吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1060-1072.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201504110

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示

李志明1,2, 芮晓庆1,2, 黎茂稳1,2, 曹婷婷1,2, 徐二社1,2, 陶国亮1,2, 蒋启贵1,2   

  1. 1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏 无锡 214151;
    2. 中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214126
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-25 发布日期:2015-07-26
  • 作者简介:李志明(1968),男,高级工程师,主要从事油气地球化学研究与石油地质综合评价,E-mail:lizm.syky@sinopec.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家"973"计划项目(2014CB239101);中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发部项目(P12012)

Characteristics of Typical Hybrid Shale-Oil System in North America and Its Implications

Li Zhiming1,2, Rui Xiaoqing1,2, Li Maowen1,2, Cao Tingting1,2, Xu Ershe1,2, Tao Guoliang1,2, Jiang Qigui1,2   

  1. 1. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, RIPEP, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214151, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2014-11-25 Published:2015-07-26

摘要:

北美Williston 盆地Bakken组属典型的混合页岩油系统.笔者系统剖析了Bakken组混合页岩油系统富有机质层段和贫有机质层段的地质与地球化学、物性与裂缝发育以及页岩油特征,揭示了页岩油"甜点"主要受高含轻质油的富有机质成熟页岩、异常压力、微裂缝以及贫有机质层的白云石化作用共同控制,同时由于贫有机质层具有相对高的孔隙度、渗透率以及低的吸附量,因此可认为其是混合型页岩油系统中的主要产层.这对目前我国东部陆相页岩油勘探效果不佳的因素分析具有重要启示.把页岩油勘探目标层仅仅聚焦于富有机质泥页岩层段是勘探效果欠佳的主观因素;而富有机质泥页岩层段天然微裂缝发育局限、滞留油主要赋存在有机质中、热演化程度偏低使滞留油较重以及湖相Ⅰ型烃源岩生成的油含蜡量高等因素,是导致可采的页岩油量十分有限的客观因素.为此,针对我国东部湖盆页岩油的勘探,建议:加强成熟富有机质层系中贫有机质碳酸盐岩或粉砂、细砂岩薄夹层的精细评价与勘探;加强成熟富有机质泥页岩层段裂缝型页岩油的评价与勘探.

关键词: 混合页岩油系统, Bakken组, Williston盆地, 页岩油勘探, 中国东部, 北美, 页岩油

Abstract:

The Bakken Formation of Williston basin in North America is a typical hybrid shale-oil system. The characteristics of geology and geochemistry, porosity and permeability, micro-fracture development, and shale oil for organic-rich shales and juxtaposed organic-lean intervals, are systematically analyzed in this paper. The results show that the shale oil sweet point is mainly controlled by the mature shale, which is rich in organic matter and high content of light oils, abnormal pressure, well-developed micro-fractures, and dolomitization in organic-lean intervals all together. Meanwhile, organic-lean intervals are the main shale oil productive layer in hybrid shale oil system due to its relative high porosity, permeability, and low adsorptive capacity. This has an important implication for discovering the causes that the continental shale oil exploring results are not desirable in Eastern China. The subjective factor is that only organic rich shale and mudstone are taken as shale oil exploration targets; while the objective factors are that the development of natural micro-fracture is limited in organic-rich shale and mudstone but the organic-lean intervals, and the retained oil is mainly existed in organic matter with high wax generated from lacustrine source rocks relative to marine source rocks; the maturity of organic-rich shale and mudstone is not high enough to generate lighter oil. Therefore, we suggest to enhance a fine evaluation and an exploration of organic-lean carbonate or silt and fine sandstone with thin intervals in mature organic-rich shale system; and mature organic-rich shale with open fractures is proposed for shale oil exploring in lacustrine face basins of Eastern China.

Key words: hybrid shale-oil system, Bakken Formation, Williston basin, shale oil exploring, Eastern China, North America, shale oil

中图分类号: 

  • P618.12

[1] Jarvie D M. Shale Resource Systems for Oil and Gas: Part 2-Shale-Oil Resource Systems[C]//Breyer J A. Shale Reservoirs-Giant Resources for the 21st Century: AAPG Memoir 97. Houston: AAPG,2012:89-119.

[2] 王志刚. 沾化凹陷裂缝型泥质岩油藏研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1):41-43. Wang Zhigang. A Study of Shale-Fractured Reservoirs in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003,30(1):41-43.

[3] 徐福刚,李琦,康仁华,等. 沾化凹陷泥岩裂缝油气藏研究[J]. 矿物岩石,2003,23(1):74-76. Xu Fugang, Li Qi, Kang Renhua, et al. The Characteristics of Fractured Shale Reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of Mineral and Petrology, 2003,23(1):74-76.

[4] 智凤琴,李琦,樊德华,等. 沾化凹陷泥岩裂缝油气藏油气运移聚集研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(5):27-29. Zhi Fengqin, Li Qi, Fan Dehua, et al. Study on Migration and Accumulation of Oil and Gas in Fractured Shale Reservoir in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004,11(5):27-29.

[5] 周庆凡,杨国丰. 致密油与页岩油的概念与应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2012,33(4):541-544,570. Zhou Qingfan, Yang Guofeng. Definition and Application of Tight Oil and Shale Oil Terms[J]. Oil &Gas Geology, 2012,33(4):541-544,570.

[6] 孙红军,刘立群,吴世祥,等. 从深水油气勘探到页岩油气开发[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(5):1-5. Sun Hongjun, Liu Liqun, Wu Shixiang, et al. From Deep Water Area Oil and Gas Exploring to Development of Shale Oil and Gas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009,30(5):1-5.

[7] Pollastro R M,Roberts L N R,Cook T A. Geologic Assessment of Technically Recoverable Oil in the Devonian and Mississippian Bakken Formation[R]. Reston: U S Geological Survey, 2011:4-5.

[8] Haid J H. Tectonic Subsidence Analysis of the Williston Basin[D]. Saskatchewan:University of Saskatchewan, 1991:1-2.

[9] Pitman J K, Price L C, LeFever J A. Diagenesis and Fracture Development in the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin: Implications for Reservoir Quality in the Middle Member[D]. Denver: U S Geological Survey,2001:2-3.

[10] Sloss L L.Sequences in the Cratonic Interior of North America[J]. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 1963,74:93-113.

[11] Sloss L L. The Williston Basin in the Family of Cratonic Basins// Longman M W. Williston Basin: Anatomy of a Cratonic Oil Province. Denver:Denver Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists,1987:1-8.

[12] Green A G,Weber W,Hajnal Z.Evolution of Proterozoic Terranes Beneath the Williston Basin[J]. Geology, 1985, 13:624-628.

[13] Gerhard L C, Anderson S B. Geology of the Williston Basin (United States Portion)[C]// Sloss L L. Sedimentary Cover-North American Craton. Boulder: Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America,1988: 221-241.

[14] Sonnenberg S A, Vickery J, Theloy C, et al. Middle Bakken Facies, Williston Baisn, USA: A Key to Prolific Production[EB/OL].[2012-11-05]. http://www. searchanddiscovery. Com /abstracts /html / 2011 /annual / abstracts / Sonnenberg3. Html.

[15] Nordeng S H. The Bakken Petroleum System: An Example of a Continuous Petroleum Accumulation[J]. DMR Newsletter, 2010, 36(1):21-24.

[16] Halabura S,Buatois L,Angulo S,et al.From Source to Trap: A Review of the Bakken Petroleum System, Upper Devonian-Mississippian, Southeastern Saskatchewan[J]. Saskatchewan Geological Survey,2007(1):1-8.

[17] Smith M G, Bustin R M. Sedimentology of the Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Bakken Formation, Williston Basin[C]//Hunter L D V,Schalla R A. 7th International Williston Basin Symposium Guidebook. Billings: Montana Geological Society,1995:103-114.

[18] Le Fever J A, Martiniuk C D, Dancsok E F R, et al. Petroleum Potential of the Middle Member,Bakken Formation,Williston Basin//Christopher J E,Haidl F.6th International Williston Basin Symposium. Regina: Saskatchewan Geological Society,1991:74-94.

[19] Smith M G, Bustin R M. Production and Preservation of Organic Matter During Deposition of the Bakken Formation (Late Devonian and Early Mississippian), Williston Basin[J]. Palaeogeog Palaeoclim Palaeoecol,1998,142:185-200.

[20] Sonnenberg S A,Parmudito A. Petroleum Geology of the Giant Elm Coulee Field, Williston Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(9):1127-1153.

[21] Alexandre C S, Sonnenberg S A,Sarg J F. Reservoir Characterization and Petrology of the Bakken Formation, Elm Coulee Field, Richland County, MT[EB/OL].[2012-11-05]. http://www. Searchanddiscovery. Com/abstracts/html/2011/annual/abstracts/Alexandre. html.

[22] Berwick B. Depositional Environment, Mineralogy, and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Late Devonian Sanish(Upper Three Forks Formation), Williston Basin, North Dakota[D]. Colorado:Colorado School of Mines,2009:263.

[23] Gantyno A. Sequence Stratigraphy and Microfacies Analysis of the Late Devonian Upper Three Forks Formation, Williston Basin, North Dakota and Montana,USA[D]. Colorado:Colorado School of Mines,2010:201.

[24] Sonnenberg S A, Gantyno A,Sarg R. Petroleum Potential of the Upper Three Formation, Williston Basin,USA[EB/OL].[2012-11-05].http://www. searchanddiscovery. Com / abstracts / html / 2011 / annual /abstracts / Sonnenberg3.html.

[25] Almanza A. Integrated Three Dimensional Geological Model of the Devonian Bakken Formation Elm Coulee Field, Williston Basin: Richland County, Montana[D]. Colorado:Colorado School of Mines,2011:2-8.

[26] Hill R, Kuhn P, diPrimio R, et al. Integrated Geochemistry and Basin Modelling Study of the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin, USA[EB/OL].[2012-11-05].http://www. searchanddiscovery. Com /abstracts /html /2011/ annual /abstracts / Hill.html.

[27] Sonnenberg S A, Appleby S K,Sarg J R. Quantitative Mineralogy and Microfractures in the Middle Bakken Formation, Williston Basin, North Dakota[EB/OL].[2012-11-05]. http://www. searchanddiscovery. Com /abstracts /html /2010/ annual /abstracts / Sonnenberg. html.

[28] Coskey R J,Leonard J L. Bakken Oil Accumulations:What's the Trap?[EB/OL].[2012-11-05].http://www. searchanddiscovery. Com /abstracts /html /2009/ annual /abstracts / Coskey. html.

[29] Bohrer M, Fried S, Helms L, et al. State of North Dakota Bakken Formation Resource Study Project. North Dakota: North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources,2008.

[30] Kuhn P P, Primio R, Horsfield B. Inconsistency of Hydrocarbon Generation Potential and Production Data of the Bakken Play of North Dakota. London:The Geological Society,2009.

[31] Jarvie D M.Components and Processes Affecting Producibility and Commerciality of Shale Resource System// Li M W. Abstracts of International Symposium on Shale Oil Technologies. Wuxi: Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms,2012:8-9.

[32] LeFever, J. Oil Production from the Bakken Formation: A Short History[J]. North Dakota Geological Survey Newsletter, 2005, 32(1):5-10.

[33] 邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26. Zou Caineng, Yang Zhi, Cui Jingwei, et al. Formation Mechanism, Geological Characteristics and Development Strategy of Nonmarine Shale Oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013,40(1):14-26.

[34] Larter S, Huang Haiping, Bennett B. What Don't We Know About Self Sourced Oil Reservoirs: Challenges and Potential Solutions. Calgary:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2012:1-4.

[35] 陈祥,王敏,严永新,等. 泌阳凹陷陆相页岩油气成藏条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2011,32(4):568-575. Chen Xiang, Wang Min, Yan Yongxin, et al. Accumulation Conditions for Continental Shale Oil and Gas in the Biyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(4):568-575.

[36] 马永生,冯建辉,牟泽辉,等. 中国石化非常规油气资源潜力及勘探进展[J]. 中国工程科学,2012,14(6):22-30. Ma Yongsheng, Feng Jianhui, Mu Zehui, et al. The Potential and Exploring Progress of Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources in Sinopec[J]. China Engineering Sciences, 2012,14(6):22-30.

[37] 中国石化胜利油田分公司. 胜利油田2012年勘探工作进展及2013年部署建议[R]. 东营:中国石化胜利油田分公司, 2012. Shengli Oil Field Branch Company, Sinopec. The Exploring Progress of 2012 Year and the Suggestion of Exploring Planning of 2013 Year in Shengli Oil Field[R]. Dongying: Shengli Oil Field Branch Company, Sinopec,2012.

[1] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[4] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[5] 张可佳, 廖明月, 刘涛, 赵玉武, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 张岩, 贺友志.

基于改进BlendMask的页岩扫描电镜图像矿物鉴定方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1387-1400.

[6] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[7] 蔡潇, 夏威, 马晓东, 臧素华, 丁安徐, 刘玉霞, 花彩霞, 朱一川, 李辉. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1482-1493.
[8] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[9] 孟庆涛, 胡菲, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉. 陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因:以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 20-37.
[10] 孟 颖, 王 剑, 马万云, 雷海艳, 孙平昌, 方 石, 丁 聪, 王 灼, 陶连馨. 基于细粒岩石类型对玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组烃源岩分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1735-1746.
[11] 罗卫锋, 胡志方, 王胜建, 杨云见, 张林, 张云枭. 基于可控源电磁技术的页岩压裂监测试验——以宜昌地区鄂阳页2HF井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1338-.
[12] 易娟子, 张少敏, 蔡来星, 陈守春, 罗鑫, 于吉星, 罗妮娜, 杨田.

川东地区下侏罗统凉高山组地层-沉积充填特征与油气勘探方向 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 795-815.

[13] 张辉, 王志章, 杨亮, 李忠诚, 邢济麟. 松南上白垩统青山口组一段不同赋存状态页岩油定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 315-327.
[14] 仉涛, 郭智奇, 刘财, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍, . 盐间页岩油韵律层地震响应模拟及页岩薄储层厚度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 281-.
[15] 马中良, 王强, 郑伦举, 张彩明. 油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(2): 394-399.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .