Journal of Jilin University Science Edition

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Range Shifter to 12C6+ Beam Simulated via  Geant4 Method

YI Haiyun1, ZHAO Guangyi1, WANG Mingyong2, MA Yugang1, WANG Zhenchao3, ZHOU Qing4, LI Jian1, WANG Jian5   

  1. 1. College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China; 2. Department of Physics, Anshan Normal College, Anshan 114005, Liaoning Provin
    ce, China;3.  Institute of Technical Physics, Heilongjiang Academy of Science, Harbin 150086, China;4. Tianjin Institute of Technical Physics, Tianjin 300192, China; 5. Editorial Department of Journal of Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
  • Received:2013-06-30 Online:2014-01-26 Published:2014-03-05
  • Contact: WANG Jian E-mail:wang_j@jlu.edu.cn

Abstract:

The angle straggling and energy straggling of 12C6+ beam were simulated with  method of Geant4. And the energy of   12C6+beam ranged from 80 MeV to 360 MeV per nucleon, while the mass thickness of the target, PMMA,Al,Cu,Pb, ranged from 0.5 g/cm2 to 4.0 g/cm2. Besides, the Bragg peak of 12C6+ beam which have passed through range shifter was compared to the Bragg peak of mono\|energetic 12C6+  beam. The results of the simulation show that the energy of 12C6+  beam is higher, the thickness and atomic number of the target is lower, then the angle and energy straggling of 12C6+  beam after range shifter is lower, the effect of its Bragg peak is minimal. So, in the case of only consider the angle and energy straggling, the target of lower atomic number is more suitable for range shifter.

Key words:  Geant4 simulation, angle straggling, energy straggling, Bragg peak

CLC Number: 

  • O571.33