Sichuan basin,deep dolomite,dolomite cement,pore,Longwangmiao Formation ,"/> <p class="MsoNormal"> 白云石胶结物特征及其对深层白云岩孔隙的作用

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 401-416.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230204

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

白云石胶结物特征及其对深层白云岩孔隙的作用

屈海洲1,陈润1,徐伟 2,张云峰1,张亚,何溥为2,唐松3,李文皓4   

  1. 1.西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 成都610500

    2.中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探开发研究院, 成都610051

    3.中国石油西南油气田分公司川中油气矿, 四川遂宁629000

    4.中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探事业部, 成都610051

  • 出版日期:2025-03-26 发布日期:2025-05-09
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41702163);中国石油-西南石油大学创新联合体科技合作项目(2020CX010301


Characteristics of Dolomite Cement and Its Effect on the Porosity of Deep Dolomite

Qu Haizhou1, Chen Run1, Xu Wei2, Zhang Yunfeng1, Zhang Ya2,He Puwei2, Tang Song3, Li Wenhao4   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences & Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

    2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China

    3. Chuanzhong Oil and Gas Mine, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Suining 629000, Sichuan, China

    4. Exploration Division, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610051, China

  • Online:2025-03-26 Published:2025-05-09
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41702163 and the Science and Technology Cooperation Project of the CNPC-SWPU Innovation Alliance 2020CX010301

摘要:

深层白云岩是近年深部勘探的重点,其孔隙内多见白云石胶结,但白云石胶结物晶粒赋存组合方式及其对孔隙的作用研究较少。因此,以四川盆地高磨地区下寒武统龙王庙组为例,综合岩心、薄片、阴极发光、碳氧同位素及包裹体等资料,研究其白云石胶结物类型、特征、结构、体积分数及其对孔隙的影响。白云石胶结物晶体在形态上主要有半菱形、菱形、环带状和鞍状等,粒径包含粉晶—巨晶。胶结物晶体与孔洞形成内衬状、桥接状和镶嵌状三种结构。使用发育频率(发育某种结构的样品数/颗粒白云岩或晶粒白云岩样品总数)来表征某种结构的发育程度,白云岩中镶嵌状结构最发育(发育频率为48.3%89.5%),桥接状次之(22.4%73.7%),内衬状最弱(8.6%55.2%)。内衬状结构和桥接状结构主要发育在颗粒白云岩中,体积分数分别为015%25%50%,且其发育程度随细粉晶白云石胶结物体积分数增加而增强;镶嵌状结构在白云岩中普遍发育,体积分数主要为50%100%,且其发育与中晶巨晶白云石体积分数正相关。内衬状结构和桥接状结构主要形成于同生成岩阶段中成岩阶段,镶嵌状结构主要形成于晚成岩阶段。内衬状结构及桥接状结构形成较早可降低成岩进程中压溶压实对孔隙的破坏,而镶嵌状结构破坏残余孔隙。以主要发育镶嵌状结构层段的孔隙度为基准,主要发育内衬状结构和桥接状结构层段的孔隙度可提高约50%


关键词: 四川盆地, 深层白云岩, 白云石胶结物, 孔隙, 龙王庙组

Abstract:

Deep dolomite has been a key focus of deep exploration in recent years, with dolomite cementation commonly found in its internal pores. However, there is relatively less research on the combination of dolomite cement grain occurrence and its effect on pores. Therefore, taking the Longwangmiao Formation of the Lower Cambrian in the Gaomo area of the Sichuan basin as an example, comprehensive data such as core samples, thin sections, cathodoluminescence, carbon-oxygen isotopes, and inclusions were used to study the types, characteristics, structures, volume fraction, and their effects on pores of dolomite cement. The crystals of dolomite cement mainly have shapes such as semi rhombus, rhombus, ring shaped, saddle shaped, etc., with particle sizes ranging from powder crystals to giant crystals. Cement crystals and pores form three types of structures: lining, bridging, and embedding. Using the frequency of development (the number of samples that develop a certain structure/the total number of samples of granular dolomite or grain dolomite) to characterize the degree of development of a certain structure, the embedding structure is the most developed in dolomite (48.3%-89.5%), followed by the bridging structure (22.4%-73.7%), and the lining structure is the weakest (8.6%-55.2%). The inner lining structure and bridging structure are mainly developed in granular dolomite, with volume fraction of 0 to 15% and 25% to 50%, respectively, and their development degree increases with the volume fraction of fine-grained dolomite cement. Embedding structures are commonly developed in dolomite, with a volume fraction mainly ranging from 50% to 100%, and their development is positively correlated with the volume fraction of medium crystalline to giant crystalline dolomite. The inner lining structure and bridging structure are mainly formed during the syndiagenetic stage to the middle diagenetic stage, while the embedding structure is mainly formed during the late diagenetic stage. The formation of inner lining and bridging structures earlier can reduce the damage to pores caused by solution compaction during diagenesis, while the embedding structure can damage residual pores. Based on the porosity of the layers with mainly developed embedding structures, the porosity of the layers with mainly developed inner lining and bridging structures can be increased by 50%.



Key words: Sichuan basin')">

Sichuan basin, deep dolomite, dolomite cement, pore, Longwangmiao Formation

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 蔡攀, 谢风猛, 刘海宁, 苗元梓, 蔡来星.

济阳坳陷义东地区中—古生界古潜山断控成山过程及其控藏规律 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 435-452.

[2] 纪泽雨, 唐华风, 李本仙.

无机天然氢类型、成因及我国生氢潜力 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 413-434.

[3] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[4] 王振军. 油气储层裂缝预测进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 469-482.
[5] 李新琦, 霍飞宇, 赵志平, 崔普媛, 李祺. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩规模性裂缝储层特征及成因#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 483-496.
[6] 黄玉龙, 张皓, 郭强, 陈昌.

低阻玄武岩的矿物学特征及其油气地质意义——以辽河坳陷古近系为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 511-521.

[7] 王伟明, 胡美硕, 焦立新, 杨斌, 苗长盛, 孙宏亮, 周志超, 曲希玉, .

三塘湖盆地下石炭统新层系石油地质条件及勘探潜力 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1401-1419.

[8] 刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, .

致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.

[9] 原家鹏, 张云峰.

 开鲁盆地陆东凹陷白垩系九佛堂组上段米兰科维奇旋回及沉积响应特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 375-386.

[10] 官大勇, 张宏国, 牛成民, 王启明, 李晓辉.

渤海湾盆地辽中凹陷地区东营组湖底扇关键成藏认识与勘探实践 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 351-362.

[11] 仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤.

松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.

[12] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[13] 吴兆徽, 刘显太, 杜玉山, 吴颖昊. 碳酸盐岩微观测试技术对比与应用——以济阳坳陷乐安油田潜山为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1519-1529.
[14] 雷永昌, 邱欣卫, 吴琼玲, 朱红涛, 肖张波, 李敏.

惠陆低凸起东侧早文昌期源-汇系统分析与勘探实践 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 413-428.

[15] 徐春强, 张新涛, 王晨杰, 张震, 刘丰. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩特征及优质储层控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1027-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .