Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition)

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Several Factors Affecting Cross-Hole Radar Tomography

Ran Limin1,2, Liu Sixin3, Li Yuxi3,4, Li Jianwei2   

  1. 1.Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geoscience, Wuhan430074, China;
    2.Well Logging Company, Northern China Petroleum Bureau, SINOPEC, Xinxiang453700, Henan, China;
    3.College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Changchun130026, China;
    4.Institute of Electronic, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing100190, China
  • Received:2012-12-30 Online:2013-09-26 Published:2013-09-26

Abstract:

Several factors affecting cross-hole radar tomography were discussed by using synthetic data, including the ray coverage angle, the regularization factor k, as well as the measurement configuration. The ray coverage angle was investigated and is found that 40-70 degree is most fitted angle for tomography. If the regularization factor k is too small or too large, the inverted image will differ from model too much. Therefore, the choice of the fitted regularization factor is very important. By studying the horizontal and various oblique anomaly bodies and related wavefield snapshots, it is found that since both the transmitter and the receivers are located in two parallel holes, the rays are mainly along the horizontal direction to propagate, the horizontal anomaly is well imaged, but the vertical or highly angle anomaly cannot be imaged well.

Key words: cross-hole radar, tomography, ray coverage, regularization factor, measurement configuration

CLC Number: 

  • P631.2
[1] Liu Sixin, Zhu Yinuo, Wang Xudong, Song Erqiao, He Wenbo. Progress of Engineering Seismic Refraction Interpretation Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 350-363.
[2] Liu Xintong, Liu Sixin, Meng Xu, Fu Lei. Envelope Waveform Inversion of Cross-Hole Radar Without Low Frequency Data [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 474-482.
[3] Lin Chengyan, Wang Yang, Yang Shan, Ren Lihua, You Chunmei, Wu Songtao, Wu Yuqi, Zhang Yimin. 3D Modeling of Digital Core Based on X-ray Computed Tomography [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[4] Lu Yanhong, Wu Zhaoying, Ding Guang, Fu Qi, Zhang Fan. Upper Crustal Velocity Structure in Qianguo M5.8 Earthquake Region [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1894-1903.
[5] Kang Jian, Wei Qinghai, Zhou Lin, Gao Yan, Zhang Yonggang, Gao Feng. Deep Structure Based on Seismic Array Observations in Daqing Area [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3): 900-910.
[6] Qu Xinxin, Li Tonglin, Wang Fei. Cross-Hole Radar Travel-Time Tomography Based on Digital Image Segmentation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(4): 1340-1347.
[7] Zhu Ziqiang, Peng Lingxing, Lu Guangyin, Mi Shiwen. Improved Borehole-GPR Tomography Based on Cross-Correlation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(2): 668-674.
[8] Feng Xuan, Chi Huanzhao, Liu Cai, Tian You,Liu Yunlong,Zheng Que. Three-Dimension Velocity Structure of Crust and Upper Mantle in Changbai Mountain and Its Adjacent Areas [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(3): 983-996.
[9] Qin Ning, Li Zhenchun, Yang Xiaodong, Zhang Kai, Wang Jun. Pre-Stack Migration Velocity Analysis Based on Sequent Optimization of Common Scattering Point Gathers and Angle Domain Common Imaging Gathers [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(2): 623-631.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!