吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1879-1885.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201506306

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    

湖南大根垄钨多金属矿地电提取法机理

欧阳菲1,2, 罗先熔2, 付立春3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 广西隐伏金属矿产勘查重点实验室/桂林理工大学隐伏矿床预测研究所, 广西 桂林 541004;
    3. 黑龙江有色金属地质勘查研究总院, 哈尔滨 150046
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-01 发布日期:2015-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 罗先熔(1953),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事勘查地球化学的研究及教学工作,E-mail:lxr811@glut.edu.cn。 E-mail:lxr811@glut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:欧阳菲(1980),男,讲师,博士研究生,主要从事勘查地球化学的研究及教学工作,E-mail:ouyf@glut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    中国地质调查局项目(2011-01-58-03);广西地质工程中心重点实验室开放基金项目(桂科能07109011-K013)

Mechanism of Geoelectrochemical Extraction from Dagenlong Tungsten Deposit in Hunan

Ouyang Fei1,2, Luo Xianrong2, Fu Lichun3   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Concealed Metallic Ore Deposit Exploration/Research Institute of Concealed Deposit Forecast, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China;
    3. Heilongjiang General Prospecting Institute of Geological Exploration, Harbin 150046, China
  • Received:2015-03-01 Published:2015-11-26

摘要:

笔者以湖南大根垄钨多金属矿为试验研究区,以20 m点距在已知矿体上方取土壤样,并按照24 h提取时间、1 000 mL HNO3提取液、50 cm电极间距等工作条件进行了地电提取试验。结果表明,地电提取前后土壤中的元素含量变化不大,被提取到的金属元素应属土壤金属总量的一部分。次生晕与地电提取的异常形态对比发现:Co、Ni较清晰,W次之,Cr无异常;元素的异常特征主要取决于土壤中该元素的活性形式所占比例。综合分析认为地电提取异常与矿体的相对位置有关:矿体的下坡位置以及控矿断裂附近容易形成异常,距离原生矿体太近则会对异常有明显干扰。在本矿区,矿体风化程度越高对Co、Ni的地电提取异常越有利;其异常宽度一般比次生晕窄。

关键词: 地电提取, 钨多金属矿, 湖南大根垄, 异常特征

Abstract:

In order to discover the mechanism and anomaly origin of geoelectrochemical extraction, an experimental study has already been conducted in Dagenlong Tungsten deposit in Hunan. We take soil samples by interval of 20 m, and implement the geoelectrochemical extraction under the working conditions of the following three: the extracting time is 24 hours, the dose of HNO3 is 1 000 mL, and the distance between two electrodes is 50 cm. The result shows that the variation of metal element content is insignificant in soil after extracting, and the extracted metal elements are proportional to the whole metal in the soil. The morphology comparison of anomaly between the geoelectrochemical extraction and the secondary halo shows that Ni and Co is clear, W is less, and Cr has no anomaly. The characteristics of anomaly mainly depend on the content proportion of element which is active in soil. Comprehensive analysis shows that the anomalies of geoelectrochemical extraction related to the relative position of the ore body. It is easy to form anomaly at downhill position, and distance too close to native ore body have obvious interference to anomaly. In this ore deposit area, the higher weathering degree, the better Co,Ni anomaly of geoelectrochemical extraction. The anomaly width of geoelectrochemical extraction is smaller than secondary halo.

Key words: geoelectrochemical extraction, tungsten deposit, Dagenlong in Hunan Province, characteristics of anomalies

中图分类号: 

  • P632.1

[1] 罗先熔. 地球电化学勘查及深部找矿[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社,1996. Luo Xianrong. Electrogeochemical Prospection Method and Searching for Deep Ore Deposits[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1996.

[2] 罗先熔, 康明, 欧阳菲,等. 地电化学成晕机制、方法技术及找矿研究[M].北京:地质出版社, 2007: 91-201. Luo Xianrong, Kang Ming, Ouyang Fei, et al. Halo-Forming Mechanism, Methodology and Application of Geoelectrochemical Technology in Exploration for Mineral Deposits[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2007: 91-201.

[3] 罗先熔. 地电化学成晕机制、方法技术及找矿研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2005. Luo Xianrong. The Mechanism of Electrogeochemical Halo-Formation and the Application of Electrogeochemical Method to Exploration of Metallic Ore Deposits[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2005.

[4] 刘吉敏. 一种新的隐伏矿勘查技术:地电化学法的现状和展望[J]. 物探与化探,1993,17(1):33-41. Liu Jimin. Present State and Perspectives for a New Prospection Method for Concealed Deposits: Geoelectrochemical Exploration[J]. Geophysical & Geological Exploration, 1993, 17(1):33-41.

[5] 文美兰,罗先熔,熊健,等. 地电化学法在南澳大利亚寻找隐伏金矿的研究[J]. 地质与勘探,2010,46(1):153-159. Wen Meilan, Luo Xianrong, Xiong Jian, et al. Electro Geochemical Method in the Search of Concealed Gold Deposits in South Australia[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2010, 46(1):153-159.

[6] 康明,罗先熔. 地电化学方法的改进及应用效果[J]. 地质与勘探,2003,39(5):63-66. Kang Ming, Luo Xianrong. Improvement and Applied Results of Geo-Electrical Chemistry Methods[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2003, 39(5):63-66.

[7] 康明, 罗先熔, 庞保成, 等. 地电化学法在广西横县泰富金矿的应用效果[J]. 桂林工学院学报,2004(1):24-27. Kang Ming, Luo Xianrong, Pang Baocheng, et al. Application of Geoelectrochemical Method in Taifu Gold Deposit in Heng County, Guangxi[J]. Journal of Guilin Institute of Technology, 2004 (1):24-27.

[8] 陈希泉, 罗先熔, 刘莉文, 等. 地球电化学勘查法寻找不同景观区隐伏金矿的研究[J]. 矿产与地质,2007(1):70-74. Chen Xiquan, Luo Xianrong, Liu Liwen, et al. Study of Exploring Concealed Gold Deposits in Different Landscape Areas by Geo-Electrochemical Exploration Methods[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology, 2007 (1):70-74.

[9] 费锡铨.电提取离子法[M].北京:地质出版社,1992. Fei Xiquan. Electric Extraction Ionic Method[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1992.

[10] 高云龙. 地电化学提取铀及其它金属的研究[J]. 中国核科技报告,1990(增刊4):34. Gao Yunlong. Using Geoelectrochemical Technique to Extract Uranium and Other Metals[J]. China Nuclear Science and Technology Report, 1990(Sup.4):34.

[11] 李金铭,卢军,严良俊,等. 地电化学提取法的理论与实验研究[J]. 地学前缘,1998, 5(1/2): 208-216. Li Jinming, Lu Jun, Yan Liangjun, et al. Theoretical and Experimental Study for Geoelectrochemical Extraction Method[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1998, 5(1/2):208-216.

[12] 王文龙,肖力,路彦明. 电提取离子法中离子来源深度初探[J]. 黄金地质,1999,23(5):56-58. Wang Wenlong,Xiao Li,Lu Yanming. Discussion on the Source Depth of Ion by Electric Extraction Ionic Method[J]. Gold Geology, 1999, 23(5):56-58.

[13] 付立春,罗先熔,欧阳菲. 地电化学提取技术条件的系统对比研究[J]. 地质与勘探,2006, 42(6):62-66. Fu Lichun, Luo Xianrong, Ouyang Fei. Contrast Research of Geoelectrochemical Extraction Technique Condition[J]. Geology and Prospection, 2006, 42(6):62-66.

[14] 费锡铨. 关于"电提取离子法"若干问题的探讨[J]. 地质与勘探,1985(7):58-60. Fei Xiquan. Discussion on Several Problems About Electric Extraction Ionic Method[J]. Geology and Prospection, 1985 (7):58-60.

[15] 关连珠. 普通土壤学[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007. Guan Lianzhu. Ordinary Soil Science[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007.

[16] 刘英俊. 元素地球化学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1984. Liu Yingjun. Geochemistry of Element[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1984.

[1] 任云生, 李京谋, 郝宇杰, 徐文坦. 吉黑东部矽卡岩型钨矿床白钨矿原位微量元素特征及其指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1706-1721.
[2] 吴景鑫, 郭秀军, 贾永刚, 孙翔, 李宁. 天然气水合物开采过程甲烷气泄漏海床基高密度电阻率法监测效果模拟与分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1854-1864.
[3] 张宝林, 吴燕冈, 苏捷, 祁民, 武广, 徐永生, 崔敏利, 沈晓丽, 郭志华, 黄雪飞. 内蒙古镶黄旗道郎和都格矿区钨多金属成矿地质背景与综合定位预测方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(6): 1959-1967.
[4] 郭秀军,黄潇雨. 含油污水污染地下介质的电性异常模拟及实例分析[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 128-0131.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .