吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 265-278.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201701306
姜艳娇1, 孙建孟1, 高建申1, 邵维志2, 迟秀荣2, 柴细元2
JiangYanjiao1, Sun Jianmeng1, Gao Jianshen1, Shao Weizhi2, Chi Xiurong2, Chai Xiyuan2
摘要: 泥浆滤液侵入渗透性地层会改变井周地层流体的原始分布状态,使井周地层电阻率发生变化、储集层电测井响应失真。本文基于油水两相渗流理论和水对流扩散理论,应用数值模拟方法构建地层模型,研究低渗储层泥浆侵入过程中井周地层矿化度、含水饱和度、电阻率变化特征及井周油藏分布特征。对不同渗透率地层泥浆侵入的数值模拟结果表明:在低渗透储层,相同侵入时间内,随着地层渗透率的增加,泥浆侵入深度增加,且同一侵入深度的含油饱和度减小;随着侵入时间的增加,井周地层水矿化度、含水饱和度和地层电阻率的侵入剖面前缘均发生明显的变化。结合3口井的泥浆侵入数值模拟分析,发现阵列感应测井响应特征及其电阻率的幅度差异受泥浆侵入时间和侵入深度影响。不同流体性质层段的井周油藏动态演化规律模拟结果表明,井周油藏的变化情况与储层流体性质有明显关系。利用实例井侵入模拟结果与阵列感应测井响应的相关性,构建了侵入深度的计算公式;根据侵入阶跃剖面,利用几何因子理论构建了原始地层电阻率计算公式,用以辅助储层电阻率校正。正确认识井周地层泥浆侵入特征及井周油藏的分布情况有助于提高阵列感应测井评价储层的准确性。
中图分类号:
| [1] 张松扬, 陈玉魁. 钻井液侵入机理特征及影响因素研究[J]. 勘探地球物理进展,2002,25(6):28-31. Zhang Songyang, Chen Yukui. Reponses to Drilling-Fluid[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2002, 25(6):28-31. [2] 黄龙, 鲍志东, 张文瑞, 等. 淡水泥浆侵入引起的低阻油气层实例分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(2):14-18. Huang Long, Bao Zhidong, Zhang Wenrui, et al. Case Study on Low Resistivity Oil &Gas Zone Caused by Fresh Water Mud Invasion[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(2):14-18. [3] 刘尊年, 孙建孟, 迟秀荣, 等. 泥浆侵入研究现状分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(6):2594-2599. Liu Zunnian, Sun Jianmeng, Chi Xiurong, et al. Analysis of Research Present Situation of Mud Invasion[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(6):2594-2599. [4] 陈福煊, 孙嘉戌. 泥浆滤液侵入孔隙地层径向导电特性的模拟实验[J]. 地球物理学报, 1996, 39(增刊1):371-378. Chen Fuxuan, Sun Jiaxu. Simulation Test of Radial Electric Conductivity During the Mud Filtrate Invading Porous Formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1996, 39(Sup.1):371-378. [5] 张建华, 胡启, 刘振华. 钻井泥浆滤液侵入储集层的理论计算模型[J]. 石油学报, 1994, 15(4):73-78. Zhang Jianhua, Hu Qi, Liu Zhenhua. A Theoretical Model for Mud-Filtrate Invasion in Reservoir Formations During Drilling[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1994, 15(4):73-78. [6] Mark A P, Wilson C C, Mohan M, et al. Multiple Factors that Influence Wireline Formation Tester Pressure Measurements and Fluid Contacts Estimates[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2001:1-16. [7] Won S, Bilgesu H I, Ameri S. Investigation of Mud-Filtrate Using Computational Fluid Dynamics[C]//SPE Eastern Regional/AAPG Eastern Section Joint Meeting. Pittsburgh:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008:1-9. [8] 徐文远. 泥浆侵入数值模拟及校正方法研究[D]. 武汉:长江大学, 2012. Xu Wenyuan. A Study Based on Numerical Simulation for Resistivity Correction in Mud-Invasion Reservoir[D]. Wuhan:Yangtze University,2012. [9] Mayank M, Carlos T V, Jesús M S, et al. Influence of Petrophysical and Fluid Properties on Apply-Induction Measurements Acquired in the Presence of Oil-Base Mud-Filtrate Invasion[C]//SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium.[S. l.]:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, 2007:1-16. [10] 常文会, 潘和平, 周峰. 泥浆侵入二维数值模拟[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2010,35(4):674-680. Chang Wenhui, Pan Heping, Zhou Feng. Two-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Mud Invasion[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2010,35(4):674-680. [11] Wu J, Carlos T V, Kamy S, et al. Numerical Simu-lation of Mud-Filtrate Invasion in Deviated Wells[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2004, 7(2):143-154. [12] 杨震, 李志强, 邓少贵, 等. 大斜度井钻井液侵入数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(3):55-59. Yang Zhen, Li Zhiqiang, Deng Shaogui, et al. Numerical Simulation of Drilling Fluid Invasion in Highly Deviated Wells[J]. Joumal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Sciences), 2008, 32(3):55-59. [13] 邓少贵, 李志强, 范宜仁, 等. 斜井泥浆侵入仿真及其阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(4):994-1000. Deng Shaogui, Li Zhiqiang, Fan Yiren, et al. Numerical Simulation of Mud Invasion and Array Laterolog Response in Deviaed Wells[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(4):994-1000. [14] Dewan J T, Martin E. Mudcake Buildup and Invasion in Low Permeability Formations:Application to Permeability Determination by Measurement While Drilling[C]//SPWLA 34th Annual Logging Symposium. Calgary:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, 1993:1-24. [15] 范宜仁, 胡云云, 李虎, 等.泥饼动态生长于泥浆侵入数值模拟[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37(5):466-471. Fan Yiren, Hu Yunyun, Li Hu, et al. Numerical Simulation of Mud-Cake Dynamic Formation and Reservoir Mud Filtrate Invasion[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(5):466-471. [16] Ling K, Shen Z, He J, et al. A Comprehensive App-roach to Estimate Invasion Radius of Mud Filtrate to Evaluate Formation Damage Caused by Overbalanced Drilling[C]//SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control. Lafayette:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014:1-18. [17] Tobola D P, Holditch S A. Determination of Reser-voir Permeability from Repeated Induction Logging[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1991, 6(1):20-26. [18] 邓少贵, 范宜仁, 谢关宝, 等. 泥浆侵入地层双感应测井曲线正负差异特性分析[J]. 测井技术, 2004, 28(6):496-498. Deng Shaogui,Fan Yiren, Xie Guanbao, et al. The Influential Factors on Electrolog Response of Formation with Mud Filtration Invasion[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2004, 28(6):496-498. [19] 范文同, 章成广, 周红涛, 等. 塔河油田电阻率泥浆侵入影响分析与校正[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009, 31(4):86-90. Fan Wentong, Zhang Chengguang, Zhou Hongtao, et al. The Analysis and Correction for Effect of Mud Invasion on Resistivity in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009, 31(4):86-90. [20] 任好, 章成广, 刘晓梅. 泥浆侵入对阵列感应电阻率测井影响的数值模拟与校正[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2006, 28(3):82-84. Ren Hao, Zhang Chengguang, Liu Xiaomei. Numerical Simulation and Correction of Influence of Array Induction Resistivity Logging in Mud Invaded Reservoirs[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2006, 28(3):82-84. [21] 韩大匡. 油藏数值模拟基础[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1993:1-325. Han Dakuang. Reservoir Numerical Simulation[M]. Beijing:Publishing House of Oil Industry, 1993:1-325. [22] Zhang J, Hu Q, Liu Z. Estimation of True Forma-tion Resistivity and Water Saturation with a Time-Lapse Induction Logging Method[J]. The Log Analyst, 1999, 40(2):138-148. [23] 张剑波,李谢清,石阳,等. 油藏数值模拟中地质模型的建模流程与方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3):860-868. Zhang Jianbo,Li Xieqing, Shi Yang, et al. Processes and Technology of Three-Dimensional Geological Modeling System in Numerical Reservoir Simulation[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(3):860-868. [24] 张建华, 欧阳健. 泥浆侵入储层电阻率测井动态反演多解性研究[J]. 测井技术, 2000, 24(2):102-107. Zhang Jianhua, Ouyang Jian. Study of Multi-Solution Characters for Inversion of Dynamic Resistivity Logging Responses to Oil/Gas Formation Invaded by Mud-Filtrate[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2000, 24(2):102-107. [25] 朱留芳, 沈建国. 测井曲线几何因子理论[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37(6):624-628. Zhu Liufang, Shen Jianguo. The Geometric Factor Theory for Logging Curves[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(6):624-628. |
| [1] | 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936. |
| [2] | 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025. |
| [3] | 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660. |
| [4] | 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385. |
| [5] | 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618. |
| [6] | 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892. |
| [7] | 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942. |
| [8] | 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞. 微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400. |
| [9] | 刁国君, 何昕. 地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549. |
| [10] | 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327. |
| [11] | 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124. |
| [12] | 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304. |
| [13] | 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431. |
| [14] | 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002. |
| [15] | 韩长玉, 赵浩汀. 路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580. |
|