松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201701107

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 74-83.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201701107

松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义

高翔^1,2, 刘志宏¹, 聂志阳², 姚勇², 贾卧², 王超¹, 宋健¹

1. 吉林大学地球科学学院, 长春 130061;
2. 大庆油田勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江大庆 163712

收稿日期:2016-03-06 出版日期:2017-01-26 发布日期:2017-01-26
通讯作者: 刘志宏(1962-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事造山带演化与盆地构造研究,E-mail:liuzhih@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:liuzhih@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:高翔(1987-),男,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事盆地构造与石油地质方面的研究,E-mail:522094744@qq.com
基金资助:
中国地质调查局工作项目（1212011085484）；国家自然科学基金项目（41072150）

Determination of Timing and Its Geological Significance of Daqing Placanticline in Songliao Basin

Gao Xiang^1,2, Liu Zhihong¹, Nie Zhiyang², Yao Yong², Jia Wo², Wang Chao¹, Song Jian¹

1. Collage of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China;
2. Exploration and Development Institute, Daqing Oil Company, Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2016-03-06 Online:2017-01-26 Published:2017-01-26
Supported by:
Supported by the Project of China Geological Survey(1212011085484); Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41072150)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大庆长垣位于松辽盆地北部一级构造单元中央坳陷区内,是松辽盆地中隆升幅度最高、规模最大的背斜,由于其含有十分丰富的油气资源,长期以来备受瞩目,但其形成时间一直存在很大争议。通过对大庆长垣二维、三维地震剖面解析,应用生长地层理论,厘定大庆长垣的形成时间,并探讨其地质意义。研究发现：大庆长垣呈近NNE走向,为一个与近NWWSEE向挤压作用有关的大型背斜。大庆长垣背斜北部嫩江组-明水组（T₁-T₀₂）、中部嫩江组四段-明水组（T₀₅-T₀₂）、南部四方台组-明水组（T₀₃-T₀₂）自构造高部位向低部位厚度逐渐增大,为与大庆长垣背斜隆升相伴沉积的一套生长地层；下伏地层在大庆长垣背斜顶部、翼部及两侧向斜部位厚度基本相等,具有前生长地层特征。大庆长垣背斜自嫩江组沉积初期受到近NWWSEE向挤压作用开始隆升,一直持续到明水组沉积末期,但大庆长垣背斜不同构造部位的隆升时间、隆升速率及隆升高度都有所不同。松辽盆地晚白垩世的挤压作用可能与太平洋板块的俯冲作用有关,对油气的运移和聚集成藏有很大的影响。

关键词: 生长地层, 形成时间, 构造演化, 地质意义, 大庆长垣, 松辽盆地

Abstract: The Daqing placanticline is the highest and largest anticline in the Songliao basin, which has been highly concerned for a long time because of its abundant oil-gas resources and the controversy for its formation time. On the basis of the detailed geological interpretation of 3D and 2D seismic profile in Daqing placanticline, with application of growth strata theory the timing and its geological significance of Daqing placanticline can be determinate. The study indicates that the Daqing placanticline is a large NNE-trending anticline due to a NWW-SEE direction compression. The growth strata contain Nenjiang-Mingshui Formation in the northern Daqing placanticline, Member 4 of Nenjiang Formation-Mingshui Formation in the middle of Daqing placanticline and Sifangtai-Mingshui Formation in southern Daqing placanticline. Based on seismic interpretations, the thickness of growth strata gradually increases from high position to low position of the structure and have characteristic wedge shaped sedimentation; The thickness of pre-growth strata are equal from high position to low position of the structure. The stage of nearly NWW-SEE compression in Songliao basin begun from the deposition of the Nenjiang Formation and ended to the deposition of the Mingshui Formation, leading to form the Daqing placanticline. The different part of anticline of Daqing placanticline has different timings, heights and rates. The stage of compression during Late Cretaceous in Songliao basin may be related to the subduction of Pacific plate. It also has significant influence for the migration and reservoir of hydrocarbon in Songliao basin.

Key words: growth strata, timing, structural evolution, geological significance, Daqing placanticline, Songliao basin

中图分类号:

P544.4

高翔, 刘志宏, 聂志阳, 姚勇, 贾卧, 王超, 宋健. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.

Gao Xiang, Liu Zhihong, Nie Zhiyang, Yao Yong, Jia Wo, Wang Chao, Song Jian. Determination of Timing and Its Geological Significance of Daqing Placanticline in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.

参考文献

[1] 陈昭年, 陈发景. 松辽盆地反转构造运动学特征[J]. 现代地质, 1996, 10(3):390-396. Chen Zhaonian, Chen Fajing. Deep Kinematics Characteristics of Inversion Structure in Songliao Basin[J]. Geoscience, 1996, 10(3):390-396.
[2] 侯贵廷, 冯大晨, 王文明, 等. 松辽盆地的反转构造作用及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(1):49-53. Hou Guiting, Feng Dacheng, Wang Wenming, et al. Reverse Structures and Their Impacts on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004, 25(1):49-53.
[3] 胡望水, 吕炳全, 张文军, 等. 松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2005, 40(1):16-31. Hu Wangshui, Lü Bingquan, Zhang Wenjun, et al.An Approach to Tectonic Evolution and Dynamics of the Songliao Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2005, 40(1):16-31.
[4] 陈晓, 李忠权, 陈均亮, 等. 松辽盆地反转期的界定[J]. 地质通报, 2010, 25(2/3):305-311. Chen Xiao, Li Zhongquan, Chen Junliang, et al. Determination of the Reverse Period of Songliao Basin, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010, 29(2/3):305-311.
[5] 艾欣,胡明毅,潘勇利,等.松辽盆地北部临江南地区扶余油层沉积相研究[J].世界地质,2016,35(1):163-172. Ai Xin,Hu Mingyi,Pan Yongli,et al.Sedimentary Facies of Fuyu Oil Layer in Southern Linjiang Area,Northern Songliao Basin[J].Global Geology,2016,35(1):163-172.
[6] 高瑞祺, 蔡希源. 松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1997:12-46. Gao Ruiqi, Cai Xiyuan. The Condition and Distribution of Oil and Gas Fields in Songliao Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1997:12-46.
[7] 葛荣峰, 张庆龙, 徐士银, 等. 松辽盆地长岭断陷构造演化及其动力学背景[J]. 地质学刊, 2009, 33(4):346-358. Ge Rongfeng, Zhang Qinglong, Xu Shiyin, et al. Structure Evolution and Its Kinetic Setting of Changling Fault Depression in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal Geology, 2009, 33(4):346-358.
[8] 刘志宏, 梅梅, 柳行军, 等. 海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷伸展断层转折褶皱作用及其对沉积作用的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(5):1330-1337. Liu Zhihong, Mei Mei, Liu Hangjun, et al.Extensional Fault-Bend Folding and Its Constrains on the Sedimentation of Beier Sag in Hailar Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(5):1330-1337.
[9] 高军义, 刘志宏, 吴相梅, 等. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊构造变形对沉降中心迁移的控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1):15-24. Gao Junyi, Liu Zhihong, Wu Xiangmei, et al. Structural Deformation Control over the Subsidence Center Migration of Wuerxun Sag in Hailar Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(1):15-24.
[10] Medwedeff D. Growth Fault-Bend Folding at South-east Lost Hills, San Joaquin Valley, California[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73:54-67.
[11] Suppe J. Geometry and Kinematics of Fault-Bend Fol-ding[J]. American Journal of Science,1983, 283:684-721.
[12] Suppe J, Medwedeff D A. Geometry and Kinematics of Fault-Propagation Folding[J]. Eclogae Geological Helvetiae,1990, 83(3):409-454.
[13] Suppe J, Chou G T, Hook S C. Rate of Folding and Faulting Determined from Growth Strata[C]//McClay K R. Thrust Tectonics. New York:Champman & Hill, 1992:105-121.
[14] Suppe J, Sabat F, Munos J A, et al. Bed-by-Bed Fold Growth by Kink-Band Migration, Sant Llorenc de Morunys, Eastern Pyrenees[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 1997, 19:443-461.
[15] Mitra S. Fault-Propagation Folds:Geometry, Kine-matic Evolution, and Hydrocarbon Traps[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(6):921-945.
[16] Shaw J H, Kook S C, Suppe J. Structural Trend Analysis by Axial Surface Mapping[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(5):700-721.
[17] Shaw J H, Suppe J. Earthquake Hazards of Active Blind-Thrust Fault Sunder the Central Los Angeles Basin, California[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1996, 101(4):8623-8642.
[18] 刘志宏, 卢华复, 贾承造, 等. 库车再生前陆逆冲带造山运动时间、断层滑移速率的厘定及其意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2000, 27(1):12-15. Liu Zhihong, Lu Huafu, Jia Chengzao, et al. Orogeny Timing and Fault-Slip Rate and Their Significance to the Rejuvenated Foreland Thrusts Belt of Kuche[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2000, 27(1):12-15.
[19] 刘胜, 汪新, 伍秀芳, 等. 塔西南山前晚新生代构造生长地层与变形时代[J]. 石油学报, 2004, 25(5):24-28. Liu Sheng, Wang Xin, Wu Xiufang, et al. Growth Strata and the Deformation Time of the Late Cenozoic Along Front Belts of Pamir, Western Kunlun, Southwest Tianshan in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2004, 25(5):24-28.
[20] 郭召杰, 方世虎, 张锐, 等. 生长地层及其在判断天山北缘前陆冲断褶皱带形成时间上的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(4):475-481. Guo Zhaojie, Fang Shihu, Zhang Rui, et al.Growth Strata and Their Application in Timing Deformation of Foreland Thrust-Fold Belts in the North Margin of Tianshan[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2006, 27(4):475-481.
[21] 郭卫星, 漆家福. 同沉积褶皱生长地层中沉积与构造关系[J]. 现代地质, 2008, 22(4):520-524. Guo Weixing, Qi Jiafu. Relationship of Sedimentation and Tectonism in Growth Strata Developed by Growth Folding[J]. Geoscience, 2008, 22(4):520-524.
[22] 刘志峰, 梁建设, 徐建永, 等. 生长地层分析法在研究反转构造形成时间中的应用:以南海北部湾盆地雷东凹陷为例[J]. 海洋石油, 2013,33(1):23-28. Liu Zhifeng, Liang Jianshe, Xu Jianyong, et al.Application of Growth Stratum Analyzing Method in Study the Formation Time of Reserve Structure:An Example of Leidong Sag in Beibuwan Basin[J]. Offshore Oil, 2013,33(1):23-28.
[23] 吕明, 汤良杰, 岳勇. 塔里木盆地西南部麦盖提斜坡构造演化过程的记录:生长地层及生长不整合[J]. 地质论评, 2014, 60(1):91-101. Lü Ming, Tang Liangjie, Yue Yong.Records of Tectonic Evolution in Maigaiti Slope Southwestern Tarim Basin:Growth Strata and Growth Unconformity[J]. Geological Review, 2014, 60(1):91-101.
[24] 刘志宏, 柳行军, 王芃, 等. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷挤压构造的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(4):138-146. Liu Zhihong, Liu Hangjun, Wang Peng, et al. Discovery of Compressional Structure in Wuerxun-Beier Sag in Hailar Basin of Northeastern China and Its Geological Significance[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(4):138-146.
[25] 何登发, 杨庚, 管树巍, 等. 前陆盆地构造建模的原理与基本方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(3):7-14. He Dengfa, Yang Geng, Guan Shuwei, et al. Principles and Methodology of Structural Modeling in Foreland Basins[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(3):7-14.
[26] 王卓卓, 施立志, 张永生, 等. 大庆长垣扶余油层油气成藏条件及主控因素研究[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(2):291-297. Wang Zhuozhuo, Shi Lizhi, Zhang Yongsheng, et al. Study on Hydrocarbon Reservoir Forming Conditions and Main Controlling Factors of Fuyu Oil Layer in Daqing Placanticline[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45(2):291-297.
[27] 李树青, 李志军. 西太平洋板块俯冲及松辽盆地晚期油气成藏[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2009, 28(3):6-9. Li Shuqing, Li Zhijun.Underthrust of West Pacific and Late Hydrocarbon Reservoir Forming in Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2009, 28(3):6-9.
[28] 舒良树, 慕玉福, 王伯长. 松辽盆地含油气地层及其构造特征[J]. 地层学杂志, 2003, 27(4):340-347. Shu Liangshu, Mu Yufu, Wang Bochang. The Oil-Gas-Bearing Strata and the Structural Features in the Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2003, 27(4):340-347.
[29] 马中振, 庞雄奇, 吴河勇, 等. 用生烃潜力法研究松辽盆地北部中浅层烃源岩资源潜力[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 33(4):27-32. Ma Zhongzhen,Pang Xiongqi, Wu Heyong, et al. Research on Resource Potential of Middle-Shallow Source Rocks of the Northern Part of Songliao Basin with Hydrocarbon-Generation Potential Method[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2009, 33(4):27-32.
[30] 万桂梅, 汤良杰, 金文正,等. 库车坳陷西部构造圈闭形成期与烃源岩生烃期匹配关系探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(2):187-196. Wan Guimei, Tang Liangjie, Jin Wenzheng, et al. Control of Salt-Related Tectonics on Oil and Gas Accumulation in the Western Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 28(2):187-196.
[31] 刘志宏, 卢华复, 贾承造, 等. 库车再生前陆盆地的构造与油气[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(4):297-303. Liu Zhihong, Lu Huafu, Jia Chengzao, et al. Structures and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Kuqa Rejuvenated Foreland Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2001, 22(4):297-303.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义

Determination of Timing and Its Geological Significance of Daqing Placanticline in Songliao Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微. 基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法：以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[2]	孙宁辰, 周建波, 李功宇, 辛中华, 陈卓, 王红燕. 东北中生代盆地演化及其对古太平洋板块俯冲的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 66-88.
[3]	冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[4]	季金礁, 边伟华, 唐华风, 李元哲, 王璞珺. 松辽盆地莺山断陷营城组凝灰熔岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1051-1060.
[5]	朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[6]	王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[7]	仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤. 松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.
[8]	高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[9]	张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[10]	李永刚. 长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[11]	王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[12]	吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443-1456.
[13]	丁恺, 赵福海, 高莲凤, 李丙喜, 付文钊, 高晨阳, 靳雪彬. 基于变分模态分解的营四段厚层砂砾岩地层细分层序[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1406-1418.
[14]	胡佳, 王丽丽, 王立贤, 韩昊天, 陶鹏, 唐华风. 基于岩浆汇聚区和上升通道特征的火山岩分布规律——以松辽盆地长岭断陷下白垩统营城组为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 429-446.
[15]	王琦, 孙永河, 付晓飞, 张万福, 李熹微, 王有功, 彭贤锋. 冀中坳陷南部中—新生代构造转换及其油气地质意义 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 447-460.