吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 843-853.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200078

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

华北典型河道地下水回补效果评价

王哲1, 付宇2, 朱静思1, 曹文庚3   

  1. 1. 水利部海河水利委员会水文局, 天津 300170;
    2. 华北水利水电大学测绘与地理信息学院, 郑州 450046;
    3. 中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所, 石家庄 050061
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-07 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-07
  • 作者简介:王哲(1984—),高级工程师,主要从事水文水资源方面的研究,E-mail:wz2012@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41972262,41971027);国家重点研发计划项目(SQ2016YFSF020004,2018YFE0106500);水资源高效开发利用项目(2016YFC0402705)

Effect Assessment on Groundwater Recharge for Typical Rivers in North China

Wang Zhe1, Fu Yu2, Zhu Jingsi1, Cao Wengeng3   

  1. 1. Hydrology Bureau of Haihe River Water Conservancy Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Tianjin 300170, China;
    2. College of Surveying and Geo-Information, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China;
    3. Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
  • Received:2020-04-07 Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-07
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972262,41971027),the National Key R&D Project (SQ2016YFSF020004,2018YFE0106500) and the Efficient Development and Utilization of Water Resources (2016YFC0402705)

摘要: 针对华北地区严重的地下水超采问题,选取河北境内的滹沱河、滏阳河、南拒马河3条补水河道的试点河段开展地下水回补效果评价。采用层次分析法,建立了包括入渗回补率、地下水水位回升率、水质改善度、水面面积变化率、水生态改善度和公众满意度等6项指标的地下水回补效果评价指标体系;选择简便实用的指标计算方法对河段补水前后指标的变化进行计算分析,并对生态补水的效果进行评价分级。结果表明:补水结束时,滹沱河、滏阳河、南拒马河3条试点河段的平均入渗回补率为65%,地下水水位相对回升率为分别为36%,17%,6%,水质改善度依次为51%,34%,90%,水面面积总计增加了8.56 km2,水生态改善度依次为46%,87%,94%,公众满意度分别为90%,90%,80%。利用建立的地下水回补效果评价方法计算滹沱河、滏阳河、南拒马河综合得分分别为84,47,64分,评价等级分别为"非常好" "一般" "较好"。3条试点河段评价结果与实际补水效果基本一致。

关键词: 地下水, 回补, 层次分析法, 指标体系, 效果评价

Abstract: In view of the serious problem of groundwater overdraft in North China, the experimental river sections of Hutuo River, Fuyang River,and Nanjuma River in Hebei Province were selected to evaluate the effect of groundwater recharge. The evaluation index system of groundwater recharge effect was established by selecting indexes from the six aspects of groundwater level recovery rate, water surface area change rate, water quality improvement degree, water ecology improvement degree,and public satisfaction degree. With AHP,a simple and practical index calculation method was selected to calculate and analyze the changes of indexes before and after the river reach replenishment, and finally to assess the effect of ecological replenishment. The results show that at the end of the groundwater recharge, the average infiltration rate covering the three pilot sections of Hutuo River, Fuyang River,and Nanjuma River is 65%, the relative recovery rate of groundwater level is 36%, 17%, and 6% respectively, the degree of groundwater quality improvement is 51%, 34%, 90% respectively, the water surface area is increased by a total of 8.56 km2, and the water ecological improvement degree is 46%, 87%, 94% respectively. In addition, the public satisfaction is 90%, 90%, and 80% respectively. The comprehensive assessment score of Hutuo River, Nanjuma River, and Fuyang River is 84, 64,and 47, respectively, and the corresponding evaluation grade is "very good" "good", and "normal", respectively. This results of the three pilot river sections are basically consistent with the actual water replenishment effect.

Key words: groundwater, recharge, analytic hierarchy process, index system, effect assessment

中图分类号: 

  • P641.25
[1] 张兆吉,费宇红,郭春艳,等.华北平原区域地下水污染评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(5):1456-1461. Zhang Zhaoji,Fei Yuhong,Guo Chunyan, et al. Regional Groundwater Contamination Assessment in the North China Plain[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(5): 1456-1461.
[2] 庄建琦,彭建兵,张利勇.不同降雨条件下黄土高原浅层滑坡危险性预测评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(3):867-875. Zhuang Jianqi,Peng Jianbing,Zhang Liyong. Risk Assessment and Prediction of the Shallow Landslide at Different Precipitation in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013,43(3):867-875.
[3] 曹阳,申月芳,焦志亮,等.中新天津生态城孔隙水化学垂向分布及其成因[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(4):1109-1120. Cao Yang,Shen Yuefang,Jiao Zhiliang,et al. Pore Water Vertical Chemistry Distribution and Origin Analysisin Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2019,49(4):1109-1120.
[4] 刘博,肖长来,梁秀娟.SOM-RBF神经网络模型在地下水位预测中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015, 45(1): 225-231. Liu Bo,Xiao Changlai,Liang Xiujuan. Application of Combining SOM and RBF Neural Network Model for Groundwater Levels Prediction[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(1): 225-231.
[5] 韩忠,邵景力,崔亚莉,等. 基于MODFLOW的地下水流模型前处理优化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(4):1290-1296. Han Zhong,Shao Jingli,Cui Yali,et al. Preprocessing Optimization of Groundwater Flow Model Based on MODFLOW[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2014,44(4):1290-1296.
[6] 李云峰,郑书彦.引黄回灌研究[M].西安:陕西科技出版社,1996:3-11. Li Yunfeng,Zheng Shuyan. Study on Reinjection of Yellow River[M]. Xi’an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,1996:3-11.
[7] 黄国如,胡和平,尹大凯.地下水人工回灌研究进展[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2001. Huang Guoru,Hu Heping,Yin Dakai. Research Progress of Artificial Recharge of Groundwater[M].Zhengzhou:Yellow River Water Conservancy Press,2001.
[8] 俞俊英,李勤奋,乔坚强.上海市地下水超采现状及防范措施[J].地下水,2000,22(4):143-147. Yu Junying,Li Qinfen,Qiao Jianqiang. The Present Situation and Preventive Measures of Groundwater Overexploitation in Shanghai[J]. Groundwater, 2000,22(4):143-147.
[9] 孙颖,苗礼文.北京市深井人工回灌现状调查与前景分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2001,28(1):69-72. Sun Ying,Miao Liwen. Investigation and Prospect Analysis of Artificial Deep Well Reinjection in Beijing[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2001, 28(1):69-72.
[10] Effects of Artificial Recharge on Water Quality in the Equus Beds Aquifer, South-Central Kansas[C]//U S Geological Survey Artificial Recharge Workshop Proceedings. Sacramento:USGS, 2002.
[11] Dillon P J. Management of Aquifer Recharge for Sustainability[M].Netherlands: A A Balkema Pubishers, 2002.
[12] Sanford W. Recharge and Groundwater Models: An Overview[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002, 10(1): 110-120.
[13] Lemer D N, Issar A S, Simmers I. Groundwater Recharge: A Guide to Understanding and Estimating Natural Recharge[J]. International Conteibution to Hydrogeology, Verlag Heinz Heise, 1990, 8:345.
[14] Bhagyawant R G. Studies on the Effect of Percolation Tank in Augmenting the Ground Water Recharge[J]. Internat J Agric Sci,2008,4(1):359-362.
[15] Lakshmanan E. Assessment of Effect of Recharge from a Check Dam as a Method of Managed Aquifer Recharge by Hydrogeological Investigations[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2015,73(9):5349-5361.
[16] 叶守泽,詹道江. 工程水文学[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社出版,2005. Ye Shouze, Zhan Daojiang. Engineering Hydrology[M]. Beijing: China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press,2005.
[1] 弋良朋, 张宇欣. 基于“三生”空间的乡村土地适宜性分析及景观生态风险评估——以天津市蓟州区赵家峪村为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 557-567.
[2] 胡飞跃, 徐昊翔, 邓成坚, 杨舒铎. 基于深度学习模型的岩溶塌陷易发性评价——以广佛肇地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 584-597.
[3] 杜新强, 尹呈杉, 方永军, 李孜涵, 郭辉. 基于地下水生态水位埋深阈值的可开采量评价——以三江平原普阳灌区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 635-646.
[4] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[5] 杨婷, 李亚鑫, 刘娜, 林晓君, 曾经文, 王秀娟, 蔡倩怡, 罗子峰, 张苑铃, 容精男, 余伟达, 丘锦荣, 周建利. 沸石作为PRB填充介质修复NH4+污染地下水的效果及原位再生性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 661-672.
[6] 秦传玉, 尤凯鸿, 李小奇, 张成武, 于丽娟. 地下水常见阴离子影响双重改性纳米零价铁降解硝基苯的机制及效果[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 342-351.
[7] 冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[8] 张文静, 涂志鹏, 贾媛媛. 矿区重金属的释放迁移与污染预测研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2001-2027.
[9] 闫纲丽, 冯屾, 刘睿男, 黄冠星. 地下水背景值评估研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1655-1670.
[10] 王双, 朱奋, 李亮, 李林坚, 刘娜. 湛江市硇洲岛浅层地下水水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1680-1690.
[11] 黄树春, 李洪涛, 邓波, 王丹, 张高华.

湖南湘潭河西地区近20年岩溶水化学时空演变及其影响因素 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1269-1287.

[12] 王锦博, 贺志毅, 王亚楠, 程诗雨, 刘明柱. 某污染场地土壤与地下水协同修复阈值[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1288-1297.
[13] 王福刚, 管小桐, 何庆成, 程辉, 杨国华, 程中乐, 王耀辉. 考虑边界层流体黏度变化的黏性土低速非达西渗流数学模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 893-905.
[14] 胡启智, 王秀娟, 丘锦荣, 康迪, 曾经文, 蔡倩怡, 刘人涛, 刘娜. 潮汕地区地下水饮用水源地酸性浅层地下水特征及其成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 906-918.
[15] 张晟瑀, 申文超, 苏小四. 基于随机森林法的区域地下水硝酸盐污染风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 943-956.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张世广, 柳成志, 卢双舫, 张雁, 吴高平, 刘秋宏. 高分辨率层序地层学在河、湖、三角洲复合沉积体系的应用--以朝阳沟油田扶余油层开发区块为例[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 361 -368 .
[2] 李碧乐,沈鑫,陈广俊,杨延乾,李永胜. 青海东昆仑阿斯哈金矿Ⅰ号脉成矿流体地球化学特征和矿床成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1676 -1687 .
[3] 杨晓平,李仰春,柳 震, 汪 岩,王洪杰. 黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 616 -621 .
[4] 李发文, 冯平, 张超. 天津北三河地区垂向耦合产流模型及应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 459 -464 .
[5] 王立军,刘国才,黄继国,李跃迁,丛颖,沈照理,赵晓波. 接触氧化技术在公园景观水体功能恢复中的运用试验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 458 -461 .
[6] 雷如雄,吴昌志,屈迅,顾连兴,陈刚,吾尔娜,孙洪涛,刘国宁. 中天山天湖东铁钼矿含矿片麻状花岗岩年代学、地球化学和锆石Hf同位素-对于中天山早古生代构造演化的启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1540 -1552 .
[7] 初凤友,胡大千,姚杰. 中太平洋YJB海山富钴结核矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 8 -0014 .
[8] 周燕,郑培玺,王铁夫,张延洁. 招平断裂带上盘金矿床氢氧同位素地质特征[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 668 -0671 .
[9] 唐华风,王璞珺,姜传金,刘杰,张庆晨,冯有良. 松辽盆地火山岩相地震特征及其与控陷断裂的关系[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 73 -0078 .
[10] 范晓敏,李舟波. 裂缝性碳酸盐岩储层声波时差曲线的波动和增幅分析[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 168 -0173 .