吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1002-1010.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201504104

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

陆相湖盆深水块体搬运体优质储层的主控因素以松辽盆地英台地区青山口组为例

陈彬滔1,2, 潘树新1,2, 梁苏娟1, 张庆石3, 刘彩燕1, 王革3   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    2. 中国石油天然气集团公司油藏描述重点实验室, 兰州 730020;
    3. 大庆油田勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江大庆 163000
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-02 发布日期:2015-07-26
  • 作者简介:陈彬滔(1985),男,工程师,主要从事储层地质与储层评价研究,E-mail:tobychencugb@foxmail.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41072084);国家"973"计划项目(2007CB209604)

Main Controlling Factors of High Quality Deep-Water Mass Transport Deposits (MTDs) Reservoir in Lacustrine Basin:An Insight of Qingshankou Formation, Yingtai Area, Songliao Basin, Northeast China

Chen Bintao1,2, Pan Shuxin1,2, Liang Sujuan1, Zhang Qingshi3, Liu Caiyan1, Wang Ge3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest (NWGI), Petrochina, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Description, CNPC, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Daqing Oilfield Company, Daqing 163000, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2014-10-02 Published:2015-07-26

摘要:

深水储层已成为增储上产的重要领域,传统观点认为此类储层物性差,但近年来的勘探实践表明,陆相湖盆深水块体搬运体可形成优质储层,其储层物性甚至优于三角洲前缘.以岩心观察、铸体薄片、扫描电镜、实测孔隙度、地层水有机酸含量、地层超压等资料为基础,对松辽盆地青山口组深水块体搬运体优质储层的主控因素进行了分析.分析认为青山口组深水块体搬运砂岩为高结构成熟度的岩屑长石砂岩,储集空间主要包括原生粒间孔和次生溶蚀孔,碎屑颗粒以点接触为主,方解石胶结物和石英次生加大现象少见.深水块体搬运优质砂岩储层的发育主要受沉积作用和超压旋回的控制.块体搬运作用是形成优质储层的基础,使其继承了三角洲前缘高能环境砂岩的原始孔渗特征;超压抑制破坏性成岩作用是核心,使原始孔隙得以保存、胶结物含量少;有机酸溶蚀是补充,促进次生孔隙发育.青山口组深水块体搬运砂岩呈透镜状分布于源岩内部且具有良好的物性,是有利的勘探目标.

关键词: 松辽盆地, 块体搬运体, 储层物性, 次生孔隙, 超压, 青山口组

Abstract:

Deepwater sandstone, viewed as poor reservoir traditionally, is now the potential target for increasing reserves and production. However, the exploration practice in recent years showed that deepwater mass transport deposits (MTDs) in lacustrine basin can form high-quality reservoir. Its reservoir properties are even superior to a delta front. Based on the data of core observation, casting thin sections, scanning electron microscope, measured porosity, organic acid content of formation water, and formation overpressure, the main controlling factors of high quality deep-water MTDs in Qingshankou Formation, Yingtai area, Songliao basin have been analyzed. According to the analysis, it can be concluded that MTDs sandstone of Qingshankou Formation is debris-feldspar sandstone with high texture maturity, where the reservoir space is dominated by primary intergranular pores and secondary dissolution pores, and the detrital grains are dominated by point-contacted with low calcite cement and quartz overgrown. The development of a good deepwater sandstone reservoir is controlled by sedimentary process and overpressure cycles. Sedimentary process of MTDs is the foundation, which makes the deepwater sandstone inherit the primary characteristics of porosity and permeability of sandstone in delta front (deposited in high energy environment). Inhibition of destructive diagenesis caused by overpressure is the core factor, which can preserve the primary pores and lead to a low content of cement. Organic acid dissolution can be a supplement to promote the development of secondary pores. MTDs deepwater sandstone of Qingshankou Formation is distributed inside the source rock as lenticulars with good physical properties, which can be treated as favorable exploration targets.

Key words: Songliao basin, mass transport deposits(MTDs), reservoir properties, secondary porosity, overpressure, Qingshankou Formation

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

[1] Moscardelli L, Wood L, Mann P. Mass-Transport Complexes and Associated Processes in the Offshore Area of Trinidad and Venezuela[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(7): 1059-1088.

[2] Shanmugam G. Transport Mechanisms of Sand in Deep-Marine Environments: Insights Based on Laboratory Experiments-Discussion[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2011, 81(11): 841.

[3] Artoni A, Bernini M, Papani G, et al. Mass-Transport Deposits in Confined Wedge-Top Basins: Surficial Processes Shaping the Messinian Orogenic Wedge of Northern Apennine of Italy[J]. Italian Journal of Geosciences, 2010, 129(1): 101-118.

[4] 李磊, 王英民, 张莲美, 等. 块体搬运复合体的识别、演化及其油气勘探意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(1): 76-82. Li Lei, Wang Yingmin, Zhang Lianmei, et al. Identification and Evolution of Mass Transport Complexes and Its Significance for Oil and Gas Exploration[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(1): 76-82.

[5] Weimer P, Slatt R M. Petroleum Systems of Deepwater Settings[M].Tulsa: AAPG/Datapages, 2007.

[6] 王大伟, 吴时国, 吕福亮, 等. 南海深水块体搬运沉积体系及其油气勘探意义[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 35(5): 14-19. Wang Dawei, Wu Shiguo, Lü Fuliang, et al. Mass Transport Deposits and Its Significance for Oil & Gas Exploration in Deep-Water Regions of South China Sea[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum: Edition of Natural Science, 2011, 35(5): 14-19.

[7] Ogiesoba O,Hammes U.Seismic Interpretation of Mass-Transport Deposits Within the Upper Oligocene Frio Formation, South Texas Gulf Coast[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(5): 845-68.

[8] 陈彬滔, 于兴河, 王天奇, 等. 岱海湖盆沿坡流与顺坡流相互作用的沉积响应[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2014, 39(4): 399-410. Chen Bintao, Yu Xinghe, Wang Tianqi, et al. Sedimentary Response to Interaction Between Alongslope and Downslope Currents in Daihai Lake, North China[J]. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2014, 39(4): 399-410.

[9] Jackson C A-L. Three-Dimensional Seismic Analysis of Megaclast Deformation Within a Mass Transport Deposit: Implications for Debris Flow Kinematics[J]. Geology, 2011, 39(3): 203-206.

[10] 翟光明, 王志武. 中国石油地质志: 卷2[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1993: 55-305. Zhai Guangming, Wang Zhiwu. Petroleum Geology of China:Vol 2[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993: 55-305.

[11] 王东坡, 刘招君, 刘立, 等. 松辽盆地演化与海平面升降[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1994. Wang Dongpo, Liu Zhaojun, Liu Li, et al. Evolution of Songliao Basin and Global Changes of Sea Level[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1994.

[12] 潘树新, 郭维华, 马凤良, 等. 松辽盆地榆树水系泉头组-嫩江组沉积相特征及勘探潜力[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(1):47-50. Pan Shuxin, Guo Weihua, Ma Fengliang, et al. Sedimentary Facies and Exploratory Potential of Quantou-Nenjiang Formations of Yushu River System in Songliao Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010, 31(1):47-50.

[13] 邹才能, 薛叔浩, 赵文智, 等. 松辽盆地南部白垩系泉头组嫩江组沉积层序特征与地层-岩性油气藏形成条件[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(2):14-17. Zou Caineng, Xue Shuhao, Zhao Wenzhi, et al. De-positional Sequences and Forming Conditions of the Cretaceous Stratigraphic-Lithologic Reservoirs in the Quantou-Nengjiang Formations, South Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(2):14-17.

[14] 潘树新. 大型坳陷湖盆深水重力流研究:以松辽盆地青山口组为例. 成都:成都理工大学, 2012. Pan Shuxin. Deep-Water Gravity Deposits in Songliao Terrestrial Basin. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012.

[15] 蔡希源, 辛仁臣. 松辽坳陷深水湖盆层序构成模式对岩性圈闭分布的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2004, 25(5): 6-10. Cai Xiyuan, Xin Renchen. Architectural Model of Sequence Stratigraphy Controlling the Distribution of Litho-Trap in Deep-Water Lake of Songliao Depressive Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2004, 25(5): 6-10.

[16] 王建功, 王天琦, 张顺, 等. 松辽坳陷盆地水侵期湖底扇沉积特征及地球物理响应[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(3): 361-366. Wang Jiangong, Wang Tianqi, Zhang Shun, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics and Geophysical Response of Sublacustrine Fan During Transgress Period in Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(3): 361-366.

[17] 李胜利, 于兴河, 刘玉梅, 等. 水道加朵体型深水扇形成机制与模式:以白云凹陷荔湾3-1地区珠江组为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2): 32-40. Li Shengli, Yu Xinghe, Liu Yumei, et al. Formation Mechanism and Pattern of Deep-Water Fan with Channel and Lobe: A Case Study of the Zhujiang Formation in Liwan 3-1 Area, Baiyun Depression[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2): 32-40.

[18] 郭巍, 李成博, 苏飞. 松辽盆地情南黑帝庙次凹青山口组储层成岩作用研究[J]. 世界地质, 2009, 28(3): 216-225. Guo Wei, Li Chengbo, Su Fei. Research on Reservoir Diagenesis of Qingshankou Formation in Qingnan-Heidimiao Secondary Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2009, 28(3): 216-225.

[19] 郑荣才, 马奇科, 杨宝泉, 等. 白云凹陷珠江组深水扇砂岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 39(5): 456-462. Zheng Rongcai, Ma Qike, Yang Baoquan, et al. Characteristics of Miocene Zhujiang Formation Submarine Fan Sandstone Reservoirs in Baiyun Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2012, 39(5): 456-462.

[20] 肖丽华, 高煜婷, 田伟志, 等. 超压对碎屑岩机械压实作用的抑制与孔隙度预测[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2011, 30(4): 400-406. Xiao Lihua, Gao Yuting, Tian Weizhi, et al. The Retardation of Mechanical Compaction in Clastic Rocks by Overpressure and the Prediction Model for Porosity[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2011, 30(4): 400-406.

[21] 付广, 王有功, 苏玉平. 用超压释放法确定烃源岩排烃期次: 以古龙凹陷青山口组为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28(5): 538-541. Fu Guang, Wang Yougong, Su Yuping. The Expulsion Hydrocarbon Periods of Source Rock by Release of Overpressure: An Example of Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28(5): 538-541.

[22] 付广, 王有功, 苏玉平. 古龙凹陷青山口组超压源岩天然气扩散速度演化史[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2007, 37(1): 91-97. Fu Guang, Wang Yougong, Su Yuping. Evolution History of Gas Diffusion Velocity from Overpressured Source Rock of Qingshankou Group (Kqn1) in Gulong Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2007, 37(1): 91-97.

[23] 雷振宇, 解习农, 孟元林, 等. 松辽盆地齐家古龙三肇凹陷超压对成岩作用的影响[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2012, 37(4): 833-842. Lei Zhenyu, Xie Xinong, Meng Yuanlin, et al. Effecting of Overpressures on Diagensis in the Qijiagulong-Sanzhao Depression of Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2012, 37(4): 833-842.

[24] 雷振宇, 解习农, 黄卫, 等. 松辽盆地齐家古龙凹陷三肇凹陷中浅层异常压力系统特征[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2012, 42(增刊1): 96-104. Lei Zhenyu, Xie Xinong, Huang Wei, et al. Abnormal Pressure System Characteristics of Mid-Shallow Formation in Qijiagulong-Sanzhao Depression of Songliao Basin, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(Sup.1): 96-104.

[25] 黄福堂. 松辽盆地油气水地球化学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1999. Huang Futang. Oil Gas & Water Geochemistry in Songliao Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1999.

[26] 朱国华. 碎屑岩储集层孔隙的形成、演化和预测[J]. 沉积学报, 1992, 10(3): 114-123. Zhu Guohua. Origin and Evolution and Prediction of Porosity in Clastic Reservoir Rocks[J]. Acta Sedi-mentologica Sinica, 1992, 10(3): 114-123.

[1] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[2] 冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[3] 季金礁, 边伟华, 唐华风, 李元哲, 王璞珺. 松辽盆地莺山断陷营城组凝灰熔岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1051-1060.
[4] 易定红, 刘应如, 李积永, 李红哲, 徐晓玲, 吴颜雄, 王爱萍, 马元琨, 涂加沙, 贾正良. 柴达木盆地南八仙地区渐新世沉积环境及储层物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 705-720.
[5] 朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[6] 王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[7] 仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤.

松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.

[8] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[9] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[10] 高彦杰, 甘军, 胡潜伟, 江汝锋, 汪紫菱, 葛翔, 沈传波. 琼东南盆地深水西区梅山组储层成岩-孔隙协同演化机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2014-2028.
[11] 李永刚.  长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[12] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[13] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443-1456.
[14] 丁恺, 赵福海, 高莲凤, 李丙喜, 付文钊, 高晨阳, 靳雪彬. 基于变分模态分解的营四段厚层砂砾岩地层细分层序[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1406-1418.
[15] 胡佳, 王丽丽, 王立贤, 韩昊天, 陶鹏, 唐华风.

基于岩浆汇聚区和上升通道特征的火山岩分布规律——以松辽盆地长岭断陷下白垩统营城组为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 429-446.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[2] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492 -497 .
[3] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 邵锐. 火山碎屑岩的储层物性--以松辽盆地营城组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 227 -236 .
[4] 潘殿琦,张祖培,潘殿彩,陈义民,徐 瑞. 人工冻土纵波波速与温度和含水率的关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 588 -591 .
[5] 付 哲,周云轩,刘殿伟,刘万崧. 基于特征的面向对象虚拟GIS数据模型设计与原型系统实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 647 -652 .
[6] 卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[7] 黄继国,黄国鑫,聂广正,魏海娟,吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[8] 孙才志,刘玉兰,杨 俊. 下辽河平原地下水生态水位与可持续开发调控研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 249 -254 .
[9] 舒萍,曲延明,王国军,丁日新,艾兴波,纪学雁,唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺. 松辽盆地火山岩储层裂缝地质特征与地球物理识别[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 726 -0733 .
[10] 单玄龙,刘青帝,任利军,赵玉婷. 松辽盆地三台地区下白垩统营城组珍珠岩地质特征与成因[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1146 -1151 .