Subei basin,Qintong depression,Funing Formation,shale oil,storage space,influence factor,oil and gas ,"/> <span>苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素</span>

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 1482-1493.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230220

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素

蔡潇,夏威,马晓东,臧素华,丁安徐,刘玉霞,花彩霞,朱一川,李辉 

#br#   

  1. 中国石油化工股份有限公司华东油气分公司勘探开发研究院,江苏 扬州 225007
  • 出版日期:2024-09-26 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化科研项目(P21112,P23190)

Storage Spaces Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Shale Oil Reservoirs of Paleogene in Funing Formation of Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

Cai Xiao, Xia Wei, Ma Xiaodong, Zang Suhua, Ding Anxu, Liu Yuxia,Hua Caixia, Zhu Yichuan, Li Hui   

  1. East China Oil and Gas Company Exploration and Development Research Institute, SINOPEC, Yangzhou 225007,Jiangsu,China
  • Online:2024-09-26 Published:2024-10-10
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Research Project of SINOPEC (P21112,P23190)

摘要: 随着技术发展和研究深入,越来越多的学者认识到页岩油储层特征的研究对于“甜点区/段”的优选至关重要。为了对苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油储层进一步勘探评价和规模开发工作,本文采用扫描电镜、薄片观察等方法,通过对苏北盆地阜宁组二段页岩油储层开展含油性、储集性、可动性和可压性等“四性”研究,精细刻画储集空间特征,分析影响储集性的主控因素。研究结果表明:阜宁组二段主要发育纹层状和层状灰云质页岩,矿物组成主要为黏土矿物(平均体积分数为35.4%)、长英质矿物(平均体积分数为39.1%)和碳酸盐矿物(平均体积分数为19.8%),该储层w(TOC)为0.5%~2.0%,Ro为0.9%~1.1%,孔隙度为1.8%~5.2%。纹层状构造是阜宁组二段页岩最显著的组构特征,主要由长英质与黏土质纹层组成。根据有机质丰度+构造特征+岩性特征,阜宁组二段页岩可划分为6种岩相,依据“四性”综合评价,中有机质纹层状含灰云页岩、中有机质层状含灰云页岩和中有机质纹层/层状灰云质页岩为优势岩相。主要储集空间类型为层理缝、构造缝、粒间孔和黏土矿物晶间孔,但不同岩相的储集空间类型各有差异,主要受岩性矿物组成、纹层发育程度和微幅构造作用等因素影响。综合6种岩相“四性”分析,阜宁组二段的中部、下部纹层状和层状含灰云页岩是页岩油勘探开发的地质甜点段。

关键词: 苏北盆地, 溱潼凹陷, 阜宁组, 页岩油, 储集空间, 影响因素, 油气

Abstract:

With the development of technology and research, more and more scholars have realized that the study of shale oil reservoir characteristics is very important for the selection of “sweet spots/segments”. By studying the “four characteristics” of the shale oil reservoir in the Second Member of Funing Formation, Subei basin, such as oil content, reservoir property, mobility, and compressibility, the reservoir space characteristics are described in detail, and the main controlling factors affecting the reservoir property are analyzed, which provides strong support for further exploration and evaluation and large-scale development in this area. The results show that the Second Member of Funing Formation mainly develops laminated or layered shale, and its mineral composition is clay minerals (35.4% on average), felsic minerals (39.1% on average), and carbonate minerals (19.8% on average), w(TOC) is 0.5%-2.0%, Ro is 0.9%-1.1%, and porosity is 1.8%-5.2%. The lamellar structure is the most prominent fabric feature of the shale in the Second Member of Funing Formation, which is mainly composed of felsic and clay lamination. According to the characteristics of “abundant organic matter + structural characteristics + lithology”, the shale of the Second Member of Funing Formation can be divided into 6 lithofacies. According to the comprehensive evaluation of “four characteristics”, the medium organic laminated/layered shales are the favorable lithofacies. The main reservoir space types are bedding seams, structural seams, intergranular pores, and clay mineral intercrystalline pores. However, the reservoir space types differ among lithofacies, mainly affected by lithology, mineral composition, and the degree of lamination development, as well as minor structural effects. Comprehensively analyzing the “four properties” of the six lithofacies of the Funing Formation, the middle and lower parts of the organic-rich laminated/layered shale are the geological sweet spots for shale oil exploration and development.

Key words: Subei basin')">

Subei basin, Qintong depression, Funing Formation, shale oil, storage space, influence factor, oil and gas

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[2] 韩红闪, 朱琳, 郭高轩, 李炳华, 卢灿. 新水情背景下北京平原朝阳—通州沉降区地面沉降特征及其影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1326-1338.
[3] 孟庆涛, 胡菲, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉. 陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因:以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 20-37.
[4] 闫佰忠, 盖俊百, 王昕洲, 占新凯, 马苗苗. 石家庄滹沱河山前冲洪积扇地下水位动态演变特征及影响机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1880-1891.
[5] 韩学雨, 李玉海, 楼 达, 王文庆, 王铸坤, 孙沛沛, 郑 直, 远光辉. 黄骅坳陷孔西斜坡区奥陶系原生油气藏成藏过程及模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 356-.
[6] 孟 颖, 王 剑, 马万云, 雷海艳, 孙平昌, 方 石, 丁 聪, 王 灼, 陶连馨. 基于细粒岩石类型对玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组烃源岩分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1735-1746.
[7] 罗卫锋, 胡志方, 王胜建, 杨云见, 张林, 张云枭. 基于可控源电磁技术的页岩压裂监测试验——以宜昌地区鄂阳页2HF井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1338-.
[8] 易娟子, 张少敏, 蔡来星, 陈守春, 罗鑫, 于吉星, 罗妮娜, 杨田.

川东地区下侏罗统凉高山组地层-沉积充填特征与油气勘探方向 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 795-815.

[9] 张辉, 王志章, 杨亮, 李忠诚, 邢济麟. 松南上白垩统青山口组一段不同赋存状态页岩油定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 315-327.
[10] 仉涛, 郭智奇, 刘财, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍, . 盐间页岩油韵律层地震响应模拟及页岩薄储层厚度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 281-.
[11] 王志恒, 梁永平, 申豪勇, 赵春红, 唐春雷, 谢浩, 赵一. 自然与人类活动叠加影响下晋祠泉域岩溶地下水动态特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1823-1837.
[12] 周彤, 商广明, 翟亚峰. 路基砾类填料土动力特性影响因素试验分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1482-1489.
[13] 刘金萍, 王改云, 简晓玲, 王嘹亮, 杜民, 成古. 北黄海东部次盆地层序地层格架中烃源岩发育特征与影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 1-17.
[14] 计玮. 致密砂岩气储层气水相渗特征及其影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田陕234-235井区盒8段、山1段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1540-1551.
[15] 朱广祥, 郭秀军, 余乐, 孙翔, 贾永刚. 高黏粒含量海洋土电阻率特征分析及模型构建[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1457-1465.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!