吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1789-1800.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210099

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基坑装配式可回收支护和桩锚支护结构的受力与变形分析

余莉1,2, 张钰1, 王维玉2, 韩子豪1, 赵拓2   

  1. 1. 河北大学建筑工程学院, 河北 保定 071000;
    2. 河北省建筑科学研究院有限公司, 石家庄 050000
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-20 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
  • 作者简介:余莉(1985-),女,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地下工程和天然气水合物防砂方面的研究,E-mail:964630415@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北大学教育厅在读研究生创新能力培养资助项目(HBU2021ss029);河北省博士后人社厅项目(B2020003028);河北省自然科学基金青年基金项目(E2020201013)

Stress and Deformation Analysis of Assembled Recoverable Support and Pile Anchor Support Structure in Foundation Pit

Yu Li1,2, Zhang Yu1, Wang Weiyu2, Han Zihao1, Zhao Tuo2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China;
    2. Hebei Construction Research Institute Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2021-04-20 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
  • Supported by:
    Suppored by the Project of Innovation Ability Training for Graduate Students in the Department of Education of Hebei University (HBU2021ss029),the Post Doctoral Program of Human Resources and Social Security Department (B2020003028) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province Youth Fund Project (E2020201013)

摘要: 基坑支护工程在我国城市化建设过程中具有重要的作用,一些新型支护形式的出现极大丰富了基坑支护的多样性。本文以衡水市现场基坑支护实验工程为背景,工程将装配式可回收支护结构和桩锚支护结构作为研究对象,通过室内土工试验数据确定本构模型参数,利用有限元软件PLAXIS3D建立三维有限元模型,模拟基坑开挖和支护的全过程,并分析基坑土体和支护结构的受力、变形特征。对比相同土体和开挖条件下装配式可回收支护结构和桩锚支护结构的稳定性,结果表明:装配式可回收深基坑支护形式能更好地控制土体隆起变形,更利于限制深层土体的位移,也可以更好地控制坑顶水平位移。装配式支护结构施工简单速度快,且能回收利用,符合我国绿色建筑理念。

关键词: 装配式支护, 桩锚支护, 数值模拟, 稳定性对比分析

Abstract: Foundation pit support engineering plays an important role in the process of urbanization in China. The emergence of some new support forms has greatly enriched the diversity of foundation pit support. In this paper, by taking the Hengshui field foundation pit support experiment project as the background, the prefabricated recyclable support structure and pile-anchor support structure are studied; By using the finite element software PLAXIS3D, the constitutive model parameters are determined through indoor geotechnical test data, and the three-dimensional finite element model is established. Further, the process of foundation pit excavation and support is simulated, and the stress and deformation of foundation pit soil and support structure characteristics are analyzed. Through comparing the stability of the assembled recyclable support structure and the pile-anchor support structure under the same soil and excavation conditions, the following conclusions are obtained:The assembled recyclable deep foundation pit support form can not only better control the soil uplift deformation, which is more conducive to limit the displacement of deep soil, but also can better control the horizontal displacement of the pit top. The fabricated support structure is simple, quick in construction, recyclable, and conforms to the concept of green building in China.

Key words: assembled support, pile anchor support, numerical simulation, stability comparative analysis

中图分类号: 

  • P59
[1] 韩健勇,赵文,贾鹏蛟,等.桩锚支护结构深基坑受力变形及稳定性分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(增刊2):907-914. Han Jianyong,Zhao Wen,Jia Pengjiao,et al. Analysis on Stress,Deformation and Stability of Deep Excavation Supported by Anchored Pile[J]. Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017,13(Sup.2):907-914.
[2] 杨丽春,庞宇斌,李慎刚.超长基坑开挖的空间效应[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(2):541-545. Yang Lichun,Pang Yubin,Li Shengang. Spatial Effect of Super Long Foundation Pit Excavation[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2015,45(2):541-545.
[3] 孙超,许成杰.基坑开挖对周边环境的影响[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(6):1698-1705. Sun Chao,Xu Chengjie. Influence of Foundation Pit Excavation on Surrounding Environment[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2019,49(6):1698-1705.
[4] 刘杰, 姚海林, 任建喜. 地铁车站基坑围护结构变形监测与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊2):456-461. Liu Jie,Yao Hailin,Ren Jianxi. Deformation Monitoring and Numerical Simulation of Foundation Pit Retaining Structure in Metro Station[J]. Geomechanics,2010,31(Sup.2):456-461.
[5] 夏晋华, 岳鹏威. 深基坑桩锚支护体系位移数值分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2014, 10(4):848-853. Xia Jinhua,Yue Pengwei.Numerical Analysis of Displacement of Pile-Anchor Retaining System in Deep Foundation Pit[J]. Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2014, 10(4):848-853.
[6] 周勇,朱亚薇.深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J].岩土力学,2018,39(9):3246-3252. Zhou Yong, Zhu Yawei. Interaction Between Pile-Anchor Etarining Structure and Soil Mass in Deep Foundation Pit[J]. Geomechanics, 2018, 39(9):3246-3252.
[7] 徐勇,杨挺,王心联,桩锚支护体系在大型深基坑工程中的应用[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006, 2(4):646-665. Xu Yong, Yang Ting, Wang Xinlian, Application of Pile Anchor Support System in Large Deep Foundation Pit Project.[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(4):646-665.
[8] 蔡根生.装配式和装配整体式地下连续墙新技术探讨[J].地下工程与隧道,1996(4):30-33. Cai Gensheng. Discussion on the New Technology of Assembling and Assembling Integral Diaphragm Wall[J]. Underground Engineering and Tunnels,1996(4):30-33.
[9] 沈晶晶.装配式型钢斜抛撑在基坑支护工程中的应用[J].山西建筑,2016(7):98-99. Shen Jingjing. The Application of Prefabricated Steel Cast Diagonal Brace in Foundation Pit Support Engineering[J]. Shanxi Architecture,2016(7):98-99.
[10] 王复明,方宏远,潘艳辉,等.一种柔性复合装配式可回收矩形工作井支护结构的设计施工方法:CN109056746A[P].2018-12-21. Wang Fuming, Fang Hongyuan, Pan Yanhui,et al. Design and Construction Method of Flexible Composite Prefabricate Recyclable Rectangular Working Well Support Structure:CN109056746A[P].2018-12-21.
[11] Pan Y H, Fang H Y, Li B, et al. Stability Analysis and Full-Scale Test of a New Recyclable Supporting Structure for Underground Ecological Granaries[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019,192:205-219.
[12] 李玉岐,周旋,谢康和.坑外荷载对软土地区基坑开挖变形性状的影响[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2016,33(4):97-102. Li Yuqi, Zhou Xuan, Xie Kanghe. Influence of External Load on Deformation Behavior of Foundation Pit Excavation in Soft Soil Area[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2016,33(4):97-102.
[1] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[9] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[10] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[11] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[12] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[13] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[14] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[15] 韩长玉, 赵浩汀.

路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .