渗流应力耦合作用下顺倾向层状边坡各向异性渗流特征数值模拟

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200055

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1783-1788.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200055

渗流应力耦合作用下顺倾向层状边坡各向异性渗流特征数值模拟

师文豪^1,2, 杨天鸿²

1. 苏州科技大学土木工程学院, 江苏苏州 215011;
2. 东北大学资源与土木工程学院, 沈阳 110819

收稿日期:2020-03-05 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
作者简介:师文豪(1988-),男,讲师,主要从事岩石渗流力学方面的研究,E-mail:shiwenhaoneu@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0801602）；江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20200993）

Numerical Simulation on Anisotropic Seepage Characteristics in Dip Layered Rock Slope with Interaction of Seepage and Stress

Shi Wenhao^1,2, Yang Tianhong²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215011, Jiangsu, China;
2. School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Received:2020-03-05 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
Supported by:
Supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0801602) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200993)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渗流场与应力场耦合作用下边坡渗流规律对研究边坡稳定性至关重要，应用基于等效连续介质模型和Louis经验公式建立的各向异性岩体渗流应力耦合模型，对顺倾向层状边坡的各向异性渗流规律进行了模拟分析。研究表明：顺倾向层状边坡中水位降深随结构面倾角θ的增大先升高、后降低，呈现两头低、中间高的形态，且越靠近溢出点，结构面倾角对水位降深影响越大；θ约为42°时水位降深最大，潜水面最低，同时渗透各向异性系数达到最大值；顺倾向边坡岩层产状一定时，随着埋深的增加，岩体渗透各向异性系数逐渐减小，裂隙控渗特征由显著到逐渐变弱，表现出向各向同性渗流过渡的趋势。

关键词: 层状边坡, 渗透各向异性系数, 渗流, 渗流应力耦合, 数值模拟

Abstract: Slope seepage law with interaction of seepage and stress is very important for slope stability analysis. The anisotropic seepage-stress coupled model established based on the equivalent continuum model and Louis empirical formula is applied to the numerical simulation of seepage in dip layered rock slope. The numerical simulation results show that for the dip layered rock slope, the value of drawdown first increases then decreases with the dip angle of structural plane θ. The outline is like a shoulder, low on both sides and high in the middle. In addition, the closer to the spill points of water is, the greater the influence on the drawdown value of structural plane dip angle; When θ is about 42°, the drawdown reaches its maximum, meanwhile, the anisotropic ratio of permeability also reaches its maximum. When the attitude of strata of dip layered rock slope is given, the anisotropic ratio of permeability decreases with the increase of the buried depth, and the seepage field controlled by the layered structural planes becomes weak gradually, showing a trend of transition to isotropic seepage.

Key words: layered slope, anisotropic ratio of permeability, seepage, coupled seepage and stress, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU45

师文豪, 杨天鸿. 渗流应力耦合作用下顺倾向层状边坡各向异性渗流特征数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1783-1788.

Shi Wenhao, Yang Tianhong. Numerical Simulation on Anisotropic Seepage Characteristics in Dip Layered Rock Slope with Interaction of Seepage and Stress[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1783-1788.

参考文献

[1] 孙广忠. 中国典型滑坡[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1988. Sun Guangzhong. Typical Landslides in China[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1988.
[2] Hoek E,Bray J W. Rock Slope Engineering[M]. London:E & FN Spon,1981.
[3] Christensen S,Rasmussen K R,Moller K. Prediction of Regional Groundwater Flow to Streams[J]. Groundwater,1998,36(2):53-66.
[4] Luppi L,Rinaldi M,Teruggi L,et al. Monitoring and Numerical Modeling of Riverbank Erosion Processes:A Case Study Along the Cecina River (Central Italy)[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2009,34(4):530-546.
[5] 陈永珍,吴斌,杨帆,等. 充气截排水渗流与变形耦合数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(2):485-492. Chen Yongzhen,Wu Bin,Yang Fan,et al. Coupled Numerical Simulation of Seepage and Deformation of Intercepting and Drainaging Water with Compressed Air[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2019,49(2):485-492.
[6] Francois B,Tacher L,Bonnard C H,et al. Numerical Modeling of the Hydrogeological and Geomechanical Behaviour of a Large Slope Movement:The Triesenberg Landslide (Liechtenstein)[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2007,44(7):840-857.
[7] Tacher L,Bonnard C H,Laloui L,et al. Modeling the Behaviour of a Large Landslide with Respect to Hydrogeological and Geomechanical Parameter Heterogeneity[J]. Landslides Journal,2005,2(1):3-14.
[8] Gonzaga G G,Leite M H,Corthésy R. Determination of Anisotropic Deformability Parameters from a Single Standard Rock Specimen[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2008,45(8):1420-1438.
[9] Jourde H,Fenart P,Vinches M,et al. Relationship Between the Geometrical and Structural Properties of Layered Fractured Rocks and Their Effective Permeability Tensor:A Simulation Study[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2007,337(1/2):117-132.
[10] 曹长鑫,孙红月. 黄土地区边坡虹吸排水孔间距优化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2021,51(4):1152-1159. Cao Changxin,Sun Hongyue. Optimization of Siphon Drainage Hole Spacing on Slop in Loess Region[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2021,51(4):1152-1159.
[11] Tian Kaiming, Wan Li, Tian Jinping. Anisotropic Variation Law of Rock Permeability with the Burial Depth of Limestone[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2003,77(1):125-128.
[12] 周玉新,周志芳,王锦国,等. 采场岩体边坡渗流的裂隙控渗特征[J]. 金属矿山,2005(4):53-55. Zhou Yuxin,Zhou Zhifang,Wang Jinguo,et al. Characteristics Fracture Controlled Seepage of Mine Rock Slope Seepage[J]. Metal Mine,2005(4):53-55.
[13] 师文豪,杨天鸿,于庆磊,等. 层状边坡各向异性岩体渗流-应力耦合模型及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(8):2352-2360. Shi Wenhao,Yang Tianhong,Yu Qinglei,et al. Seepage-Stress Coupling Model of Anisotropic Rock Mass of Stratified Slope and Its Engineering Application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(8):2352-2360.
[14] Cho J W,Kim H,Jeon S,et al. Deformation and Strength Anisotropy of Asan Gneiss, Boryeong Shale,and Yeoncheon Schist[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanical & Mining Sciences,2012,50(1):158-169.
[15] Biot M A. Gernaral Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics,1941,12(3):155-164.
[16] 张金才,张玉卓. 应力对裂隙岩体渗流影响的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,1988,20(2):19-22. Zhang Jincai,Zhang Yuzhuo. The Effect of Stress on the Permeability of Fractured Rock Masses[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1988,20(2):19-22.
[17] 师文豪,杨天鸿,王培涛,等. 露天矿边坡岩体稳定性各向异性分析方法及工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报,2014,36(10):1924-1933. Shi Wenhao,Yang Tianhong,Wang Peitao,et al. Anisotropic Analysis Method for Stability of Open-Pit Slope Rock Mass and Its Application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36(10):1924-1933.
[18] Sun Jianping,Zhao Zhiye. Effects of Anisotropic Permeability of Fractured Rock Masses on Underground Oil Storage Caverns[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2010,25(5):629-637.

相关文章 15

[1]	夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2]	涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3]	束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4]	蒋政, 舒彪, 路伟. 高温花岗岩张拉与剪切裂隙的渗流与传热性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 315-326.
[5]	黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[6]	王福刚, 郭坤逸, 彭朝辉, 杨义, 李茚藤, 贾俊. 温度条件影响下不同类型黏性土低速渗流特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2028-2037.
[7]	刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, . 致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.
[8]	周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[9]	路研, 刘宗宾, 廖新武, 李超, 王亚. 低渗透砂岩油藏水驱渗流特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1077-1090.
[10]	苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[11]	于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[12]	程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞. 微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.
[13]	刁国君, 何昕. 地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.
[14]	蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[15]	魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

渗流应力耦合作用下顺倾向层状边坡各向异性渗流特征数值模拟

Numerical Simulation on Anisotropic Seepage Characteristics in Dip Layered Rock Slope with Interaction of Seepage and Stress

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10