吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1322-1331.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201505106

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川宣汉盘龙洞长兴组生物礁沉积特征及成礁模式

李秋芬1, 苗顺德2, 江青春1, 王铜山1, 徐安娜1, 翟秀芬1   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国海洋石油总公司研究总院, 北京 100027
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-12 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 作者简介:李秋芬(1979),女,博士,主要从事沉积地质学、层序地层学研究,E-mail:liqiufen@petro-china.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    国家油气重大专项(2011ZX05004);中石油重大专项(2014E-3201)

Sedimentary Characteristics and Reef-Forming Model of Changxing Formation in Panlongdong Section of Xuanhan,Sichuan

Li Qiufen1, Miao Shunde2, Jiang Qingchun1, Wang Tongshan1, Xu Anna1, Zhai Xiufen1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100027, China
  • Received:2015-01-12 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

结合野外露头剖面观察与深入剖析,对宣汉盘龙洞长兴组生物礁沉积特征和成礁模式进行了室内综合分析。该礁位于鄂西城口海槽西侧台缘带,为相对海平面整体下降背景下形成的一套加积-进积型台地边缘生物礁。该露头出露良好,长兴组以海绵骨架礁灰岩和海绵骨架礁白云岩为主。综合岩性、古生物等沉积相标志,该区长兴组属于碳酸盐岩台地边缘沉积体系,可进一步划分出斜坡相、台地边缘生物礁和台地边缘生屑滩相,其中台地边缘生物礁又可划分为礁基、礁核、礁盖、礁前、礁后等亚相。区域沉积环境、岩性、古生物以及生物礁的内部构成分析认为,盘龙洞生物礁可分为3期成礁旋回:第一旋回礁是低能环境下形成的未经充分生长而被淹死的礁,主要由生屑泥晶灰岩和少量骨架岩组成;第二旋回礁形成于较高能环境下,经历了充分生长后暴露而死亡,暴露时间短,仅顶部发生了较弱的白云岩化;第三旋回礁则形成于高能环境下,经历了充分生长并暴露出海平面后死亡,其死亡后经波浪和水流的改造作用而形成生屑滩,长期暴露发生强烈白云岩化。

关键词: 长兴组, 生物礁, 沉积特征, 成礁模式

Abstract:

Based on the multidisciplinary analysis of outcrop and microfacies observation, the sedimentary characteristics and forming model of Changxing Formation reef are researched in detail in Panlongdong Section. The reef is located in the platform margin of Exi-Chengkou trough. It is a huge platform marginal reef deposition during aggradation-progradation in a background of relative sea-level fall. The reef is full of outcrops. Sponge skeleton reef limestone and sponge skeleton reef dolomite are the main rocks. According to the sedimentary facies' characteristics, Panlongdong region belongs to a carbonate platform marginal sedimentary system, and can be divided into slope facies, platform marginal reef, and platform marginal bio-clast bank. The platform marginal reef facies can be divided into reef base, reef core, reef cap, fore reef, and back reef. Panlongdong reef consists of three depositional cycles: the first cycle of reef was formed in a low energy environment which was drown without sufficient growth; the second cycle of reef was formed in a relative high energy environment which died of exposure after experiencing sufficient growth with weak dolomitization on the top; and the third cycle of reef was formed in a high energy environment which died of exposure after experiencing sufficient growth, and then the reef formed a bio-clast bank, and later was destroyed by waves and tides. The reef and bio-clast bank experienced an intensive dolomitization after a long-term exposure.

Key words: Changxing Formation, reefs, sedimentary characteristics, reef-forming model

中图分类号: 

  • P539

[1] Dyjaczynski K, Gorski M, Mamczur S, et al . Reefs in the Basinal Facies of the Zechstein Limestone ( Upper Permian ) of Western Poland: A New Gas Play[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2001,24: 265-285.

[2] Kiessling W,Flgel E,Golonka J.Paleoreef Maps: Ev-aluation of Comprehensive Database on Phanerozoic Reefs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999,83:1552-1587.

[3] Paul J. Stromatolite Reefs of the Upper Permian Zechstein Basin(Central Europe)[J]. Facies, 1995,32: 28-31.

[4] Toomey D F. Late Permian Reefs of Southern Tunisia: Facies Patterns and Comparison with the Capitan Reef, Southwestern United States[J]. Facies, 1991,25: 119-146.

[5] 王永标,徐桂荣,林启祥,等.东昆仑地区早二叠世礁岛海的沉积模式[J].中国科学: D辑:地球科学,2001,31(3): 243-249. Wang Yongbiao, Xu Guirong, Lin Qixiang, et al. Depositional Model of Early Permian Reef-Island Ocean in Eastern Kunlun[J]. Science China: Series D: Earth Sciences, 2001, 44(9): 808-815.

[6] 吴亚生,范嘉松,姜红霞,等.二叠纪末生物礁生态系绝灭的方式[J].科学通报:地球科学,2007,52(2): 207-210. Wu Yasheng, Fan Jiasong, Jiang Hongxia, et al. Microbialite of Anoxic Condition from Permian-Triassic Transition in Guizhou China[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2007,50 (7): 1040-1051.

[7] 高志前,樊太亮,杨伟红,等.塔里木盆地下古生界碳酸盐岩台缘结构特征及其演化[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(3):657-665. Gao Zhiqian, Fan Tailiang, Yang Weihong, et al. Structure Characteristics and Evolution of the Eopaleozoic Carbonate Platform in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2012,42(3):657-665.

[8] 卫生平,刘全新,张景廉,等.再论生物礁与大油气田的关系[J].石油学报,2006,27(2):22-27. Wei Shengping, Liu Quanxin, Zhang Jinglian, et al. Re-Discussion of Relationship Between Reef and Giant Oil-Gas Fields[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006,27(2):22-27.

[9] 张兵,张荣才,史建南,等.四川盆地东部长兴组礁滩相储层测井地质特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(增刊1):17-25. Zhang Bing, Zheng Rongcai, Shi Jiannan, et al. Well Logging Geological Characteristics of Reef and Shoal Facies Reservoir of Changxing Formation in Eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2012,42(Sup.1):17-25.

[10] Li Qiufen,Wang Zecheng,Li Jun, et al. Discovery of Yanting-Tongnan Trough of Late Permian in Sichuan Basin and Its Significance[J]. Journal of Earth Science,2012,23(4): 582-596.

[11] 郭彤楼.元坝深层礁滩气田基本特征与成藏主控因素[J].天然气工业,2011,31(10): 12-16. Guo Tonglou. Basic Characteristics of Deep Reef-Bank Reservoirs and Major Controlling Factors of Gas Pools in the Yuanba Gas Field[J]. Natrual Gas Industry, 2011,31(10): 12-16.

[12] 赵文光,郭彤楼,蔡忠贤,等.川东北地区二叠系长兴组生物礁类型及控制因素[J].现代地质,2010,24(5):951-956. Zhao Wenguang, Guo Tonglou, Cai Zhongxian, et al. The Controlling Factors and Types of Carbonate Reef of Permian Changxing Formation in Northeast of Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2010,24(5):951-956.

[13] 胡明毅, 魏欢,邱小松,等. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组生物礁内部构成及成礁模式[J].沉积学报,2012,30(1):33-42. Hu Mingyi, Wei Huan, Qiu Xiaosong, et al. Reef Composition and Their Forming Models of Changxing Formation in Jiantianba Section of Lichuan, Western Hubei[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012,30(1):33-42.

[14] 牟传龙, 马永生, 王瑞华, 等.川东北地区上二叠统盘龙洞生物礁成岩作用研究[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2005, 25(l/2):198-202. Mou Chuanlong, Ma Yongsheng, Wang Ruihua, et al. Diagenesis of the Upper Permian Panlongdong Organic Reefs in Northeastern Sichuan[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2005, 25(l/2):198-202.

[15] 牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全, 等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁油藏的发现及其重要意义[J].地质论评,2003, 49(3):315. Mou Chuanlong, Tan Qinyin, Wang Liquan, et al. Discovery of the Late Permian Organic Reefal Oil Pool and Its Significance[J]. Geological Review, 2003,49(3):315.

[16] 牟传龙, 谭钦银, 余谦, 等. 四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏剖面序列[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2003, 23(3):60-64. Mou Chuanlong, Tan Qinyin, Yu Qian, et al. The Late Permian Organic Reefal Oil Pool Section in Panlongdong, Xuanhan, Sichuan[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2003, 23(3):60-64.

[17] 邱小松,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等.川东北宣汉盘龙洞长兴组生物礁剖面沉积相分析[J].海洋石油,2011,31(3):39-44. Qiu Xiaosong, Hu Mingyi, Hu Zhonggui, et al. Analysis on Sedimentary Facies of Changxing Formation Reefs Pofile of Panlongdong in Xuanhan, Nor-theastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Offshore Oil, 2011,31(3):39-44.

[18] 邓胜徽,卢远征,徐道一.三叠纪末生物集群绝灭事件[J]. 中国科学:D辑:地球科学,2005,35(9):799-809. Deng Shenghui, Lu Yuanzheng, Xu Daoyi. Mass Extinction Event of Late Triassic[J]. Science China: Series D: Earth Sciences, 2005,35(9):799-809.

[19] 马永生,郭旭升,郭彤楼,等.四川盆地普光大型气田的发现与勘探启示[J]. 地质论评,2005,51(4):477-480. Ma Yongsheng, Guo Xusheng, Guo Tonglou, et al. Discovery of the Large-Scale Puguang Gas Field in the Sichuan Basin and Its Enlightenment for Hydroearbon Prospecting[J]. Geological Review, 2005,51(4):477-480.

[20] 王一刚,洪海涛,夏茂龙,等. 四川盆地二叠系、三叠系环海槽礁、滩富气带勘探[J]. 天然气工业,2008,28(1):22-27. Wang Yigang, Hong Haitao, Xia Maolong, et al. Exploration of Reef-Bank Gas Reservoirs Surrounding Permian and Triassic Troughs in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natrual Gas Industry, 2008,28(1):22-27.

[21] Zhao Wenzhi, Xu Chunchun, Wang Tongshan, et al. Comparative Study of Gas Accumulations in the Permian Changxing Reefs and Triassic Feixianguan Oolitic Reservoirs Between Longgang and Luojiazhai-Puguang in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(31):3310-3320.

[22] 倪新锋,陈洪德,田景春,等. 川东北地区长兴组飞仙关组沉积格局及成藏控制意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(4):458-465. Ni Xinfeng, Chen Hongde, Tian Jingchun, et al. Sedimentary Framework of Changxing-Feixianguan Formations and Its Control on Reservoiring in Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(4):458-465.

[23] Read J F.Carbonate Platform Facies Models[J]. AAPG Bull,1985, 69(1): 1-21.

[24] Tucker M E, Wright V P. Carbonate Sedimentology[M]. London:Blackwell Science, 1990:228-283.

[25] Wilson J L. Characteristics of Carbonate-Platform Margins[J].AAPG Bull, 1974, 58:810-824.

[26] Wilson J L. Carbonate Facies in Geological History[M]. New York: Spring-Verlag, 1975:1-471.

[27] Armstrong A K. Carboniferous Carbonate Depositional Models, Preliminary Lithofacies and Paleotectonics Maps, Arctic Alaska[J]. AAPG Bull, 1974, 58(4):621-645.

[28] Read J F. Carbonate Platform Facies Models[J]. AAPG Bull, 1985,69(1): 1-21.

[1] 刘强, 汤民强, 贺惠忠, 李正元, 刘文潇. 广东阳西沙扒海域埋藏古河道沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1791-1799.
[2] 薛辉, 韩春元, 朱萍, 汤小琪, 杨经栋, 窦连彬. 金坛储气库阜宁组四段含盐层系沉积特征及成盐模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 363-381.
[3] 王鑫, 林承焰, 马存飞, 陈柄屹, 杜凯, 李志鹏. 东营凹陷北部陡坡带利563区块沙四上亚段砂砾岩扇体沉积特征及沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 705-720.
[4] 陈秀艳, 王剑, 张立平, 马德波, 周波. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区石炭系东河砂岩段碳酸盐胶结物沉积特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 509-517.
[5] 鄢伟, 张光学, 樊太亮, 夏斌, 高志前, 张莉, 杨振, 强坤生. 塔里木盆地塔中—顺托果勒地区奥陶系良里塔格组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 621-636.
[6] 赵佳琦, 高有峰, 刘海波, 王清斌, 张艳, 王璞珺. 辽西北票盆地中侏罗统海房沟组砾岩沉积特征与成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 650-661.
[7] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[8] 张兵, 杨凯, 贾雪丽, 郑荣才, 郭强, 文华国. 开江梁平台内海槽东段长兴组白云岩储层沉积-成岩系统研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1631-1641.
[9] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 李昂, 石蕾, 刘爽. 松辽盆地肇州区块沙河子组层序格架特征及其对沉积和烃源岩的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 724-735.
[10] 刘宗堡, 赵淼, 吕延防, 马世忠, 方庆, 郭新. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层地层减薄模式及控油意义[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 984-990.
[11] 万志峰, 夏斌, 林舸, 施秋华, 郭峰, 刘宝明. 莺歌海盆地与济阳拗陷成因机制与沉积特征的比较及其油气勘探意义[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 976-982.
[12] 侯伟, 刘招君, 何玉平, 和钟铧, 张雷. 漠河盆地上侏罗统沉积特征与构造背景[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 286-297.
[13] 刘招君, 孙平昌, 杜江峰, 方石, 陈永成, 贾建亮, 孟庆涛. 汤原断陷古近系扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 1-8.
[14] 刘宗堡, 吕延防, 付晓飞, 付广, 李迪, 李晓伟. 三肇凹陷扶余油层沉积特征及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 998-1006.
[15] 张成弓, 陈洪德, 董桂玉, 李洁. 百色盆地东部凹陷北部陡坡带东段百岗组二段沉积特征分析[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 369-378.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .