吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 937-950.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240163

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于小龙虾优化算法的BP神经网络模型在滑坡易发性评价中的应用

周孙超1,宋腾蛟1,王琰1,蔡宗佑2   

  1. 1.吉林建筑大学测绘与勘查工程学院,长春130118
    2.浙江省三建建设集团有限公司,杭州310009

  • 出版日期:2026-05-26 发布日期:2026-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 宋腾蛟(1988—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事岩土力学与工程地质方面的研究,E-mail:songtengjiao@jlju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周孙超(1997—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究,E-mail:2575560617@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省科技发展计划项目(YDZJ202501ZYTS563);吉林省教育厅科学研究项目(JJKH20190874KJ);国家自然科学基金项目(42002263)

Application of BP Neural Network Model Based on Crayfish Optimization Algorithm in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment

Zhou Sunchao1,Song Tengjiao1 ,Wang Yan1,Cai Zongyou2   

  1. 1. School of Geomatics and Prospecting Engineering,Jilin Jianzhu University,Changchun 130118,China
    2. Zhejiang Sanjian Construction Group Co.,Ltd.,Hangzhou 310009,China
  • Online:2026-05-26 Published:2026-06-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Science and Technology Development Program of Jinlin Province (YDZJ202501ZYTS563), the Scientific Research Project of Jilin Provincial Education Department (JJKH20190874KJ) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42002263)

摘要: 针对标准BP(back propagation)神经网络易陷入局部最优解、对初始权重敏感等缺陷,引入小龙虾优化算法(COA)对其进行优化,构建COA-BP滑坡易发性评价模型,以浙江省武义县为研究区,开展滑坡易发性评价。首先,采用四种单峰测试函数和一种多峰测试函数对COA进行性能测试,并与多元宇宙优化算法(MVO)、麻雀优化算法(SSA)、海洋捕食者算法(MPA)进行对比;然后,提取研究区高程、坡度、坡向、降水量等13个环境因子数据,利用本文提出的COA-BP模型对研究区进行滑坡易发性评价,与BP、MVO-BP、MPA-BP、SSA-BP模型进行对比,并通过混淆矩阵及二级指标雷达图进行精度检验。结果表明:COA比其他三种算法更具优势;COA-BP模型的预测性能较强,滑坡易发性区域划分更为清晰;同时,该模型对滑坡点和非滑坡点识别精度较高,AUC(曲线下面积)值在0.9以上,满足该地区滑坡易发性评价精度要求。

关键词: 小龙虾优化算法, BP神经网络, 滑坡易发性, 混淆矩阵, 浙江省武义县

Abstract: Standard BP (back propagation) neural network suffers from inherent drawbacks such as easy trapping in local optimal solutions and high sensitivity to initial weights. To address these limitations, the crayfish optimization algorithm (COA) was introduced to optimize the BP neural network, and a COA-BP landslide susceptibility evaluation model was constructed. Taking Wuyi County in Zhejiang Province as the study area, the landslide susceptibility evaluation was carried out. Firstly, four unimodal test functions and one multimodal test function were adopted to test the performance of COA, and comparative analysis was conducted with the multi-verse optimizer (MVO), sparrow search algorithm (SSA), and marine predators algorithm (MPA). Subsequently, 13 environmental conditioning factors including elevation, slope, aspect, and precipitation were extracted from the study area. The proposed COA-BP model was applied to landslide susceptibility evaluation, with BP, MVO-BP, MPA-BP and SSA-BP models set as comparison models. The classification accuracy was verified via the confusion matrix and two-level index radar chart. The results demonstrate that COA outperforms the other three optimization algorithms. The COA-BP model presents superior predictive capability with clearer zoning of landslide susceptibility levels and high recognition accuracy for both landslide and non-landslide samples. The area under curve (AUC) value of the model exceeds 0.9, which meets the accuracy requirements for landslide susceptibility evaluation in the study area.

Key words: crayfish optimization algorithm, BP neural network, landslide susceptibility, confusion matrix, Wuyi County, Zhejiang Province

中图分类号: 

  • P694
[1] 安雪莲, 密长林, 孙德亮, 文海家, 李晓琴, 辜庆渝, 丁悦凯. 基于不同评价单元的三峡库区滑坡易发性对比——以重庆市云阳县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1629-1644.
[2] 李瑞友, 白细民, 张勇, 汪靖, 朱亮, 丁小辉, 李广. 基于小波包分解与GA优化BP神经网络的瞬变电磁反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1003-1015.
[3] 朱凯光, 王昊, 彭聪, 张琼, 范天姣, 景春阳. 基于BP神经网络的固定翼航空电磁线圈姿态校正[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 252-260.
[4] 赵金童, 牛瑞卿, 姚琦, 武雪玲. 雷达数据辅助下的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1182-1191.
[5] 张代磊, 黄大年, 张冲. 基于遗传算法优化的BP神经网络在密度界面反演中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 580-588.
[6] 王宇, 卢文喜, 卞建民, 侯泽宇. 三种地下水位动态预测模型在吉林西部的应用与对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 886-891.
[7] 徐黎明,王清,陈剑平,潘玉珍. 基于BP神经网络的泥石流平均流速预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 186-191.
[8] 周晓华, 林君, 陈祖斌, 焦健, 郭同健. 改进的神经网络反演微动面波频散曲线[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 900-906.
[9] 张晨,陈剑平,肖云华. 基于神经网络对有限元强度折减法分析[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 114-0118.
[10] 张治国,杨毅恒,夏立显. RPROP算法在测井岩性识别中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 389-0393.
[11] 周波,李舟波,潘保芝. 火山岩岩性识别方法研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 394-0397.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!