吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 2329-2339.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250105

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

不同天气下快速路交织区交通冲突机理

周备1(),周千喜1,马壮林1(),蔡凌霄2,路熙3   

  1. 1.长安大学 运输工程学院,西安 710064
    2.贵州省发展和改革委员会 贵州省民营经济和区域经济发展中心,贵阳 550081
    3.交通运输部 科学研究院,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-11 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-07
  • 通讯作者: 马壮林 E-mail:bzhou3@chd.edu.cn;zhuanglinma@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周备(1986-),男,副教授,博士.研究方向:交通安全.E-mail:bzhou3@chd.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(52102404);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2024JC-YBMS-359);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(300102343204)

Mechanisms of traffic conflicts in expressway weaving areas under different weather condition

Bei ZHOU1(),Qian-xi ZHOU1,Zhuang-lin MA1(),Ling-xiao CAI2,Xi LU3   

  1. 1.School of Transportation Engineering,Chang'an University,Xi'an 710064,China
    2.Guizhou Provincial Private Economy and Regional Economy Development Center,Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission,Guiyang 550081,China
    3.China Academy of Transportation Science,Ministry of Transport,Beijing 100029,China
  • Received:2025-02-11 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-07
  • Contact: Zhuang-lin MA E-mail:bzhou3@chd.edu.cn;zhuanglinma@chd.edu.cn

摘要:

针对不同天气条件下城市快速路交织区交通冲突机理进行研究,提出了一种基于车辆边框信息的交通冲突识别算法,采用超阈值极值理论确定不同天气条件下的严重冲突阈值,并结合机器学习模型和可解释性分析方法,系统探讨了天气对交通冲突特征的影响。通过高精度轨迹数据,解决了传统冲突指标提取方法精度不足、阈值选取主观性强以及天气因素影响研究缺失的问题。研究结果表明,晴天与雨天的严重冲突阈值分别为1.75 s和1.85 s,雨天严重冲突比例(39.1%)显著高于晴天(9.7%)。通过可解释性分析发现:①天气条件显著调节交通冲突影响因素;②晴天时,车辆空间位置(尤其是被冲突车辆是否位于匝道或交织车道)是影响冲突严重程度的主导因素;③雨天时,影响因素的作用强度显著增大,且交通流特征成为主导因素。本文研究成果可为交织区的差异化管理和安全防控提供理论依据。

关键词: 交通运输规划与管理, 交通冲突, 天气影响, 模型可解释性, 碰撞时间

Abstract:

Aiming at the mechanism of traffic conflicts in urban expressway weaving areas under different weather conditions, a traffic conflict identification algorithm based on vehicle bounding box information was proposed. The peak over threshold extreme value theory was employed to determine severe conflict thresholds under distinct weather conditions, and machine learning models combined with interpretability analysis methods were utilized to systematically investigate the impact of weather on traffic conflict characteristics. By leveraging high-precision trajectory data, the limitations of traditional conflict metric extraction methods, such as insufficient accuracy, subjectivity in threshold selection, and the lack of exploration into weather-related influences were addressed. The results demonstrate that the severe conflict thresholds for sunny and rainy conditions are 1.75 s and 1.85 s, respectively, with the proportion of severe conflicts in rainy conditions (39.1%) being significantly higher than in sunny conditions (9.7%). Through interpretability analysis, the following findings are revealed: ①Weather conditions significantly modulate the influencing factors of traffic conflicts; ②Under sunny conditions, spatial vehicle positions (particularly whether the conflicted vehicle is located in a ramp or weaving lane) dominate the severity of conflicts; ③In rainy conditions, the intensity of influencing factors increases markedly, and traffic flow characteristics emerge as the predominant factors. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for differentiated management and safety prevention and control in weaving areas.

Key words: transportation planning and management, traffic conflict, weather impact, model interpretability, time to collision

中图分类号: 

  • U491.3

图1

调查区域俯瞰示意图"

图2

追尾冲突TTC计算示意图"

图3

碰撞点检测示意图"

图4

晴天及雨天TTC值密度分布图"

图5

晴天TTC阈值稳定性分析图"

图6

晴天TTC平均残差寿命图"

图7

雨天TTC阈值稳定性分析图"

图8

雨天TTC平均残差寿命图"

表1

冲突严重程度分类表"

数据划分TTC阈值/s严重冲突数量比例/%
晴天1.758509.7
雨天1.853 33339.1

表2

二级区间分类信息表"

所处路段位置区间编号区间长度/m
交织段W130
W230
W340
W430
W530

表3

变量相关信息"

变量单位及描述变量单位及描述
前3 min路段车流速度均值m/s前3 min前方区间车流速度均值m/s
前3 min路段车流速度标准差-前3 min前方区间车流速度标准差-
前3 min路段车流密度均值pcu/km前3 min前方区间车流密度均值-
前3 min路段车流密度标准差-前3 min前方区间车流密度标准差-
前3 min路段车流量均值pcu/h前3 min前方区间车流量均值pcu/h
前3 min路段车流量标准差-前3 min前方区间车流量标准差-
前3 min自身区间车流速度均值m/s前3 min后方区间车流速度均值m/s
前3 min自身区间车流速度标准差-前3 min后方区间车流速度标准差-
前3 min自身区间车流密度均值pcu/km前3 min后方区间车流密度均值pcu/km
前3 min自身区间车流密度标准差-前3 min后方区间车流密度标准差-
前3 min自身区间车流量均值pcu/h前3 min后方区间车流量均值pcu/h
前3 min自身区间车流量标准差-前3 min后方区间车流量标准差-
瞬时路段车流量pcu/h冲突车辆行驶方向角度一阶差分标准差-
瞬时路段车流密度pcu/km被冲突车辆行驶方向角度一阶差分标准差-
瞬时路段车流速度m/s冲突车辆位于匝道和交织车道0-否;1-是
主线至主线流量pcu冲突车辆位于主线外侧车道0-否;1-是
主线至匝道流量pcu冲突车辆位于主线中间车道0-否;1-是
匝道至主线流量pcu冲突车辆位于主线内侧车道0-否;1-是
匝道至匝道流量pcu被冲突车辆位于匝道和交织车道0-否;1-是
交织比%被冲突车辆位于主线外侧车道0-否;1-是
交织段车流密度pcu/km被冲突车辆位于主线中间车道0-否;1-是
交织段与上游段车流密度差pcu/km被冲突车辆位于主线内侧车道0-否;1-是
交织段与下游段车流密度差pcu/km是否晚高峰0-否;1-是

表4

超参数调优结果"

参数含义晴天TTC模型取值雨天TTC模型取值
subsample每棵树训练时随机选择的样本比例,防止过拟合0.61.0
num_leaves单棵树的最大节点数,控制树的复杂度10031
n_estimators模型迭代的次数5001 500
min_child_samples一个节点上最小的样本数量2030
max_depth树的最大深度,限制树的生长,防止过拟合。设置为-1时,深度不受限制-15
learning_rate学习率,控制每次迭代更新的步长0.0010.1
colsample_bytree每棵树随机采样的特征比例0.60.6

图9

晴天LightGBM模型SHAP值分析图"

图10

雨天LightGBM模型SHAP值分析图"

[1] 曹倩, 李志慧, 陶鹏飞, 等. 考虑风险异质特性的路网交通事故风险评估方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2023, 53(10): 2817-2825.
Cao Qian, Li Zhi-hui, Tao Peng-fei, et al. Traffic accident risk assessment method for road network consider risk heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(10): 2817-2825.
[2] Wang L, Abdel-Aty M, Shi Q, et al. Real-time crash prediction for expressway weaving segments[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 61: 1-10.
[3] 穆松成. 基于交通冲突极值统计的事故预测模型研究[D]. 威海: 哈尔滨工业大学汽车工程学院, 2022.
Mu Song-cheng. Research on crash prediction model based on extreme statistics of traffic conflicts[D]. Weihai: School of Automotive Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2022.
[4] 姜雪. 城市快速路交织区交通冲突机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连交通大学交通工程学院, 2021.
Jiang Xue. Study on traffic conflict mechanism in urban expressway weaving areas[D]. Dalian: School of Traffic Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University,2021.
[5] Yuan R, Abdel-Aty M, Xiang Q. A study on diversion behavior in weaving segments: individualized traffic conflict prediction and causal mechanism analysis[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 205: No.107681.
[6] 李佳硕, 郑展骥, 顾欣, 等. 考虑快速路交织区驾驶人强行变道行为的交通冲突机理分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(3): 1-11.
Li Jia-shuo, Zheng Zhang-ji, Gu Xin, et al. An analysis of the mechanism of traffic conflicts considering risky lane-changing behavior in weaving sections of expressways[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(3): 1-11.
[7] 马菲. 基于轨迹数据的快速路交织区交通风险评估[D]. 济南: 山东大学齐鲁交通学院, 2024.
Ma Fei. Risk assessment of expressway weaving sections based on trajectory data[D]. Jinan: School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, 2024.
[8] 卢启慧. 基于交通冲突预测模型的城市快速路交织区安全评价方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学交通学院, 2024.
Lu Qi-hui. Research on safety evaluation method of urban expressway weaving areas based on traffic conflict prediction model[D]. Nanjing: School of Transportation, Southeast University, 2024.
[9] Onelcin P, Alver Y. A new lane change index for lane change conflicts at weaving segments[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2023, 24(7): 559-566.
[10] Xia Y, Qin Y, Li X, et al. Risk identification and conflict prediction from videos based on TTC-ML of a multi-lane weaving area[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14: No.4620.
[11] 赵涛, 张宁, 王小超, 等. 基于图神经网络轨迹预测的合流区交通冲突预测方法[J]. 山东大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(2): 36-46.
Zhao Tao, Zhang Ning, Wang Xiao-chao, et al. A traffic conflict prediction method for merging areas based on trajectory prediction with graph neural network[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2024, 54(2): 36-46.
[12] Zheng O, Abdel-Aty M, Yue L, et al. CitySim: a drone-based vehicle trajectory dataset for safety oriented research and digital twins[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2023, 2678(4): 606-621.
[13] 史道济. 实用极值统计方法[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 2006.
[14] Lundberg S M, Lee S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions[C]∥Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, CA, USA, 2017: 4768-4777.
[15] 温惠英, 何梓琦, 李秋灵, 等. 高速公路货车换道冲突预测及其影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
Wen Hui-ying, He Zi-qi, Li Qiu-ling, et al. Traffic conflict prediction and influencing factors analysis of truck lane change on expressway[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
[1] 王艳丽,王晨曦,赵欣然,吴兵. 考虑多维属性的混合路网路径选择行为预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(8): 2067-2076.
[2] 刘康琳,张泽宇,蒋婧雯,宫洵,陈垚. 基于分布鲁棒优化的无人机配送设施选址分配问题[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(2): 464-472.
[3] 张毅,陈莎雯,陈艳,范翔宇,王思祺,吴欢,焦鹏飞. 高速公路机电设备动态运维评价及预测性维护[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(1): 170-182.
[4] 孙峣,白东轩,姚宝珍,白子建. 基于渗流理论的港城交通网络特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(1): 199-208.
[5] 贾洪飞,庄博,罗清玉,刘玲,黄秋阳. 积水条件下城市路网性能恢复决策优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2969-2977.
[6] 王东,李宇暄,吴欢,宗芳. 基于随机森林的智能网联汽车开放测试道路评级算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2998-3006.
[7] 徐慧智,郝东升,徐小婷,蒋时森. 基于深度学习的高速公路小目标检测算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 2003-2014.
[8] 何庆龄,裴玉龙,侯琳,刘静,潘胜. 混合策略改进WOA-BiLSTM的快速路出口匝道车速预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 2038-2049.
[9] 吴文静,邓淳淳,贾洪飞,孙舒航. 内涝影响下路网畅通可靠度评估及关键路段识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1250-1257.
[10] 岳昊,常笑,刘建业,曲秋莳. 引入车辆窗的定制公交线路优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1266-1274.
[11] 孟祥海,王国锐,张明扬,田毕江. 基于选择集成的山区高速事故预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1298-1306.
[12] 高天洋,胡大伟,姜瑞森,吴雪,刘慧甜. 基于模块化车辆的区域灵活接驳公交线路优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 537-545.
[13] 李昱燃,汪飞,朱才华,韩飞,李岩. 污染天气居民通勤模式选择影响因素的链式效用[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 577-590.
[14] 马书红,张俊杰,陈西芳,廖国美. 利用出租车时序数据识别城市功能区[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 603-613.
[15] 曲大义,戴守晨,陈意成,崔善柠,杨宇翔. 基于轨迹数据的车辆博弈切出及汇入行为建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(10): 3208-3220.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!