J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 92-103.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

陕南铜厂铜矿床成矿物质来源探讨

叶霖1|2|杨玉龙1|2| 高伟1|2|刘铁庚1   

  1. 1.中国科学院地球化学研究所矿床地球化学国家重点实验室|贵阳550002;
    2.中国科学院研究生院|北京100039
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-02 出版日期:2012-01-26 发布日期:2012-01-26
  • 作者简介:叶霖(1970-)|男|副研究员|主要从事矿床地球化学研究|Tel:0851-5895591|E-mail:yelin@vip.gyig.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40873038);国家“973”计划项目(2006CB403508)

Source of Ore-Forming Materials of Tongchang Copper Ore Deposit in Southern Shaanxi Province, China

YE Lin1|YANG Yu-long1|2|GAO Wei1|2|LIU Tie-geng1   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang550002, China;
    2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100039, China
  • Received:2011-05-02 Online:2012-01-26 Published:2012-01-26

摘要:

陕南铜厂铜矿床是“勉-略-宁”矿集区内最具代表性的铜矿床,通过黄铜矿等单矿物及矿区地质体的微量与稀土元素地球化学对比研究发现:1)黄铜矿以富Ni、Zn和贫Co为特征,与晚元古代郭家沟组细碧岩类似,较闪长岩和钠长岩不同;矿床中存在轻稀土富集和稀土配分模式相对平坦两类黄铜矿,岩体内外接触带黄铁矿Co/Ni值差异表明其成矿物质具多源性;由矿区各地质体成矿元素背景可见,矿床成矿物质来源应以细碧岩为主、闪长岩为辅。2)黄铜矿Eu负异常明显,其δEu值明显低于闪长岩和细碧岩,这与成矿过程中富挥发分流体所形成云英岩化、钠长石化造成的Eu亏损有关,且黄铜矿Y/Ho值与钠长岩较为相似,暗示铜矿化与钠质交代作用关系密切。3)黄铜矿Co、Ni含量一般大于黄铁矿几倍到几十倍,与矽卡岩、斑岩、火山-次火山热液及火山-喷气型铜矿中黄铜矿差异明显,而与铜镍硫化物型矿床中黄铜矿类似,这可能与成矿作用继承了富Ni源区有关。该矿床成矿模式为:海西期,伴随着勉略洋盆闭合俯冲-碰撞形成勉略宁地区韧-脆性逆冲推覆构造、走滑断层,在区域变质流体与天水混合形成富碱和CO2的混合热液作用下,使地层-细碧岩和部分闪长岩中Cu等成矿物质大量析出,形成低温、低盐度成矿热液,沿矿区发育EW向与NE 向两组韧性走滑断裂充填沉淀成矿。

关键词: 勉略宁地区, 铜厂, 铜矿床, 微量元素, 成矿物质来源, 矿床成因

Abstract:

The Tongchang deposit is the most typical copper deposit in Mianxian-Lueyang-Ningqiang (Mian-Lue-Ning) area in southern Shaanxi, China. By studying on trace elements and REEs geochemistry of chalcopyrite (pyrite) as well as geological bodies in the deposit, we can draw some conclusions as followings. Firstly, the chalcopyrite is characterized by enrichment of Ni and Zn, depletion of Co, which is similar to the spilite of Late Proterozoic Guojiagou Formaion, while different from diorite and albite rocks in the mine. There are two kinds of chalcopyrites with different REE patterns, one is enriched in LREE and the other has relatively flat REE pattern. The pyrite grains hosted in internal and external contact zones of the diorite intrusion have different Co/Ni ratios, suggesting multiple sources of ore-forming materials. Analyzing on the background values of those oreforming elements in various geological bodies indicates that ore-forming material is mainly from the spilite and minor from the diorite. Secondly, the chalcopyrite is characterized by obvious negative Eu anomalies and its δEu value is much lower than those of the diorite and spilite. The depletion of Eu is likely related to greisenization and albitization caused by volatile fluids during mineralization. Furthermore, Y/Ho ratios of the chalcopyrite are similar to those of albite rocks, implying the close relationship between copper mineralization and Na replacement. Thirdly, due to the inheritance of the trace elements feature from source of ore-forming mineralizing materials, the Ni and Co content in the chalcopyrite is n-n×10 times than in the pyrite, corresponding to that in Cu-Ni sulfide type deposit and different from that in skarn-type, porphyry-type, volcanic-subvolcanic hydrothermal type as well as VMS Cu deposit. The metallogenic model of Tongchang copper deposit can be listed as following. During the Hercynian period, with the closure, subduction and collision of Mian-Lue ancient oceanic basin, the dutile-brittle thrusting nappe structure and strike-slip fault were formed in Mian-Lue-Ning area. The metasomatism of mixed hydrothermal by regional metamorphic fluid and rainwater, which rich in Na+, K+ and CO2, resulted in the translation of ore-forming materials (e.g. Cu and Ni) from strata of Guojiagou Group and spilite (and diorite) to form the metallogenic hydrothermal fluid. The hydrothermal fluid was characterized by low temperature and salinity, and enriched in ore-forming materials. The Tongchang deposit was resulted from filling and metasomatism of the hydrothermal fluid in the EW-and NE-trending dutile strike-slip faults in this area.

Key words: Mian-Lue-Ning area, Tongchang, copper deposits, trace elements, source of ore-forming materials, ore genesis

中图分类号: 

  • P618.41
[1] 徐骏, 高阳, 刘军, 王晓彤, . 大兴安岭北段三矿沟铁铜矿床成因——来自石榴子石U-Pb定年及元素地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 540-556.
[2] 许中杰, 冷龙, 朱占平, 段煜, 张芳霞, 徐大志. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近纪构造背景分析:来自碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 229-251.
[3] 王清璇, 黄颖兴, 刘云华, 王硕, 李志谦, 杨选江, 李伟良. 河北丰宁兴源萤石矿床花岗斑岩岩石地球化学特征及其成矿作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1525-1548.
[4] 于喜洹, 崔锡彪, 陆胜, 李新鹏, 贾宏, 孙江军, 谷华娟, 王野.

勃利双兴铜矿床侵入岩年代学、岩石地球化学特征及岩石成因 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1143-1162.

[5] 杨爱雪, 吕水, 许曼, 韦文国, 刘海龙, 吴再忠, 安梦莹.

冀东高家店岩体锆石年代学和微量元素地球化学特征及其地质意义 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 503-524.

[6] 王万能, 张耀堂, 李锁明, 吴亮, 袁永盛 . 上扬子西缘晚奥陶世—早志留世重要层位火山活动记录——来自滇东北地区钾质斑脱岩的信息[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 155-178.
[7] 徐鑫, 刘阳, 张勇, 褚小磊, 徐智恺, 孙景贵, 刘晨. 大兴安岭东坡中北段六九山斑岩铜成矿系统浅成岩成因与地球动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1558-1574.
[8] 何中波, 冀华丽, 胡宝群, 孙萧, 钟军, 杨喆, 陈虹. 准噶尔盆地北部晚白垩世至新近纪沉积介质环境演化特征及其对铀成矿的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 800-810.
[9] 任云生, 李京谋, 郝宇杰, 徐文坦. 吉黑东部矽卡岩型钨矿床白钨矿原位微量元素特征及其指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1706-1721.
[10] 张桓, 陈亚军, 伍宏美, 马强.

火山喷发间歇期沉积岩层古沉积环境的地球化学示踪与判别 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1417-1436.

[11] 柴鹏, 孙景贵, 袁玲玲, 门兰静. 吉林延吉杜荒岭浅成热液金矿床岩体锆石微量元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 767-784.
[12] 雷恩, 韩世炯, 庞小朋, 胡连成, 韩梓衡, 郭荣强, 陈奕臣. 青海省格尔木市妥拉海河超大型石墨矿床地球化学特征及其成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 853-865.
[13] 李欣航, 白令安, 胡乔帆, 谢兰芳, 庞保成, 岳志恒. 桂西北金牙金矿床成矿流体性质与成矿机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 840-852.
[14] 单玄龙, 热西提·亚力坤, 刘 培, 陶文芳, 张 琴, 郝国丽, 李克成, 姚佳利. 珠江口盆地西江主洼珠琼运动的沉积响应及构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 329-.
[15] 李玉洁, 李成禄, 杨元江, 袁茂文, 李博文, 苏 航. 大兴安岭东北部多宝山矿集区二道坎银铅锌矿床磁铁矿地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 436-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔建军, 刘晓春, 胡娟, 曲玮. 桐柏杂岩中印支期变质岩包体的变质作用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 618 -629 .
[2] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[3] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[4] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[5] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[6] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[7] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[8] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[9] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[10] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .