塔西南叶城凹陷二叠系两套烃源岩特征及柯东1井油源分析

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603103

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 651-660.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603103

塔西南叶城凹陷二叠系两套烃源岩特征及柯东1井油源分析

杜治利^1,2, 曾昌民³, 邱海峻², 杨有星², 张亮³

1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
2. 中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心, 北京 100029;
3. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2015-10-02 出版日期:2016-05-26 发布日期:2016-05-26
作者简介:杜治利(1979-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气资源选区研究工作,E-mail:du.zhili@qq.com
基金资助:
国土资源部全国油气资源战略选区调查与评价项目（1211302108022）

Key Formations of the Permian Hydrocarbon Source Rocks and Oil-Source Correlation of well KD1 in Yecheng Depression of Southwestern Tarim Basin

Du Zhili^1,2, Zeng Changmin³, Qiu Haijun², Yang Youxing², Zhang Liang³

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Oil & Gas Survey, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100029, China;
3. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China

Received:2015-10-02 Online:2016-05-26 Published:2016-05-26
Supported by:
Supported by the Project of National Oil and Gas Resources Survey and Strategic Selections, Ministry of Land and Resources (1211302108022)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔里木盆地西南坳陷叶城凹陷以二叠系为主力烃源岩，前人多按单一的海相或湖相烃源岩笼统分析，未考虑二叠系烃源岩不同组段及其沉积环境和沉积相带的差异。本文通过对叶城凹陷二叠系开展野外地质调查，结合该区钻井资料，首次将烃源岩分析精细到组，结果显示，叶城小区和和田小区二叠系分别以棋盘组和普司格组上段为主力烃源岩，但两者在分布和地化指标上有较大差异。其中棋盘组以浅海陆棚相为主，分布于凹陷西部的和什拉甫-莫莫克地区，烃源岩平均厚度大于100 m，总有机碳质量分数平均1.06%，类型为Ⅱ型，处于高-过成熟阶段。普司格组上段以湖相为主，分布于凹陷东部的普萨-杜瓦地区，烃源岩平均厚度大于200 m，总有机碳质量分数平均0.97%，类型为Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型之间，处于生油高峰阶段。二叠系这两套烃源岩具有较好的生烃能力，相比之下普司格组上段湖相烃源岩生烃潜力明显好于棋盘组浅海陆棚相。通过正构烷烃碳同位素比值和生物标志化合物分析，普司格组上段烃源岩为柯东1井原油的油源。结合储盖条件综合分析，叶城凹陷以甫沙-克里阳地区为油气勘探最有利区。

关键词: 塔里木盆地, 叶城凹陷, 二叠系, 陆相烃源岩, 普司格组, 棋盘组

Abstract:

Permian is the main period for the accumulation of the hydrocarbon source rocks in the Yecheng depression of southwestern Tarim basin. Previous works hitherto have commonly treated simply the Permian oil-shales as a marine or lacustrine hydrocarbon source rocks, which have ignored an important fact that different formations of the Permian formed in different sedimentary environments, and show different sedimentary facies and have different oil and gas potentials. Based on the geological survey in Yecheng depression, combined with the drilling data, our results indicate that the key source units include Qipan and Pusige Formations. They are the main Permian source rocks in Yecheng (in the northwest) and Hetian (in the southeast) areas of the Yecheng depression. According to facies analysis and organic geochemical results, we interpreted that the Qipan Formation was deposited in a shallow marine shelf environment and distributed in Heshilafu-Momoke area of the northwestern Yecheng depression. The average thickness of source rock is more than 100 meters, the type Ⅱ organic matter have reached a high maturity evolution stage. In contrast, Pusige Formation was deposited in a lacustrine facies sedimentary environment and distributed in Pusha-Duwa area, the average thickness of source rock is more than 200 meters. It shows an average TOC content of 0.97% and type Ⅱ or Ⅲ organic matter which has reached the peak stage of hydrocarbon generation. Concerning the hydrocarbon potential of the two formations, Upper Pusige Formation is better than Qipan Formation. In order to trace the oil-source of a nearby commercial well KD1, we correlate the data sets of radiometric carbon isotope ratios and biomarkers of normal alkanes between the oil and different source rocks. Our results show that the oil trapped in the well KD1 comes from the Upper Pusige Formation source rocks. Combined with the comprehensive analysis of the petroleum system, we indicated that the most favorable exploration target in the region is the area of Fusha-Keliyang in the eastern Yecheng depression.

Key words: Tarim basin, Yecheng depression, Permian, shallow marine and lacustrine source rocks, Pusige Formation, Qipan Formation

中图分类号:

P618.13

杜治利, 曾昌民, 邱海峻, 杨有星, 张亮. 塔西南叶城凹陷二叠系两套烃源岩特征及柯东1井油源分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 651-660.

Du Zhili, Zeng Changmin, Qiu Haijun, Yang Youxing, Zhang Liang. Key Formations of the Permian Hydrocarbon Source Rocks and Oil-Source Correlation of well KD1 in Yecheng Depression of Southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3): 651-660.

参考文献

[1] 杜金虎, 王招明, 雷刚林, 等. 柯东1风险探井的突破及其战略意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2011, 16(2):1-12. Du Jinhu, Wang Zhaoming, Lei Ganglin, et al. A Discovery in Well Kedong-1 and Its Exploration Significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2011, 16(2):1-12.

[2] 何登发, 李德生, 何金有, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷和西南坳陷油气地质特征类比及勘探启示[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(2):201-218. He Dengfa, Li Desheng, He Jinyou, et al. Comparison in Petroleum Geology Between Kuqa Depression and Southwest Depression in Tarim Basin and Its Exploration Significance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):201-218.

[3] 张玮, 雷刚林, 师骏, 等. 塔西南坳陷甫沙构造带正反转构造及其石油地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(3):681-688. Zhang Wei, Lei Ganglin, Shi Jun, et al. Positive Inversion Structure in Fusha Structure Zone of Southwest Depression of Tarim Basin and Its Significance to Petroleum Geology[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(3):681-688.

[4] 杜治利, 梁瀚, 师骏, 等. 西昆仑山前柯东构造新生代构造变形及油气意义[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1):22-29. Du Zhili, Liang Han, Shi Jun, et al. Cenozoic Structural Deformation and Hydrocarbon Exploration of Kedong Structure in the Piedmont of Western Kunlun Mountain[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):22-29.

[5] 丁勇, 邱芳强, 李国政. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷油气源对比分析[J]. 新疆地质, 2000, 18(1):61-68. Ding Yong, Qiu Fangqiang, Li Guozheng. Correlation of Oil-Gas-Source Rock in the Southwest Depression of Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2000, 18(1):61-68.

[6] 肖中尧, 唐友军, 侯读杰, 等. 柯克亚凝析油气藏的油源研究[J].沉积学报, 2002, 20(3):716-720. Xiao Zhongyao, Tang Youjun, Hou Dujie, et al. Study on Oil Source of Kekeya Condensate Oil-Gas Pool[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(3):716-720.

[7] 唐勇, 崔炳富, 浦世照, 等. 塔里木西南地区含油气系统特征[J]. 新疆地质, 2002, 20(增刊):108-115. Tang Yong, Cui Bingfu, Pu Shizhao, et al. Characteristics and Appraisal of Oil, Gas-Bearing System in Southwestern Tarim[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2002, 20(Sup.):108-115.

[8] 侯读杰, 肖中尧, 唐友军, 等.柯克亚油气田混合来源天然气的地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(6):474-479. Hou Dujie, Xiao Zhongyao, Tang Youjun, et al. Geochemical Characterization of Mixing Natural Gas in Kekeya Field, Tarim Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2003, 14(6):474-479.

[9] 曾昌民, 张亮, 雷刚林, 等. 塔西南坳陷烃源岩生标特征对比及沉积环境指示意义[J]. 新疆地质, 2011, 29(3):319-324. Zeng Changmin, Zhang Liang, Lei Ganglin, et al. Biomarkers Characteristics of Source Rocks of South-West Tarim Depression and Its Signification for Sedimentary Environment[J]. Xinjiang Geolgogy, 2011, 29(3):319-324.

[10] 唐友军, 侯读杰, 徐佑德. 塔里木盆地柯克亚地区天然气和凝析油的地球化学特征与成因[J]. 海相油气地质,2007, 12(1):33-36. Tang Youjun, Hou Dujie, Xu Youde. The Geochemical Characteristics and Origin of Gas and Condensate Oil in Kokyar Gas Field, Tarim Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2007, 12(1):33-36.

[11] 郑涛, 徐耀辉, 王进. 塔西南坳陷二叠系烃源岩热演化及生烃史模拟[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013, 35(5):33-39. Zheng Tao, Xu Yaohui, Wang Jin. Simulation on Thermal Evolution and Hydrocarbon Generation History of Permian Source Rocks in Southwestern Depression of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013, 35(5):33-39.

[12] 刘得光, 伍致中, 李勇广, 等. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷烃源岩评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1997, 18(1):50-53. Liu Deguang, Wu Zhizhong, Li Yongguang, et al. Source Rock Evaluation in Southwestern Depression of Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1997, 18(1):50-53.

[13] 徐兴友, 张林晔, 陈致林, 等. 塔西南胜利探区和参1井天然气来源[J]. 特种油气藏, 2003, 11(3):47-50. Xu Xingyou, Zhang Linye, Chen Zhilin, et al. Gas Source of Well Hecan l in Shengli Exploration Area of Taxinan[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2003, 11(3):47-50.

[14] 李世臻, 康志宏, 邱海峻, 等. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷油气成藏模式[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3):387-398. Li Shizhen, Kang Zhihong, Qiu Haijun, et al. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Modes of the Southwest Depression in Tarim Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3):387-398.

[15] 胡健, 王铁冠, 陈建平, 等. 塔西南坳陷周缘原油地球化学特征与成因类型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10):1221-1233. Hu Jian, Wang Tieguan, Chen Jianping, et al. Geochemical Characteristics and Origin Patterns of Oils in Periphery of Southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(10):1221-1233.

[16] 新疆维吾尔自治区地质矿产局.新疆维吾尔自治区岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1999. Geology Minerals Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Lithostratigraphic Units of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press, 1999.

[17] 黄第藩, 李晋超, 张大江. 干酪根的类型及其分类参数的有效性、局限性和相关性[J]. 沉积学报, 1984, 2(3):18-35. Huang Difan, Li Jinchao, Zhang Dajiang. Kerogen Types and Study on Effectiveness, Limitation and Interrelation of Their Identification Parameters[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1984, 2(3):18-35.

[18] 张水昌, 梁狄刚, 张大江. 关于古生界烃源岩有机质丰度的评价标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(2):8-12. Zhang Shuichang, Liang Digang, Zhang Dajiang. Evaluation Criteria for Paleozoic Effective Hydrocarbon Source Rocks[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002, 29(2):8-12.

[19] Li Zilong,Chen Hanlin,Song Biao,et al. Temporal Evolu-tion of the Permian Large Igneous Province in Tarim Basin in Northwestern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011,42(5):917-927.

[20] Li Yinqi, Li Zilong, Sun Yali, et al. Platinum-Group Elements and Geochemical Characteristics of the Permian Continental Flood Basalts in the Tarim Basin, Northwest China:Implications for the Evolution of the Tarim Large Igneous Province[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 328(3):278-289.

[21] 李洪颜, 黄小龙, 李武显, 等. 塔西南其木干早二叠世玄武岩的喷发时代及地球化学特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(10):3353-3368. Li Hongyan,Huang Xiaolong,Li Wuxian, et al. Age and Geochemistry of the Early Permian Basalts from Qimugan in the Southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(10):3353-3368.

[22] 汤良杰,邱海峻,云露,等. 塔里木盆地多期改造-晚期定型复合构造与油气战略选区[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1):1-14. Tang Liangjie, Qiu Haijun, Yun Lu, et al. Poly-Phase Reform-Late-Stage Finalization Composite Tectonics and Strategic Area Selection of Oil and Gas Resources in Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(1):1-14.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

塔西南叶城凹陷二叠系两套烃源岩特征及柯东1井油源分析

Key Formations of the Permian Hydrocarbon Source Rocks and Oil-Source Correlation of well KD1 in Yecheng Depression of Southwestern Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	郭春涛, 刘亮, 倪玲梅, 史江涛, 田朋飞, 荆雪婷. 塔里木盆地米兰低凸起寒武系白云岩成因——来自米兰1井的指示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 57-69.
[2]	林波, 云露, 张旭, 肖重阳, 况安鹏, 徐学纯, 曹自成. 一种板内小尺度走滑断层平面分段研究方法——以塔里木盆地顺北5号断层中北段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1006-1018.
[3]	韩强, 云露, 蒋华山, 邵小明, 金仙梅. 塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系油气充注过程分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 645-658.
[4]	田兴旺, 罗冰, 孙奕婷, 刘冉, 李亚, 陈延贵, 周春林, 汪华, 李亚丁, 王尉, 王云龙, 杨岱林. 二叠系火山碎屑岩气藏天然气地球化学特征及气源分析——以四川盆地成都—简阳地区永探1井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 325-335.
[5]	陈秀艳, 王剑, 张立平, 马德波, 周波. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区石炭系东河砂岩段碳酸盐胶结物沉积特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 509-517.
[6]	徐进军, 李宁, 金强, 刘吉华, 楼达, 滕建成. 黄骅坳陷石炭-二叠系凝析油气地球化学特征及来源分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 644-652.
[7]	李汝斌. 吐哈盆地台南凹陷二叠系充填特征及其研究意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1518-1528.
[8]	杨庚, 陈竹新, 刘银河, 王晓波. 塔里木盆地巴楚隆起北缘吐木休克弧形基底卷入斜向滑移构造[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1209-1221.
[9]	鄢伟, 张光学, 樊太亮, 夏斌, 高志前, 张莉, 杨振, 强坤生. 塔里木盆地塔中—顺托果勒地区奥陶系良里塔格组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 621-636.
[10]	史冀忠, 卢进才, 魏建设, 牛亚卓, 韩小锋, 张宇轩. 内蒙古阿拉善右旗雅干地区二叠系埋汗哈达组硅质岩成因及其沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1711-1724.
[11]	罗少辉, 李九梅, 王辉. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡皮山北新1井白云质角砾岩地层时代厘定[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1405-1415.
[12]	郭春涛, 李如一, 陈树民. 塔里木盆地古城地区鹰山组白云岩稀土元素地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1121-1134.
[13]	李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[14]	李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[15]	陈斐然, 张颖, 徐祖新, 谭程, 周肖肖. 全球前寒武—寒武系含油气盆地石油地质特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 974-989.