Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3): 905-918.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220276

Previous Articles     Next Articles

 Debris Flow Accumulation Area Using Modified Laharz Model

Wen Haijia1,2,Hu Jiwei1,2,Zhang Hui1,2,Xiang Xuekun1,2,3,Huang Qin3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of New Technology of Mountainous Town Construction (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education,Chongqing 
    400045,China
    2. National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Environmental Geological Disaster Prevention in the Reservoir Area/School 
    of Civil Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China
    3. Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources,Chongqing 400042,China

  • Online:2024-05-26 Published:2024-05-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1505504),the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2022NSCQMSX0594) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021CDJKYJH036)

Abstract:  There is no rapid and satisfactory method to analysis the accumulation area of debris flow as involved complex factors including trigger conditions, provenance, topography and so on. Based on the principle of Laharz, this work proposed a modified statistical model based on the local regional debris flow sample data, and the modified ArcGIS toolbox. Taking Yangjiawan creek, Wuxi County,Chongqing City as an example, this modified Laharz model was used to simulate the debris flow accumulation area under different rainfall return periods. The results show: 1) The fitting accuracy (SSE, RMSE and R2) of Laharz model is significantly improved by modifying the parameters. 2) Based on the DEM and the source volume calculated by field survey, the accumulation ranges of debris flow under different rainfall return periods (10,20, 50,100 a) can be quickly analyzed by using Laharz toolbox in ArcGIS. 3) FLO2D software was used to verify the results of modified Laharz model. The both Laharz and FLO2D basedaccumulation ranges are basically coincident, the error rate of punching distance, accumulation width and area are 10.00 %, 15.00 % and 20.00 % respectively, and the simulation results of Laharz modified model are closer consistent with the field survey results. The modified Laharz model provides a fast and effective method to analysis the accumulation ranges of debris flow, which can provide reference for hazard range prediction of debris flow.


Key words: debris flow, modified Laharz model, accumulation area, rainfall return period

CLC Number: 

  • P642.23
[1] Xu Xinghua, Xiao Shuangsu, Feng Hangjian, Lü Qing. Hydrodynamic Erosion Initiation Mechanism and Dynamic Monitoring of Low Frequency Gully Debris Flow [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(3): 919-932.
[2] Liu Xin, Zhang Wen, Li Gen, Liu Bo. Research on Evolution Process and Impact Range Prediction of High Level Remote Collapse and Landslide-Debris Flow Disaster Chain:Taking the “4·5” Tiejiangwan Geological Disaster Chain in Hongya County,Sichuan Province as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1799-1811.
[3] Wang Changming, Liu Xinlei, Wang Fei.  Infulence of Three-Pile Structure with Trefoil-Shaped Distribution on Impact of Debris Flow on Bridge Pier [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1773-1784.
[4] Wang Changming, Li Tong, Tian Shuwen, Li Shuo. Establishment and Application of Prediction Model for Debris Flow Accumulation Area Based on LAHARZ [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1672-1679.
[5] Xia Jingsheng, Wang Zhikun, Wang Hairong, Xue Lin, Wang Kai, Liu Chengquan. Blended Mouth Bars' Cause and Sedimentary Significance of Middle-Deep Beds in Western Slope of Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1642-1653.
[6] Song Zhi, Deng Ronggui, Chen Zeshuo, Feng Wei. Physical Simulation and Early Identification of Dadu River Blocking Due to Moxi River Debris Flow [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 163-170.
[7] Wang Meng, Jiang Yuanjun, Huang Dong, Li Qianqian. Hazard Assessment on Rainfall-Triggered Landslide and Debris Flow in the Seismic Disturbance Area at Watershed Level [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6): 1781-1788.
[8] Xu Peihua, Yuan Zhongfan, Li Guangjie, Li Guang, Du Wenhao, Wang Yuehua. Prediction on the Hazardous Extent of the Secondary Debris Flow Induced by Volcanic Disaster of Changbai Moutains [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4): 1155-1163.
[9] Guo Xiaojun, Li Yong, Cui Peng. Experiment on Random Law of Slope Soil Movement in the Source Area of Debris Flow [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(4): 1260-1268.
[10] Zhu Yuan,Yu Bin,Qi Xing,Wang Tao,Chen Yuanjing. Topographical Factors in the Formation of Gully Type Debris Flows in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(1): 268-277.
[11] Wang Yongsheng,Zhu Yanpeng,Jin Peihao. Modeling and Analysis of the Coupling Wear Random Process of Debris Flow Drainage Structure [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(5): 1556-1562.
[12] Zheng Rong-cai, Li Yun, Dai Chao-cheng, Gao Bo-yu, Hu Xiao-qing, Wang Chang-yong. Depositional Features of Sandy Debris Flow of Submarine Fan in Zhujiang Formation, Baiyun Sag [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(6): 1581-1589.
[13] GUO Ji-fa, CUI Tie-jun, CUI Wei-hong. Multi-Scale Regional Debris Flow Hazard Assessment on Fitting Scale Interval [J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 150-160.
[14] HUANG Rui, CHEN Jian-peng, LI Hui-zhong, ZHANG Chen, ZHANG Wen, XU Pei-hua. Dynmic Characteristics of Debris Flow Based on the Granularmetric Analysis of the Value of φ [J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 182-187.
[15] ZHANG Chen, CHEN Jian-ping, WANG Qing, GU Fu-Guang, ZHANG Wen. Prediction Model of Debris Flow Risk Range in Wudongde Region [J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1365-1370.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!