吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 694-703.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200084

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

油源断裂油气成藏期优势通道输导能力综合评判方法及其应用

袁红旗, 魏鸣禄, 于英华   

  1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-07
  • 作者简介:袁红旗(1979—),男,教授,主要从事沉积分析及油气藏形成与保存研究,E-mail:yuan_flag@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省高等教育教学改革项目(SJGY20180072);教育部产学合作育人项目(201902302045);国家自然科学基金项目(41572126);国家大型油气田及煤层气开发专项(2016ZX05006-005)

Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Oil and Gas Transmission Capacity of Oil Source Fracture Dominant Channel in Oil and Gas Accumulation Period and Its Application

Yuan Hongqi, Wei Minglu, Yu Yinghua   

  1. Geoscience College, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2020-04-22 Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-07
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Higher Education Reform Foundation of Heilongjiang (SJGY20180072),the Education Cooperation Foundation of the Ministry of Education (201902302045),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572126) and the National Special Project for Large-Scale Oil and Gas Field and Coal-Bed Methane Development (2016ZX05006-005)

摘要: 本文通过油气成藏期油源断裂不同部位古活动速率相对大小分布,确定其油气输导的优势通道。并基于优势输导通道的断裂古活动速率、古倾角、目的层古埋深和源岩古剩余地层压力等指标,建立了一套油源断裂在油气成藏期优势通道输导能力的综合评判方法。以渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷廊固凹陷为靶区,对大柳泉区块旧州油源断裂带在成藏期沙三中下亚段内的优势通道进行了厘定和油气输导能力综合评判。评判结果表明:旧州油源断裂6条分支断裂油气成藏期——沙二段沉积时期发育了10个优势通道,其油气输导能力以F1和F2分支断裂的6个优势通道输导油气能力相对较强,有利于油气运移,F3、F4、F5和F6分支断裂发育4个优势通道,其输导油气能力相对较弱,不利于油气运移。此评判结果与目前旧州断裂带附近沙三中下亚段内的油气分布现状相吻合,表明用此方法进行油源断裂成藏期优势通道的输导能力综合评判是可行性的。

关键词: 油气成藏期, 油源断裂, 优势通道, 输导油气能力, 综合评判方法, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: Based on the relative size distribution of the ancient activity rate in the different parts of the oil source fault during the hydrocarbon accumulation period, its dominant channel for transporting oil and gas was determined. Based on the fracture activity rate, the ancient dip angle, the paleo-burial depth of the target layer, and the paleo-remaining stratum pressure of the dominant transport channel, the comprehensive evaluation method of the oil and gas capacity of the oil source fault dominant channel during the hydrocarbon accumulation period was established, and applied to the comprehensive evaluation of the oil and gas capacity of the dominant channel in the middle and lower sub-members of the third member from Shahejie Formation in Daliuquan area of Langgu depressions in Bohai Bay basin. The results show that ten dominant channels developed during the sedimentary period of the six branch faults of the oil-bearing faults of the Jiuzhou oil source. The oil and gas transport capacity is relatively strong in the six dominant channels of F1 and F2 faults. Four dominant channels developed in F3, F4, F5 and F6 fractures developed, and their oil and gas transport capacity is relatively weak and not conducive to oil and gas migration. This evaluation result is consistent with the current status of oil and gas distribution in the middle and lower sub-members of the third member from Shahejie Formation in the vicinity of the Jiuzhou fault. This indicates that the method is feasible for comprehensive evaluation of oil and gas transport capacity of the dominant channel during the accumulation period of the oil source faults.

Key words: oil and gas accumulation period, oil source fracture, dominant channel, transporting oil and gas capacity, comprehensive evaluation method, Bohai Bay basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 杨德相,付广,孙同文,等.油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(6):1678-1686. Yang Dexiang, Fu Guang, Sun Tongwen, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Its Application of Oil Carrying Capacity Through Dominant Channel of Oil Source Fault[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47 (6): 1678-1686.
[2] 姜贵璞,付广,孙同文.利用地震资料确定油源断裂输导油气能力及油气富集的差异性[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(1):160-166. Jiang Guipu, Fu Guang, Sun Tongwen. Seismic Data Is Used to Determine the Transportation Oil-Gas Ability of Oil Source Faults and the Difference of Oil-Gas Accumulation[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32 (1): 160-166.
[3] 刘滨莹,姜海燕,付广,等.下生上储式油气富集程度的定量研究方法及其应用:以廊固凹陷大柳泉构造带沙三中亚段为例[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(5):2035-2043. Liu Binying, Jiang Haiyan, Fu Guang, et al. Quantitative Research Method and Application to the Enrichment Degree of the Down Generated up Stored Hydrocarbon Accumulation: Case of Es3z in the Daliuquan Structure Zone of the Langgu Sag[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32 (5): 2035-2043.
[4] 王浩然, 付广, 孙同文. 油源断裂古转换带恢复及其输导油气的有利条件:以南堡凹陷2号构造 F10断裂为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(10):1848-1854. Wang Haoran, Fu Guang, Sun Tongwen. Recovery of Oil-Source Fault Ancient Transfer Zone and Its Favorable Conditions to Oil-Gas Transportation: Taking Fault F10 in No.2 Structure of Nanpu Sag as an Example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(10):1848-1854.
[5] 孙同文,付广,吕延防,等.南堡1号构造中浅层油气富集主控因素分析[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1042-1051. Sun Tongwen, Fu Guang, Lü Yanfang, et al. Main Controlling Factors on the Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Middle-Shallow Layer of 1st Structure, Nanpu Sag[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25 (7): 1042-1051.
[6] 付广,史集建,吕延防.断层岩古排替压力恢复及其封闭性能研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2013,42(6):996-1001. Fu Guang, Shi Jijian, Lü Yanfang. Study of Ancient Displacement Pressure of Fault Rock Recovery and Its Sealing Characteristics[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2013, 42 (6): 996-1001.
[7] 付广,杨勉,吕延防,等.断层古侧向封闭性定量评价方法及其应用[J].石油学报,2013,34(增刊1):78-83. Fu Guang, Yang Mian, Lü Yanfang, et al. A Quantitative Evaluation Method for Ancient Lateral Sealing of Fault[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34 (Sup.1): 78-83.
[8] 罗晓容, 雷裕红, 张立宽,等. 油气运移输导层研究及量化表征方法[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3):428-436. Luo Xiaorong, Lei Yuhong, Zhang Likuan, et al. Characterization of Carrier Formation for Hydrocarbon Migration: Concepts and Approaches[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3):428-436.
[9] 付广, 韩刚, 李世朝. 断裂侧接输导油气运移部位预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2017, 52(6): 1298-1304,1124. Fu Guang, Han Gang, Li Shizhao. A Prediction Method for Fracture Lateral-Connected Hydrocarbon Migration[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017, 52(6): 1298-1304,1124.
[10] 张博为,付广.油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用:以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017,47(2): 370-381. Zhang Bowei, Fu Guang. Fracture Development in Oil-Migrating Fault Transition Zones and Its Control on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation: A Case Study of Es2 Oil Formation of Yilunpu Structure of Wen’an Slope of Jizhong Depression[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017,47(2): 370-381.
[11] 孙同文,付广,吕延防,等.断裂输导流体的机制及输导形式探讨[J].地质论评,2012,58(6):1081-1090. Sun Tongwen, Fu Guang, Lü Yanfang, et al. A Discussion on Fault Conduit Fluid Mechanism and Fault Conduit Form[J]. Geological Review, 2012, 58 (6): 1081-1090.
[12] 裴立新,刚文哲,高岗,等.断裂对油气的控制作用:以南堡凹陷为例[J].现代地质,2015,29(4):930-936. Pei Lixin, Gang Wenzhe, Gao Gang, et al. Control of Faults on the Hydrocarbon: A Case Study in Nanpu Sag[J]. Geoscience, 2015, 29 (4): 930-936.
[13] 吕延防,许辰璐,付广,等.南堡凹陷中浅层盖-断组合控油模式及有利含油层位预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(1):86-97. Lü Yanfang, Xu Chenlu, Fu Guang, et al. Oil-Controlling Models of Caprock-Fault Combination and Prediction of Favorable Horizons for Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Middle-Shallow Sequences of Nanpu Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35 (1): 86-97.
[14] 方希锐,付广,马世忠.下生上储式断圈含油气性综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷2号构造以东地区东一段为例[J].现代地质,2015,29(6):1418-1424. Fang Xirui, Fu Guang, Ma Shizhong. Comprehensive and Quantitative Evaluation for Oil-Gas-Bearing of Fault Traps in Combination of Lower Generation and Upper Reservoir: An Example from Ed1 in the East of Number 2 Structure of Nanpu Depression[J]. Geoscience, 2015, 29 (6): 1418-1424.
[15] 范婕,蒋有录,刘景东,等.长岭断陷龙凤山地区断裂与油气运聚的关系[J].地球科学,2017,42(10):1817-1829. Fan Jie, Jiang Youlu, Liu Jingdong, et al. Relationship of Fault with Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation in Longfengshan Area, Changling Faulted Depression[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2017, 42 (10): 1817-1829.
[16] 刘帅, 康德江, 樊迪, 等. 松辽盆地双城地区断砂匹配关系与油气优势输导通道[J]. 世界地质, 2019, 38(2):437-447. Liu Shuai, Kang Dejiang, Fan Di, et al. Fault-Sand Body Assemblage and Advantageous Oil and Gas Migration Pathways in Shuangcheng Area of Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2019, 38(2):437-447.
[17] 王雪峰.断裂输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2017,36(3):33-38. Wang Xuefeng. Comprehensive Evaluating Method and Its Application for the Fault Oil-Gas Transporting Ability[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2017, 36 (3): 33-38.
[18] 张云峰,赵旭光,王宇,等.正断层伴生裂缝物理模拟实验研究[J].科学技术与工程,2010,10(36):8975-8979. Zhang Yunfeng, Zhao Xuguang, Wang Yu, et al. Physical Simulation Experiment of Normal Faults Associated Fractures[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2010, 10 (36): 8975-8979.
[19] 康立明,任战利,张林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地Y区块长6致密油层裂缝特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50(4):979-990. Kang Liming, Ren Zhanli, Zhang Lin, et al. Fracture Characteristics of Chang 6 Tight Oil Reservoir in Block Y in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50 (4): 979-990.
[20] 陈云峰.东营凹陷八面河地区西南段断裂输导能力研究[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(增刊1):39-45. Chen Yunfeng. A Study on Fault Transporting Ability in Southwest of Bamianhe in Dongying Sag[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25 (Sup.1): 39-45.
[21] 姜大朋,何敏,张向涛,等.箕状断陷控洼断裂上下盘油气成藏差异性及勘探实践:以南海北部珠江口盆地惠州凹陷X洼为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(2):346-355. Jiang Dapeng, He Min, Zhang Xiangtao, et al. Difference of Hydrocarbon Accumulation Between Hanging and Foot Wall of Half Graben Boundary Fault and Exploration Practice: A Case Study of X Sag in Huizhou Depression, Pearl River Mouth Basin, Northern South China Sea[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2019,49(2): 346-355.
[22] 刘哲,吕延防,付广,等.断层古侧向封闭能力恢复方法及其应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(5):1964-1970. Liu Zhe, Lü Yanfang, Fu Guang, et al. A Recovering Method for Ancient Lateral Sealing Ability of Fault and Its Application[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44 (5): 1964-1970.
[23] 付广,王有功,苏玉平.用超压释放法确定烃源岩排烃期次:以古龙凹陷青山口组为例[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(5):538-541. Fu Guang, Wang Yougong, Su Yuping. The Expulsion Hydrocarbon Periods of Source Rock by Release of Overpressure: An Example of Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28 (5): 538-541.
[1] 孙哲, 于海波, 彭靖淞, 胡安文, 李飞. 渤海湾盆地庙西中南洼围区原油成因类型及分布主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1665-1677.
[2] 姜文亚, 宋泽章, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 王娜, 代昆, 万伟超, 刘祥柏. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷地层压力结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 52-69.
[3] 李欢, 王清斌, 庞小军, 冯冲, 刘晓健. 渤海湾盆地辽东凹陷旅大29构造沙二段近源砂砾岩体优质储层形成机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(2): 294-309.
[4] 于翠玲, 李宝刚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷牛庄洼陷岩性油气藏平面富集主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 240-247.
[5] 杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[6] 赵汉卿, 张建民, 李栓豹, 周连德, 江远鹏. 渤海湾盆地A油田新近系明下段沉积特征及演化模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1021-1029,1046.
[7] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[8] 曲长胜, 邱隆伟, 李文涛, 师政, 王巍. 渤海湾盆地潍北凹陷孔三段中基性火山岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1284-1296.
[9] 杨光达, 邹丙方, 王树昆, 王淳, 韩旭. 从海域-陆地石油地质条件类比分析探索辽河滩海西部油气勘探方向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1030-1041.
[10] 龚建洛,张金功,惠涛,黄传卿,张林晔,孙志刚,陈晓军. 沉积岩平行层面与垂直层面方向热导率与孔隙连通性之间的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1789-1797.
[11] 李三忠, 索艳慧, 周立宏, 戴黎明, 周均太, 赵峰梅, 卢异, 蒲秀刚, 楼达, 吴奇, 焦倩. 华北克拉通内部的拉分盆地:渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷结构构造与演化[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1362-1379.
[12] 于明德,王璞珺,施昌瑞,张 辉,唐华风,李凤勋. 焉耆盆地包裹体特征和伊利石测年对油气成藏期次的指示[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 45-0052.
[13] 张俊,庞雄奇,姜振学,邵振军,陈冬霞,王亮. 东营凹陷岩性油藏含油性定量预测[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 732-0737.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尹秀珍,刘万洙,蓝先洪,万晓樵. 南黄海表层沉积物的碎屑矿物、地球化学特征及物源分析[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 491 -0499 .
[2] 滕吉文,田有,刘财,韩立国. 中国双相沉积盆地、古老结晶基底与东北地区深层潜在油气藏[J]. J4, 2008, 38(4): 527 -0552 .
[3] 刘洪林,李海山. ICA及其在气液两相流辨识中的应用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 31 -0036 .
[4] 杨蕴, 吴剑锋, 吴吉春. 两种智能算法在求解地下水管理模型中的对比[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 474 -481 .
[5] 周燕,郑培玺,王铁夫,张延洁. 招平断裂带上盘金矿床氢氧同位素地质特征[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 668 -0671 .
[6] 高红梅,高福红,樊馥,高玉巧. 鸡西盆地早白垩世烃源岩可溶有机质地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 86 -0090 .
[7] 范晓敏,李舟波. 裂缝性碳酸盐岩储层声波时差曲线的波动和增幅分析[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 168 -0173 .
[8] 郭智奇, 刘财, 冯晅, 韩颜颜, 王晓欢. 各向异性衰减与AVO分析[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 432 -438 .
[9] 李发文, 冯平, 张超. 天津北三河地区垂向耦合产流模型及应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 459 -464 .
[10] 宋晶, 王清, 夏玉斌, 陈允进, 陈慧娥, 苑晓青. 真空预压处理高黏粒吹填土的物理化学指标[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1476 -1480 .