吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 671-680.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603105

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

伦坡拉盆地渐新统丁青湖组油页岩特征及其地质意义

杜佰伟1, 谢尚克1, 董宇2, 彭清华1, 郑博1   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心, 成都 610081;
    2. 西藏地勘局第六地质大队, 拉萨 851400
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-11 出版日期:2016-05-26 发布日期:2016-05-26
  • 作者简介:杜佰伟(1976),男,高级工程师,长期从事青藏高原石油地质和非常规油气调查研究,E-mail:dbw88@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05004001-006);中国地质调查局地质矿产调查评价专项(12120115000301)

Characteristics of Oil Shale of Oligocene Dingqinghu Formation and Its Geological Significance, Lunpola Basin

Du Baiwei1, Xie Shangke1, Dong Yu2, Peng Qinghua1, Zheng Bo1   

  1. 1. Chengdu Center of China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China;
    2. No. 6 Geological Brigade of the Geological Prospecting Bureau of Tibet, Lhasa 851400, China
  • Received:2015-10-11 Online:2016-05-26 Published:2016-05-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project(2011ZX05004001-006) and the Special Geological Survey Evaluation of China Geological Survey(12120115000301)

摘要:

伦坡拉盆地丁青湖组油页岩呈北西-南东向断续分布,长约50 km,油页岩有18~22层,薄者0.10 m,厚者8.81 m,一般厚0.70~2.00 m。工业分析数据表明,油页岩属于高灰分、中低含油率、低发热量型。油页岩有机碳质量分数为2.40%~20.23%,平均值7.38%,丰度较高。干酪根镜检显示油页岩有机质类型为腐泥型(Ⅰ型),镜质体反射率(Ro)值为0.43%~0.71%,平均值为0.52%,说明油页岩有机质处于未成熟-低成熟阶段。油页岩样品检测出丰富的正构烷烃、类异戊二烯烷烃、萜烷化合物和甾烷化合物。饱和烃色谱/质谱特征表明伦坡拉油页岩有机母质来源以水生浮游植物为主。通过生物标志物特征及野外地质观察,揭示了油页岩形成于一定盐度的缺氧还原半深湖-深湖环境。湖盆内各种水生浮游植物、藻类等为油页岩的形成提供了主要的有机母质来源,稳定的构造条件和缺氧的环境有利于有机质的堆积和保存。

关键词: 油页岩, 生物标志化合物, 地质意义, 伦坡拉盆地, 丁青湖组

Abstract:

Oil shale of Oligocene Dingqinghu Formation orientating in NW-SE with about 50 km in length is discontinuously distributed. There are 18 to 22 oil shale layers ranging from 0.70 m to 2.00 m in thickness, of which the thinnest layer is 0.10 m and the thickest layer is 8.81 m. The results of industrial analysis show that Lunpola oil shale is a kind of high content of ash, medium to low oil yield and low calorific value. Organic carbon content of oil shale ranges from 2.40% to 20.23% with an average of 7.38%, indicating a relatively high abundance. Microscopic observations indicate that organic matter of oil shale is a kind of sapropel type kerogen. Vitrinite reflectance of kerogen range from 0.43% to 0.71% with an average of 0.52%, indicating that organic matter of oil shale underwent a stage of immature to low maturation. Abundant biomarkers, including n-alkanes, isoprenoid, terpanes and steranes from oil shale have been detected by GC and GC-MS. GC-MS characteristics of saturated hydrocarbon show that organic matter is characterized by aquatic phytoplankton. The characteristics of biomarkers and field observation reveal that oil shale forms in low-salinity anoxic semideep-deep lake environment. Phytoplankton and algae in the lake provide main origin of organic matters for oil shale formation, and stable structure and anoxic environment are beneficial for the conservation of organic matters.

Key words: oil shale, biomarkers, geological significance, Lunpola basin, Dingqinghu Formation

中图分类号: 

  • P618.12

[1] 刘招君,柳蓉.中国油页岩特征及开发利用前景分析[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):315-323. Liu Zhaojun, Liu Rong. Oil Shale Character and Exploitation & Utilization Prospect[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005,12(3):315-323.

[2] 刘招君,孟庆涛,柳蓉.中国陆相油页岩特征及成因类型[J].古地理学报,2009,11(1):105-114. Liu Zhaojun,Meng Qingtao,Liu Rong. Characteristics and Genetic Types of Continental Oil Shales in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2009,11(1):105-114.

[3] 刘招君,董清水,叶松青,等.中国油页岩资源现状[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(6):871-877. Liu Zhaojun, Dong Qingshui, Ye Songqing,et al.The Situation of Oil Shale Resource in China[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2006,36(6):871-877.

[4] 顾树松, 徐旺, 薛超,等,中国石油志:青藏油气区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1990. Gu Shusong, Xu Wang, Xue Chao, et al. Petroleum Geology of China:Qinghai-Tibet[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1990.

[5] 王剑,丁俊,王成善,等.青藏高原油气资源战略选区调查与评价[M].北京:地质出版社,2009. Wang Jian, Ding Jun, Wang Chengshan,et al. Investigation and Evaluation of Petroleum Resources Strategic Area Selection in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2009.

[6] 邓涛,王世琪,颉光普,等.藏北伦坡拉盆地丁青湖组哺乳动物化石对时代和古高度的指示[J].科学通报,2011,56(34):2873-2880. Deng Tao,Wang Shiqi,Xie Guangpu, et al.Amammalian Fossil from the Dingqinghu Formation in the Lunpola Basin,Northern Tibet,and Its Relevance to Age and Palp-Altimetry[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2011,56(34):2873-2880.

[7] 全国矿产储量委员会办公室.矿产工业要求参考手册[M].北京:地质出版社,1987:312-315. National Mineral Reserve Assessment Centre.Reference Manual for Mineral and Resources Industry[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1987:312-315.

[8] 张健,刘招君,杜江峰,等.黑龙江省依兰盆地古近系达连河组油页岩沉积特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(6):933-937. Zhang Jian, Liu Zhaojun, Du Jiangfeng, et al.Sedimentary Characteristics of the Oil Shale in the Paleogene Dalianhe Formation in the Yilan Basin,Heilongjiang Province[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2006,36(6):933-937.

[9] 李忠雄,何江林,熊兴国,等.藏北羌塘盆地上侏罗-下白垩统胜利河油页岩特征及其形成环境[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(2):264-272. Li Zhongxiong, He Jianglin, Xiong Xingguo, et al. The Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous Shenglihe Oil Shales and Their Formation in the Qiangtang Basin, Northern Xizang[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2010,40(2):264-272.

[10] 赵隆业,陈基娘,王天顺.关于中国油页岩的工业成因分类[J].煤田地质与勘探,1991,19(5):2-6. Zhao Longye, Chen Jiniang, Wang Tianshun. Industrial-Original Classification of Chinese Oil Shales[J].Coal Geology and Exploration,1991, 19(5):2-6.

[11] 董清水,王立贤,于文斌,等.油页岩资源评价关键参数及其求取方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(6):899-903. Dong Qingshui, Wang Lixian, Yu Wenbin, et al. The Key Parameters of Oil Shale Resource Appraisement and Its Evaluating Methods[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2006,36(6):899-903.

[12] 武汉地质学院煤田教研室.煤田地质学:上册[M].北京:地质出版社,1982. Coalfield Teaching and Research Section of Wuhan Geographic Institute. Coal Geology:Upper Volume[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1982.

[13] 气相色谱-质谱法测定沉积物和原油中生物标志物:GB/T 18606-2001[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2001. The Standard Test Method for Biomarker in Sediment and Crude Oil by GC-MS:GB/T 18606-2001[S].Beijing:China Standard Press, 2001.

[14] 傅家漠,盛国英,许家友,等.应用生物标志化合物参数判识古沉积环境[J].地球化学,1991(l):l-12. Fu Jiamo, Sheng Guoying, Xu Jiayou,et al. Application of Biomarker Compounds in Assessment of Faleoen-vironments of Chinese Terrestrial Sediments[J]. Geochimica, 1991(1):1-12.

[15] Powell T, Mckirdy D M. Relationship Between Ratio of Pristance to Phytane, Crude Oil Composition and Geological Environments in Australia[J].Nature,1973,243(12):37-39.

[16] 张立平,黄第藩, 廖志勤. 伽马蜡烷:水体分层的地球化学标志[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(1):136-140. Zhang Liping,Huang Difan,Liao Zhiqin.Gammacerane Geochemical Indicator of Water Column Stratification[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1999, 17(1):136-140.

[17] 段毅,吴保祥,张辉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田原油地球化学特征及成因[J].地质学报, 2006,80(2):301-310. Duan Yi, Wu Baoxiang, Zhang Hui,et al.Geochemistry and Genesis of Crude Oils of the Xifeng Oilfield in the Ordos Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2006,80(2):301-310.

[18] 谢尚克,杜佰伟,王剑,等.西藏伦坡拉盆地丁青湖组油页岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2014,33(3):503-510. Xie Shangke,Du Baiwei,Wang Jian,et al.Geochemical Characteristics of Oil Shale Member of Dingqinghu Formation in Lunpola Basin of Tibet and Their Geological Implications[J].Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2014,33(3):503-510.

[19] 张大江,黄第藩,李晋超.抚顺、茂名油页岩和劣质煤中生物标记烃及其地化意义的初步探究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1985,4(2):1-18. Zhang Dajiang,Huang Difan,Li Jinchao.A Preliminary Study of Biomarkers in Fushun and Moming Oil Shales and Faulty Coals and Their Geochemical Significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oil Field Development in Daqing, 1985,4(2):1-18.

[20] 刘招君,柳蓉,董清水,等.抚顺盆地始新统计军屯组油页岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].岩石学报,2009,25(10):2340-2350. Liu Zhaojun, Liu Rong, Dong Qingshui,et al. Geochemical Characteristics of Oil Shale of Eocene Jijuntun Formation and Its Geological Significance, Fushun Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2009,25(10):2340-2350.

[1] 杨立红, 刘莹, 罗弋卜, 曾皓, 苏建政, 李迎超. 油页岩原位开采中高温腐蚀下的选材[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1091-1102.
[2] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[3] 惠瑞瑞, 刘妍, 张志升, 张治东, 李斌, 郭爱华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9段原油地球化学特征与油源对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1468-1481.
[4] 张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[5] 赵慧博, 冯彩霞, 刘燊, 刘芳晓. 陕西省紫阳县下寒武统黑色岩系有机地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1016-1032.
[6] 高家俊, 孟庆涛, 曾文人, 李金国, 李丽, 康嘉楠, . 依兰盆地始新统达连河组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 60-72.
[7] 陈 静 . 东昆仑驼路沟钴(金)矿床千枚岩碎屑锆石年代学、Lu-Hf同位素特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1558-1574.
[8] 陈晨, 张颖, 朱江, 朱颖, 翟梁皓, 沈国军, 潘栋彬. 油页岩原位开采区注浆封闭浆液优化及其防渗效果实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 815-824.
[9] 李成博, 宁传奇, 钟长林, 任建超, 徐人吁, 殷淑芹. 中国油页岩矿勘查控制程度探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 13-21.
[10] 海连富, 王磊, 马治军, 徐清海, 宋扬, 白金鹤. 宁夏固原炭山地区中侏罗统延安组油页岩特征及其沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 747-756.
[11] 刘招君, 柳蓉, 孙平昌, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 中国典型盆地油页岩特征及赋存规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 313-325.
[12] 王嗣敏, 臧东升, 王熙琼, 李杰, 韩嵩, 李建中. 辽西建昌盆地油页岩发育特征及沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 326-340.
[13] 孟庆涛, 李金国, 刘招君, 胡菲, 徐川. 茂名盆地羊角含矿区始新统油柑窝组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 356-367.
[14] 贾建亮, 刘招君, 孟庆涛, 孙平昌, 徐进军, 柳蓉, 白悦悦. 中国陆相油页岩含油率与总有机碳的响应机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 368-377.
[15] 宋宇, 刘招君, Achim Bechtel, 徐银波, 孟庆涛, 孙平昌, 朱凯. 老黑山盆地下白垩统穆棱组油页岩与煤含油率控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 378-391.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .