吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 13-24.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201501102

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲积扇砾岩储层构型特征及其对储层开发的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例

陈欢庆1, 梁淑贤1, 舒治睿2, 邓晓娟1, 彭寿昌2   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-20 发布日期:2015-01-26
  • 作者简介:陈欢庆(1979), 男, 工程师, 博士, 主要从事储层地质学研究, E-mail:hqchen2009@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05016-006)

Characteristics of Conglomerate Reservoir Architecture of Alluvial Fan and Its Controlling Effects to Reservoir Development:Taking Alluvial Fan Reservoir in Some Area of Northwest Margin of Junggar Basin as an Example

Chen Huanqing1, Liang Shuxian1, Shu Zhirui2, Deng Xiaojuan1, Peng Shouchang2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2014-07-20 Published:2015-01-26

摘要:

冲积扇砾岩储层作为陆相沉积储层十分重要的类型之一, 一直是我国油气勘探开发的重点领域。以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区下克拉玛依组为例, 根据砾岩储层相变快、储层非均质性强等特点, 在沉积相分析的基础上, 对储层构型特征进行了精细分析, 将储层划分为槽流砾石体、槽滩砂砾体、漫洪内砂体、漫洪内细粒、片流砾石体、漫洪外砂体、漫洪外细粒、辫流水道、辫流砂砾坝、漫流砂体、漫流细粒、径流水道和水道间细粒共13种构型单元, 其中以槽流砾石体、片流砾石体、辫流水道和辫流砂砾坝占主导。构型解剖结果显示:研究区砾岩储层槽流砾石体平面呈条带状, 剖面厚度大, 为2~8 m;片流砾石体沉积厚度大, 一般为2~7 m;辫流水道构型单元宽度为80~400 m, 剖面呈透镜状, 厚度为2~7 m;辫流砂砾坝沉积厚度较大, 为2~7 m。上述构型单元受北部和西北部方向物源控制明显。储层构型特征能有效反映储层非均质性、连通性等属性, 对油田开发具有较强的控制作用。

关键词: 准噶尔盆地, 下克拉玛依组, 冲积扇, 砾岩储层, 储层构型, 油田开发

Abstract:

Being one of the important kind of reservoir, conglomerate reservoir always was hotpot area to explorationists and developers of oilfield. Taking Lower Karamay Formation of some area in northwest margin of Junggar basin as an example, it characteristics of sedimentary facies quick changes and heterogeneity intensity. reservoir architecture characteristics were finely analyzed on the base of sedimentary facies studied. The reservoirs were carved into thirteen kind of architecture, such as, channel flow conglomerate, channel beach conglomerate, sandstone of inner belt of sheet flood, fine grained of inner belt of sheet flood, laminar flow conglomerate, sandstone of exterior belt of sheet flood, fine grained of exterior belt of sheet flood, braided channel, braided sandstone-conglomerate dam, sandstone of unconcentrated flow, fine grained of unconcentrated flow, streamflow channel, fine grained between streamflow channels. And channel flow conglomerate and laminar flow conglomerate and braided channel and braided sandstone-conglomerate dam take the leading roles. The results of reservoir architecture analyzed indicated development laws of different kind of architecture. Channel flow conglomerates extend like banding, and had thickness from two meters to eight meters. Laminar flow conglomerates are two meters to seven meters in vertical section. Braided channels are wide about eighty meters to four hundred meters. Braided sandstone-conglomerate dams take thickness about two meters to seven meters. All kinds of architecture are controlled by the sedimentary source of north and north-west directions. Reservoir architecture characteristics could finely reflect the properties of reservoir of heterogeneity and connectivity. And it has an important controlled function to oilfield development.

Key words: Junggar basin, Lower Karamay Formation, alluvial fan, conglomerate reservoir, reservoir architecture, oilfield development

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] 吴胜和.储层表征与建模[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2010:136-174. Wu Shenghe. Reservoir Characterization & Modeling[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2010:136-174.

[2] 兰朝利, 吴峻, 张为民, 等.冲积沉积构型单元分析法:原理及其适用性[J].地质科技情报, 2001, 20(2):37-40. Lan Chaoli, Wu Jun, Zhang Weimin, et al. Architectural Element Analysis for Alluvial Deposits:Principle and Applicability[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2001, 20(2):37-40.

[3] Rayl S, Chakraborty T. Lower Gondwana Fluvial Succession of the Pench-Kanhan Valley, India:Stratigraphic Architecture and Depositional Controls[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2002, 151:243-271.

[4] Prather B E. Controls on Reservoir Distribution, Architecture and Stratigraphic Trapping in Slope Settings[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003, 20:529-545.

[5] Williams B P J, Hillier R D. Variable Alluvial Sandstone Architecture Within the Lower Old Red Sandstone, Southwest Wales[J]. Geological Journal, 2004, 39:257-275.

[6] 岳大力, 吴胜和, 刘建民. 曲流河点坝地下储层构型精细解剖方法[J].石油学报, 2007, 28(4):99-103. Yue Dali, Wu Shenghe, Liu Jianmin. An Accurate Method for Anatomizing Architecture of Subsurface Reservoir in Point Bar of Meandering River[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(4):99-103.

[7] 陈欢庆, 朱筱敏. 精细油藏描述中的沉积微相建模进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2008, 27(2):73-79. Chen Huanqing, Zhu Xiaomin. Microfacies Modeling in Fine Reservoir Description[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2008, 27(2):73-79.

[8] 伊振林, 吴胜和, 杜庆龙, 等.冲积扇储层构型精细解剖方法:以克拉玛依油田六中区下克拉玛依组为例[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2010, 40(4):939-946. Yi Zhenlin, Wu Shenghe, Du Qinglong, et al. An Accurate Anatomizing Method for Structure of Reservoir of Alluvial Fan:A Case Study on Lower Karamay Formation, Liuzhong Area, Karamay Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2010, 40 (4):939-946.

[9] 陈平, 陆永潮, 杜学斌, 等.准噶尔盆地腹部压性背景下"二元体系域"层序构型特征及其形成机理[J].地质科学, 2010, 45(4):1078-1087. Chen Ping, Lu Yongchao, Du Xuebin, et al. Dual Characteristic of Sequence Structures and Forming Mechanism in Compressional Abdominal Area of Junggar Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2010, 45 (4):1078-1087.

[10] 曾祥平.储集层构型研究在油田精细开发中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(4):483-489. Zeng Xiangping. Application of Reservoir Structure Research in the Fine Exploitation of Oilfields [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(4):483-489.

[11] 王凤兰, 白振强, 朱伟. 曲流河砂体内部构型及不同开发阶段剩余油分布研究[J].沉积学报, 2011, 29(3):512-519. Wang Fenglan, Bai Zhenqiang, Zhu Wei. Study on Geological 3D Reservoir Architecture Modeling and Distribution of Remaining Oil of Different Development Stage in Meandering Reservoir[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(3):512-519.

[12] Olariu M I, Aiken C L V, Bhattacharya J P. Interpretation of Channelized Architecture Using Three-Dimensional Photo Real Models, Pennsylvanian Deep-Water Deposits at Big Rock Quarry, Arkansasq[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28:1157-1170.

[13] 侯加根, 刘钰铭, 徐芳, 等.黄骅坳陷孔店油田新近系馆陶组辫状河砂体构型及含油气性差异成因[J].古地理学报, 2008, 10(5):459-464. Hou Jiagen, Liu Yuming, Xu Fang, et al. Architecture of Braided Fluvial Sandbody and Origin for Petroliferous Diference of the Guantao Formation of Neogene in Kongdian Oilfield of Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2008, 10(5):459-464.

[14] 吴胜和, 范峥, 许长福, 等. 新疆克拉玛依油田三叠系克下组冲积扇内部构型[J].古地理学报, 2012, 14(3):331-340. Wu Shenghe, Fan Zheng, Xu Changfu, et al. Internal Architecture of Alluvial Fan in the Triassic Lower Karamay Formation in Karamay Oilfield, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14 (3):331-340.

[15] 郑占, 吴胜和, 许长福, 等.克拉玛依油田六区克下组冲积扇岩石相及储层质量差异[J].石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(4):463-471. Zheng Zhan, Wu Shenghe, Xu Changfu, et al. Lithofacies and Reservoirs of Allluvial Fan in the Lower Keramay Formation in the Block 6 of Karamay Oilfield, the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(4):463-471.

[16] 姜在兴.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2003:270-282. Jiang Zaixing. Sedimentary[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003:270-282.

[17] 李庆昌, 吴虻, 赵立春, 等. 砾岩油田开发[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1997. Li Qingchang, Wu Meng, Zhao Lichun, et al.Development of Conglomerate Oilfield[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1997.

[1] 吴宇灏, 于祥江, 芮 雪, 于 航, 鞠天航, 李德靖. 地质环境演变对青藏高原古人类聚落的影响:以柴达木盆地诺木洪文化塔里他里哈遗址为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 915-923.
[2] 巴忠臣, 秦军, 华美瑞, 张宗斌, 秦赛赛, 张稳. 隐蔽性微小断裂智能识别技术在准噶尔盆地MH1井区的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 612-626.
[3] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[4] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[5] 何中波, 冀华丽, 胡宝群, 孙萧, 钟军, 杨喆, 陈虹. 准噶尔盆地北部晚白垩世至新近纪沉积介质环境演化特征及其对铀成矿的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 800-810.
[6] 张增宝. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷深层侏罗系砂岩储层差异性成岩演化与烃类充注[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1672-1688.
[7] 黄 睿, 张 颖, 史 骁, 孙跃武. 新疆准噶尔盆地东缘中—晚二叠世植物群及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 403-.
[8] 罗超, 李晓颜, 刘渠洋, 张强, 于洲, 代洁, 尹楠鑫, 林魂. 砂质辫状河储层构型差异特征分析——以苏里格气田盒8下亚段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 30-43.
[9] 丁超, 解阳波, 张家豪, 熊志国, 马小梅, 袁翔, 张雷, 方石. 三维高密度电法揭示SAGD地面窜漏通道[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 2021-2033.
[10] 王柯, 高崇龙, 王剑, 刘明, 罗正江, 陈海峰, 刘可, 任影, 邓毅. 准噶尔盆地南缘东段侏罗系—白垩系物源及其演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 328-347.
[11] 刘英辉. 准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区风城组云质岩类沉积环境及成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 80-.
[12] 单祥, 郭华军, 郭旭光, 邹志文, 李亚哲, 王力宝. 低渗透储层孔隙结构影响因素及其定量评价——以准噶尔盆地金龙2地区二叠系上乌尔禾组二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 637-649.
[13] 瞿雪姣, 李继强, 张吉, 赵忠军, 戚志林, 罗超. 辫状河致密砂岩储层构型单元定量表征方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1342-1352.
[14] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[15] 马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛, 王彦君, 魏彩茹. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1695-1704.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .