吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 993-1001.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201504103

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

川西新场气田上三叠统须二、须四段相对优质储层成因差异性分析

刘四兵, 沈忠民, 吕正祥, 宋荣彩, 王鹏   

  1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室/成都理工大学, 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-09 发布日期:2015-07-26
  • 作者简介:刘四兵(1981),男,讲师,博士,主要从事油气储层地质方面的研究,E-mail:lsbcdut@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41172119);国家重点实验室基金项目(PLC201101)

Contributing Factor Divergence Analysis of Relative High Quality Reservoir of Upper Triassic in the 2nd and 4th Member of Xujiahe Formation of Xinchang Gas Field in West Sichuan

Liu Sibing, Shen Zhongmin, Lü Zhengxiang, Song Rongcai, Wang Peng   

  1. State Key Lab of Oil-Gas Reservoirs Geology and Exploitation/Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Received:2014-10-09 Published:2015-07-26

摘要:

川西新场地区须家河组储层埋藏深度大、成岩作用复杂、致密化程度高,但在整体超致密背景下,局部仍发育较多的相对优质储层.相对优质储层在埋深较大的须二段,往往发育较多的原生孔隙,和相对次要的次生孔隙;而埋深较小的须四段储层,次生孔隙占绝对优势,原生孔隙发育较少.造成这一现象的主要原因是须二、须四段原生孔隙保存和次生孔隙发育机制上的差异.须二段储层中较多刚性颗粒的存在和较为发育的包膜绿泥石是原生孔隙得到较好保存的主要原因;而其较大的单砂层厚度和较少的泥岩发育则导致了有机酸性流体的注入量较少,长石溶蚀有限.须四段塑性岩屑含量明显较高,储层原生孔隙在压实作用下几乎消失殆尽,但较薄的单砂层厚度和较多泥岩的叠置发育使长石在有机酸性流体作用下得到了充分溶蚀;这是须四段储层次生孔隙相对发育、长石含量很低、同时还有自生高岭石沉淀的主要原因.

关键词: 致密砂岩, 相对优质储层, 须家河组, 新场气田

Abstract:

Major relative high quality reservoirs are locally developed in the context of the entire super densified Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang in west Sichuan. They have a great burial depth, complicate diagenesis, and high density. The relative high quality reservoir is in the 2nd member of Xujiahe Formation with a big burial depth, which developed more primary pores than secondary pores; while the 4th member of Xujiahe Formation with small burial depth developed more secondary pores than primary pores. The main reason of this appearance is the divergent mechanisms of the primary pore conservation and secondary pore development of the 2nd and 4th member of Xujiahe Formation. The existence of the relatively developed encapsulating chlorite and the harsh particulates led to the well conservation of the primary pores in the 2nd member of Xujiahe Formation; while the single thick sand and the undeveloped mudstone layer cause the poor influx of organic acid fluid, so that the feldspar corrosion is limited. As for the 4th member of Xujiahe Formation, the plasticity of the rocks is relatively high; this, in turn, resulted in the disappearance of the primary pores under the diagenetic compaction, while the secondary pores are relatively popular with minor authigenic kaolinite sedimentated, multiple thin single sand and mudstone developed, and sufficient feldspar corroded by organic acid fluid.

Key words: tight sandstones, relatively high-quality reservoir, Xujiahe Formation, Xinchang gasfield

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] Weller J M.Compaction of Sediments[J].AAPG Bulletin, 1959, 43: 273-310.

[2] Houseknecht D W. Assessing the Relative Importance of Compaction Processes and Cementation to Reduction of Porosity in Sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71: 633-642.

[3] Paxton S T, Szabo J O, Calvert C S, et al. Preservation of Primary Porosity in Deeply Buried Sandstones: A New Play Concept from the Cretaceous Tuscaloosa Sandstone of Louisiana[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74: 737.

[4] Szabo J O, Paxton S T. Intergranular Volume (IGV) Decline Curves for Evaluating and Predicting Compaction and Porosity Loss in Sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75: 678.

[5] Lander R H,Walderhaug O.Porosity Prediction Through Simulation of Sandstone Compaction and Quartz Cementation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83:433-449.

[6] Paxton S T, Szabo J O, Ajdukiewicz J M, et al. Construction of an Intergranular Compaction Curve for Evaluating and Predicting Compaction and Porosity Loss in Rigid Grained Sandstone Reservoirs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86: 2047-2067.

[7] Ajdukiewiczl J M, Lander R H. Sandstone Reservoir Quality Prediction: The State of the Art[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2010, 94: 1083-1091.

[8] Pittman E D,Larese R E.Compaction of Lithic Sands: Experimental Results and Applications[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75(8): 1279-1299.

[9] 吕正祥,刘四兵. 川西须家河组超致密砂岩成岩作用与相对优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩石学报,2009,25(10):273-283. Lü Zhengxiang, Liu Sibing. Ultra-Tight Sandstone Diagenesis and Mechanism for the Formation of Relatively High-Quality Reservoir of Xujiahe Group in Western Sichuan[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(10): 273-283.

[10] Bloch S, Lander H R, Bonnel L, et al. Anomalously High Porosity and Permeability in Deeply Buried Sandstone Reservoirs: Origin and Predictability[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86: 301-328.

[11] 黄思静,黄可可,冯文立,等. 成岩过程中长石、高岭石、伊利石之间的物质交换与次生孔隙的形成:来自鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界和川西凹陷三叠系须家河组的研究[J]. 地球化学,2009,38(5):498-506. Huang Sijing, Huang Keke, Feng Wenli, et al. Mass Exchanges Among Feldspar, Kaolinite and Illite and Their Influences on Secondary Porosity Formation in Clastic Diagenesis: A Case Study on the Upper Paleozoic, Ordos Basin and Xujiahe Formation, Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Geochimica, 2009, 38(5): 498-506.

[12] 叶素娟,吕正祥. 川西新场气田下沙溪庙组致密储层特征及储集性影响因素[J]. 矿物岩石, 2010, 30(3): 96-104. Ye Sujuan, Lü Zhengxiang. Reservoir Characterization and Factors Influencing Reservoir Characteristics of the Lower Shaximiao Formation in Xinchang Gas Field, Western Sichuan, China[J]. Journal of Mine-ralogy and Petrology, 2010, 30(3): 96-104.

[13] 赵艳,吴胜和,徐樟有,等.川西新场气田上三叠统须家河组二段致密砂岩优质储层控制因素[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(4):1-6. Zhao Yan, Wu Shenghe, Xu Zhangyou, et al. Control Factors of Compacted High-Quality Sandstone Reservoirs of Member 2 of Xujiahe Formation, Upper Triassic in Xinchang Gas Field of Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum: Edition of Natural Sciences, 2010, 34(4): 1-6.

[14] 刘四兵,沈忠民,刘昊年,等.川西坳陷中段上三叠统须家河组水岩相互作用机制[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):47-58. Liu Sibing, Shen Zhongmin, Liu Haonian, et al. Mechanism of Water-Rock Interaction of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Middle Part of Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 47-58.

[15] Worden R H, Needham S J, Cuadros J, et al. The Worm Gut: A Natural Claymineral Factory and a Possible Cause of Diagenetic Grain Coats in Sandstones[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2006, 89: 428-431.

[16] Hillier S, Fallick A E, Matter A. Origin of Pore-Lining Chlorite in the Aeolian Rotliegend of Northern Germany[J]. Clay Minerals, 1996, 31: 153-171.

[17] Ehrenberg S N. Preservation of Anomalously High Porosity in Deepburied Sandstones by Grain Coating Chlorite: Example from the Norwegian Continental Shelf[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1993, 77: 1260-1286.

[18] 黄思静,谢连文,张萌,等.中国三叠系陆相砂岩中自生绿泥石的形成机制及其与储层孔隙保存的关系[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(3):273-291. Huang Sijing, Xie Lianwen, Zhang Meng, et al. Formation Mechanism of Authigenic Chlorite and Relation to Preservation of Porosity in Nonmarine Triassic Reservoir Sandstones, Ordos Basin and Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Edition of Natural Sciences, 2004, 31(3): 273-291.

[19] 孙全力,孙晗森,贾趵,等.川西须家河组致密砂岩储层绿泥石成因及其与优质储层关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(5):751-757. Sun Quanli, Sun Hansen, Jia Bao, et al. Genesis of Chlorites and Its Relationship with High-Quality Reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation Tight Sandstones,Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(5): 751-757.

[1] 刘涛, 刘宗堡, 张可佳, 张岩, 张瑞雪, 刘晓文, 徐翠云.

基于深度学习的致密砂岩储层薄片图像生成与识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 724-738.

[2] 吴小奇, 刘全有, 王萍, 黎华继, 朱东亚, 李朋朋. 沉积盆地天然气藏中氦气贫化机理及资源潜力:以四川盆地新场气田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1837-1850.
[3] 张可佳, 徐意行, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 赵玉武, 刘涛, 张岩, 贺友志. 基于混合智能的致密砂岩薄片面孔率计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1774-1784.
[4] 宋林珂, 刘四兵, 曾青高, 周栋, 唐大海, 王锦西.

四川盆地川中—川西过渡带中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密砂岩相对优质储层成因机制 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 371-388.

[5] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[6] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[7] 贺婷, 周宁, 吴啸宇. 基于深度全连接神经网络的储层有效砂体厚度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1262-1274.
[8] 李彦泽, 商琳, 王群会, 孙彦春, 邢建鹏, 蒋东梁, 陈浩. 断陷盆地强非均质低渗-致密砂岩储层综合分类——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1830-1843.
[9] 张立亚, 徐 文, 沈艳杰. 松辽盆地南部深层致密砂岩气储层形成机制及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1707-1717.
[10] 吴 蒙1, 2, 秦 勇2, 申 建2, 宋党育3, 王晓青3, 张谷春1, 李国璋2, 朱士飞1. 致密砂岩储层束缚水饱和度影响因素:以鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区为例#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 68-.
[11] 张益明, 秦小英, 郭智奇, 牛聪, 王迪, 凌云. 针对致密砂岩气储层复杂孔隙结构的岩石物理模型及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 927-939.
[12] 张大智, 初丽兰, 周翔, 王晓莲, 李鑫. 松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷沙河子组致密气储层成岩作用与成岩相特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 22-34.
[13] 吴蒙, 秦勇, 王晓青, 李国璋, 朱超, 朱士飞. 中国致密砂岩储层流体可动性及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 35-51.
[14] 崔景伟, 朱如凯. 致密砂岩层内强钙质胶结物成因机制及其意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 957-967.
[15] 吴蒙, 朱超, 秦云虎, 秦勇, 申建, 赵恒, 朱士飞. 临兴地区山西组致密砂岩气开采潜力地质评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 991-1002.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[2] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492 -497 .
[3] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 邵锐. 火山碎屑岩的储层物性--以松辽盆地营城组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 227 -236 .
[4] 潘殿琦,张祖培,潘殿彩,陈义民,徐 瑞. 人工冻土纵波波速与温度和含水率的关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 588 -591 .
[5] 付 哲,周云轩,刘殿伟,刘万崧. 基于特征的面向对象虚拟GIS数据模型设计与原型系统实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 647 -652 .
[6] 卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[7] 黄继国,黄国鑫,聂广正,魏海娟,吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[8] 孙才志,刘玉兰,杨 俊. 下辽河平原地下水生态水位与可持续开发调控研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 249 -254 .
[9] 舒萍,曲延明,王国军,丁日新,艾兴波,纪学雁,唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺. 松辽盆地火山岩储层裂缝地质特征与地球物理识别[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 726 -0733 .
[10] 赵玉岩,郝立波,张志立,陆继龙,孙广瑞. 金属矿床勘查找矿信息系统的设计与实现[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 161 -0166 .