近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201702106

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 393-404.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201702106

近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例

刘鑫金^1,2, 冯阵东³, 李聪⁴, 周艳⁵, 王亚明⁵

1. 中石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 山东东营 257015;
2. 中石化胜利油田分公司博士后科研工作站, 山东东营 257002;
3. 河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院, 河南焦作 454003;
4. 中国石油冀东油田分公司, 河北唐山 063004;
5. 中石化中原油田勘探开发科学研究院, 河南濮阳 457001

收稿日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2017-03-26 发布日期:2017-03-26
作者简介:刘鑫金(1983),男,在站博士后,主要从事石油地质和沉积学的研究,E-mail:liuxinjin.slyt@sinopec.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2011ZX05006-004，2011ZX05040-005）

Discussion of Secondary Dissolved Pore Origin in Near Source Sandy Conglomerate Reservoir: A Case Study of Xiang 6 Well Area in Chagan Depression

Liu Xinjin^1,2, Feng Zhendong³, Li Cong⁴, Zhou Yan⁵, Wang Yaming⁵

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield, Sinopec Dongying 257015, Shandong, China;
2. Postdoctoral Work Station of Shengli Oilfield, Sinopec, Dongying 257002, Shandong, China;
3. College of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, Henan, China;
4. Jidong Oilfield, PetroChina, Tangshan 063004, Hebei, China;
5. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Zhongyuan Oilfield, Sinopec, Puyang 457001, Henan China

Received:2016-06-06 Online:2017-03-26 Published:2017-03-26
Supported by:
Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project(2011ZX05006-004,2011ZX05040-005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 查干凹陷祥6井区砂砾岩储层发育蜂窝状次生溶蚀孔隙。通过对岩石薄片、阴极发光薄片及扫描电镜分析，结果表明，该孔隙主要由钙长石颗粒及碳酸盐胶结物溶蚀形成，少量长英质岩屑及石英颗粒边缘也有溶蚀迹象。荧光薄片及包裹体测温证实存在两期胶结作用，结合研究区热演化史研究结果，成岩演化规律与该湖盆主要发育的两期生烃历史、两期构造抬升剥蚀相对应。主要的成岩演化序列：压实作用为主（初次深埋）→长石颗粒大量溶蚀，少量石英次生加大，局部成藏（初次生烃）→第一期胶结（第一期构造抬升剥蚀）→第一期胶结物溶蚀，蜂窝状次生溶孔发育，局部成藏（再次深埋，二次生烃）→第二期胶结物胶结，少量石英质颗粒溶蚀（第二期构造抬升剥蚀）。

关键词: 查干凹陷, 成岩作用, 孔隙演化, 次生孔隙, 储层

Abstract: The honeycomb-like secondary dissolved pores are well developed in Xiang 6 well area in one side of Maoxi fault in Chagan depression. Based on thin sections, SEM, and casting thin sections data, the secondary pores formed mainly due to dissolution of anorthite particles and carbonate cement as well as some felsic rock debris and quartz granule. Fluorescence chip and inclusion temperature verified the existence of two stages of cementations. Combining with the evolution of reservoir, we found that the diagenetic evolution corresponded to two hydrocarbon generations and two uplift denudations. The key diagenetic evolution sequences is as follows, Compaction (the first deep burial)-dissolution of a great deal of feldspar particles, little quartz overgrowth and partly accumulation(the first hydrocarbon generation)-the first cementation(the first uplift denudation)-dissolution of the first cement, development of honeycomb-like secondary dissolved pores and partly accumulation(the second deep burial and the second hydrocarbon generation)-the second cementation and dissolution of some quartz particles.

Key words: Chagan depression, diagenesis, pore evolution, secondary pore, reservoir

中图分类号:

P544.4

刘鑫金, 冯阵东, 李聪, 周艳, 王亚明. 近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 393-404.

Liu Xinjin, Feng Zhendong, Li Cong, Zhou Yan, Wang Yaming. Discussion of Secondary Dissolved Pore Origin in Near Source Sandy Conglomerate Reservoir: A Case Study of Xiang 6 Well Area in Chagan Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 393-404.

参考文献

[1] 向廷生,蔡春芳,付华娥.不同温度、羧酸溶液中长石溶解模拟实验[J].沉积学报,2004,4(22):597-602. Xiang Tingsheng,Cai Chunfang,Fu Huae.Dissolution of Microcline by Carboxylic Acids at Different Temperatures and Complexing Reaction of Al Anion with Carboxylic Acid in Aqueous Solution[J].Acta Sedmentologica Sinica, 2004,4(22):597-602.
[2] 张晶,李双文,王书香,等.歧南斜坡深层成岩演化与次生孔隙形成机制[J].中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(6):1070-1077. Zhang Jing,Li Shuangwen,Wang Shuxiang,et al.Deep Diagenetic Evolution and Formation Mechanisms of Secondary Porosity in Qinan Ramp,Qikou Sag[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2014,43(6):1070-1077.
[3] 赵彦彦,郑永飞.碳酸盐沉积物的成岩作用[J].岩石学报,2011,27(2):501-518. Zhao Yanyan,Zheng Yongfei.Diagenesis of Carbonate Sediments[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(2):501-518.
[4] 李杪,罗静兰,赵会涛,等.不同岩性的成岩演化对致密砂岩储层储集性能的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界盒8段天然气储层为例[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(1):97-106. Li Miao,Luo Jinglan,Zhao Huitao,et al.Impact of the Diagenetic Evolution of Different Lithology on Tight Sandstone Reservoir Performance:A Case Study from He 8 Natural Gas Reservoir of the Upper Paleozoic in Eastern Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2015,45(1):97-106.
[5] 罗静兰,邵红梅,杨艳芳,等.松辽盆地深层火山岩储层的埋藏-烃类充注-成岩时空演化过程[J].地学前缘,2013,20(5):175-187. Luo Jinglan,Shao Hongmei,Yang Yanfang,et al.Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Burial-Hydrocarbon Filling-Diagenetic Process of Deep Volcanic Reservoir in Songliao Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(5):175-187.
[6] 张云峰,王国强,付宝利,等.长岭断陷深层碎屑岩储层成岩作用及异常高孔带成因[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(2):372-376. Zhang Yunfeng,Wang Guoqiang,Fu Baoli,et al.The Diagenesis and the Origin of Abnormal High Porosity Zone in the Deep Clastic Reservoir in Changling Fault Depression[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(2):372-376.
[7] 蒋庆平,李德敏,罗洋,等.东濮凹陷桥口构造沙三段储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].新疆地质,2008,26(4):382-385. Jiang Qingping,Li Demin,Luo Yang,et al.Diagenesis and Porosity Evolution of the Reservoir of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Qiaokou Area in Dongpu Sag[J].Xinjiang Geology,2008,26(4):382-385.
[8] 宁宁,陈孟晋,刘锐娥,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界石英砂岩储层成岩及孔隙演化[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(3):334-338. Ning Ning,Chen Mengjin,Liu Ruie,et al.Upper Paleozoic Quartz-Sandstone Reservoir Diagenesis and Pore Evoletion,Eastern Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(3):334-338.
[9] 柳蓉,杨小红,董清水,等.罗子沟盆地有机质热演化对砂岩物性的改造作用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(2):460-468. Liu Rong,Yang Xiaohong,Dong Qingshui,et al.Effect of Organic Thermal Evolution on Physical Characteristics of Sandstone in Luozigou Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2014,44(2):460-468.
[10] 蒋恕,蔡东升,朱筱敏,等.辽河坳陷辽中凹陷成岩作用与中深层孔隙演化[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(3):362-369. Jiang Shu,Cai Dongsheng,Zhu Xiaomin,et al.Diagenesis of Liaozhong Sag in Liaohe Ddepression and Pore Evolution in Its Middle-Deep Strata[J].Oil and Gas Geology,2007,28(3):362-369.
[11] 郭长敏,施振生.歧口凹陷沙一段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):31-39. Guo Changmin,Shi Zhensheng.Diagenesis and Pore Evolution of the First Member of Shahejie Formation in Qikou Sag[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(1):31-39.
[12] 敬国超,毕生,陈建民.双河油田核三段砂岩储集层的孔隙演化研究[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(3):292-296. Jing Guochao,Bi Sheng,Chen Jianmin.Research on Pore Evolution of the Paleogene Sandstone Reservoir in the Shuanghe Oil Field[J].Journal of Chendu Universtiy of Technoligy,2001,28(3):292-296.
[13] 邵红梅,刘招君,王成,等.松辽盆地北部深层砂岩成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].世界地质,2005,24(1):58-62. Shao Hongmei,Liu Zhaojun,Wang Cheng, et al.Diagenesis and Pore Evolution of Deep Sandstone in North of Songliao Basin[J].Global Geology,2005,24(1):58-62.
[14] 郭建华,朱锐,周小康.塔河地区西南缘东河砂岩的成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,37(3):572-578. Guo Jianhua,Zhu Rui,Zhou Xiaokang.Diagenesis and Porosity Evolution of Donghe Sandstone in Southwest of Tahe Area[J].Journal of Center South University(Science and Techology),2006,37(3):572-578.
[15] 李士祥,胡明毅,李浮萍.川西前陆盆地上三叠统须家河组砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(4):535-539. Li Shixiang,Hu Mingyi,Li Fuping. Diagenesis and Porosity Evolution of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation Sandstone in Western Sichuan Foreland Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007,18(4):535-539.
[16] 张创,孙卫,高辉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池长8储层成岩相与孔隙度演化[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2014,39(4):411-419. Zhang Chuang,Sun Wei,Gao Hui,et al.Reservoir Diagenetic Facies and Porosity Evolution Pathways of Chang 8 Formation in Huachi,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2014,39(4):411-419.
[17] 薛永超,程林松.白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(2):365-371. Xue Yongchao,Cheng Linsong.The Diagenetic Reservoir Facies of Chang 8 Reservoir in Baibao Oilfield[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(2):365-371.
[18] 赵健,童晓光,肖坤叶,等.乍得Bongor盆地储层沉积成岩特征及其主控因素[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(3):649-658. Zhao Jian,Tong Xiaoguang,Xiao Kunye,et al.Sedimentary-Diagenetic Characteristics of Reservoir Sandstone and Their Controlling Factors in Bongor Basin,Chad[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2013,43(3):649-658.
[19] 高辉,孙卫.鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长8储层成岩作用与有利成岩相带[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(3):542-548. Gao Hui,Sun Wei.Diagenesis and Faorable Diagenetic Facies of Chang 8 Reservoir in Heshui Area,Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2010,40(3):542-548.
[20] 国殿斌,李聪,李忠,等.查干凹陷早白垩世碎屑岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].地质科学,2014,49(4):1258-1268. Guo Dianbin,Li Cong,Li Zhong, et al.Diagenesis and Evolution of Pores in Clastic Rock Reservoir of Early Cretaceous in Chagan Sag[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2014,49(4):1258-1268.
[21] 王艳忠,操应长,葸克来.次生孔隙发育带的概念及石油地质意义新认识[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(3):659-668. Wang Yanzhong,Cao Yingchang,Xi Kelai.New View on the Concept of Secondary Pore Developing Zones and Its Significance of Petroleum Geology[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2013,43(3):659-668.
[22] 王新民,郭彦如,马龙,等.银额盆地侏罗、白垩系油气超系统特征及其勘探方向[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(4):490-495. Wang Xinmin,Guo Yanru,Ma Long, et al.Yin'e Basin:Characters of Jurassic and Cretaceous Petroleum Supersystem and Prospecting Area[J].Advance in Earth Sciences,2001,16(4):490-495.
[23] 李汶国,张晓鹏,钟玉梅.长石砂岩次生溶孔的形成机理[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,2(26):220-229. Li Wenguo,Zhang Xiaopeng,Zhong Yumei.Formation Mechanism of Secondary Dissolved Pores in Arcose[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2005,2(26):220-229.
[24] 贾珍臻, 林承焰, 任丽华, 等. 苏德尔特油田低渗透凝灰质砂岩成岩作用及储层质量差异性演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6):1624-1636. Jia Zhenzhen, Lin Chengyan, Ren Lihua, et al. Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality Evolution of Low Permeability Tuffaceous Sandstones in Suderte Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6):1624-1636.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例

Discussion of Secondary Dissolved Pore Origin in Near Source Sandy Conglomerate Reservoir: A Case Study of Xiang 6 Well Area in Chagan Depression

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2]	陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法：以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3]	王蓓东, 杨胜来 , 赵帅 , 邓惠 , 张钰祥 , 白浩言, 李沁怡, 姜艺. 高磨地区震旦系灯影组四段台内储层储集空间类型及其孔喉结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 804-817.
[4]	夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[5]	张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微. 基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法：以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[6]	丁梦颜, 冯晅, 刘财. 裂缝对岩石非线性弹性特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1051-1061.
[7]	唐华风, 张亚东, 邹明倬, 陆国超, 户景松, 张津铭, 卞海越. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷K油田中生界火山岩储层定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 739-753.
[8]	刘涛, 刘宗堡, 张可佳, 张岩, 张瑞雪, 刘晓文, 徐翠云. 基于深度学习的致密砂岩储层薄片图像生成与识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 724-738.
[9]	周三栋, 张伟鑫, 成巧耘, 魏佳成, 周国栋, . 深部煤储层中煤层水可动性评价方法及动力学机制研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 397-412.
[10]	王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[11]	王振军. 油气储层裂缝预测进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 469-482.
[12]	黄玉龙, 张皓, 郭强, 陈昌. 低阻玄武岩的矿物学特征及其油气地质意义——以辽河坳陷古近系为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 511-521.
[13]	唐华风, 付琦, 尹永康, 高有峰, 户景松, 武海超, 田志文. 花岗岩潜山储层地质研究回顾[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1806-1836.
[14]	王伟明, 胡美硕, 焦立新, 杨斌, 苗长盛, 孙宏亮, 周志超, 曲希玉, . 三塘湖盆地下石炭统新层系石油地质条件及勘探潜力 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1401-1419.
[15]	刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, . 致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.