吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 705-720.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190061

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    

东营凹陷北部陡坡带利563区块沙四上亚段砂砾岩扇体沉积特征及沉积模式

王鑫1,2, 林承焰1,2, 马存飞1,2, 陈柄屹1,2, 杜凯1,2, 李志鹏3   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    2. 山东省油藏地质重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266580;
    3. 中石化胜利油田勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257022
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-12 发布日期:2020-05-29
  • 通讯作者: 林承焰(1963-),男,教授,博士,主要从事油气藏开发地质方面的研究,E-mail:lincy@upc.edu.cn E-mail:lincy@upc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王鑫(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事沉积相、储层非均质性方面的研究,E-mail:1554147573@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05009-001)

Sedimentary Characteristics and Sedimentary Model of Glutenite Fans in Upper Es4 in L563 Area,North Steep Slope of Dongying Depression

Wang Xin1,2, Lin Chengyan1,2, Ma Cunfei1,2, Chen Bingyi1,2, Du Kai1,2, Li Zhipeng3   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    3. Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Exploration and Development Research Institute, Dongying 257022, Shandong, China
  • Received:2019-03-12 Published:2020-05-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Special Project (2017ZX05009-001)

摘要: 东营凹陷北部陡坡带发育的大量砂砾岩扇体在油气勘探与开发中占据重要地位。本文研究针对东营北带利563区块沙四上亚段砂砾岩扇体及其中发育的重力流沉积,通过岩心精细描述,依据岩性、粒度、构造将砂砾岩扇体划分出12种岩相。然后以发育相同水动力条件为单元,依据岩性和沉积机理将岩相在垂向上进行组合,划分8种水动力类型和8种岩相组合类型。再基于砂砾岩沉积的空间分布、尺度大小、接触关系和根据沉积物中泥岩的结构、纹理所细分出的7种泥岩类型所代表的各种环境,定义了5种砂砾岩扇体沉积形态特征:近端厚层砾石沉积、限制性水道沉积、非限制性舌状体沉积、非河道薄层沉积、远端细粒沉积。认为该区砂砾岩扇体为近岸水下扇,包括扇根沟道、沟道间、扇中辫状水道、水道间、扇中前缘、扇端泥6种沉积微相类型并归纳其综合鉴定特征。最终建立本区砂砾岩扇体的沉积过程和沉积模式。

关键词: 砂砾岩扇体, 沉积特征, 沉积模式, 沙四上亚段, 东营凹陷北部陡坡带

Abstract: A large number of glutenite fans are developed in the north steep slope of Dongying depression;which is important in oil and gas exploration and development. In this paper, we focus on the sand-bearing conglomerate fan body and its gravity flow sedimentation in the north member of the No. 563 block in the northeast part of Dongying. Through the fine description of the core, the glutenite fan body is divided into eleven facies by lithology, grain size,and structure;then, with the same hydrodynamic conditions as the unit, according to lithology and sedimentary mechanism the lithofacies are combined vertically into eight hydrodynamic types and eight lithofacies combination types. Based on the spatial distribution, scale, contact relationship,and various environments represented by the seven types of mudstone subdivided by the structure and texture of the mudstone in the sediment, five types of sediments are defined for the glutenite fan:thick gravel deposits at the proximal end, restricted water channel deposit, unrestricted tongue deposit, non-channel thin layer deposit, and distal fine grain deposit. Based on a comprehensive analysis of features,six sedimentary microfacies types are identified,including fan root channel, channel, fan-shaped water channel, water channel, fan front edge,and fan end mud. It is believed that the glutenite fan in this area is a near-shore submerged fan. On the basis above, the sedimentary process and sedimentary model of the glutenite fan in this area are finally established.

Key words: glutenite fans, sedimentary characteristics, sedimentary model, Upper Es4, north steep slope of Dongying depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.2
[1] Zeng Lianbo, Jiang Jianwei, Yang Yongli. Fractures in the Low Porosity and Ultra-Low Permeability Glutenite Reservoirs:A Case Study of the Late Eocene Hetaoyuan Formation in the Anpeng Oilfield, Nanxiang Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2010, 27:1642.
[2] 刘惠民,刘鑫金,贾光华. 东营凹陷北部陡坡带深层砂砾岩扇体成岩圈闭有效性评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(5):7. Liu Huimin, Liu Xinjin, Jia Guanghua. Effectiveness Evaluation of Diagenetic Traps of Deep Glutenite Fans in the Steep Slope of the Northern Dongying Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(5):7.
[3] 胡文海. 世界天然气发展动向:第14界世界石油大会上有关天然气的讨论[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 1995, 24(1):1-3. Hu Wenhai. World Gas Development Trends:Discussion on Natural Gas at the 14th World Petroleum Congress[J]. Oil and Gas Chemical Industry, 1995, 24(1):1-3.
[4] 陆光辉,朱玉波,张宏,等. 隐蔽圈闭识别技术发展概述[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2004, 27(2):79-80. Lu Guanghui, Zhu Yubo, Zhang Hong,et al. Overview of the Development of Hidden Trap Recognition Technology[J]. Advances in Exploration Geophysics, 2004, 27(2):79-80.
[5] 朱光辉,蒋恕,蔡东升,等. 中国碎屑岩隐蔽油气藏勘探进展与问题[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2007, 29(2):1-2. Zhu Guanghui, Jiang Shu, Cai Dongsheng, et al. Progress and Problems in the Exploration of Subtle Reservoirs in China's Clastic Rocks[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2007, 29(2):1-2.
[6] 林敉若,操应长,葸克来,等. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4):991-1007. Lin Miruo, Cao Yingchang, Xi Kelai, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Permian Reservoirs in Eastern Slope of Fukang Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4):991-1007.
[7] 邹妞妞,张大权,史基安,等. 准噶尔西北缘玛北地区扇三角洲砂砾岩岩相分类及储集意义[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(2):440-450. Zou Niuniu, Zhang Daquan, Shi Ji'an, et al. Lithofacies Classification and Reservoir Significance of Fan-Delta Glutenite in the Mabei Area, Northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Geology, 2017, 91(2):440-450.
[8] 闫建平,蔡进功,赵铭海,等. 电成像测井在砂砾岩体沉积特征研究中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(4):444-451. Yan Jianping, Cai Jingong, Zhao Minghai, et al. Application of Electrical Imaging Logging in Study of Sedimentary Characteristics of Glutenite[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(4):444-451.
[9] Xu Wei, Fang Lei, Zhang Xinye, et al. Object-Based 3D Geomodel with Multiple Constraints for Early Pliocene Fan Delta in the South of Lake Albert Basin, Uganda[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2017, 125:1-10.
[10] 张立强,罗晓容,肖欢,等. 胜坨地区沙四上亚段近岸水下扇相砂砾岩体成岩矿物类型及分布特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(1):13-18. Zhang Liqiang, Luo Xiaorong, Xiao Huan, et al. Types and Distribution of Diagenetic Alterations in the Nearshore Subaqueous Fan of the Upper Es4 in Shengtuo Area of Dongying Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(1):13-18.
[11] 刘大卫,纪友亮,高崇龙,等. 砾质辫状河型冲积扇沉积微相及沉积模式:以准噶尔盆地西北缘现代白杨河冲积扇为例[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(3):435-450. Liu Dawei, Ji Youliang, Gao Conglong, et al. Microfacies and Sedimentary Models of Gravelly Braided-River Alluvial Fan:A Case Study of Modern Baiyanghe-River Alluvial Fan in Northwestern Margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography 2018, 20(3):435-450.
[12] Yan Jianping, Fan Jie, Wang Min, et al. Rock Fabric and Pore Structure of the Shahejie Sandy Conglomerates from the Dongying Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 97:624-626.
[13] 李丕龙. 断陷盆地油气聚集模式及其动力学特征[J]. 石油大学学报, 2000, 24(4):26-27. Li Pilong. Accumulating Models of Petroleum and Their Dynamic Characteristeristics in Faulted Depression Basin[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, 2000, 24(4):26-27.
[14] Zhang Shaolong, Yan Jianping, Hu Qinhong, et al. Integrated NMR and FE-SEM Methods for Pore Structure Characterization of Shahejie Shale from the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 100:85-94.
[15] 操应长,金杰华,王艳忠,等. 东营凹陷北带古近系沙四段砂砾岩体沉积特征及沉积模式[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2014, 34(4):13-22. Cao Yingchang, Jin Jiehua, Wang Yanzhong, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics and Model for the Sandstones and Conglomerates in the 4th Member of the Palaeogene Shahejie Formation, Northern Dongying Depression, Shandong[J]. Sedimentary and Tethyan Geology, 2014, 34(4):13-22.
[16] 隋风贵,操应长,刘惠民,等. 东营凹陷北带东部古近系近岸水下扇储集物性演化及其油气成藏模式[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(2):246-255. Sui Fenggui, Cao Yingchang, Liu Huimin, et al. Physical Properties Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Paleogene Nearshore Subaqueous Fan in the Eastern North Margin of the Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Geology, 2010, 84(2):246-255.
[17] Guo J, Gou B, Liu Y. Fracturing Stimulations Improve Oil Well Performance in Deep Tight Glutenite Reservoirs of the Shengli Oilfield[C]//SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition Asia. Brisbane:SPE, 2013:12.
[18] 鲜本忠,路智勇,佘源琪,等. 东营凹陷陡坡带盐18-永921地区砂砾岩沉积与储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):28-34. Xian Benzhong, Lu Zhiyong, She Yuanqi, et al. Sedimentary and Reservoir Characteristics of Glutenite in Yan 18-Yong 921 Area, Steep Slope of Dongying Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):28-34.
[19] 仲维苹,操应长,王艳忠,等. 渤南洼陷沙四段沉积砂体类型及分布[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(1):48-50. Zhong Weiping, Cao Yingchang, Wang Yanzhong,et al. The Types and Distribution of the Sand Bodies in Sha4 Member in Bonan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17(1):48-50.
[20] 梁官忠,李龙松,张峰,等. 廊固凹陷大兴断裂带沙四-沙三段近岸水下扇沉积特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(2):122-127. Liang Guanzhong, Li Longsong, Zhang Feng, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of Nearshore Subaqueous Fans of Sha-4-Sha-3 Member of Shahejie Formation in Daxing Fault Zone of Langgu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(2):122-127.
[21] Mutti E, Mavilla N, Angella S, et al. An Introduction to the Analysis of Ancient Turbidite Basins from an Outcrop Perspective[M]. Oklahoma:AAPG Continuing Education, 1999:61.
[22] Zavala C,Arcuri M. Intrabasinal and Extrabasinal Turbidites:Origin and Distinctive Characteristics[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2016, 337:36-54.
[23] Mulder T, Alexander J. The Physical Character of Subaqueous Sedimentary Density Flows and Their Deposits[J]. Sedimentology, 2001, 48:269-299.
[24] Liu Lei, Chen Hongde, Zhong Yijiang, et al. Sedimentological Characteristics and Depositional Processes of Sediment Gravity Flows in Rift Basins:The Palaeogene Dongying and Shahejie Formations, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017,147:60-76.
[25] Henstra G A, Grundvåg S A, Johannessen E P, et al. Depositional Processes and Stratigraphic Architecture Within a Coarse Grained Rift-Margin Turbidite System:The Wollaston Forland Group, East Greenland[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 76:187-209.
[26] Covault J A, Hubbard S M, Graham S A, et al. Turbidite Reservoir Architecture in Complex Foredeep-Margin and Wedge-Top Depocenters, Tertiary Molasse Foreland Basin System, Austria[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2009, 26(3):379-396.
[27] Zavala C, Arcuri M, Gamero H, et al. A Genetic Facies Tract for the Analysis of Sustained Hyperpycnal Flow Deposits, Shelf to Deep Water-Revisiting the Delivery System[J]. AAPG Studies in Geology, 2011, 61:31-51.
[28] MacKay D A, Dalrymple R W. Dynamic Mud Deposition in a Tidal Environment:The Record of Fluid-Mud Deposition in the Cretaceous Bluesky Formation, Alberta, Canada[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2011, 81:901-920.
[29] Yang Renchao, Fan Aiping, Han Zuozhen, et al. Lithofacies and Origin of the Late Triassic Muddy Gravity-Flow Deposits in the Ordos Basin, Central China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 85:194-217.
[1] 陈秀艳, 王剑, 张立平, 马德波, 周波. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区石炭系东河砂岩段碳酸盐胶结物沉积特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 509-517.
[2] 李维禄, 高思宇, 张翼, 张金亮, 韩春花. 末端扇—滨浅湖滩坝组合沉积机制与演化分布:以东濮凹陷卫城油田沙河街组四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 31-40.
[3] 王夏斌, 姜在兴, 胡光义, 范廷恩, 王俊辉, 卢欢. 辽河盆地西部凹陷古近系沙四上亚段沉积相及演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1222-1234.
[4] 鄢伟, 张光学, 樊太亮, 夏斌, 高志前, 张莉, 杨振, 强坤生. 塔里木盆地塔中—顺托果勒地区奥陶系良里塔格组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 621-636.
[5] 赵佳琦, 高有峰, 刘海波, 王清斌, 张艳, 王璞珺. 辽西北票盆地中侏罗统海房沟组砾岩沉积特征与成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 650-661.
[6] 王蛟, 李智高, 蔡来星, 龚奇勇. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 131-138.
[7] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[8] 朱兆群, 林承焰, 张宪国, 李志鹏, 谢晶晶, 魏肃东, 程平. 断陷湖盆早期浅水三角洲沉积——以高邮凹陷永安地区戴一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 659-673.
[9] 单敬福, 张吉, 王继平, 赵忠军, 李浮萍, 陈治华, 石林辉, 刘利峰. 苏里格气田西区盒8亚段辫状河沉积论证与分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1597-1607.
[10] 李秋芬, 苗顺德, 江青春, 王铜山, 徐安娜, 翟秀芬. 四川宣汉盘龙洞长兴组生物礁沉积特征及成礁模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1322-1331.
[11] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 李昂, 石蕾, 刘爽. 松辽盆地肇州区块沙河子组层序格架特征及其对沉积和烃源岩的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 724-735.
[12] 张晶, 刘化清, 李双文, 冀虎山, 袁淑琴, 洪忠. 断陷湖盆深水重力流水道的识别标志及沉积模式——以歧口凹陷歧南斜坡沙一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 701-711.
[13] 马奔奔, 操应长, 王艳忠, 刘惠民, 高永进. 东营凹陷盐家地区沙四上亚段砂砾岩储层岩相与物性关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 495-506.
[14] 刘宗堡, 赵淼, 吕延防, 马世忠, 方庆, 郭新. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层地层减薄模式及控油意义[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 984-990.
[15] 万志峰, 夏斌, 林舸, 施秋华, 郭峰, 刘宝明. 莺歌海盆地与济阳拗陷成因机制与沉积特征的比较及其油气勘探意义[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 976-982.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!