黑洞大型古地下洞室群工程地质条件及岩体稳定性分析

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201501203

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 214-224.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201501203

黑洞大型古地下洞室群工程地质条件及岩体稳定性分析

尚彦军¹, 杨志法¹, 李丽慧¹, 李天斌², 何万通¹

1. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所工程地质力学重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室, 成都 610059

收稿日期:2014-04-12 发布日期:2015-01-26
作者简介:尚彦军(1967), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事工程地质研究工作, E-mail:jun94@mail.igcas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41372324,41172269);国家重点实验室项目(SKLGP2011K007);中国科学院重点部署项目(KZZD-EW-05-02)

Study of the Engineering Geological Conditions and Rock Mass Stability of Heidong Large Ancient Underground Caverns

Shang Yanjun¹, Yang Zhifa¹, Li Lihui¹, Li Tianbin², He Wantong¹

1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Geomechanics, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610069, China

Received:2014-04-12 Published:2015-01-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

位于浙江天台县蟹山山体内的黑洞洞室群, 以其优越的工程地质条件和完整的岩体结构, 自隋朝以来成为大型古地下采石场。洞室群包括总面积达24 000 m²的21个洞室, 其长轴方向基本沿两组主要地质结构面走向展布。研究显示:总体采石层系上白垩统塘上组(K₂t)第6层灰白色含玻屑熔结凝灰岩;岩体质量指标Q值计算结果为53(I级)。按现代地下洞室设计理念, 其长期稳定最大跨度应不大于50 m, 但实际上5号洞最大跨度达81 m, 可望成为地下人工岩石单洞跨度之最。现场调查发现, 古人在蟹山山脚残留多处地质探洞。古代工匠在洞室开挖过程中遇到断层破碎带时, 采用了近垂直、小断面、高台阶穿越技术方法, 有效保证了不良地质体中无支护开采的安全性和长期稳定性, 这对现代地下工程具有借鉴和工程类比意义。

关键词: 黑洞, 大型古地下采石场, 断层泥, 岩体质量, 长期稳定

Abstract:

The favorable engineering geological conditions and the structural integrity of rock mass make the Heidong ancient man-made underground caverns in Tiantai County, Zhejiang Province a large scale subterraneous quarry ever since the Sui Dynasty. Consisting of 21 single caverns, the group caverns situated in Xieshan cover an area of 24 000 m², and the long axis of the caverns tend towards the same direction of the strike of the major two sets of geological structural planes. The lithology of the overall quarrying area is composed of the Upper Cretaceous Tangshang Formation layer No.6 off-white vitric ignimbrite. The value of the rock mass quality index Q is 53(class I). If the concept of modern underground caverns'architectural design is held, the maximum allowable span for the caverns'secular stability should not be greater than 50 m, and the maximum span of cavern No.5 actually reaches 81 m-promises to be perhaps the greatest span of single cavern. The several geological exploratory holes excavated by the ancients in the foot of Xieshan and the large angle-small section-high bench passing technique adopted in regional fault fracture zone effectively ensure the safety and secular stability of unsupported mining in unfavorable geological bodies. By piling massive quarrying waste in the cavern, the stability of the side walls is enhanced to some extent, and besides, the disposal method is also beneficial to the environment.

Key words: Heidong, large scale ancient quarry, gouge, rock mass quality, long term stability

中图分类号:

P642.3

尚彦军, 杨志法, 李丽慧, 李天斌, 何万通. 黑洞大型古地下洞室群工程地质条件及岩体稳定性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 214-224.

Shang Yanjun, Yang Zhifa, Li Lihui, Li Tianbin, He Wantong. Study of the Engineering Geological Conditions and Rock Mass Stability of Heidong Large Ancient Underground Caverns[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(1): 214-224.

参考文献

[1] 周念清, 杨楠, 汤亚绮, 等. 基于Hoek-Brown准则确定核电工程场地岩体力学参数[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2013, 43(5):1517-1522. Zhou Nianqing, Yang Nan, Tang Yaqi, et al. Determination of Rockmass Mechanical Parameters of Nuclear Power Engineering Site Based on Hoek-Brown Criterion[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Sciences Edition, 2013, 43(5):1517-1522.

[2] 浙江省区域地质调查大队. 区域地质调查报告:1:20万:仙居幅[R]. 北京:中科院地质资料馆, 1978:260. The Regional Geology Survey Team, Geology Bureau of Zhejiang. Chinese Geological Survey Report:1:200 000:Xianju Sheet[R]. Beijing:Geology and Earth Reference Room of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1978:260.

[3] 浙江省区域地质调查大队. 区域地质调查报告:1:20万:临海幅、渔山列岛幅[R]. 北京:中科院地质资料馆, 1980:245. The Regional Geology Survey Team, Geology Bureau of Zhejiang. Chinese Geological Survey Report:1:200 000:Linhai Sheet and Yushan Liedao Sheet[R]. Beijing:Geology and Earth Reference Room of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1980:245.

[4] 浙江省地质矿产局. 浙江省区域地质志[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1989:688. Geology Bureau of Zhejiang. Regional Geological Survey Report of Zhejiang[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1989:688.

[5] 张咸恭, 王思敬, 李智毅. 工程地质学概论[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 2005:102-117. Zhang Xiangong, Wang Sijing, Li Zhiyi. A Guide to Engineering Geology[M]. Beijing:Seismological Publishing House, 2005:102-117.

[6] GB50086-2001 杆喷射混凝土支护技术规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2001. GB50086-2001 Specification for Bolt-Shotcrete Support[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2001.

[7] 王思敬, 杨志法, 刘竹华. 地下工程岩体稳定性分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1984. Wang Sijing, Yang Zhifa, Liu Zhuhua. Analysis of Stability of Rock Mass for Underground Engineering[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1984.

[8] 宿白. 石窟·中国大百科全书:文物·博物馆[M]. 北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 1995:473-475. Su Bai. Stone Cavern Temple ·China Encyclopedia:Heritage and Museum[M]. Beijing:Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 1995:473-475.

[9] Barton N, By T L, Chryssanthakis P, et al. Predicted and Measured Performance of the 62 m Span Norwegian Olympic Ice Hockey Cavern at Gjøvik[J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech Abstr, 1994, 31:617-641.

[10] Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J. Engineering Cla-ssification of Rock Masses for the Design of Tunnel Support[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1974, 6:189-236.

[11] Yang Zhifa, Shang Yanjun, Li Lihui, et al. Long-Term Stability of Large Span Cavern at the 1 400-Year Heidong Quarry[J]. Episodes, 2013, 36(1):39-46.

[12] CECS239 2008岩石与岩体鉴定和描述标准[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2008. CECS239 2008 Standard for Identification and De-scription of Rock & Rock Mass[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2008.

[13] 杨志法, 李丽慧, 潘炜. 关于大型古地下工程若干问题的讨论[J].科学技术与工程, 2003, 3(5):464-466. Yang Zhifa, Li Lihui, Pan Wei. Discussions About Large-Scale Ancient Underground Engineerings[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2003, 3(5):464-466.

[14] 张中俭. 中国古代大面积薄石板劈裂技术及其岩石力学原理[R]. 北京:中科院地质与地球物理研究所, 2012. Zhang Zhongjian. Technique of Splitting Large-Area Thin Stone Plate of Ancient Chinese and Its Rock Mechanics Principles[R]. Beijing:Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

黑洞大型古地下洞室群工程地质条件及岩体稳定性分析

Study of the Engineering Geological Conditions and Rock Mass Stability of Heidong Large Ancient Underground Caverns

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	柴乃杰, 周文梁. 基于优化组合权-模糊可变集的坝基岩体质量分级[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 514-.
[2]	王梓龙, 裴向军, 张御阳, 张硕, 魏小佳, 王双. 松动岩体工程特性研究——以雅砻江楞古水电站松动岩体为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1376-1388.
[3]	王吉亮, 郝文忠, 黄孝泉, 许琦, 魏雨军, 周炳强, 徐磊. 乌东德水电站特高拱坝施工期坝基岩体质量工程地质评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1566-1573.
[4]	周念清，杨楠，汤亚琦，秦敏. 基于Hoek-Brown准则确定核电工程场地岩体力学参数[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1517-1522.
[5]	李明, 李广杰, 张文. 基于概率统计的可拓学分析方法在边坡岩体质量分级中的应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1488-1493.
[6]	张鹏, 陈剑平, 张丽, 肖云华. 隧道围岩断面轮廓分维数与岩体质量关系[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1110-1114.
[7]	邱道宏，陈剑平，阙金声，安鹏程. 基于粗糙集和人工神经网络的洞室岩体质量评价[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 86-0091.