吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 617-626.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190270

• 油气勘探开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤层气井产出剖面测试技术及应用

张雷, 樊洪波, 侯伟, 张伟, 郝帅, 孙晓光   

  1. 中石油煤层气有限责任公司, 北京 100028
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-11 出版日期:2020-03-26 发布日期:2020-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 樊洪波(1988-),男,工程师,主要从事煤层气气藏动态分析及采气工艺研究,E-mail:fhb_cbm@petrochina.com.cn E-mail:fhb_cbm@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:张雷(1982-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事煤层气资源评价、勘探开发部署及采气工艺研究,E-mail:zhanglei2010@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05042-002);中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项(2017E-1405)

Production Profile Test Technology and Application of Coalbed Methane

Zhang Lei, Fan Hongbo, Hou Wei, Zhang Wei, Hao Shuai, Sun Xiaoguang   

  1. PetroChina Coalbed Methane Company Limited, Beijing 100028, China
  • Received:2019-12-11 Online:2020-03-26 Published:2020-03-31
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05042-002) and Major Science and Technology Projects of CNPC (2017E-1405)

摘要: 现有常规油气井产出剖面测试方法在煤层气井中适应性较差,测试范围和测量工艺等存在局限性,施工成功率低。因此,本文对煤层气井产出剖面测试技术进行了整体的系统化设计和研发。通过紧凑的结构设计、高度集成,研发了一套可同时进行温度、压力、磁性定位、热式流量、探针持气率、微波持气、涡轮流量和超声流量等多参数测量的煤层气井测井仪,并研制了一套一次下井可进行多种测试技术测量的煤层气井产出剖面测试技术。同时提高了测试仪器的精度和抗干扰能力,开发了多任务多窗口的便携地面系统操作,并研制新型偏心测试井口应用于煤层气井,实现修井作业时不间断连续测试。该技术在鄂尔多斯盆地石楼北区块3口煤层气井进行了现场试验,取得精确、连续的测试数据。测试结果显示,石楼北区块8#+9#煤层为主力产气、产水层。

关键词: 煤层气, 产出剖面测试, 测井仪, 偏心测试井口, 石楼北区块, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: At present, the existing conventional oil and gas well production profile testing methods have limitations such as testing range and measuring technology,low construction success rate,and poor adaptability in coalbed methane wells. In order to make an improvement, a systematic design and development of coal-bed gas well production profile testing technology were carried out. Through the compact structure design and high integration, a set of coalbed methane logging instrument has been developed, which can simultaneously measure the temperature, pressure, magnetic positioning, thermal flow, probe gas, microwave gas, turbine flow, ultrasonic flow,and other multiple parameters. A multi-purpose one-time testing technology for single well coal bed methane production logging profile has been developed. A multi task and multi window portable ground system operation has been developed, and a new type of eccentric testing wellhead has also been developed and applied to coalbed methane well to realize continuous testing during workover. The technology was tested in three coalbed methane wells in north Shilou block, Ordos basin, the test data obtained are accurate and continuous,and the anti-interference ability are improved. The test results show that the 8#+9# coal seam in north Shilou block is the main gas and water producing layer.

Key words: coalbed methane, output profile testing, logging tool, eccentric testing wellhead, north Shilou block, Ordos basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 郑民,李建忠,吴晓智,等.我国常规与非常规天然气资源潜力、重点领域与勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(10):1383-1397. Zheng Min, Li Jianzhong, Wu Xiaozhi, et al.Potential, Key Areas and Exploration Direction of Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(10):1383-1397.
[2] 门相勇,韩征,宫厚健,等.新形势下中国煤层气勘探开发面临的挑战与机遇[J].天然气工业,2018,38(9):10-16. Men Xiangyong, Han Zheng, Gong Houjian, et al. Challenges and Opportunities for CBM Exploration and Development in China Under the New Situation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(9):10-16.
[3] 熊章凯,李瑞,王生维,等.煤层气合层排采流体产出特征及其控制因素[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(6):143-148. Xiong Zhangkai, Li Rui, Wang Shengwei, et al.Output Characteristics and Control Factors of Coalbed Methane Combined Layer Drainage Fluid[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(6):143-148.
[4] 吴艳婷. 多煤层区煤层气合层开发产能及经济性研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2018. Wu Yanting. Research on Productivity and Economy of CBM Development in Multi-Seam Areas[D]. Beijing:China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2018.
[5] 梁涛. 煤层气排采工艺及工作制度优化研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2017. Liang Tao. Study on Optimization of CBM Drainage Technology and Working System[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2017.
[6] 代永革. 智能分层测试技术研究与应用[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2008. Dai Yongge. Research and Application of Intelligent Hierarchical Testing Technology[D]. Daqing:Daqing Petroleum College, 2008.
[7] 张建军,张宝辉.油井深抽过泵产液剖面测试技术[J].油气井测试,2007(1):57-59,78. Zhang Jianjun, Zhang Baohui. Oil Well Deep Pumping Fluid Production Profile Testing Technology[J]. Oil and Gas Well Testing, 2007(1):57-59,78.
[8] 柴金刚. 溢气型低产液低含水产出剖面测井技术研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2014. Chai Jingang. Research on Log Technology of Low-Yield Liquid and Low-Water-Cut Production Profile with Overflow Type[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2014.
[9] 庞伟,邸德家,张同义,等.页岩气井产出剖面测井资料分析及应用[J].地球物理学进展,2018,33(2):700-706. Pang Wei, Di Dejia, Zhang Tongyi, et al.Analysis and Application of Log Data of Shale Gas Well Production Profile[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018,33(2):700-706.
[10] 邢艳娟,孙娟,郭淑梅,等.套管钻井测井解释评价技术[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(增刊2):148-150. Xing Yanjuan, Sun Juan, Guo Shumei, et al. Interpretation and Evaluation Technology of Casing Well Logging[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(Sup. 2):148-150.
[11] 凌龙,任永宏,于波涛,等.分层测压取样技术在油田监测中的应用[J].油气井测试,2017,26(3):60-62. Ling Long, Ren Yonghong, Yu Botao, et al. Application of Stratified Pressure Sampling Technology in Oilfield Monitoring[J]. Oil and Gas Well Testing, 2017, 26(3):60-62.
[12] 朱洪征,郭靖,黄伟,等.低液量水平井存储式产液剖面测井技术与应用[J].钻采工艺,2018,41(6):50-52. Zhu Hongzheng, Guo Jing, Huang Wei, et al.Interpretation Results of Gas Production and Water Production in Production Profile Logging of Test Well[J]. Drilling and Production Technology, 2018, 41(6):50-52.
[13] 艾望希.伞式集流型产液剖面测试技术的应用研究[J].声学与电子工程,2002(2):40-42. Ai Wangxi. Applied Research of Umbrella Collector Profile Testing Technology[J]. Acoustics and Electronic Engineering, 2002(2):40-42.
[14] 高建申,孙建孟,姜艳娇,等.侧向测井电极系结构影响分析及阵列化测量新方法[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(6):1874-1883. Gao Jianshen, Sun Jianmeng, Jiang Yanjiao, et al. Analysis of the Influence of the Structure of the Lateral Logging Electrode System and New Method of Array Measurement[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6):1874-1883.
[15] 贺金鑫,Jonathan Li,闫浩文.一种面向水质监测的地球空间传感器网络架构[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(4):1262-1266. He Jinxin, Li Jonathan, Yan Haowen. A Geospatial Sensor Network Architecture for Water Quality Monitoring[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(4):1262-1266.
[16] 李雯. 热式质量流量计的设计[D].杭州:浙江大学,2007. Li Wen. Design of Thermal Mass Flowmeter[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2007.
[17] 顾宇,叶寒生,冯超,等.一种恒功率热式气体流量计温度补偿实现[J].仪表技术与传感器,2015(10):38-39. Gu Yu, Ye Hansheng, Feng Chao, et al. Temperature Compensation of a Constant Power Thermal Gas Flowmeter[J]. Instrument Technology and Sensor, 2015(10):38-39.
[18] 张金红. 气液两相流流型实验研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2005. Zhang Jinhong. Experimental Study of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Pattern[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2005.
[19] 殷光. 超声波流量测量技术研究[D].西安:西安石油大学,2012. Yin Guang. Research on Ultrasonic Flow Measurement Technology[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Petroleum, 2012.
[20] 张永胜,刘彦军,赵伯涛.涡轮流量计变粘度流量计算与校准方法研究[J].中国测试,2019,45(9):89-93. Zhang Yongsheng, Liu Yanjun, Zhao Botao. Calculation and Calibration Method of Variable Viscosity Flow of Turbine Flowmeter[J]. China Test, 2019,45(9):89-93.
[21] 顾玲嘉,赵凯,任瑞治,等.两种被动微波遥感混合像元分解方法比较[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(6):2057-2064. Gu Lingjia, Zhao Kai, Ren Ruizhi, et al. Comparison of Two Passive Microwave Remote Sensing Hybrid Pixel Decomposition Methods[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(6):2057-2064.
[1] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2] 周三栋, 张伟鑫, 成巧耘, 魏佳成, 周国栋, . 深部煤储层中煤层水可动性评价方法及动力学机制研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 397-412.
[3] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[4] 刘涛, 刘宗堡, 张可佳, 张岩, 张瑞雪, 刘晓文, 徐翠云.

基于深度学习的致密砂岩储层薄片图像生成与识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 724-738.

[5] 刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, .

致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.

[6] 惠瑞瑞, 刘妍, 张志升, 张治东, 李斌, 郭爱华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9段原油地球化学特征与油源对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1468-1481.
[7] 李晓光, 倪智勇, 宋到福, 张旋, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 杭锦旗地区二叠系储层油气成藏期次及流体势特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1110-1123.
[8] 李勇霖, 倪智勇, 李晓光, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区断控气藏差异[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 773-783.
[9] 冯若琦, 刘正伟, 孟越, 蒋丽婷, 韩作为, 刘林玉.

烃源岩有机碳测井预测模型优选及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 688--700.

[10] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[11] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[12] 余传涛, 柳春林, 薛俊杰, 张富明 , 李勇. 废弃矿井煤层气资源地球物理勘探研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1991-2005.
[13] 张晓晴, 康玉国, 孙斌, 孙钦平, 杨青. 勃利盆地七台河断陷煤层气富集特征及有利区优选[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1033-1047.
[14] 胡艳飞, 孔庆莹 . 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长8油层储层主控因素及分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1078-.
[15] 安百州, 曾昭发, 闫照涛, 张代磊, 于朝阳, 赵勇, 杜亚男. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘热储构造模式及地热资源分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1286-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .