吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 20-37.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230314

• 原长春地质学院创建70周年纪念活动专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因:以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例

孟庆涛1,2,胡菲1,2,刘招君1,2,孙平昌1,2,柳蓉1,2   

  1. 1.吉林大学地球科学学院,长春 130061
    2.吉林省油页岩与共生能源矿产重点实验室,长春 130061
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-21 出版日期:2024-01-26 发布日期:2024-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 胡菲(1986—),男,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事石油天然气勘探与开发方面的研究,E-mail: hufei@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孟庆涛(1984—),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积学、石油地质学、非常规油气勘探与开发方面的研究,E-mail: mengqt@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省自然科学基金项目(20230101081JC);吉林大学科技创新团队项目(2021TD-05)

Lithofacies Types and Genesis of Fine-Grained Sediments in Terrestrial Depression Lake Basin: Taking Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Songliao Basin as an Example

Meng Qingtao1,2, Hu Fei1,2, Liu Zhaojun1,2, Sun Pingchang1,2, Liu Rong1,2    

  1. 1. College of Earth Sciences,Jilin University,Changchun 130061, China 
    2. Key Laboratory for Oil Shale and Coexisting Minerals of Jilin Province,Jilin University,Changchun 130061, China
  • Received:2023-11-21 Online:2024-01-26 Published:2024-03-11
  • Supported by:
    the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20230101081JC) and the Program for Jilin University Science and Technology Innovative Research Team (2021TD-05)

摘要: 页岩油是目前非常规油气研究的热点与难点。细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因分析是页岩油“源储”特征研究及“甜点”预测的有效途径。松辽盆地青山口组细粒沉积广泛发育,是页岩油富集的有效层段。本文通过岩性、矿物成分、有机质丰度与沉积构造4个参数,将松辽盆地青山口组细粒沉积岩划分为6种岩相:高有机质泥纹层黏土质页岩(A)、中高有机质含细粉砂纹层长英质页岩(B)、中低有机质含粗粉砂纹层长英质页岩(C)、低有机质层状粉砂岩(D)、低有机质层状介形虫灰岩(E)和低有机质层状白云岩(F)。进一步从水动力学与有机质富集方面探讨了不同岩相类型的成因,并建立了相应的沉积模式。具体为:在风暴浪基面之下的静水、咸水环境、高湖泊生产力背景中,浮游藻类与黏土絮状物均匀悬浮沉降,形成贫富有机质黏土质纹层,沉积A岩相;在正常浪基面之下的相对静水(浪基面附近局部动荡)、半咸水环境、高湖泊生产力背景中,三角洲径流与洪流带来的细粉砂颗粒继续向湖盆中央搬运,经均匀悬浮沉降形成长英质纹层,间歇期悬浮沉降形成黏土质纹层,形成B岩相;正常浪基面之下,洪水携带粉砂级颗粒,顺着水下分流河道搬运至外前缘,以稳定性浊流的形式进入前三角洲,随流速逐渐降低,分异形成粗粉砂—细粉砂纹层,间歇期悬浮沉降形成黏土质纹层,形成C岩相;正常浪基面之下,三角洲前缘早期沉积物在阵发性浊流的作用下,滑塌至较深水区,形成D和E岩相;于正常浪基面与风暴浪基面之间,在相对干燥的气候背景下的咸水环境中,形成F岩相。


关键词: 陆相坳陷湖盆, 细粒沉积, 岩相, 成因模式, 页岩油, 松辽盆地, 青山口组

Abstract: Shale oil is currently a hot and difficult topic in unconventional oil and gas research. The analysis of the types and genesis of fine-grained sedimentary lithofacies is an effective way to study the “source and reservoir” characteristics of shale oil and predict its “sweet spot”. The fine-grained sediments of the Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao basin are widely developed and are effective intervals for shale oil enrichment. Based on four parameters, including organic matter abundance, mineral composition, lithology, and sedimentary structures, six kinds of lithofacies of fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao basin are divided in this paper, as clay shale with high content of organic matter and mud-grade lamination(A), felsic shale with medium-high content of organic matter and fine silt-grade lamination(B), felsic shale with medium-low content of organic matter and coarse silt-grade lamination(C), layered siltstone with low content of organic matter(D), layered ostracoid limestone with low content of organic matter (E) and layered dolomite with low content of organic matter (F). Then, the genesis of different lithofacies types were discussed from the perspectives of hydrodynamics and organic matter enrichment, and corresponding sedimentary models were established. In the static and salty water environment below the base of storm waves with high lake productivity, planktonic algae and clay flocs are uniformly suspended and settled, forming organic-rich clay lamination and lithofacies A is deposited. In a relatively static and brackish water environment below the normal wave base (with local turbulence near the wave base) with high lake productivity, the fine silt particles brought by delta runoff and flood flow continue to move towward the center of the lake basin, forming a felsic lamination through uniform suspension and sedimentation, and a clay lamination is formed during the period of intermittent suspension and sedimentation, and lithofacies B is deposited. Below the normal wave base, the flood which carries silt-grade particles are transported to the outer front of delta along the underwater distributary channel, and enter the front delta in the form of stable turbidity current. As the flow velocity gradually decreases, it forms a coarse to fine silt lamination, clay lamination is formed during the period of intermittent suspension and sedimentation, and lithofacies C is deposited. Below the normal wave base, the early sediments of the delta front, under the action of paroxysmal turbidity currents, collapse into deeper water, forming lithofacies D and E. Between the normal wave base and storm wave base, lithofacies F is formed in saline water environment under a relatively dry climate.


Key words: terrestrial depression lake basin, fine-grained sediments, lithofacies, genetic model, shale oil, Songliao basin, Qingshankou Formation

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3] 赵振, 秦光雄, 闫佰忠, 马苗苗. 青海省互助土族自治县地热田水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 986-1001.
[4] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[5] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[6] 冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[7] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[8] 季金礁, 边伟华, 唐华风, 李元哲, 王璞珺. 松辽盆地莺山断陷营城组凝灰熔岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1051-1060.
[9] 张可佳, 廖明月, 刘涛, 赵玉武, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 张岩, 贺友志.

基于改进BlendMask的页岩扫描电镜图像矿物鉴定方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1387-1400.

[10] 朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[11] 王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[12] 原家鹏, 张云峰.

 开鲁盆地陆东凹陷白垩系九佛堂组上段米兰科维奇旋回及沉积响应特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 375-386.

[13] 仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤.

松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.

[14] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[15] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .