镍铬合金、钛合金及金铂合金在人工唾液中的耐腐蚀性能

doi:国家“十五”攻关项目(2004BA720A27)

镍铬合金、钛合金及金铂合金在人工唾液中的耐腐蚀性能

刘肃^1,2，周延民^1*，王晓容¹，王瑞¹

1. 吉林大学口腔医院种植中心，吉林长春130041;2. 长春工业大学医院口腔科，吉林长春130012

收稿日期:2004-03-11 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-09-28 发布日期:2005-09-28
通讯作者: 周延民

Corrosion resistance of Ni-Cr,Ti-6Al-4V,andAu-Pt alloy in artificial saliva

LIU Su^1,2，ZHOU Yan-min^1*，WANG Xiao-rong¹，Wang Rui¹

1. Department of Center of Implantation, School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130041,China;2. Department of Stomatology, Hospital of Changchun Technology University,Changchun 130012,China

Received:2004-03-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2005-09-28 Published:2005-09-28
Contact: ZHOU Yan-min

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：评价镍铬合金(Ni-Cr)、钛合金(Ti-6Al-4V)以及金铂合金(Au-Pt)在人工唾液中的耐腐蚀性能。方法：制作Ni-Cr、Ti-6Al-4V以及Au-Pt合金3种试件共9个，每种合金各3片。采用阳极极化技术，在37℃人工唾液中测定其稳态电位（Ecorr）,并记录其动电位极化曲线。用扫描电子显微镜观察试件表面形态变化，用X-射线衍射仪分析腐蚀试件表面产物的物相。结果：Ni-Cr、Ti-6Al-4V及Au-Pt合金的稳态电位分别为-115、-24和+61 mV。极化曲线表明，电位一定时(<600 mV),Au-Pt及Ti-6Al-4V合金的电流密度比Ni-Cr合金低。扫描电子显微镜观察表明，Ni-Cr合金试件表面有腐蚀痕迹，Ti-6Al-4V合金表面腐蚀痕迹不明显,Au-Pt合金表面无腐蚀痕迹。X-射线衍射图谱表明,Ni-Cr合金的腐蚀产物以Cr₂O₃为主,Ti-6Al-4V合金试件表面有TiO₂形成，Au-Pt合金表面无化合物生成。结论：在人工唾液中， Au-Pt及Ti-6Al-4V合金均有较好的耐腐蚀性，Ni-Cr合金的耐腐蚀性相对较差。

关键词: 电化学, 唾液, 人工

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the corrosion resistance of Ni-Cr alloy,Ti-6Al-4V alloy and Au-Pt alloy in artificial saliva. Methods Nine speciments of Ni-Cr alloy,Ti-6Al-4V alloy and Au-Pt alloy were made and they were divided into three groups(n=3). Then anodic polarization test was performed to measure the Ecorr and Anodic potentiondynamic polarization curves of each group. Surface changes of the alloys were observed by SEM. The products of corrosion were analyzed by X-ray diffractiometer. Results Ecorr of Ni-Cr alloy, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and Au-Pt alloy were -115,-24 and +61 mV. Anodic potentiondynamic polarization curves showed at the certain potential(<600 mV),the Ti-6Al-4V and Au-Pt alloys had lower current density than Ni-Cr alloy. SEM results showed that the corrosive marks on the surface of Ni-Cr alloy were evident and that of Ti-6Al-4V were not very evident. There were not corrosive marks on the surface of Au-Pt alloy. X-ray diffractogram showed that the corrosive product was mainly Cr chemical compound on the surface of Ni-Cr alloy and Ti chemical compound on the surface of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The chemical compound in Au-Pt alloy was not detected. Conclusion In artificial saliva,the corrosion resistance of Au-Pt alloy and Ti-6Al-4V alloy are superior to that of Ni-Cr alloy.

Key words: electrochemistry, saliva, artificial

中图分类号:

R783.1

刘肃，周延民，王晓容，王瑞. 镍铬合金、钛合金及金铂合金在人工唾液中的耐腐蚀性能[J]. J4, 2005, 31(5): 774-777.

LIU Su，ZHOU Yan-min，WANG Xiao-rong，Wang Rui. Corrosion resistance of Ni-Cr,Ti-6Al-4V,andAu-Pt alloy in artificial saliva[J]. J4, 2005, 31(5): 774-777.

[1]	马晓周, 刘麒麟, 尹唯凰, 王越, 于阳, 杨刚, 于子莹. CC趋化因子受体6在人唾液腺腺样囊性癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(01): 147-150.
[2]	张亚敏, 朱慧勇. 唾液腺干细胞及其在放射性唾液腺损伤治疗中应用的研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(04): 852-856.
[3]	吴嫣然, 杨陆一, 刘军, 殷红, 牟胤赫, 夏小雪, 滕蓉. 类金刚石涂层与未涂层镍钛丝在人工唾液中耐腐蚀性能的比较[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(03): 517-522.
[4]	王帅, SeanX.LUO, 孙思翘, 程志华, 张阳, 赵文光, 王琦. Viabahn腔内人工血管治疗髂股动脉长段闭塞性病变的疗效评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(03): 577-581.
[5]	莫珩, 高承志, 王少杰. 口腔扁平苔藓患者心理因素与唾液脱氢表雄酮水平的关联性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(01): 94-98.
[6]	王永勤,潘留兰,贾胜男,柳思琪,金珍婧. 人工肝支持系统临床应用的研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2014, 40(02): 460-464.
[7]	葛艳,贺玺,张凤兰,李江,赵超悦,李小菊,陈振宇,王旭. 常用口腔修复材料镍铬合金、钴铬合金和纯钛对可乐饮品的耐腐蚀性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2013, 39(2): 335-338.
[8]	安志红, 杨贲, 张冰洁. 白内障手术前后前房深度和瞳孔直径的测量及其意义[J]. J4, 2010, 36(3): 571-573.
[9]	季晓风，成伏波，李旸，李幼琼，郑文旭，刘俊利，孙月芳，来颖，傅耀文. 数字化国人胫骨近端形态学参数测量在人工膝关节领域的应用[J]. J4, 2008, 34(5): 871-874.
[10]	孙庆，刘鹏，李英普，左建林，秦彦国，高忠礼. X线评估对人工髋置换股骨假体选择及功能评价的意义(附71例报告)[J]. J4, 2008, 34(4): 694-697.
[11]	禹彬,许莉,孙连坤,李晓洁,李扬,赵雪俭. 人质膜型唾液酸酶对丁酸钠诱导细胞凋亡的影响及其机制[J]. J4, 2008, 34(1): 49-52.
[12]	蒋维海, 谷长跃，宋宝东, 金景鹏，杨树忠. 万古霉素骨水泥假体在羊人工髋关节翻修术中的抗感染作用[J]. J4, 2007, 33(5): 917-920.
[13]	刘鹏，刘光耀，秦彦国，左建林，孙庆，高忠礼. 人工膝关节线水平与屈曲角度的相关性分析[J]. J4, 2007, 33(5): 921-923.
[14]	戚良晨，韩振国，马长金. 自制分叉型人工气管重建犬气管及隆突对犬生存期及吻合口愈合的影响[J]. J4, 2006, 32(5): 781-783.
[15]	赵佳，朱玉琢，高久春，庞慧民，稻泽让治. 应用FISH技术鉴定肿瘤CGH微阵列BAC克隆[J]. J4, 2006, 32(4): 629-631.