吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1672-1679.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180194

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LAHARZ的泥石流堆积范围预测模型的建立及应用

王常明, 李桐, 田书文, 李硕   

  1. 吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-18 发布日期:2019-11-30
  • 作者简介:王常明(1966-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学方面的教学和研究工作,E-mail:wangcm@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41572257)

Establishment and Application of Prediction Model for Debris Flow Accumulation Area Based on LAHARZ

Wang Changming, Li Tong, Tian Shuwen, Li Shuo   

  1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2018-07-18 Published:2019-11-30
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572257)

摘要: 为了探究泥石流的堆积范围,利用LAHARZ软件,对北京市密云县泥石流沟喇嘛栅子南沟进行了数值模拟。结合泥石流沟小流域1:10 000数字高程模型图,模拟了泥石流的堆积范围。首先利用中国部分地区泥石流体积和堆积范围的数据资料,获得了泥石流体体积与其堆积范围的新的统计模型B=11.42V0.7156;然后通过模拟沟道与实际沟道的对比,确定了最佳沟道阈值为15 000;再结合现场调查统计和降雨历史资料,确定了10年、20年、50年和100年一遇暴雨条件的泥石流体积值,分别为56 500、72 900、94 200和113 100 m3;最后在此基础上对该条泥石流沟的堆积范围进行了预测。结果表明,100年一遇的暴雨条件下泥石流堆积面积为48 729 m2,到达最远距离约为490 m,已影响下游村庄。

关键词: 泥石流, LAHARZ, 数值模拟, 堆积范围

Abstract: In order to explore the accumulation range of debris flow, a numerical simulation of the Lamazhazi debris flow in Miyun County, Beijing was carried out by using the LAHARZ software combined with the 1:10 000 DEM map of the small drainage basin. The authors utilized the data of volume and accumulation area of debris flow in some areas of China, and obtained a new statistical model for debris flow volume and its accumulation area. The optimal river threshold was determined to be 15 000 through comparing the simulated river channel with the actual river channel; combined with the on-site survey statistical and rainfall historical data, the debris flow volume thresholds for 10, 20, 50, and 100 years under heavy rain were determined to be 56 500, 72 900, 94 200, and 113 100 m3, respectively. The corresponding accumulation area of the debris flow trench is predicted as follows:the area of the debris flow under the condition of once-in-a-century rainstorm is 48 729 m2, and the longest distance is about 490 m, which has an impact on the downstream villages.

Key words: debris flow, LAHARZ, numerical simulation, accumulation area

中图分类号: 

  • P642.23
[1] 唐邦兴.中国泥石流[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000. Tang Bangxing. Debris Flow in China.[M].Beijing:Commercial Press,2000.
[2] 水山高久,北原一平.土石流泛滥夕三口卜夕日夕毛于沙上为土石流对策的效果评价[J].新砂防,1989,40(5):14-21. Takahisa Mizuyama, Ippei Kitahara. Effectiveness Evaluation of Countermeasures for Debris Flow on Sandy Soil[J]. New Sand Protection, 1989,40(5):14-21.
[3] 刘希林,唐川,陈明,等.泥石流危险范围的模型实验预测法[J].自然灾害学报,1993(3):67-73. Liu Xilin, Tang Chuan, Chen Ming,et al. Model Experimental Prediction Method for Debris Flow Hazard Range[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 1993(3):67-73.
[4] O'Brien J S, Julian P Y, Fullerton W T. Two-Dimensional Water Flood and Mudflow Simulation[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1993, 119(2):244-261.
[5] Patra A K,Bauer A C,Nichita C C,et al.Parallel Adaptive Numerical Simulation of Dry Avalanches over Natural Terrain[J].Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,2005,139:1-21
[6] Iverson R M,Denlinger R P. Flow of Variably Fluidized Granular Masses Across Three-Dimensional Terrain:1:Coulomb Mixture Theory[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2001,106(B1):537-552.
[7] Denlinger R P,Iverson R M. Flow of Variably Fluidized Granular Masses Across Three-Dimensional Terrain:2:Numerical Predictions and Experimental Tests[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,2001, 106(B1):553-566.
[8] 余斌.美国纽约州立大学布法罗分校火山碎屑流和泥石流数学模型研究近况[J].山地学报,2005,23(1):126-128. Yu Bin.Research on the Numerical Model of Pyroclastic Flow and Debris Flow in the State University of New York at Buffalo[J].Mountain Research,2005,23(1):126-128.
[9] Han G, Wang D. Numerical Modeling of Anhui Debris Flow[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1996, 122(5):262-265.
[10] Iverson R M, Schilling S P, Vallance J W. Objective Delineation of Lahar-Inundation Hazard Zones[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1998, 110(8):972-984.
[11] Griswold J P, Iverson R M. Mobility Statistics and Automated Hazard Mapping for Debris Flows and Rock Avalanches[M].[S.l.]:US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 2008.
[12] Savage S B, Hutter K. The Motion of A Finite Mass of Granular Material Down a Rough Incline[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1989,199:177-215.
[13] Pierson, Thomas C, Thoure J C, et al. Perturbation and Melting of Snow and Ice by the 13 November 1985 Eruption of Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia, and Consequent Mobilization, Flow and Deposition of Lahars[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 1990, 41(1/2/3/4):17-66.
[14] Scott K M, Vallance J W. Debris Flow, Debris Avalanche and Flood Hazards at and Downstream from Mount Rainier, Washington[J].Hydrologic Atlas.doi.org/10.3133/ha729.
[15] 燕继宇. 内蒙克旗泥石流堆积区平面形态和危险范围预测模型[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2015. Yan Jiyu. The Study of Flat Shape of Alluvial Fans and the Model for Predicting Deposition of Debris Flow in Inner Mongolia[D]. Changchun:Jilin University,2015.
[16] Li Yaoming, Ma Chao, Wang Yujie. Landslides and Debris Flows Caused by an Extreme Rainstorm on 21 July 2012 in Mountains near Beijing, China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019,78:1265-1280.
[17] 王松桂. 线性模型引论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2004. Wang Songgui. Introduction to Linear Model[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2004.
[18] 陈剑平,王常明,张文,等. 北京泥石流灾害预测预警[R].长春:吉林大学,2016. Chen Jianping, Wang Changming, Zhang Wen,et al. Debris Flow Disaster Prediction and Early Warning System in Beijing[R]. Changchun:Jilin University,2016.
[19] O'Callaghan J F, Mark D M. The Extraction of Drainage Networks from Digital Elevation Data[J]. Computer Vision,Graphics, and Image Processing, 1984, 28(3):323-344.
[20] 赵志新,高振宇,杜文成,等.北京市水文手册[M].北京:北京市水务局,2005. Zhao Zhixin, Gao Zhenyu, Du Wencheng, et al. Beijing Hydrological Manual[M]. Beijing:Beijing Water Bureau,2005.
[1] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[9] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[10] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[11] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[12] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[13] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[14] 文海家, 胡吉威, 张辉, 向学坤, 黄勤. 泥石流危险范围Laharz修正模型及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 905-918.
[15] 徐兴华, 肖双粟, 冯杭建, 吕庆. 低频性沟谷型泥石流水动力学冲蚀启动机制及动态监控[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 919-932.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .