吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 930-937.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603307

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

致密砂岩储层含气测井特征及定量评价

潘保芝1, 蒋必辞1,2, 刘文斌1, 房春慧1, 张瑞1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026;
    2. 中国煤炭科工集团西安研究院有限公司, 西安 710077
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-09 出版日期:2016-05-26 发布日期:2016-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 蒋必辞(1990)女,硕士,主要从事测井数据处理与综合解释工作,E-mail:jiangbici@163.com E-mail:jiangbici@163.com
  • 作者简介:潘保芝(1962),女,教授,博士,主要从事岩石物理学教学和研究工作,E-mail:panbaozhi@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目（41174096）；国家“十二五”重大科技专项（2011ZX05040-002）

Gas-Bearing Logging Features and Quantitative Evaluation for Tight Sandstone Reservoirs

Pan Baozhi1, Jiang Bici1,2, Liu Wenbin1, Fang Chunhui1, Zhang Rui1   

  1. 1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2. Xi'an Research Institute of China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp, Xi'an 710077, China
  • Received:2015-09-09 Online:2016-05-26 Published:2016-05-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Nature Science Foundation (41174096) and the 12th Five-Year Major Projects(2011ZX05040-002)

PDF (PC)

258

摘要：

致密砂岩储层孔隙度低、渗透率低、非均质性强，气层所对应的测井响应特征较为复杂，气层识别和评价难度较大、多解性突出。传统上，利用常规测井曲线进行含气性评价多是定性评价，在利用智能识别法评价含气性时，也是利用分类模型进行定性评价；而利用常规测井资料定量评价含气性比较困难。本文首先以岩心、地质、试气资料和常规测井曲线为基础，利用交会图法进行致密砂岩含气特征分析，建立含气性定性评价指标；然后，利用广义回归神经网络（GRNN）预测含气量和含水量，构造含气性和含水性指示曲线，定量评价致密砂岩的含气性；最后，定性评价和定量评价综合使用，以评价致密砂岩含气性，并在苏里格地区盒8段进行应用，取得了较好的应用效果。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 含气性定量评价, 曲线重构, GRNN, 指标法, 苏里格地区

Abstract:

Tight sandstone reservoirs always show the characteristics, such as, low porosity, low permeability, and strong heterogeneity.The logging response characteristics corresponding to gas-bearing reservoir is very complex, so that the identification and evaluation of gas are difficult and it always shows multiple solution. Conventional well log is used for qualitative evaluating the gas-bearing characteristics.However, the classification model in intelligent recognition method still belongs to qualitative evaluation, which makes the traditional well log difficult to quantitatively evaluate gas.We use the core, geology, gas testing and conventional logging data to analyze the gas characteristics by cross-plot method and build two indexes, which can be used for qualitatively evaluating the gas containing. The workflow includes the generalized regression neural network (GRNN)that reconstructs gas and water indication curve to quantitatively evaluate the gas containing. Finally, we used the index method and GRNN curve reconstruction method to evaluate the tight sandstone gas in the Sulige area.The results show the good application effects.

Key words: tight sandstone, gas-bearing quantitativeevaluation, curve reconstruction, GRNN, index method, Sulige area

中图分类号: 

  • P631.8

[1] 黄布宙, 潘保芝, 李舟波. 大庆徐家围子地区深部致密砂砾岩气层识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2003, 33(4):490-494. Huang Buzhou, Pan Baozhi, Li Zhoubo. The Recognition of Gas-Bearing Tight Sandstone Gravel Reservoirs at the Deep of Xujiaweizi in Daqing[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2003, 33(4):490-494.

[2] 董建刚, 范晓敏. 致密砂岩孔隙度计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006,36(增刊1):193-196. Dong Jiangang,Fan Xiaomin.A Method to Calculate Porosity of Compact Sandstone[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2006,36(Sup. 1):193-196.

[3] 张海涛. 苏里格地区有效储层测井识别方法研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2010. Zhang Haitao.Well Logging Identification Method of Gas Reservoir in Sulige Field[D]. Xi'an:Northwest University,2010.

[4] 王飞. 交叉偶极声波测井资料处理及在致密气层评价中的应用研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2013. Wang Fei. Research on the Application and Evaluation of Cross-Dipole Logging to Interpretation of Tight Reaervoirs[D]. Changchun:Jilin University,2013.

[5] 李云省, 曾渊奇, 田建波, 等. 致密砂岩气层识别方法研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2003, 25(1):25-28. Li Yunsheng,Zeng Yuanqi,Tian Jianbo,et al, A Study on the Recognition Method of Tight Sandstone Gas Layers[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2003, 25(1):25-28.

[6] 张静. 苏里格地区致密砂岩含气性评价及产能预测[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2011. Zhang Jing. The Evaluation of Gas Characteristics of Tight Sandstone and Productivity Prediction of Sulige Gas Field[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2011.

[7] 庄华. 苏里格致密砂岩气层压裂产能测井预测方法研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013. Zhuang Hua. Research on Gas Productivity Prediction Based on Logs for Post-Frac Tight Sandstone Reservoirs in Sulige Area[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2013.

[8] 童凯军,单钰铭,廖特权,等.基于统计学的测井储层产能分级预测研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2008,31(2):40-43. Tong Kaijun,Shan Yuming,Liao Tequan,et al. Based on the Statistical Classification Logging Reservoir Capacity Forecast[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2008,31(2):40-43.

[9] 潘保芝, 石玉江, 蒋必辞, 等. 致密砂岩气层压裂产能及等级预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2):649-654. Pan Baozhi, Shi Yujiang, Jiang Bici, et al. Research on Gas Yield and Level Prediction for Post-Frac Tight Sandstone Reservoirs[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2015,45(2):649-654.

[10] 李小强,赵彦超. 基于MATLAB的广义回归神经网络的低渗特低渗砂岩气层产能预测[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2009(17):138-141. Li Xiaoqiang, Zhao Yanchao.MATLAB-Based GRNN Hypotonic Low Permeability Sandstone Gas Production Forecast[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2009(17):138-141.

[11] 李霞, 石玉江, 王玲, 等. 致密砂岩气层测井识别与评价技术:以苏里格气田为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1):62-68. Li Xia,Shi Yujiang,Wang Ling,et al.Logging Identification and Evaluation Technique of Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs:Taking Sulige Gas Field as an Example[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):62-68.

[12] 邢晓哲,骆伟. GRNN算法在电力系统状态估计中的应用[J]. 黑龙江电力,2011,33(1):50-52. Xing Xiaozhe, Luo Wei. State Estimation in Power System Based on GRNN Algorithm[J]. Heilongjiang Electric Power,2011,33(1):50-52.
[1] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 尚庆华, 黄生旺. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 981-990.
[2] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 张训华, 肖国林, 吴志强, 黄文彪. 基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案——以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1654-1667.
[3] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[4] 陈冬霞, 庞雄奇, 杨克明, 祝渭平, 严青霞. 川西坳陷深层叠复连续型致密砂岩气藏成因及形成过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1611-1623.
[5] 刘鹏, 王伟锋, 孟蕾, 姜帅. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界煤层气与致密气联合优选区评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 692-701.
[6] 李易霖, 张云峰, 丛琳, 谢舟, 闫明, 田肖雄. X-CT扫描成像技术在致密砂岩微观孔隙结构表征中的应用——以大安油田扶余油层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 379-387.
[7] 刘四兵, 沈忠民, 吕正祥, 宋荣彩, 王鹏. 川西新场气田上三叠统须二、须四段相对优质储层成因差异性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 993-1001.
[8] 潘保芝, 石玉江, 蒋必辞, 刘丹, 张海涛, 郭宇航, 杨小明. 致密砂岩气层压裂产能及等级预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 649-654.
[9] 王淑萍，徐守余，董春梅，王丽萍，刘春平. 东营凹陷民丰洼陷北带沙四下亚段深层天然气储层成岩作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1747-1759.
[10] 乐友喜，黄健良，张阳，周磊，张玉明，陈孔全. 地质模型约束下的地震储层预测技术及其在梨树断陷中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 632-640.
[11] 李军, 邹华耀, 张国常, 李平平, 冯冲, 张彦振, 陈加松. 川东北地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏异常高压成因[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 624-633.
[12] 唐海发，彭仕宓，赵彦超. 致密砂岩气藏储层流动单元划分方法及随机模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 469-0474.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发