吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 637-649.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170330

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透储层孔隙结构影响因素及其定量评价——以准噶尔盆地金龙2地区二叠系上乌尔禾组二段为例

单祥1, 郭华军1, 郭旭光2, 邹志文1, 李亚哲1, 王力宝1   

  1. 1. 中国石油杭州地质研究院, 杭州 310023;
    2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-18 出版日期:2019-06-03 发布日期:2019-06-03
  • 作者简介:单祥(1988-),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事油气储层地质方面的研究,E-mail:shanx_hz@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    十三五国家重大科技专项(2017ZX05001-002)

Influencing Factors and Quantitative Assessment of Pore Structure in Low Permeability Reservoir: A Case Study of 2nd Member of Permian Upper Urho Formation in Jinlong 2 Area, Junggar Basin

Shan Xiang1, Guo Huajun1, Guo Xuguang2, Zou Zhiwen1, Li Yazhe1, Wang Libao1   

  1. 1. Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, PetroChina, Hangzhou 310023, China;
    2. Institute of Exploration and Development of Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Keramay 834000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2017-12-18 Online:2019-06-03 Published:2019-06-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Major National Science and Technology Projects for the 13th Five-Year Plan (2017ZX05001-002)

摘要: 利用薄片、扫描电镜、物性及压汞等资料,对金龙2地区三叠系上乌尔禾组二段(P3w2)低渗(含砾)砂岩储层孔隙结构及其影响因素进行了研究。结果表明:①乌二段属于低孔低渗储层,根据压汞曲线参数特征,将其孔隙结构划分为三类。②成岩作用控制了储层孔隙结构,定量计算结果表明,乌二段视压实率平均为53.54%、视胶结率平均为47.53%、视溶蚀率平均为13.84%、视微孔隙率平均为60.67%,表现为中等压实、中-强胶结、弱溶蚀、微孔发育等特征;压实作用、胶结作用、微孔隙发育主要控制储层孔隙结构的形成。③引入成岩综合指数来定量表征各种成岩作用的综合强度,其与储层孔隙结构参数(排驱压力、分选系数)以及储层品质因子(RQI)具有较好的统计相关关系,Ⅰ类储层成岩综合指数大于8%,Ⅱ类储层成岩综合指数为2%~8%,Ⅲ类储层成岩综合指数小于2%。因此,可以利用成岩综合指数定量评价储层孔隙结构。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 成岩作用, 影响因素, 低渗透储层, 上乌尔禾组, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: The pore microstructure characteristics and their influencing factors of the 2nd member of Permian Upper Urho Formation (P3w2) in Jinlong 2 area were analyzed by using thin sections, SEM, porosity, permeability, and mercury injection curve data. The results show that:1)P3w2 is characterized by low porosity and low permeability. Based on mercury injection curves, the pore microstructure can be divided into three categories. 2)Diagenesis controls P3w2 pore microstructure. Quantitative assessments show that the average apparent compaction rate, average apparent cementation rate, average apparent dissolution rate, and average apparent micropore rate are 53.54%, 47.53%, 13.84%,and 60.67% respectively. P3w2 is characterized by moderate compaction, moderate to strong cementation, weak dissolution and well developed micropores. Thus compaction, cementation, micropores are the main factors controlling the P3w2 pore microstructure. 3)The comprehensive diagenetic coefficient was chosen to quantitatively assess the multiple diagenetic strength, and revealed good statistical correlation with displacement pressure, sorting coefficient,and RQI. The comprehensive diagenetic coefficient value of the reservoir typesⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ are more than 8%, 2%-8%, less than 2%,respectively. It can be concluded that the comprehensive diagenetic coefficient can be taken as the quantitative characterization parameter for evaluating reservoir pore microstructure.

Key words: pore structure, diagenesis, influence factor, low permeability reservoir, Upper Urho Formation, Junggar basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 赖锦,王贵文,孟辰卿,等.致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构特征及其成因机理分析[J].地球物理学进展,2015,30(1):217-227. Lai Jin,Wang Guiwen, Meng Chenqing,et al.Pore Structure Characteristics and Formation Mechanisms Analysis of Tight Gas Sandstones[J].Progress in Geophysics,2015,30(1):217-227.
[2] 陈欢庆,曹晨,梁淑贤,等.储层孔隙结构研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):227-234. Chen Huanqing,Cao Chen,Liang Shuxian,et al.Research Advances on Reservoir Pores[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):227-234.
[3] 林敉若,操应长,葸克来,等.阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2018,48(4):991-1007. Lin Miruo, Cao Yingchang, Xi Kelai, et al.Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Permian Reservoirs in Eastern Slope of Fukang Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2018,48(4):991-1007.
[4] 孙海涛,钟大康,李勇,等.超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素:以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2018,48(3):693-704. Sun Haitao,Zhong Dakang,Li Yong,et al.Porosity Origin and Controlling Factors of Ultra-Deep,Low Porosity and Ultra-Low Permeability Sandstone Reservoirs:A Case Study of Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen Area of Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2018,48(3):693-704.
[5] Lai Jin,Wang Guiwen, Chai Yu,et al.Deep Burial Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality Evolution of High-Temperature,High-Pressure Sandstones:Examples from Lower Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen Area,Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin of China[J].AAPG Bulletin,2017,101(6):829-862.
[6] 史基安,何周,丁超,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘克百地区二叠系沉积特征及沉积模式[J].沉积学报,2010,28(5):962-967. Shi Ji'an,He Zhou,Ding Chao,et al.Sedimentary Characteristics and Model of Permian System in Ke-Bai Area in the Northwestern Margin of Junggar Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(5):962-967.
[7] 李兵,党玉芳,贾春明,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系碎屑岩沉积相特征[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):432-439. Li Bing, Dang Yufang, Jia Chunming, et al. Sedimentary Facies of Permian Clastic Rocks in Zhongguai-Wuba Area in Northwestern Margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):432-439.
[8] 牛海青,陈世悦,张鹏,等.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区二叠系碎屑岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,41(2):749-757. Niu Haiqing, Chen Shiyue, Zhang Peng,et al.Diagenesis and Porosity Evolution of Permian Reservoir in Wu-Xia Area,Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2010,41(2):749-757.
[9] 贾凡建,姚卫江,梁则,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘克百断裂下盘二叠系储层成岩作用特征及其孔隙演化[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(3):458-463. Jia Fanjian,Yao Weijiang, Liang Ze, et al. Diagenic Feature and Evolution of Reservoir Pore of Permian Reservoir Under the Kebai Fault in the Northwestern Margin,Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geology,2010,21(3):458-463.
[10] 何登发,尹成,杜社宽,等.前陆冲断带构造分段特征:以准噶尔盆地西北缘断裂构造带为例[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):91-101. He Dengfa,Yin Cheng,Du Shekuan,et al.Characteristics of Structural Segmentation of Foreland Thrust Belts:A Case Study of the Fault Belts in the Northwestern Margin of Junggar Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2004,11(3):91-101.
[11] 高旺来.安塞低渗油田孔隙结构对渗流特征曲线的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1):79-80. Gao Wanglai.The Effect of Pore Structure on the Characteristics of Percolation Flow Curves of Ansai Low-Permeability Reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(1):79-80.
[12] 连承波,钟建华,杨玉芳,等.松辽盆地龙西地区泉四段低孔低渗储层物性及微观孔隙结构特征[J].地质科学,2010,45(4):1170-1179. Lian Chengbo,Zhong Jianhua,Yang Yufang,et al.Characteristics of Poroperm and Microscopic Pore Structure of the Low Porosity and Low Permeability Reservoir of Quan 4 Formation Sandstone in Longxi Area,Songliao Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology,2010,45(4):1170-1179.
[13] 王瑞飞,吕新华,国殿斌.深层高压低渗砂岩油藏储层微观孔喉特征:以东濮凹陷文东油田沙三中段油藏为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2012,41(1):64-69. Wang Ruifei,Lü Xinhua,Guo Dianbin. Characteristics of Micro Pore Throat in High Pressure and Low Permeability Sandstone Reservoir of Deep Section:Taking the Middle of the Third Member of Shahejie Formation in Wendong Oilfield,Dongpu Sag as an Example[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2012,41(1):64-69.
[14] 宋鹍,金振奎,王晓卫,等.沉积相对储集层质量的控制作用:以黄骅坳陷王官屯油田枣Ⅱ、Ⅲ油层组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):335-339. Song Kun,Jin Zhenkui,Wang Xiaowei,et al.Control of Sedimentary Facies on Reservoir Quality:An Example from Zao Ⅱ, Ⅲ Oil Sets in Wangguantun Oilfield, Huanghua Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(3):335-339.
[15] 赖锦,王贵文,陈敏,等.基于岩石物理相的储集层孔隙结构分类评价:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):566-573. Lai Jin,Wang Guiwen,Chen Min,et al.Pore Structures Evaluation of Low Permeability Clastic Reservoirs Based on Petrophysical Facies:A Case Study on Chang 8 Reservoir in the Jiyuan Region, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(5):566-573.
[16] Dutton S P, Loucks R D.Diagenesis Controls on Evolution of Porosity and Permeability in Lower Tertiary Wilcox Sandstones from Shallow to Ultradeep (200~6700 m) Burial,Gulf of Mexico Basin,USA[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2010,27:69-81.
[17] Lai Jin,Wang Guiwen,Ran Ye,et al.Impact of Diagenesis on the Reservoir Quality of Tight Oil Sandstones:A Case of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 7 Oil Layers in Ordos Basin,China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016,145:54-65.
[18] 赖锦,王贵文,柴毓,等.致密砂岩储层孔隙结构成因机理分析及定量评价:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组为例[J].地质学报,2014,88(11):2119-2129. Lai Jin,Wang Guiwen,Chai Yu,et al.Mechanism Analysis and Quantitative Assessment of Pore Structure for Tight Sandstone Reservoirs:An Example from Chang 8 Oil Layer in the Jiyuan Area of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(11):2119-2129.
[19] Higgs K E,Zwingmann H,Reyes A G,et al.Diagenesis Porosity Evolution,and Petroleum Emplacement in Tight Gas Reservoirs, Taranaki Basin New Zealand[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2007,77:1003-1025.
[20] 刘伟,窦齐丰,黄述旺,等.成岩作用的定量表征与成岩储集相研究:以科尔沁油田交2断块区九佛堂组下段为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2002,31(5):399-403. Liu Wei,Dou Qifeng,Huang Shuwang,et al.Quantitative Characterization of Diagenesis and Diagenesis Reservoir Facies:The Case Study of Lower Member of J3jf of Jiao 2 Block in Kerqin Oilfield[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2002,31(5):399-403.
[21] 朱世发,朱筱敏,吴冬,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘下二叠统油气储层中火山物质蚀变及控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014,35(1):78-85. Zhu Shifa,Zhu Xiaomin,Wu Dong,et al.Alteration of Volcanics and Its Controlling Factors in the Lower Permian Reservoirs at Northwestern Margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(1):78-85.
[22] 朱世发,朱筱敏,王旭龙,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系沸石矿物成岩作用及对油气的意义[J].中国科学:地球科学,2011,41(11):1602-1612. Zhu Shifa,Zhu Xiaomin,Wang Xulong,et al.Zeolite Diagenesis and Its Control on Petroleum Reservoir Quality of Permian in Northwesten Margin of Junggar Basin,China[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences,2011,41(11):1602-1612.
[23] 李汶国,张晓鹏,钟玉梅.长石砂岩次生溶孔的形成机理[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):220-229. Li Wenguo,Zhang Xiaopeng,Zhong Yumei.Formation Mechanism of Secondary Dissolved Pores in Arcose[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(2):220-229.
[24] 宋子文,王静,路向伟,等.特低渗透油气藏成岩储集相的定量评价方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(2):23-31. Song Ziwen,Wang Jing,Lu Xiangwei,et al.An Quantitative Assessment Method of the Diagenetic Reservoir Facies in Extra-Low Permeability Oil-Gas Reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2006,13(2):23-31.
[1] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[2] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[3] 孙超, 邵艳红, 王寒冬. 支挡式结构物水平冻胀力研究进展与思考[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 784-798.
[4] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[5] 孙海涛, 钟大康, 李勇, 毛亚昆, 杨宪彰. 超深低孔特低渗砂岩储层的孔隙成因及控制因素——以库车坳陷克深地区巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 693-704.
[6] 张玉玲, 司超群, 陈志宇, 初文磊, 陈在星, 王璜. 土壤硝酸盐氮的空间变异特征及影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 241-251.
[7] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[8] 郑国东, 覃建勋, 付伟, 杨志强, 赵辛金, 卢炳科. 广西北部湾地区表层土壤As分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 181-192.
[9] 林承焰, 王杨, 杨山, 任丽华, 由春梅, 吴松涛, 吴玉其, 张依旻. 基于CT的数字岩心三维建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
[10] 马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛, 王彦君, 魏彩茹. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1695-1704.
[11] 施有志, 林树枝, 车爱兰, 惠祥宇, 冯少孔, 黄钰琳. 基于三维地震映像法的地铁盾构区间孤石勘探及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1885-1893.
[12] 高崇龙, 纪友亮, 靳军, 王剑, 任影, 车世琦, 王茹, 桓芝俊. 准噶尔盆地莫索湾地区清水河组深层优质储层特征及其物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 990-1006.
[13] 刘鑫金, 冯阵东, 李聪, 周艳, 王亚明. 近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 393-404.
[14] 孙靖, 宋永, 王仕莉, 薛晶晶, 贾开富, 常秋生. 准噶尔盆地深层致密油储层特征及致密化成因——以莫索湾-莫北地区侏罗系八道湾组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 25-33.
[15] 姜艳娇, 孙建孟, 高建申, 邵维志, 迟秀荣, 柴细元. 低孔渗储层井周油藏侵入模拟及阵列感应电阻率校正方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 265-278.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!