Heterogeneity[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .
[10] LIU Jia-jun, LI Zhi-ming,LIU Jian-ming,WANG Jian-ping,FENG Cai-xia, LU Wen-quan. Mineralogy of the Stibnite-Antimonselite Series in the Nature[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 545 -553 .