吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 804-817.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240127

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

高磨地区震旦系灯影组四段台内储层储集空间类型及其孔喉结构特征

王蓓东1, 2, 杨胜来1, 2 ,赵帅1, 2 ,邓惠3 ,张钰祥4 ,
白浩言1, 2,李沁怡1, 2,姜艺3 


  

  1. 1.中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院,  北京102249
    2.油气资源与工程全国重点实验室(中国石油大学(北京)),北京102249
    3.中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探开发研究院,成都610000
    4.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京100083
  • 出版日期:2026-05-26 发布日期:2026-06-02
  • 作者简介:王蓓东(1996—),男,博士研究生,主要从事气藏渗流特性方面的研究,E-mail:wangbd_edu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51774300);国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05015-003)

Characteristics of Reservoir Space and Pore-Throat Structure in Intra-Platform Reservoir of the Member 4 of  Dengying Formation in Gaomo Area

Wang Beidong1, 2, Yang Shenglai1, 2, Zhao Shuai1, 2, Deng Hui3, Zhang Yuxiang4, #br# Bai Haoyan1, 2, Li Qinyi1, 2, Jiang Yi3#br#

#br#
  

  1. 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    2. National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Resources and Engineering (China University of Petroleum (Beijing)), Beijing  102249, 
    China
    3. Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu  610000, China
    4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing  100083, China

  • Online:2026-05-26 Published:2026-06-02
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774300) and the National  Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05015-003) 

摘要: 为进一步认识高磨地区震旦系灯影组四段台内储层储集空间类型及其孔喉结构特征,本文通过物性测试、岩心与铸体薄片观察、离心核磁测试、不同尺度CT扫描等技术手段,刻画了不同类型储层孔喉结构特征。结果表明:台内储层以晶间(溶)孔、小型溶洞为主要储集空间, 以喉道、裂缝作为主要渗流通道;缝洞发育处岩石密度低且溶缝、溶洞具有集群分布的特性;离心核磁中缝洞型岩心内部裂缝的存在可降低近缝区域的渗流阻力,增大小孔的排液率。结合铸体薄片与离心核磁实验结果将孔洞型岩心进一步划分为溶洞储气型与溶孔储气型两类,明确溶孔储气型储层具有一定的开发难度,但开发潜力较大。在合理储层改造及地面作业措施下孔洞型岩心可作为台内储层开发中后期稳产的重要支撑。


关键词: 台内储层, 孔喉结构, 离心核磁, 排液率, 储渗特性, 灯影组

Abstract:  In order to comprehensively characterize the characteristics of reservoir space and pore-throat structure of the intra-platform reservoir of the Member 4 of Dengying Formation in the Gaomo area,  this study investigated the pore-throat structure characteristics of different types of reservoirs using physical property analysis, core and cast thin section observation, centrifugal NMR(nuclear magnetic resonance), and CT scans at different scales. The results show that the main storage spaces of the intra-platform reservoir are inter-crystalline (dissolved) pores and small solution cavities, with throats and fractures as the main flow channels. The rock density is low where fractures and cavities develop, and the dissolved fractures and cavities are distributed in clusters. The existence of fractures in fracture-cave type core can reduce the seepage resistance in the near-fracture area and increase the drainage efficiency of small-sized pores in centrifugal NMR experiments. Combined with the results of cast thin section and centrifugal NMR experiments, the cavity-type core was further classified into two categories: cavity gas storage and dissolved-pore gas storage. The dissolved-pore gas storage reservoir is difficult to develop but has high development potential. If reasonable reservoir improvement and surface operation measures are adopted, cavity-type core can serve as an important support for stable production in the middle and late stages of Intra-platform reservoir development.


Key words:  , intra-platform reservoir, pore throat structure, centrifugal NMR, drainage efficiency, storage and seepage feature, Dengying Formation

中图分类号: 

  • TE371
[1] 刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, .

致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.

[2] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[3] 陈庆松, 杨润柏, 刘德民, 陶兰初. 滇东北会泽灯影组硅质岩成因及沉积环境——来自岩石学和地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1327-1337.
[4] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 张训华, 肖国林, 吴志强, 黄文彪. 基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案——以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1654-1667.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[5] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[6] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[7] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[8] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[9] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[10] 王谦,吴志芳, 张汉泉,莫修文. 随机分形在刻划储层非均质特性中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .