吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1332-1341.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201505107

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

冀中坳陷东北部石炭—二叠系烃源岩生烃潜力评价

钱铮1, 张松航2, 梁宏斌1, 唐书恒2, 杨宁2   

  1. 1. 中国石油华北油田勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062552;
    2. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-12 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 张松航(1982),男,讲师,主要从事非常规油气地质研究,E-mail:zhangsh@cugb.edu.cn。 E-mail:zhangsh@cugb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:钱铮(1968),男,高级工程师,主要从事非常规油气地质研究,E-mail:yjy_qianz@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41202116);中央高校基本科研业务费(20142016)

Hydrocarbon Evaluation of Carboniferous-Permian Source Rocks in Northeast Jizhong Depression

Qian Zheng1, Zhang Songhang2, Liang Hongbin1, Tang Shuheng2, Yang Ning2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China;
    2. School of Energy and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2014-10-12 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

冀中坳陷东北部石炭—二叠系煤系地层生、储、盖组合条件完备,上古生界自生自储煤成气藏勘探潜力巨大。笔者基于该层系"油井少、空井多"的勘探现实,通过烃源岩热解数据分析和热模拟实验工作,评价区内烃源岩的生烃潜力,以期减少勘探风险。数据分析表明,w(TOC)为10%和40%是区内煤系暗色泥岩、炭质泥岩和煤岩的有效划分界限。区内石炭—二叠系煤系烃源岩主要以III型干酪根为主,为中等较差的油源岩和较好的气源岩。分别受岩浆热变质和深成变质作用影响,区内存在武清凹陷、苏4-苏8-苏23-文古4和葛8-大参1三个成熟度高值区,即生油气中心。结合热模拟实验结果,采用体积法算得该区石炭—二叠系地层生气总量约为4万亿m3

关键词: 冀中坳陷, 烃源岩, 煤成气, 热模拟, 生烃潜力

Abstract:

Carboniferous-Permian coal measures strata possess the conditions of a good source-reservoir-seal assemblage and thus a huge exploration potential of the self-generation and self-storage coal gas in the Upper Paleozoic strata in the northeast of Jizhong depression. However, the reality demonstrates only a few successful wells but a lot of empty ones in the historic exploration. We evaluated the hydrocarbon potential of source rock based on the pyrolysis data analysis and thermal simulation experiment to reduce the exploration risk in this strata. The results show that the contents of TOC (10% and 40%) is the effective demarcation of dark mudstone, carbon mudstone and coal. The source rock of Carboniferous-Permian coal measures strata are of mainly type III kerogen, and belong to poor-medium oil source rock and good gas source rock. Affected by magmatic thermal metamorphism and plutonic metamorphism respectively, the maturity of the three areas i.e. Wuqing depression, Su4-Su8-Su23-Wengu4, and Ge8-Dacan1 are relatively high. As hydrocarbon generation centers, their hydrocarbon generation amount is calculated for 4 trillion cubic square meters of gas.

Key words: Jizhong depression, source rock, coal gas, thermal simulation, hydrocarbon generation potential

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] 梁生正, 谢恭俭, 马郡,等.华北石炭—二叠系残留盆地天然气勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 1998(6): 31-35. Liang Shengzheng, Xie Gongjian, Ma Jun,et al. Exploration Prospects for Natural Gas in the Carboniferous-Permian Remnant Basins in North China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1998(6): 31-35.

[2] 张林炎, 范昆, 黄臣军,等. 冀中坳陷深层油气成藏潜力与勘探方向[J]. 地质力学学报, 2011, 17(2): 144-157. Zhang Linyan,Fan Kun,Huang Chenjun,et al. Potential of the Deep Oil-Gas Reservior-Forming and Exploitation Direction in Jizhong Depression[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2011, 17(2): 144-157.

[3] 朱炎铭, 秦勇, 范炳恒,等. 武清凹陷石炭—二叠系烃源岩的二次生烃评价[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2004,29(1): 77-84. Zhu Yanming, Qin Yong, Fan Bingheng, et al. Evaluation of the Second Hydrocarbongeneration of the Permocarboniferous Source Rocks in Wuqing Depression[J]. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences,2004, 29(1): 77-84.

[4] 蔡超, 朱炎铭, 秦勇,等. 冀中坳陷武清凹陷苏50井石炭二叠纪煤系的成烃演化[J]. 地质科学, 2008,43(1): 154-161. Cai Chao, Zhu Yanming, Qin Yong, et al. Hydrocarbon Generation and Evolution of Carbono-Permian Coal Series from the Well Su-50 in the Wuqing Sag, Central Hebei Depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2008, 43(1): 154-161.

[5] 降栓奇, 冀中坳陷北部天然气成因类型及成藏模式[D].西安:西北大学,2003. Jiang Shuanqi. The Natural Gas Genitic Type and Reservoir Forming Model of the North of the Jizhong Depression[D]. Xi'an:Northwestern University,2003.

[6] 何生, 陈荣书, 兰廷泽. 冀中文安斜坡石炭二叠纪煤系特征及岩浆热力成烃作用[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1992,17(6): 699-708. He Sheng, Chen Rongshu, Lan Tingze. Coal Formation Characteristics of Carboniferous-Permain and Magmatic Thermal Power Hydrocarbon-Generating in Wenan Slope, Jizhong Depression[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1992, 17(6): 699-708.

[7] 赵贤正, 金强, 张亮,等. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷北部石炭—二叠系煤成油气成藏条件及勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2010,32(5): 459-464. Zhao Xianzheng, Jin Qiang, Zhang Liang, et al. Accumulation Conditions and Perspectives of Coal-Derived Hydrocarbon of Carboniferous-Permian in Northern Jizhong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment. 2010, 32(5): 459-464.

[8] 张亮, 冀中坳陷北部石炭—二叠系煤成油气成藏作用与主控因素分析[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学,2009. Zhang Liang. Study on the Reservoir-Forming Process and Exploration Directions of Coal-Derived Oil and Gas from the Permo-Carboniferous in the North of Jizhong Depression[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2009.

[9] 梁宏斌, 崔周旗, 张舒亭,等. 冀中坳陷东北部石炭—二叠系储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2006(2): 8-14. Liang Hongbin, Cui Zhouqi, Zhang Shuting, et al. Reservoir Characteristics and Exploration Target of Carboniferous-Permian Reservoirs in Northwestern Jizhong Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2006(2): 8-14.

[10] 田建章, 张锐锋, 李先平,等. 冀中拗陷北部天然气成藏系统及勘探方向[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2010(3): 67-74. Tian Jianzhang, Zhang Ruifeng, Li Xianping, et al. Natural Gas Reservoir Forming System and Exploration Direction of Northern Jizhong Depression[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2010(3): 67-74.

[11] 沈金龙, 易万霞, 徐美茹. 武清凹陷石炭系—二叠系含油气系统定量模拟与勘探方向[J]. 海相油气地质, 2001(1): 27-34. Shen Jinlong, Yi Wanxia, Xu Meiru. Carboniferous-Permian Petroleum Systems Quantitative Modeling and Exploration of Wuqing Sag[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2001(1): 27-34.

[12] 米敬奎, 张水昌, 王晓梅. 不同类型生烃模拟实验方法对比与关键技术[J]. 石油实验地质, 2009(4): 409-414. Mi Jingkui, Zhang Shuichang, Wang Xiaomei. Comparison of Different Hydrocarbon Generation Simulation Approaches and Key Technique[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2009(4): 409-414.

[13] Primio Di, Horsfield R B. From Petroleum-Type Or-ganofacies to Hydrocarbon Phase Prediction[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006,90(7): 1031-1058.

[14] Li Rongxi, Li Youzhu, Gao Yunwen. Catagenesis of Organic Matter of Oil Source Rocks in Upper Paleozoic Coal Formation of the Bohai Gulf Basin (Eastern China)[J]. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 2007, 48(5): 415-421.

[15] 陈建平, 赵长毅, 何忠华. 煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1997(1): 1-5. Chen Jianping, Zhao Changyi, He Zhonghua. Criteria for Evaluating the Hydrocarbon Generating Potential of Organic Matter in Coal Measures[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1997(1): 1-5.

[16] 秦建中, 贾蓉芬, 郭爱明,等. 华北地区煤系烃源岩层油气生成、运移和评价[M].北京: 科学出版社,2000. Qin Jianzhong, Jia Rongfen, Guo Aiming, et al. Hydrocarbon Generation, Migration, and Evaluation of Source Rock in Coal Measures, North of China[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000.

[17] 孙金山, 刘国宏, 孙明安, 等. 库车坳陷侏罗系煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2003,25(6): 1-4. Sun Jinshan, Liu Guohong, Sun Ming'an, et al.Source Rock Evaluation of Coal-Measures Strata in Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2003,25(6): 1-4.

[18] 曹代勇. 渤海湾盆地深层烃源岩生烃条件研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2001. Cao Daiyong. Bohai Bay Basin Deep Hydrocarbon Source Rocks Conditions[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House,2001.

[19] 邓已寻, 左银辉, 郝情情, 等. 查干凹陷现今地温场研究及其油气地质意义[J]. 断块油气田, 2012,19(3): 284-288. Deng Yixun, Zuo Yinhui, Hao Qingqing, et al. Present Geothermal Fields of Chagan Sag and Its Oil and Gas Geological Significance[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012,19(3): 284-288.

[20] 高岗,柳广弟. 资源评价中油气生成定量模型的建立[J]. 天然气工业, 2006,26(10): 6-8. Gao Gang, Liu Guangdi. Quantitative Modeling of Hydrocarbon Generation in Resource Assessment[J]. Nature Gas Industry, 2006, 26(10): 6-8.

[21] 高岗, 柳广弟, 王兆峰. 生烃模拟结果的校正[J]. 新疆石油地质,2005,26(2): 202-205. Gao Gang, Liu Guangdi, Wang Zhaofeng. Correction of Results from Hydrocarbon-Generating Simulation[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2005, 26(2): 202-205.

[22] 李正文,杨宗起,廖群山,等. 文安斜坡石炭—二叠系天然气成藏规律研究与勘探目标优选[R]. 任丘:中石油华北油田分公司勘探部,2008. Li Zhengwen, Yang Zongqi, Liao Qunshan, et al. Carboniferous-Permian Gas Accumulation Pattern and Exploration Target Optimization of Wen'an Slope[R]. Renqiu:Exploration Department of Huabei Oilfield Branch, PetroChina,2008.

[23] 中石油华北油田分公司. 沧县隆起馆陶凸起及其西侧天然气勘探方向及目标评价[R]. 任丘:中石油华北油田分公司勘探部, 1999. PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Branch. Cangxian Uplift-West of Guantao Raised Its Gas Exploration Direction and Objectives Evaluation[R]. Renqiu:Exploration Department of Huabei Oilfield Branch, PetroChina,1999.

[24] 中石油华北油田分公司. 冀中北部天然气资源评价[R]. 任丘:中石油华北油田分公司勘探部, 2000. PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Branch. Assessment of Natural Gas Resources in Northern Jizhong Depression[R]. Renqiu:Exploration Department of Huabei Oilfield Branch, PetroChina, 2000.

[1] 吴小奇, 刘全有, 王萍, 黎华继, 朱东亚, 李朋朋. 沉积盆地天然气藏中氦气贫化机理及资源潜力:以四川盆地新场气田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1837-1850.
[2] 蔡嵩, 郑金云, 李振升, 舒梁锋, 靳瑶瑶, .

珠江口盆地番禺低隆区构造调控下断陷湖盆源—汇响应特征  [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1420-1433.

[3] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[4] 原家鹏, 张云峰.

 开鲁盆地陆东凹陷白垩系九佛堂组上段米兰科维奇旋回及沉积响应特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 375-386.

[5] 高阳东, 龙祖烈, 陈聪 , 姜大朋 , 马宁.  珠江口盆地开平凹陷南部区域中深层原油地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1883-1896.
[6] 邓高山.

准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷原油地球化学特征与油源分析 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 389-412.

[7] 王琦, 孙永河, 付晓飞, 张万福, 李熹微, 王有功, 彭贤锋.

冀中坳陷南部中—新生代构造转换及其油气地质意义 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 447-460.

[8] 冯若琦, 刘正伟, 孟越, 蒋丽婷, 韩作为, 刘林玉.

烃源岩有机碳测井预测模型优选及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 688--700.

[9] 付丽. 大杨树盆地南部坳陷九峰山组烃源岩地球化学特征及油气来源[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1001-1015.
[10] 孟 颖, 王 剑, 马万云, 雷海艳, 孙平昌, 方 石, 丁 聪, 王 灼, 陶连馨. 基于细粒岩石类型对玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组烃源岩分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1735-1746.
[11] 谢明贤, 陈广坡, 苏玉平. 海拉尔盆地侏罗系烃源岩特征及发育模式——以红旗凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1065-.
[12] 王晓琳, 张小莉, 王祥, 曹聪.

鄂尔多斯盆地枣园探区延长组长7段和长9段烃源岩评价及油源对比 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 840-854 .

[13] 殷 越1, 2, 贾鹏飞3, 黄志龙2, 吴红烛4, 金 希4, 刘国杰4. 三塘湖盆地马东地区卡拉岗组烃源岩特征与致密油意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 26-.
[14] 李天军, 黄志龙, 王瑞, 苟红光, 张品, 殷越. 银根—额济纳旗盆地天草凹陷下白垩统巴音戈壁组有效烃源岩地球化学特征及其形成环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 957-972.
[15] 刘峻桥, 吕延防, 付广, 胡欣蕾, 史集建, 孙同文. 斜坡区断层圈闭发育部位及其形成时期识别方法及应用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 355-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .