基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170252

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解决构造识别中多个断层不能同时识别倾向的问题，提出了利用断裂构造重力异常水平导数的分布特征实现的倾向成像技术，即断裂水平导数变化率较小的一侧指示断裂的倾向；由此可直接标识出断裂的特征，避免了以往该类方法复杂的运算。将这种技术应用到松辽盆地的实测重力异常的处理中，获得了松辽盆地的构造特征。松辽盆地东西两侧具有明显的重力异常差异，但已有的电法、地震资料难以揭示这种差异的原因。笔者以地震数据为约束，利用重力数据进行松辽盆地地层界面的反演，获得了莫霍面及以下的界面特征；认为松辽盆地重力异常差异的原因是松辽盆地莫霍面下方10 km存在一个界面，且由于太平洋板块的俯冲造成该界面在松辽盆地发生了较大的起伏，从而呈现异常的变化。

关键词: 重力异常, 松辽盆地, 断裂, 界面

Abstract: The authors deduced that the distribution of the horizontal derivative of the gravity anomaly of the fault structure can realize the recognition of the fault tendency, which indicates the tendency of the fracture on the side of the small change rate of the fracture horizontal derivative, so it can directly identify the fracture characteristics and avoid the complicated operation of the previous methods. The technique is applied to the treatment of gravity anomaly in Songliao basin, and the tectonic characteristics of Songliao basin are obtained. There are obvious differences of gravity anomaly between the east and the west of Songliao basin, and the reasons of the difference are difficult to be revealed by electric method and seismic data. The boundary inversion of Songliao basin is conducted by gravity data, and the interface features of Moho surface and below are obtained by using seismic data. It is proved that the difference of gravity anomalies in Songliao basin is caused by the boundary of 10km under Moho in Songliao basin, and the great fluctuation occurs in Songliao basin due to the subduction of the Pacific plate.

Key words: gravity anomaly, Songliao basin, fault, boundary

中图分类号:

P631.1

马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.

Ma Guoqing, Meng Qingfa, Huang Danian. Structure Identification by Gravity Anomaly in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.

参考文献

[1] 曹金华. 松辽盆地综合地球物理剖面地质解释[D].长春:吉林大学,2017. Cao Jinhua. Geological Interpretation of Integrated Geophysical Profile in Songliao Basin, NE China[D].Changchun:Jilin University, 2017.
[2] 侯启军,冯志强,冯子辉.松辽盆地陆相石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009. Hou Qijun, Feng Zhiqiang, Feng Zihui. Petroleum Geology of Continental Facies in Songliao Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009.
[3] 王金臣. 松辽盆地古中央隆起带基底构造特征研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2016. Wang Jinchen. Study on the Basement Structure Characteristics of the Paleo Central Uplift Belt[D].Changchun:Jilin University, 2016.
[4] 曹怀仁. 松辽盆地烃源岩形成环境与页岩油地质评价研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学, 2017. Cao Huairen. The Paleo-Environment of Source Rock Formation and Geological Evaluation of Shale Oil in Songliao Basin[D].Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017.
[5] Evjen H M. The Place of the Vertical Gradient in Gravitational Interpretations[J].Geophysics, 1936, 1(1):127-136.
[6] Cordell L, Grauch V J S. Mapping Basement Mag-netization Zones from Aeromagnetic Data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico[J].Seg Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1982, 1(1):520.
[7] Cordell L. Gravimetric Expression of Graben Faulting in Santa Fe Country and the Espanola Basin, New Mexico[J].Science, 2014, 192:43-43.
[8] Roest W R, Verhoef J, Pilkington M.Magnetic Inter-pretation Using the 3-D Analytic Signal[J].Geophysics, 1992, 57(1):116-125.
[9] Miller H G, Singh V. Potential Field Tilt:A New Co-ncept for Location of Potential Field Sources[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics, 1994, 32(2):213-217.
[10] Wijns C, Perez C, Kowalczyk P. Theta Map:Edge Detection in Magnetic Data[J].Geophysics, 2005, 70(4):39-43.
[11] Ma Guoqing, Liu Cai, Huang Danian. The Removal of Additional Edges in the Edge Detection of Potential Field Data[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2015, 114:168-173.
[12] 周帅, 黄大年, 焦健. 基于三维构造张量的位场边界识别滤波器[J].地球物理学报, 2016, 59(10):3847-3858. Zhou Shuai, Huang Danian, Jiao Jian. A Filter to Detect Edge of Potential Field Data Based on Three-Dimensional Structural Tensors[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(10):3847-3858.
[13] Xu Menglong, Yang Changbao, Wu Yangang, et al. Edge Detection in the Potential Field Using the Correlation Coefficients of Multidirectional Standard Deviations[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2015, 12(1):23-24.
[14] 马国庆.位场(重&磁)及其梯度异常自动解释方法研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013. Ma Guoqing. The Study on the Automatic Interpretation Methods of Potential Field(Gravity & Magnetic)and Its Gradients[D].Changchun:Jilin University, 2013.
[15] Green R. Accurate Determination of the Dip Angle of a Geological Contact Using the Gravity Method[J].Geophys Prosp, 1976(24):265-272.
[16] Butle D K. Generalized Gravity Gradient Analysis for 2D Inversion[J]. Geophysics, 1995, 60(4):1018-1028.
[17] 魏伟,刘天佑.梯度法解释复杂二维断裂重力异常[J].物探与化探,2005,29(4):347-350. Wei Wei, Liu Tianyou. Interpretation of Complex Two-Dimensional Fault Gravity Anomalies by Gradient Method[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2005, 29(4):347-350.
[18] Cooper G R J. Obtaining Dip and Susceptibility Infor-mation from Euler Deconvolution Using the Hough Transform[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2006, 32(10):1592-1599.
[19] 高秀鹤,黄大年,孙思源,等. 重力梯度数据协克里金三维反演确定岩脉倾向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(2):589-596. Gao Xiuhe, Huang Danian, Sun Siyuan, el al. Identify the Dip Angle of the Dipping Dike Model Based on Cokriging Inversion of Gravity Grandient Data[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2):589-596.
[20] 李丽丽,孟令顺,杜晓娟,等.一种断层重力异常定量解释方法[J].石油地球物理勘探,2012,47(4):665-667. Li Lili, Meng Lingshun, Du Xiaojuan, el al. A Quantitative Interpretation Method for Gravity Anomaly of Faults[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(4):665-667.

相关文章 15

[1]	张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微. 基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法：以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[2]	蔡攀, 谢风猛, 刘海宁, 苗元梓, 蔡来星. 济阳坳陷义东地区中—古生界古潜山断控成山过程及其控藏规律 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 435-452.
[3]	李新琦, 霍飞宇, 赵志平, 崔普媛, 李祺. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩规模性裂缝储层特征及成因#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 483-496.
[4]	毛子雄, 侯贺晟, 周建波, 符伟. 佳木斯地块—那丹哈达地体近地表速度结构[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 219-228.
[5]	王伯昕, 王天略, 王清, 陈慧娥. 冻土-结构界面剪切性能研究进展综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1923-1944.
[6]	冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[7]	蔡嵩, 郑金云, 李振升, 舒梁锋, 靳瑶瑶, . 珠江口盆地番禺低隆区构造调控下断陷湖盆源—汇响应特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1420-1433.
[8]	季金礁, 边伟华, 唐华风, 李元哲, 王璞珺. 松辽盆地莺山断陷营城组凝灰熔岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1051-1060.
[9]	孙敬雯, 吕子强, 孔庆翰, 唐泽豪, 邱俊辉, 刘珈君. 基于背景噪声成像的沂沭断裂带及邻区波速变化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1361-1371.
[10]	朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[11]	王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[12]	仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤. 松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.
[13]	高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[14]	张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[15]	郝国丽, 蒋迪娅, 许风光, 张昊, 金艳, 刘洋. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷西南部火山岩相和火山机构特征及其分布控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1951-1967.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed