吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 495-506.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201502113

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

东营凹陷盐家地区沙四上亚段砂砾岩储层岩相与物性关系

马奔奔1, 操应长1, 王艳忠1, 刘惠民2, 高永进2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266555;
    2. 中国石化胜利油田地质科学研究院, 山东 东营 257015
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-06 发布日期:2015-03-26
  • 作者简介:马奔奔(1988-),男,博士研究生,主要从事储层地质学方面的学习和研究工作,E-mail:mabenbenupc@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家油气重大专项项目(2011ZX05006-003);国家自然科学基金项目(41102058);中国石油大学(华东)优秀博士学位论文培育计划项目(LW140101A)

Relationship Between Lithofacies and Physical Properties of Sandy Conglomerate Reservoirs of Es4s in Yanjia Area,Dongying Depression

Ma Benben1, Cao Yingchang1, Wang Yanzhong1, Liu Huimin2, Gao Yongjin2   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China;
    2. Geological Scientfic Research Institute of Shengli Oil Field Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-05-06 Published:2015-03-26

摘要:

依据岩性、粒度、沉积构造等特征,将东营凹陷盐家地区沙四上亚段近岸水下扇砂砾岩体划分为10种岩相类型和13种在一次沉积事件中形成的岩相组合类型,并将其岩相组合类型划分为3大类6小类。针对砂砾岩储层在任一深度物性范围变化较大的问题,遵循"岩相组合类型-岩相类型-距砂泥接触面距离"的研究思路,采用逐步分解的方法,建立"岩相组合类型-岩相类型-距砂泥接触面距离"约束下的物性纵向演化图,结果显示任一深度物性参数变化范围相对较小,各岩相类型储层孔隙度的变化一般为±2%,渗透率的变化一般在一个数量级以内。对比分析各岩相类型物性图可知:随埋深增加,各岩相类型远泥岩部位储层物性整体变差;同一深度,由Ⅰ型岩相类型到Ⅱ型岩相类型物性变好。与远泥岩的各岩相组合底部岩相类型相比,扇中比扇根部位各级别孔隙度和渗透率的深度上限增加了800~1 200 m;与远泥岩的各岩相组合中上部岩相类型相比,扇中比扇根部位各级别孔隙度和渗透率的深度上限增加了1 100~1 650 m。扇中近泥岩部位和扇缘薄层砂因发生强烈胶结作用而使物性变差,在3 400 m以下基本为超低孔超低渗储层。

关键词: 近岸水下扇, 砂砾岩, 岩相, 物性, 储层沙四上亚段, 东营凹陷

Abstract:

According to the characteristics of lithology, particle size as well as sedimentary structure, the sandy conglomerate bodies are divided into 10 types of lithofacies as well as 13 types of lithofacies assemblages; each of which is of the same event deposits of Es4s in Yanjia Dongying depression. The types of lithofacies assemblages are further divided into three categories and six subcategories. The scientific issue is that the range of the physical parameters of the sandy conglomerate reservoirs are relatively large at an arbitrary depth. Following the thought of "types of lithofacies assemblages-types of lithofacies-distance from sand-mud boundary", and decomposing the lithofacies step by step, we achieved the charts of longitudinal physical property evolution which are restrained within each group of the lithoface division. Within each group of the lithofacies, the range of physical parameters of the lithoface is relatively small at an arbitrary depth: the range of porosity is ±2%; while the range of permeability is in one order of magnitude. When the lithofacies are far away from the mudstone, their physical property becomes weak with the increase of the burial depth. The physical property of type Ⅱ lithofacies is better than those of type Ⅰ lithofacies at the same depth. Compared to the lithoface types, which are at the bottom of lithoface assemblages far away from mud, the corresponding depth-upper-limit of different grades of porosity and permeability of the lithofacies types of the middle fan is 800-1 200 m deeper than that of the inner fan. Compared to lithofacies types which are at the middle-upper part of lithofacies assemblages far away from mud, the corresponding depth-upper-limit of different grades of porosity and permeability of the lithofacies types of the middle fan is 1 100-1 650 m deeper than that of the inner fan. The sandstones near mudstones in middle fan and thin sandstones in outer fan both have weak physical properties because of their intensive cementation. They are ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoirs under the depth of 3 400 m.

Key words: nearshore subaqueous fan, sandy conglomerate, lithofacies, physical properties, reservoirs Es4s, Dongying depression

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] 隋风贵. 断陷湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩扇体成藏动力学特征:以东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(4):335-340. Sui Fenggui. Characteristics of Reservoiring Dynamic on the Sand-Conglomerate Fan Bodies in the Steep-Slope Belt of Continental Fault Basin: A Case Study on Dongying Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(4): 335-340.

[2] 孔凡仙. 东营凹陷北带砂砾岩扇体勘探技术与实践[J]. 石油学报, 2000, 21(5):27-31. Kong Fanxian. Exploration Technique and Practice of Sandy-Conglomeratic Fans in the Northern Part of Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, 21(5): 27-31.

[3] 宋明水, 李存磊, 张金亮.东营凹陷盐家地区砂砾岩体沉积期次精细划分与对比[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(5):781-782. Song Mingshui, Li Cunlei, Zhang Jinliang. Fine Division and Correlation of Conglomerate Sedimentary Cycles in Yanjia Area of Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(5): 781-782.

[4] 隋风贵, 操应长, 刘惠民, 等. 东营凹陷北带东部古近系近岸水下扇储集物性演化及其油气成藏模式[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(2):246-256. Sui Fenggui, Cao Yingchang, Liu Huimin, et al.Physical Properties Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Paleogene Nearshore Subaqueous Fan in the Eastern North Margin of the Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2010, 84(2): 246-256.

[5] 郭玉新, 隋风贵, 林会喜, 等. 时频分析技术划分砂砾岩沉积期次方法探讨:以渤南洼陷北部陡坡带沙四段沙三段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(5):8-11. Guo Yuxin, Sui Fenggui, Lin Huixi, et al. Discussion on the Division and Correlation of Glutenite Sedimentary Period by Time-Frequency Analysis: A Case of Sha4 to Sha3 Member of Northern Abrupt Slope Zone in Bonan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(5): 8-11.

[6] 亓雪静. 利津油田砂砾岩扇体发育特征及储层评价[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2006, 41(4):410-414. Qi Xuejing. Development Feature of Sandstone/Gravel Stone Fan and Reservoir Evaluation in Lijin Oilfield[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2006, 41(4): 410-414.

[7] 宋来亮. 东营凹陷陡坡带深部储层储集空间演化特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(5): 8-12. Song Lailiang. Pore Space Evolution of Deep Reservoir in the Steep Slope Zone of Dongying Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(5): 8-12.

[8] 伍松柏. 东营凹陷北带不同类型砂砾岩扇体"相-势"控藏作用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(3):39-42. Wu Songbai. Controlling of Facies and Fluid Potential on the Oil Accumulation of Different Glutenite Fan, North Belt of Dongying Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(3): 39-42.

[9] 张琴, 朱筱敏, 钟大康, 等. 山东东营凹陷古近系碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 古地理学报, 2004, 6(4):495-498. Zhang Qin, Zhu Xiaomin, Zhong Dakang, et al. Clastic Reservoir Properties and Their Controlling Factors of the Paleogene in Dongying Sag, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2004, 6(4): 495-498.

[10] 李军亮. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷深层砂砾岩储层成岩演化特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008, 30(3):252-253. Li Junliang. Diagenesis Evolution Characteristic of Deep Buried Glutenite Reservoir Bed in the Dongying Sag, the Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(3): 252-253.

[11] 安洁, 操应长, 王艳忠. 东营凹陷北带沙四段近岸水下扇砂砾岩储层物性演化特征[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2008, 30(6):221-225. An Jie, Cao Yingchang, Wang Yanzhong. Evolution Characteristics of Physical Properties on Sand-Conglomerate Reservoir of the Nearshore Subaqueous Fan of Es4, North Belt of Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology:Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2008, 30(6): 221-225.

[12] 王艳忠, 操应长, 李永新. 东营凹陷北带沙四上亚段近岸水下扇砂砾岩储层物性对比分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(4):10-15. Wang Yanzhong, Cao Yingchang, Li Yongxin. Comparative Analysis on Sand-Conglomerate Physical Properties of the Nearshore Subaqueous Fan of Upper Es4, North Belt of Dongying Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17(4): 10-15.

[13] 姜在兴. 沉积学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2010. Jiang Zaixing. Sedimentology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2010.

[14] 于兴河, 王德发, 孙志华.湖泊辫状河三角洲岩相、层序特征及储层地质模型:内蒙古岱海湖现代三角洲沉积考察[J]. 沉积学报, 1995, 13(1):50-52. Yu Xinghe, Wang Defa, Sun Zhihua. Lithofacies Types, Vertical Profile Features and Reservoir Geological Models of Braided Deltaic Sandbodies in Faultde Lake Basin: The Observation on Deposltion of Modern Deltas in Daihai Lake, Inner Mongolla[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1995, 13(1):50-52.

[15] 陈欢庆, 胡永乐, 冉启全, 等.火山岩气藏储层岩相特征及其对储层物性的影响:以徐深气田徐东地区白垩系营城组一段火山岩为例[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2011, 30(1):61-68. Chen Huanqing, Hu Yongle, Ran Qiquan, et al. Lithofacies Characteristics of Volcanic Gas Reservoirs and Their Influence on Reservoir Physical Properties: A Case Study of Member 1 of Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Xudong Area of the Xushen Gas Field[J].Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2011, 30(1): 61-68.

[16] 吴颜雄, 王璞珺, 曲立才, 等.营城组一段及下段岩性岩相和储层物性的精细刻画-基于标准剖面营一D1井全取心钻孔资料[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2007, 37(6):1193-1197. Wu Yanxiong, Wang Pujun, Qu Licai, et al. Detailed Description of Lithology, Lithofacies and Porosity and Permeability of the First and the Lower Member of Yingcheng Formation: Based on the Latest Data of Ying-1D1 Well Cores in Standard Section[J].Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2007, 37(6): 1193-1197.

[17] 王璞珺, 吴河勇, 庞颜明, 等.松辽盆地火山岩相:相序、相模式与储层物性的定量关系[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2006, 36(5):806-810. Wang Pujun, Wu Heyong, Pang Yanming, et al. Volcanic Facies of the Songliao Basin: Sequence, Model and the Quantitative Relationship with Porosity & Permeability of the Volcanic Reservoir[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2006, 36(5): 806-810.

[18] 孙圆辉, 宋新民, 冉启全, 等.长岭气田火山岩岩性和岩相特征及其对储集层的控制[J].石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1):68-73. Sun Yuanhui, Song Xinming, Ran Qiquan, et al. Lithologic and Lithofacies Characteristics of Volcanic Rock and Their Control over Reservoirs, Changling Gasfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(1): 68-73.

[19] 谢庆宾, 高霞, 夏秋君, 等.松辽盆地昌德地区营城组火成岩气藏储层特征及其控制因素[J].地质学报, 2012, 86(8):1218-1223. Xie Qingbin, Gao Xia, Xia Qiujun, et al. Characteristics and Controlling Factors of the Yingcheng Formation Volcanic Reservoir in the Changde Area, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(8): 1218-1223.

[20] 钟大康, 朱筱敏, 张琴. 不同埋深条件下砂泥岩互层中砂岩储层物性变化规律[J]. 地质学报, 2004, 78(6):863-871. Zhong Dakang, Zhu Xiaomin, Zhang Qin. Variation Characteristics of Sandstone Reservoirs when Sandstone and Mudstone are Interbedded at Different Buried Depths[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2004, 78(6): 863-871.

[21] 李丕龙, 庞雄奇. 陆相断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏形成:以济阳坳陷为例[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2004:254-293. Li Pilong, Pang Xiongqi. Formation of Subtle Reservoirs in Continental Fault Basin:Based on the Jiyang Depression[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004: 254-293.

[22] 漆滨汶, 林春明, 邱桂强, 等. 东营凹陷古近系沙河街组砂岩透镜体钙质结壳形成机理及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 古地理学报, 2006, 8(4):522-529. Qi Binwen, Lin Chunming, Qiu Guiqiang, et al. Formation Mechanism of Calcareous Incrustation in Lenticular Sandbody of the Shahejie Formation of Paleogene and Its Influence on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2006, 8(4): 522-529.

[23] 张永旺, 曾溅辉, 高霞, 等. 东营凹陷古近系储层碳酸盐胶结物分布特征及主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2009, 39(1):17-22. Zhang Yongwang, Zeng Jianhui, Gao Xia, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of Carbonate Cements in the Paleogene Reservoirs in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2009, 39(1): 17-22.

[24] 油气储层评价方法 SY/T 6285-2011[S]. 北京:石油出版社, 2011. Evaluation methods on Oil and Gas Reservoir SY/T 6285-2011[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011.

[25] 王艳忠.东营凹陷北带古近系次生孔隙发育带成因机制及演化模式[D].青岛:中国石油大学, 2010. Wang Yanzhong. Genetic Mechanism and Evolution Model of Secondary Pore Development Zone of Paleogene in the North Zone in Dongying Depression[D].Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2010.

[26] 万念明, 王艳忠, 操应长, 等. 东营凹陷民丰洼陷北带沙四段深层超压封存箱与油气成藏[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(2):395-400. Wan Nianming, Wang Yanzhong, Cao Yingchang, et al. Overpressured Fluid Compartment and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Deep Layer of Es4 in the North Zone of Minfeng Sag, Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(2):395-400.

[27] 李明诚. 石油与天然气运移[M]. 第2版.北京:石油工业出版社, 1994. Li Mingcheng. Oil and Gas Migration[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1994.

[1] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[2] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[3] 贾艳聪, 操应长, 林畅松, 王健. 东营凹陷博兴洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝优质储层形成机理与分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 652-664.
[4] 刘宗利, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 赵淑琴, 欧伟明. 辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.
[5] 林承焰, 王杨, 杨山, 任丽华, 由春梅, 吴松涛, 吴玉其, 张依旻. 基于CT的数字岩心三维建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[6] 高崇龙, 纪友亮, 靳军, 王剑, 任影, 车世琦, 王茹, 桓芝俊. 准噶尔盆地莫索湾地区清水河组深层优质储层特征及其物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 990-1006.
[7] 贾珍臻, 林承焰, 任丽华, 董春梅, 宫宝. 苏德尔特油田低渗透凝灰质砂岩成岩作用及储层质量差异性演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1624-1636.
[8] 朱传华, 王伟锋, 王青振, 李玉坤. 非均质储层三维构造应力场模拟方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1580-1588.
[9] 邱隆伟, 师政, 付大巍, 潘泽浩, 杨生超, 曲长胜. 临南洼陷沙三段孔隙度控制因素分析与定量模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1321-1331.
[10] 耿晓洁, 朱筱敏, 董艳蕾. 地震沉积学在近岸水下扇沉积体系分析中的应用以泌阳凹陷东南部古近系核三上亚段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 57-64.
[11] 郑香伟, 吴健, 何胜林, 胡向阳, 梁玉楠. 基于流动单元的砂砾岩储层渗透率测井精细评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 286-294.
[12] 操应长, 张会娜, 葸克来, 赵贤正, 周磊, 崔周旗, 金杰华. 饶阳凹陷南部古近系中深层有效储层物性下限及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1567-1579.
[13] 曹文炅, 陈继良, 蒋方明. 工质变物性对EGS热开采过程影响的数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1180-1188.
[14] 陈彬滔, 潘树新, 梁苏娟, 张庆石, 刘彩燕, 王革. 陆相湖盆深水块体搬运体优质储层的主控因素以松辽盆地英台地区青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1002-1010.
[15] 潘荣, 朱筱敏, 张剑锋, 何敏, 邸宏利. 克拉苏冲断带深层碎屑岩有效储层物性下限及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1011-1020.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!