吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1649-1659.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201606105

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法

姜贵璞   

  1. 大庆油田有限责任公司第四采油厂, 黑龙江 大庆 163511
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-21 出版日期:2016-11-26 发布日期:2016-11-26
  • 作者简介:姜贵璞(1972),男,高级工程师,主要从事油田开发方面研究,E-mail:jiangguipu@petrolchina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41372153)

Cause of Oil-Gas Space Complementary Distribution and the Determining Methods of Distribution Range in Continental Faulted Depression

Jiang Guipu   

  1. Fourth Oil Recovery Plant of Daqing Oil Field Corporation, Ltd., Daqing 163511, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2016-02-21 Online:2016-11-26 Published:2016-11-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science Natural Foundation Project (41372153)

摘要: 为了研究陆相断陷盆地油气分布规律,在构造和地层-岩性油气藏、下伏和上覆调整油气藏之间空间分布关系研究的基础上,通过分析不同类型油气藏分布及形成条件之间关系,对陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法进行了研究。结果表明:油气聚集圈闭类型和侧向运移条件的差异是造成构造和地层-岩性油气藏平面互补分布的主要原因;反转断裂沟通与下伏油气藏调整程度是造成下伏与上覆调整油气藏剖面互补分布的主要原因。利用地层砂地比值大小可以确定构造和地层-岩性油气藏平面互补分布范围。当地层砂地比大于40%时,主要形成以构造为主的油气藏;当地层砂地比小于20%时,主要形成以地层-岩性为主的油气藏。利用下伏油气藏内反转断裂分布范围便可以确定出上覆调整油气藏范围,上覆调整油气藏分布范围即为其与下伏油气藏剖面互补分布范围。

关键词: 陆相断陷盆地, 地层砂地比值, 构造油气藏, 地层-岩性油气藏, 油气空间互补, 反转断裂

Abstract: In order to study the oil-gas distribution principle in continental faulted depression,based on the research of the space relationship of distribution between structural and stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs, between underlying and overlying adjustment reservoirs,the cause of oil-gas space complementary distribution and the determining methods of distribution range were studied by analyzing the relationship between distribution of different types of reservoir and their formation conditions. The result indicated that, traps of oil-gas accumulation and conditions of lateral migration are the main factors influencing the plane complementary distribution of structural and stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs,the communication of reverse fault and the adjustment degree of underlying reservoir are the main factors influencing the complementary distribution of underlying and overlying adjustment reservoirs. The ratio of sandstone to stratum can be used to determine the complementary distribution range of structural and stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs,when the ratio is greater than 40%, the structural reservoirs mainly formed, when the ratio is less than 20%, the stratigraphic-lithologic reservoirs mainly formed. The distribution range of overlying adjustment reservoirs can be determined by the distribution range of reverse fault in and near the underlying reservoirs,that is the complementary distribution range of underlying reservoirs.

Key words: continental faulted depression, ratio of sandstone to stratum, structural reservoir, stratigraphic-lithologic reservoir, oil-gas space of complementary distribution, reverse fault

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 杜金虎,易士威,卢学军,等. 试论富油凹陷油气分布的"互补性"特征[J]. 中国石油勘探,2004,9(1):15-22. Du Jinhu,Yi Shiwei,Lu Xuejun,et al. Oil and Gas Distribution of Oil-Enriched Depression Characterized with"Reciprocity"[J]. China Petrleum Exploration,2004,9(1):15-22.
[2] 赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,等. 陆相断陷盆地洼槽聚油理论及其应用:以渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷和二连盆地为例[J]. 石油学报,2011,32(1):18-24. Zhao Xianzheng,Jin Fengming,Wang Quan,et al. Theory of Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Troughs Within Continental Faulted Basins and Its Application: A Case Study in Jizhong Depression and Erlian Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(1):18-24.
[3] 吕延防,韦丹宁,孙永河,等. 南堡凹陷断层对中、上部含油组合油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):971-982. Lü Yanfang,Wei Danning,Sun Yonghe,et al. Control Action of Faults on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation in the Middle and Upper Oil-Bearing Group in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2015,45(4):971-982.
[4] 付广,孟庆芬,徐琴. 乌尔逊凹陷南二段油气成藏与分布主控因素及有利区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(3):377-382. Fu Guang,Meng Qingfen,Xu Qin. Main Factors Controlling Oil or Gas Accumulation and Distribution and Forecasting for Favorable Exploration Areas of K1n2 in Wuerxun Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2004,34(3):377-382.
[5] 郭泽清,刘卫红,张林,等. 中国陆相岩性地层油气藏分布规律和控制因素研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报,2009,28(5):71-77. Guo Zeqing,Liu Weihong,Zhang Lin,et al. Review of Distribution and Controlling Factors for Continental Lithologic and Stratigraphic Oil Gas Reservoirs in China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2009,28(5):71-77.
[6] 刘震,赵政璋,赵阳,等. 含油气盆地岩性油气藏的形成和分布特征[J].石油学报,2006,27(1):17-23. Liu Zhen,Zhao Zhengzhang,Zhao Yang,et al. Predominant Characteristics of Formation and Distribution for Lithologic Reservoirs in Petroliferous Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(1):17-23.
[7] 张文朝,降栓奇,陈彦君,等. 断陷盆地"相-势-导"成藏模式与油气成藏[J]. 石油学报,2008,29(5):680-687. Zhang Wenchao,Jiang Shuanqi,Chen Yanjun,et al. "Facies-Potential-Transport"Reservoir Model and Formation of Reservoirs in Fault Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(5):680-687.
[8] 庞雄奇,周新源,姜振学,等. 叠合盆地油气藏形成、演化与预测评价[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(1):1-103. Pang Xiongqi,Zhou Xinyuan,Jiang Zhenxue,et al. Hydrocarbon Reservoirs Formation, Evolution, Prediction and Evaluation in the Superimposed Basins[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(1):1-103.
[9] 匡立春,唐勇,雷德文,等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):657-667. Kuang Lichun,Tang Yong,Lei Dewen,et al. Formation Conditions and Exploration Potential of Tight Oil in the Permian Saline Lacustrine Dolomitic Rock, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):657-667.
[10] 刘池洋. 沉积盆地动力学与盆地成藏(矿)系统[J]. 地球科学与环境学报,2008,30(1):1-23. Liu Chiyang. Dynamics of Sedimentary Basin and Basin Reservoir(Ore) Forming System[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2008,30(1):1-23.
[11] 刘震,陈艳鹏,赵阳,等. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):121-127. Liu Zhen,Chen Yanpeng,Zhao Yang,et al. Distribution and Controlling Factors of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in Continental Fault Basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):121-127.
[12] 刘志宏,万传彪,任延广,等. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷的地质特征及油气成藏规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(4):527-534. Liu Zhihong,Wan Chuanbiao,Ren Yanguang,et al. Geological Features and the Rule of Oil and Gas Accumulation of Urxun-Beier Depression in Hailaer Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2006,36(4):527-534.
[13] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,张伟,等. 陆相断陷油气勘探有利目标区三元定量评价方法及应用:以沧东凹陷古近系孔二段为例[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版):2013,40(2):184-192. Zhou Lihong,Pu Xiugang,Zhang Wei,et al. Three Factors Evaluation and Its Application to the Favorable Oil-Gas Exploration Targets in Continental Rift: Taking the Ek2 of Cangdong Sag for Example[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2013,40(2):184-192.
[14] 吴冲龙,林忠民,毛小平,等. "油气成藏模式"的概念、研究现状和发展趋势[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(6):673-683. Wu Chonglong,Lin Zhongmin,Mao Xiaoping,et al. Concept, Research Status and Trend of "Hydrocarbon Pooling Patterns"[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(6):673-683.
[15] 张万选. 论油、气藏的分类及中国油、气藏的主要类型[J]. 石油学报,1981,2(3):1-11. Zhang Wanxuan. On Classification of Petroleum Pools and the Types of Petroleum Pools in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1981,2(3):1-11.
[16] 吴红华,戴福贵,杨津,等. 挤压断裂构造样式地震解释[J]. 地学前缘, 2010,17(5):361-373. Wu Honghua,Dai Fugui,Yang Jin,et al. Seismic Interpretation of Contractive Fractured Structure Styles[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010,17(5):361-373.
[17] Bill St John. World Sedimentary Basins and Giant Hydrocarbon Accumulation[J]. Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting,1983,67(3):337-347.
[18] 朱丽旭,吕延防,吴宇,等. 海塔盆地中部断陷带反转构造特征及其对油气的控制[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2013,37(2):46-54. Zhu Lixu,Lü Yanfang,Wu Yu,et al. Features of Inversion Tectonics and Reservoir Controlling Significance of the Middle Zone of Haita Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(2):46-54.
[19] 周广军. 小型断陷带盆地自生自储式油成藏规律:以海塔盆地中部主要断陷带南一段为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2012,36(5):38-44. Zhou Guangjun. Oil Accumulation Patterns of Self Generation and Self Reservation in Small Depression Basin: An Example from K1n1 of the Main Central Depression Zones of Haita Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2012,36(5):38-44.
[20] 付广,李海丽. 贝尔凹陷油藏形成过程及油富集的主控因素[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,43(12):4850-4858. Fu Guang,Li Haili. Forming Procession of Oil and Gas Reservoirs and Main Controlling Factors of Oil Accumulation in Beier Depression[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2012,43(12):4850-4858.
[21] 罗晓容,雷裕红,张立宽,等. 油气运移输导层研究及量化表征方法[J]. 石油学报,2012,33(3):428-436. Luo Xiaorong,Lei Yuhong,Zhang Likuan,et al. Characteristics of Carrier Formation for Hydrocarbon Migration: Concepts and Approaches[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):428-436.
[22] 雷裕红,罗晓容,潘坚,等. 大庆油田西部地区姚一段油气成藏动力学过程模拟[J]. 石油学报,2010,31(2):204-210. Lei Yuhong,Luo Xiaorong,Pan Jian,et al. Simulation on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation Dynamics of the First Member of Yaojia Formation in the West of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):204-210.
[23] 赵健,罗晓容,张宝收,等. 塔中地区志留系柯坪塔格组砂岩输导层量化表征及有效性评价[J]. 石油学报,2011,32(6):949-958. Zhao Jian,Luo Xiaorong,Zhang Baoshou,et al. A Quantitative Characterization and Effectiveness Evaluation on Sandstone Carrier Beds of the Silurian Kalpintag Formation in the Tazhong Area, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):949-958.
[24] 杨勉,陈艳丽,李培海. 松辽盆地北部西斜坡油气藏类型与分布预测[J]. 科学技术与工程,2012,12(22):5588-5592. Yang Mian,Chen Yanli,Li Peihai. Reservoir Types and Distribution Prediction in the Western Slope of the Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2012,12(22):5588-5592.
[1] 陈爱民. 澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 965-980.
[2] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 尚庆华, 黄生旺. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 981-990.
[3] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[4] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[5] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[6] 龚跃华, 杨胜雄, 王宏斌, 梁金强, 梁劲. 琼东南盆地天然气水合物成矿远景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1030-1042.
[7] 李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[8] 贾艳聪, 操应长, 林畅松, 王健. 东营凹陷博兴洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝优质储层形成机理与分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 652-664.
[9] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[10] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[11] 孙海涛, 钟大康, 李勇, 毛亚昆, 杨宪彰. 超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素——以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 693-704.
[12] 胡欣蕾, 吕延防, 孙永河, 孙同文. 泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 705-718.
[13] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[14] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[15] 田亚, 杜治利, 刘宝宪, 杜小弟, 陈夷. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部宜川黄龙地区奥陶系风化壳储层发育特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1620-1630.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!