Florida牙周探针在种植体周围软组织探诊中的临床应用评价

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20180325

吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (03): 592-596.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20180325

Florida牙周探针在种植体周围软组织探诊中的临床应用评价

丁子清¹, 王维倩², 金冬梅¹, 于光¹, 轩东英¹

1. 杭州口腔医院牙周黏膜科, 浙江杭州 310000;
2. 杭州口腔医院种植中心, 浙江杭州 310000

收稿日期:2017-11-14 出版日期:2018-05-28 发布日期:2018-05-31
通讯作者: 轩东英,主任医师,博士研究生导师(Tel:0571-28352635,E-mail:xuanxuan187@126.com) E-mail:xuanxuan187@126.com
作者简介:丁子清(1988-),女,吉林省通化市人,主治医师,医学硕士,主要从事牙周病临床和基础治疗方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目资助课题（81470750）；浙江省杭州市科技局卫生科技计划（一般）项目资助课题（2015B50）；浙江省杭州市科技局农业和社会发展科研入库项目资助课题（20171226Y51）

Evaluation on clinical application of Florida probes in probing peri-implantsoft tissue

DING Ziqing¹, WANG Weiqian², JIN Dongmei¹, YU Guang¹, XUAN dongying¹

1. Department of Periodontitis, Hangzhou Dental Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, China;
2. Implantation Center, Hangzhou Dental Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, China

Received:2017-11-14 Online:2018-05-28 Published:2018-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：采用Florida牙周探针进行种植体周围软组织的探诊检查，为选择适当临床检查手段、探诊力度及种植体周围软组织维护期治疗提供临床依据。方法：选择62例完成种植上部修复6个月以上的患者，且对侧同名牙为天然牙，分别使用普通牙周探针与Florida探针检查牙周袋探诊深度（PD）值2次，将天然牙和种植牙按探诊是否出血分为炎症组（n=32）和健康组（n=30），比较2种探针在天然牙和种植体周围软组织检查位点测量PD值的变异系数（CV）值。结果：普通牙周探针测量健康组和炎症组患者天然牙和种植牙的PD值比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。Florida牙周探针测量健康组和炎症组患者天然牙和种植牙的PD值比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。检测健康组患者种植体周围软组织PD值时，Florida探针的CV值小于普通牙周探针（t=2.489，P=0.019）；检测炎症组患者种植体周围软组织PD值时，Florida探针的CV值小于普通牙周探针（t=2.238，P=0.033）。炎症组患者种植牙PD值的CV值高于健康组（Z=3.804，P<0.01；Z=2.913，P=0.004）；炎症组和健康组天然牙PD值的CV值比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：在天然牙和种植牙的健康位点及炎症位点的探诊检查中2种探针均具有较好的可重复性。在健康种植体周围软组织和炎症种植体周围软组织的探诊检查中，Florida牙周探针重复性好于普通牙周探针。

关键词: 普通牙周探针, Florida 牙周探针, 牙周袋深度, 种植体周围软组织

Abstract: Objective: To detect the peri-implant soft tissue with Florida probes,and to provide the clinical basis for choosing the appropriate clinical examination method,probing strength,and treatment of peri-implant soft tissue in the maintenance period. Methods: The common periodontal probes and Florida probes were used to examine the probing depth(PD) values in 62 patients who underwent implantation for more than 6 months for two times,and the contralateral teeth were natural teeth.The natural teeth and the implants were divided into inflammation group(n=32) and healthy group(n=30) according to whether the bleeding was probed.The coefficient of variation (CV) values of PD values of natural teeth and peri-implant soft tissues detected by two probes were compared. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the PD values between natural teeth and implants of the patients measured by common periodontal probes in healthy and inflammation groups (P>0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the PD values between natural teeth and implants of the patients measured by Florida probes in healthy and inflammation groups (P>0.05).The CV value of PD value detected by Florida probes of the patients in healthy group was less than that detected by common periodontal probes (t=2.489,P=0.019); the CV value of PD value detected by Florida probes of the patients in inflammation group was less than that detected by common periodontal probe (t=2.238,P=0.033).The CV value of PD value of implants of the patients in inflammation group was higher than that in healthy group(Z=3.804,P<0.01;Z=2.913,P=0.004);the CV value of PD value of nature teeth of the patients in two groups had no significant differences(P>0.05). Conclusion: Both two probes have good reproducibility in probing the healthy and inflammatory sites of the natural teeth and implants.The Florida probes are more reproducible than the common periodontal probes in probing the healthy and inflammatory peri-implant soft tissues.

Key words: Florida probes, common periodontal probe, peri-implant tissue, probing depth

中图分类号:

R781.42

丁子清, 王维倩, 金冬梅, 于光, 轩东英. Florida牙周探针在种植体周围软组织探诊中的临床应用评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(03): 592-596.

DING Ziqing, WANG Weiqian, JIN Dongmei, YU Guang, XUAN dongying. Evaluation on clinical application of Florida probes in probing peri-implantsoft tissue[J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2018, 44(03): 592-596.

参考文献

[1] 赵溪达,张建全,潘亚萍.Florida探针对牙周炎基础治疗的疗效观察[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2008,1(1):27-29.
[2] Petkovic AB,Matic SM,Stamatovic NV,et al.Proinflammatory cytokines(IL-1beta and TNF-alpha) and chemokines(IL-8 and MIP-1alpha) as markers of peri-implant tissue condition[J].Intern J Oral Maxill of Surg,2010,39(5):478-485.
[3] 张玺,宿玉成.种植体周围炎诊断[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2016,9(2):69-74.
[4] Gibbs CH,Hirschfeld JW,Lee JG,et al.Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe the Florida Probe[J].J Clin Periodontol,1988,15(2):137-144.
[5] Barendregt DS,Van der Velden U,Timmerman MF,et al.Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients[J].J Clin Periodontol,2006,33(4):276-282.
[6] Lang NP,Nyman S,Senn C,et al.Bleeding on probing as it relates to probing pressure and gingival health[J].J Clin Periodontol,1999,18(4):257-261.
[7] Gerber JA,Tan WC,Balmer TE,et al.Bleeding on probing and pocket depth in relation to probing pressure and mucosal health around oral implants[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2009,20(1):75-78.
[8] Rosen P, Clem D, Cochran D, et al.Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis:a current understanding of their diagnoses and clinical implications[J].J Periodontol,2013,84(4):436-443.
[9] Karoussis IK,Müller S,Salvi GE,et al.Association between periodontal and peri-implant conditions:a 10-year prospective study[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2004,15(1):1-7.
[10] BraggerU,BurginWB,HammerleCH,et al.Associationsbetween clinical parameters assessed around implants and teeth[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,1997,8(5):412-421.
[11] Serino G, Turri A, Lang NP.Probing at implants with peri-implantitis and its relation to clinical peri-implant bone loss[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24 (1):91-95.
[12] Listgarten MA.Periodontal probing:what dose it means[J].J Clin Periodontol,1980,7(3):165-176.
[13] van der Velden U.Probing force and the relationship of the probe tip to periodontal tissues[J].J Clin Periodontol,1979,6(2):106-114.
[14] Lang NP,Wetzel AC,Stich H,et al.Histologic probe penetration in healthy and inflamed peri-implant tissues[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,1994,5(4):191-201.
[15] Ouirynen M,Papaioannou W,van Steenberghe D.Intraoral transmission and the colonization of oral hard surfaces[J].J Periodontol,1996,67(10):986-993.
[16] Marinello CP,Berglundh T,Ericsson I,et al.Resolution of ligature-induced peri-implantitis lesions in the dog[J].Clin Periodontol,1995,22(6):475-479.
[17] Ericsson I,Persson LG,Berglundh T,et al.The effect of antimicrobial therapy on periimplantitis lesions.An experimental study in the dog[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,1996,7(4):320-328.
[18] Persson LG,Ericsson I,Berglundh T,et al.Guided bone regeneration in the trewtment of periimplantitis[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,1996,7(4):366-372.
[19] Gotfredsen K,Berglundh T,Lindhe J.Bone reaction at implants subjected to experimental peri-implantitis and ststic load.A study in the dog[J].J Clin Periodontol,2002,29:144-151.
[20] 康军,曹采方,沙月琴. Florida 探针与普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度的比较[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(2):120-122.
[21] 赵溪达,潘亚萍,赵雪,等.利用 Florida 探针评价牙周炎非手术治疗的疗效[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2007,25(3):253-256.
[22] 周卉,唐志辉,曹采方.电子牙周探针在牙植体周围组织探诊检查中的应用[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2010,24(2):93-95.

Florida牙周探针在种植体周围软组织探诊中的临床应用评价

Evaluation on clinical application of Florida probes in probing peri-implantsoft tissue

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	付军权, 费瑞, 张桂荣, 迟立超, 王书香, 佟巨慧. 羧甲基壳聚糖银对实验性大鼠牙周炎的治疗作用[J]. J4, 2009, 35(4): 669-672.
[2]	李博，林崇韬，张颖丽，周春华. 应激和尼古丁对大鼠牙周组织的协同破坏作用[J]. J4, 2008, 34(6): 952-955.
[3]	李博，林崇韬，周春华. 应激对Wistar大鼠牙周炎动物模型的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 33(5): 856-859.
[4]	车彦海，李桂英，赵令君，赵相任，冯延民，赵燕国. 综合方法建立牙周炎动物模型的效果评价[J]. J4, 2006, 32(6): 1119-1121.
[5]	罗云纲，杨涛，许力强，黄洋. 牙周炎动物模型的建立[J]. J4, 2004, 30(2): 230-232.