吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 1883-1896.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240248

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

 珠江口盆地开平凹陷南部区域中深层原油地球化学特征及成因

高阳东1, 龙祖烈2,3, 陈聪2,3 , 姜大朋2,3 , 马宁2,3    

  1. 1.中海石油(中国)有限公司勘探开发部,北京100010
    2.中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司,广东深圳518054
     3.中海石油深海开发有限公司,广东深圳518054

  • 出版日期:2024-11-26 发布日期:2024-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 陈聪(1987),男,高级工程师,主要从事油气地化与成藏综合方面的研究,E-mail:chencong8@cnooc.com.cn
  • 作者简介:高阳东(1975—),男,教授级高工,主要从事油气地质与油气勘探综合方面的研究,E-mail: gaoyd@cnooc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国海洋石油有限公司“十四五”重大科技项目(KJGG2021-0100)

 Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of Middle and Deep Oil in Southern Region of Kaiping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

Gao Yangdong 1,Long Zulie2,3,Chen Cong2,3,Jiang Dapeng2,3,Ma Ning2,3   

  1. 1. Exploration and Development Department, CNOOC China Limited, Beijing 100010, China
    2. CNOOC China Limited, Shenzhen Branch,  Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China
    3. CNOOC Deepwater Development Limited,  Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China
  • Online:2024-11-26 Published:2024-12-13
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Major Science and Technology Project of CNOOC During the 14th Five-Year Plan Period (KJGG2021-0100)

摘要: 为了分析珠江口盆地开平凹陷原油地球化学特征,明确该区域的油气来源与分布规律,本研究基于开平凹陷南部区域中深层原油及烃源岩的地球化学实验分析测试资料,开展了地球化学特征、原油成因与来源,以及烃源岩评价及分子地球化学特征分析。结果表明:开平凹陷南部区域原油为高含蜡量、轻—中质原油。开平凹陷南部K18-1和K11-4含油气构造原油的地球化学特征较为类似,均具有C21TT或C23TT优势,较低的奥利烷含量,以及C27、C29规则甾烷优势,并有4-甲基C30甾烷的分布,表明该区域原油具有藻类水生生物和陆源高等植物贡献,但K18-1和K11-4含油气构造的原油生烃母质不甚相同。K18-1含油气构造的原油较为特殊,与K11-4和其他区域原油均具有一定差异,奥利烷含量较低,C21TT/C19+20TT指数较高,为较为典型的湖相原油;K11-4含油气构造的原油则与开平凹陷等其他区域的原油相类似,奥利烷含量较高,C21TT/C19+20TT较低,为偏河流-三角洲相原油。开平凹陷南部区域不同层段烃源岩的地球化学特征差异较大,文昌组下段为Ⅰ—Ⅱ2型有机质湖相烃源岩,文昌组上段—恩平组为Ⅱ1—Ⅲ型三角洲煤系烃源岩,前者的有机质丰度及生烃潜力均优于后者。基于上述研究,结合油-源生物标志化合物参数对比及烃源岩的生烃潜力评价,综合认为开平凹陷南部区域原油主要来源于各自含油气构造下伏的文昌组下段烃源岩。开平凹陷南部区域具有较为优质的烃源条件,勘探前景较好。


关键词: 开平凹陷, 地球化学, 油源对比, 原油成因, 烃源岩, 珠江口盆地

Abstract:  To analyze the geochemical characteristics of crude oil in the Kaiping sag of the Pearl River Mouth basin and to ascertain the hydrocarbon sources for more scientific and rational exploration and development strategies, this study conducted an analysis of geochemical features, crude oil genesis, and sourcing based on geochemical experimental analysis and testing data of crude oil and source rocks from the middle-deep layers in the southern region of the Kaiping sag. The results indicate that the crude oil in the southern Kaiping sag is characterized by high wax content and light-to-medium density. The crude oil from the K18-1 and K11-4 hydrocarbon-bearing structures in the southern Kaiping sag exhibits similar geochemical features, including a dominance of C21TT or C23TT, low oleanane content, a preference for C27 and C29 regular steranes, and the presence of 4-methyl C30 sterane, suggesting a contribution from both algal aquatic organisms and terrestrial higher plants. However, there are still certain differences in organic matter input and depositional environments between the hydrocarbon-generating precursors of the crude oil from the two hydrocarbon-bearing structures. The crude oil from the K18-1 hydrocarbon-bearing structure is relatively unique, differing from that of K11-4 and other regions. It has low oleanane content and a high C21TT/C19+20TT index, indicating it is a typical lacustrine crude oil. In contrast, the crude oil from the K11-4 hydrocarbon-bearing structure is similar to that from other regions in the Kaiping sag, with relatively high oleanane content and a lower C21TT/C19+20TT index, suggesting it is more fluvial-deltaic in nature. An evaluation of source rocks and an analysis of molecular geochemical characteristics indicate that there are significant differences in the geochemical features of source rocks from different intervals in the southern Kaiping sag. The lower member of the Wenchang Formation consists of Type Ⅰ-Ⅱ2 organic matter lacustrine source rocks, while the upper member of the Wenchang Formation to the Enping Formation comprises Type Ⅱ1-Ⅲ deltaic coal-measure source rocks. The former exhibits superior organic matter abundance and hydrocarbon generation potential compared to the latter. Based on an analysis of the depositional environments, organic matter sources, and maturity levels of crude oil and source rocks, combined with a comparison of oil-source biomarker compound parameters and an analysis of the hydrocarbon generation potential of source rocks, it is believed that the crude oil in the southern Kaiping sag primarily originates from the lower member of the Wenchang Formation underlying the respective hydrocarbon-bearing structures. The southern Kaiping sag possesses relatively high-quality hydrocarbon source conditions and exhibits favorable exploration prospects.


Key words:  , Kaiping sag, geochemistry, oil-source rock correlation, origin of crude oil, source rock, Pearl River Mouth basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 任宪军, 石云倩. 松辽盆地南部下白垩统火石岭组钙碱性火山岩地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 818-834.
[2] 王常东, 董小宇, 郝晓飞, 姜山, 于兵, 周舰, 王天奇. 广兴—芝瑞盆地上伙房地段流纹斑岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 835-851.
[3] 刘宇泰, 李碧乐, 陈晓琳, 李浩然, 史雨凡, 孙亚明.  东昆仑沟里地区瓦勒尕南矿区花岗闪长岩地球化学特征、锆石U-Pb年代学及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 875-895.
[4] 张海洪, 乔锦燃, 陈国强, 薛晓刚, 邓馨卉, 苗长盛, 李 雪, 郜春生. 张广才岭南部早侏罗世两类I型花岗岩成因:年代学、地球化学和锆石Hf同位素证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 896-914.
[5] 赵振, 秦光雄, 闫佰忠, 马苗苗. 青海省互助土族自治县地热田水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 986-1001.
[6] 何天鑫, 柳蓉, 刘强浩, 宁婷, . 银额盆地下白垩统巴音戈壁组纤维状方解石脉成因机制——热水沉积与同位素证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 497-510.
[7] 李阳, 周文博, 王长虹, 刘娜, 苟军, 孙文博, 孙家兴, 孙德有. 海拉尔盆地克鲁伦凹陷赋铀地层沉积物源#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 522-539.
[8] 徐骏, 高阳, 刘军, 王晓彤, . 大兴安岭北段三矿沟铁铜矿床成因——来自石榴子石U-Pb定年及元素地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 540-556.
[9] 张佳琦, 王志新, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 刘永江. 吉中地区范家屯组变沉积岩碎屑锆石年代学与Hf同位素示踪——对古亚洲洋东段闭合的约束[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 149-172.
[10] 高心如, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 刘永江, 周建波, 宋志伟, 贾祥鹤, 殷浚哲, 洪雨萱, 谭卓, 张佳琦. 蒙古—鄂霍茨克构造域东段晚中生代演化历史——来自岩浆岩和沉积岩的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 36-65.
[11] 陈卓, 周建波, 李功宇, 辛中华, 王红燕, 孙宁辰. 北方造山带东段微陆块构造属性与超大陆重建[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 1-16.
[12] 柳蓉, 何天鑫, 张浩然, 刘强浩, 张苡铭. 中国典型含油气盆地热液作用及其对沉积环境的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1785-1805.
[13] 吴小奇, 刘全有, 王萍, 黎华继, 朱东亚, 李朋朋. 沉积盆地天然气藏中氦气贫化机理及资源潜力:以四川盆地新场气田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1837-1850.
[14] 张万仁, 吴保祥, 韦枫, 杨维刚, 刘杰. 甘肃省宕昌—崖湾地区水系沉积物地球化学特征与锑找矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1462-1480.
[15] 郑伟, 刘东宏, 吴晓东, 孙煜恒, 邢波. 粤西石菉Cu-Mo矿床石榴子石与符山石地球化学特征及其对成矿流体演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1481-1505.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[2] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492 -497 .
[3] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 邵锐. 火山碎屑岩的储层物性--以松辽盆地营城组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 227 -236 .
[4] 潘殿琦,张祖培,潘殿彩,陈义民,徐 瑞. 人工冻土纵波波速与温度和含水率的关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 588 -591 .
[5] 付 哲,周云轩,刘殿伟,刘万崧. 基于特征的面向对象虚拟GIS数据模型设计与原型系统实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 647 -652 .
[6] 卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[7] 黄继国,黄国鑫,聂广正,魏海娟,吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[8] 孙才志,刘玉兰,杨 俊. 下辽河平原地下水生态水位与可持续开发调控研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 249 -254 .
[9] 舒萍,曲延明,王国军,丁日新,艾兴波,纪学雁,唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺. 松辽盆地火山岩储层裂缝地质特征与地球物理识别[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 726 -0733 .
[10] 单玄龙,刘青帝,任利军,赵玉婷. 松辽盆地三台地区下白垩统营城组珍珠岩地质特征与成因[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1146 -1151 .